CIVL 181 tutorial 10 Value of information, expected utility.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DECISION TREE Project Risk Management: A combined Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree Approach Dr.Prasanta Kumar Dey 大家好,我今天要報告的是 有關決策樹的內容,我會先簡單介紹一下決策樹的概念,接著介紹一篇應用決策樹分析在專案上的paper.
Advertisements

5.1 Suppose a person must accept one of three bets:
1 Decision Making and Utility Introduction –The expected value criterion may not be appropriate if the decision is a one-time opportunity with substantial.
Chapter Topics The Payoff Table and Decision Trees Opportunity Loss
Chapter 17 Decision Making 17.1 Payoff Table and Decision Tree 17.2 Criteria for Decision Making.
Decision Theory Lecture 8. 1/3 1 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 A A B C A B C 1/2 A B A C Reduction of compound lotteries 1/2 1/4 A B C.
Risk Attitude Dr. Yan Liu
ISMT 161: Introduction to Operations Management
Risk Valuation First, we need to identify the risks Second, we need to value the risks To do that, we need to KNOW the losses AND the probabilities with.
Conditional Probability and Independence. Learning Targets 1. I can calculate conditional probability using a 2-way table. 2. I can determine whether.
1 Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 5 Zhangxi Lin ISQS 5340 July 2006.
Example 7.4 Selecting the Best Marketing Strategy at the Acme Company
Behavioral Finance Uncertain Choices February 18, 2014 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
1 Utility Theory. 2 Option 1: bet that pays $5,000,000 if a coin flipped comes up tails you get $0 if the coin comes up heads. Option 2: get $2,000,000.
How to construct a decision tree 1.List each decision nodes & its alternatives. 2.List each chances nodes& its alternatives. 3.Draw the nodes and links.
1 Utility Examples Scott Matthews Courses: /
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.

13.21 A decision maker faces a risky gamble in which she may obtain one of five outcomes. Label the outcomes A, B, C, D, and E. A is the most preferred,
1 Utility Examples Scott Matthews Courses: /
Figure 1 Probability Distribution Probabilit y, % Days ofrain per month % 20%40%20% Probability distribution 10% 30 (a) Less Certain Probabilit.
Decision Analysis1 Ultimate objective of all engineering analysis Uncertainty always exist, hence satisfactory performance not guaranteed More conservative.
Chapter Twelve Uncertainty. Uncertainty is Pervasive u What is uncertain in economic systems? –tomorrow’s prices –future wealth –future availability of.
1 Decision Making under Uncertainty. 2 The maximin criterion A decision table for the food manufacturer (Daily profits) Demand (no. of batches) 1 2 Course.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 16-1 Chapter 16 Decision Making Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Decision Analysis1 Ultimate objective of all engineering analysis Uncertainty always exist, hence satisfactory performance not guaranteed More conservative.
Risk and Uncertainty for Fun and for Profit Risk = “Objective Uncertainty” –You know the probabilities of all the outcomes Uncertainty = “Subjective Uncertainty”
Behavioral Finance Other Noise Trader Models Feb 3, 2015 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Outline Regression (excel demo) Important point: which is x and which is y? Regression (as lecture notes) Other methods of regression than in lecture notes.
Attitude toward risk Problem: Costello likes to ride his bike to school. If it is raining when he gets up, he can take the bus. If it isn’t, he can ride,
Problems With Expected Utility or if the axioms fit, use them but...
CIVL202 Construction Engineering I Tutorial 2 T1Mon11:00 – 11:50 T2Wed09:00 – 09:50.
Decision Trees and Influence Diagrams Dr. Ayham Jaaron.
Chapter 5 Decision Making Under Uncertainty Dr. Ayham Jaaron.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
4. The Theories and the Real World 4.3 What the theory does not reflect? (Back to your experiment)
Impact of Low Volume Roads Downstream of Dams on Hazard Classification By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive,
Chapter 6 Decision Trees and Influence Diagrams.
Case Analysis for EE590 Wang Yu Iowa State University.
Application of Decision Trees to Product Design
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 17-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition Chapter.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 17-1 Chapter 17 Decision Making Basic Business Statistics 10 th Edition.
Consumer Choice With Uncertainty Part II: Expected Utility & Jensen’s Inequality Agenda: 1.From Expected Value to Expected Utility: The VNM 2.Jensen’s.
Quantitative Decision Techniques 13/04/2009 Decision Trees and Utility Theory.
Decision Analysis Mary Whiteside. Decision Analysis Definitions Actions – alternative choices for a course of action Actions – alternative choices for.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 16: Making Simple Decision March 23, 2004.
Decision Trees. Introduction Decision trees enable one to look at decisions: with many alternatives and states of nature which must be made in sequence.
Utility Model for Minimizing Risk Chandru Mirchandani Lockheed-Martin August 9, 2004 P115/MAPLD2004 MIRCHANDANI 1.
Decision Analysis Study Guide for ES205 Yu-Chi Ho Jonathan T. Lee Jan. 24, 2001.
Prospect Theory - complement J.Skorkovský ESF-KPH.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Embankment Dam and Spillway Relative Risk Procedures (for Asset Management/Maintenance) Luc Chouinard – McGill University.
Situation David Chang is the owner of a small electronics company. In six months, a proposal is due for an electronic timing system for the 2016 Olympic.
Decision making under uncertainty
Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Chapter 19 Statistical Decision Theory ©. Framework for a Decision Problem action i.Decision maker has available K possible courses of action : a 1, a.
Behavioral Finance Preferences Part I Feb 16 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture 12.
Cost and Management Accounting: An Introduction, 7 th edition Colin Drury ISBN © 2011 Cengage Learning EMEA Cost and Management Accounting:
QUANTITATIVE BUSINESS ANALYSIS
مراجعة عامة.
Statistical Decision Theory
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Decision Trees ADVANTAGES:
Chapter 17 Decision Making
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Presentation transcript:

CIVL 181 tutorial 10 Value of information, expected utility

E[L|CN]?

Adopted from Question 2.8 In order to protect an $8M dam from overtopping, two spillway systems are proposed. Spillway A ~ 3.5 M, Spillway B ~ 3 M If fail, the spillway and the dam will be destroyed. P (F A ) = 0.15, P (F B ) = 0.3 A test, cost 0.3M, give the following result: If “A is preferred”, P (F A ) = 0.2, P (F B ) = 0.6 If “B is preferred”, P (F A ) = 0.5, P (F B ) = 0.1 The engineer thinks 70% chance will be “B is preferred”

Question 2.8 a)Draw a decision tree, include all relevant alternatives Test No test A preffered (0.3) B preffered (0.7) System A System B System A System B System A System B Probability of failure Loss

Question 2.8 b) Determine whether the test should be conducted based on EMV No test: E(A) = 0.15 x x 3.5 = 4.7, E(B) = 0.3 x x 3 = 5.4A* Test and if A is preferred: E(A) = 5.1, E(B) = 7.8 A* Test and if B is preferred: E(A) = 7.5, E(B) = 3.8B*

Question 2.8 Test No test A preferred (0.3) B preferred (0.7) System A* System B System A System B* System A* System B Probability of failure Loss

Question 2.8 E (no test) = E (A*) =4.7 E (test) = E(A|A*)P(A*) + E(B|B*)P(B*) = (5.1)(0.3) + (3.8)(0.7) [no test cost] = 4.19 E (test) with test cost = = 4.49 So, test c) What is the value of the test? = 4.7 – 4.19 = 0.51

Question 2.8 d) Suppose the designer is Risk aversive, such that u(x) = x 1.5, should the test be conducted? Test No test A prefered (0.3) B prefered (0.7) System A* System B System A System B* System A* System B Probability of failure Loss utility

Question 2.8 No test: U(A) = 0.15 x x = , U(B) = 0.3 x x 3 2 = A* Test and if A is preferred: U(A) =, U(B) = A* Test and if B is preferred: U(A) =, U(B) = B* …