Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IN THE NAME OF GOD.

Advertisements

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas with LENSTAR LS 900® Tsunekazu Hamada Hamada Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan Disclosure statement of.

Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification trough 3.2, 2.2 and 1.8 clear corneal incision. Luis Izquierdo Jr MD. PhD. Maria.

Presented by: Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D. Sharper Vision Centers A MEDICAL GROUP Comparison of PalmScan and IOL Master axial lengths measurements No financial.

Accuracy of Predicted Refractive Error in Resident-Performed Cataract Surgery Using Partial Coherence Interferometry Nickolas P. Katsoulakis, M.D., Paul.

Biometry: Long & Short eyes Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

A simple and accurate method of alignment for toric intraocular lens implantation using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). Kazuno Negishi,

Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.

SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG DR ARUP BHAUMIK DISHA EYE HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH CENTRE BARRACKPORE, WEST BEGAL, INDIA

IOLs & Biometry Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.

INTRA-OCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION IN POST- REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASIAN EYES USING THE HAIGIS-L FORMULA Dr Daphne Han, FRCS Dr Wei-Han Chua, FRCS Dr Peter.

IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.

M. Allison Roensch, MD, Preston H. Blomquist, MD, Nalini K Aggarwal, MD, James P. McCulley, MD Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Southwestern.

Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,

JAIRO E. HOYOS, MD MELANIA CIGALES, MD Instituto Oftalmológico Hoyos Barcelona - SPAIN.

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

PIGGYBACK IMPLANTATION OF FOR HIGH HYPEROPIA 24 MONTHS FOLLOW UP JL. FEBBRARO I.VIELPEAU, F. KRIFA, S.BERBACHE, S. GANEM Department of Ophthalmology S.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Reanalysis of Refractive Growth in Pediatric Aphakia and Pseudophakia Susan Whitmer, MD 1 Aurora Xu 2 Scott McClatchey, MD 1,3,4 1 Naval Medical Center.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2011 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan Resident, Hong Kong Eye Hospital.

Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes

Phacoemulsification some Basic Ideas…

INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,

Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.

Phoebe D. Lenhart, M.D. 1, Amy K. Hutchinson, M.D. 1, Michael J. Lynn, M.S. 2, Scott R. Lambert M.D. 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University,

EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION

Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System

Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,

Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD

Nang-Hee Song(MD) 1, Jae-Woong Koh (MD/PhD) 1, Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Republic.

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

Futoshi Taketani, MD,PhD,

Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.

I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.

Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;

Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.

Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.

Nebraska Laser Eye Associates Mark Johnston MD FRCSC

Liquifaction Method and Extent of Posterior Capsule Opacification: Two-Year Follow-up Marie Kalfertova, Mariya Burova, Pavel Rozsival, Nada Jiraskova Nada.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.

Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0

Comparison of Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification Performed by Third Year Residents and Anterior Segment Surgeons Alexandra Braunstein, MD.

Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)

Premium IOL May be one way to achieve the visual goals of selected patients I describe some pearls for premium IOL implantation to help ensure that we.

Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery

Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.

Aug 11, 2017 Comparison of predictive accuracy on Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swpt-source optical coherence tomographry (SS-OCT) Choun-Ki.

Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.

Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts

Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.

Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.

Comparison of Autokeratometry and Manual Keratometry

The authors have no financial interest

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD

IN THE NAME OF GOD.

versus 2.75mm Incision Phacoemulsification

Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,

Biometry before catarct surgery

SPINNING THE WHEEL- STABILITY OF COMMONLY USED IOL IN-THE-BAG

International Vision Correction Research Centre

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of an intraocular lens (IOL) calculator application (commonly referred to as an “app”) for the Apple iPhone mobile device platform. To compare the results of the app against the IOLMaster reference standard for a set of test cases.

Methods The iPhone software development kit (Xcode version 3.2.5; Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) was used to develop the IOL calculator app. The app was developed on an iMac (2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3; Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) running Mac OS X (version ). The iPhone app was tested on the iOS Simulator (version 4.2) and an iPhone (model 3G S; 16GB memory; iOS version 4.2.1; Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA).

Methods - continued The IOL calculator app implements four standard intraocular lens calculations used for cataract surgery: – Hoffer Q 1-4 – Holladay 1 5 – SRK II 6,7 – SRK/T 8 The IOLMaster (version 5.4; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was used as a reference standard.

Methods - continued 10 patients (20 eyes) were selected from a database of patients that underwent cataract surgery with biometry data obtained from an IOLMaster. 4 intraocular lens models were selected per eye. For each lens, the 4 IOL formulas were tabulated for 7 refractive targets. The combinations of eyes, lenses, IOL formulas, and refractive targets yielded 2,240 intraocular lens power data points for comparison between the iPhone IOL calculator app and the IOLMaster.

Results The IOL calculator app was successfully implemented using the stated Apple hardware and software (figure 1,2). Characteristics of the 10 test cases (20 eyes) are listed in table 1: – Axial lengths ranged from mm. – Mean keratometry values ranged from D.

Figure 1: Screen shots of the IOL calculator app (a) About tab. The home screen which lists app version, IOL power formulas implemented, and links to others about the app or us questions/feedback. (b) Input tab. Four variables must be entered: axial length, mean keratometry, desired correction, and an IOL A constant.

Figure 2: Screen shots of the IOL calculator app (a) Input tab. An example with the specified input variables. Clicking “Done” goes to the “Results” tab shown in (b). (b) Results tab. The highlighted row shows the 4 formula IOL powers corresponding to the desired correction in (a). Also displayed on the tab are values for a range of other refractive targets (-2.00 to D).

Table 1: Characteristics of the IOLMaster test cases Test Case # ODOS Selected IOLs OU Axial Length (mm) Mean Keratometry (D) Desired Correction Range (D) Axial Length (mm) Mean Keratometry (D) Desired Correction Range (D) to to MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF, SN6AT to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF, SN6AT to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF, SN6AT to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MA60AC, MTA4UO, SA60AT, SN60WF to to MN60MA,MTA4UO,SA60AT,SN60WF Minimum Maximum Mean (SD)24.35 (1.43)43.85 (1.57)24.30 (1.33)43.88 (1.50)

Results - continued All 2,240 (100%) IOL powers calculated by the iPhone IOL calculator app agreed with those derived from the IOLMaster.

Conclusion It is feasible to develop an intraocular lens calculator app for the Apple iPhone platform. The IOL calculator app showed agreement with the IOLMaster reference standard. Future work will include a larger test database, including more extreme ranges of axial lengths, mean keratometries, and target refractions, as well as tests of other IOL models.

References 1 Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6): Zuberbuhler B, Morrell AJ. Errata in printed Hoffer Q formula. J Cataract Refract Surgery. 2007;33(1):2; author reply Hoffer KJ. Errors in self-programming the Hoffer Q formula. Eye (Lond). 21(3):429; author reply 430. Epub 2006 Sep Basu S. Reply to Dr. Haigis. Re: Errors in self-programming the Hoffer Q formula. Eye (Lond). 21(4):550 Epub 2006 Sep Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(1): Sanders DR, Retzlaff J, Kraff MC. Comparison of the SRK II formula and other second generation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(2): Dang MS, Raj PP. SRK II formula in the calculation of intraocular lens power. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73(10): Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4): Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4):528.