Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Advertisements

PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) -Chicane & Absorber David Neuffer C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … January 31, 2012.
Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers MICE CM 24 September 2005.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
1 Downstream PID update Rikard Sandström PID phone conference
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.
1 Chris Rogers Imperial College 18 May 2006 TOF II Justification.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.
30 June 2004MICE VC1 MICE  functions Since last VC report: –New Mike Green configurations for decreased spacing between focus and matching coils of 400mm,
Beam Parameter Study - preliminary findings Tim Carlisle.
1 st Study of Tracker Misalignments with G4MICE David Forrest University of Glasgow.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers Analysis PC 18 August 2005.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement. MICE solenoid includes 5 coils First solenoid expected at FNAL for magnetic field measurements in April Measurements.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
TOF Resolution Required to measure bunch length ~ 0.5 ns RMS from RF Bucket size For 1e-3 emittance measurement resolution of TOF should be
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 Tracker Window & Diffuser Radius vs Scraping Aperture Chris Rogers Analysis PC 6th April 06.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
Stats update Was asked to provide comparison between toy mc and g4mice at two points along z (middle of first and third absorbers) 10,000 events, step.
Critical Issues for MICE Chris Rogers MICE CM 15.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Timothy Carlisle, Oxford CM 28. Step 3 Matching Step 3  Step 3 rematched for 830 mm spool piece  Calc. B(z) & BetaFn with the following:  Minimize.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Fast TOF for Muon Cooling Experiments Robert Abrams Muons, inc.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.
3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
Field Modelling Tools in G4MICE MICE VC Chris Rogers 1st Feb 2006.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
Re-tuning MICE June 1 st 2010 Tim Carlisle. Intro At the moment MICE coil currents optimized for: central Pz = 0 RF No LH2 want to rematch M1 & M2 in.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.
Brunel University London Field-off LiH Energy Loss Rhys Gardener CM45 – July 28th.
Beam Energy-Loss measurement
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005

2 Overview Two Aims: –Aim to understand in detail position/thickness/material of diffuser –Also would like to move the lead outside of the Solenoid bore This may be possible due to iron shield Require to provide beams of –Different momenta? –Different emittances? (transverse, ?longitudinally?) –Or at least get enough statistics that we can select such a beam Initial thoughts on how to approach the problem and a few plots –Will initially consider MICE Stage VI as this has the most stringent requirements –Relate this back to phase 1 later This is all work in progress!

3 Transverse requirements Transverse phase space - two requirements: –Require that we can produce a beam that completely fills the cooling channel to scraping –Require that we can produce a beam that looks like the input beam from a neutrino factory Take the larger of the two? Also need to consider different beta function requirements –Different  in absorbers ->different  in spectrometer? Also require that we can produce a beam less than eqm emittance ~ 1-2 pi mm rad Statistical arguments apply And beams in between

4 Acceptance of Cooling Channel The acceptance of the cooling channel –Take grid of particles in 2D x-px phase space –Left is the phase space map of the particles that make it through the spectrometer –Right is phase space map of particles that make it through the cooling channel –All maps are plotted at z=-2750 (centre of LH2), pz = 200 MeV, beta = 420 mm in absorbers X/mm px G4MICE

5 Matched 12 pi beam For reference, this is a matched, “Gaussian” 12 pi beam –Inserted in 4T region, draw phase space map at z = Centre of LH2 –Left is all muons, right is muons which make it to z = 2750 –Transmission ~90% –Monochromatic beam X/mm G4MICE

6 Matched beam - beta func Again for reference, this is the beta function for a matched beam into MICE –Calculated numerically (hacked from JHC/UB’s code) –No diffuser/TOF, but semi-analytical solutions exist Hope to have them soon –No iron shield/field thereof G4MICE Use beta function defined by:

7 Position of diffuser Current Diffuser Position ~450 mm This shows the current position of the diffuser It would be desirable to move it out of the solenoid bore This may be possible due to field effects from iron shielding Iron shield

8 Baseline Design  (z) (left) and  n (z) (right) with diffuser at mm –Taken turtle beam as input –Doesn’t include field mods due to iron shielding –Big drop in beta in materials… 1/emittance factor? –Does include kinematic cut 215 < E < 235 MeV/c^2 –Note that the input beam is not symmetric in x and y G4MICE TOF Diffuser TOF Diffuser

9 Baseline Design - Diffuser at Again, phase space map at entrance to cooling channel –Left is full beam; Right is beam with cut 215 < E < 235 MeV/c^2 –Doesn’t include new field map –Decent match –6 pi emittance X/mm G4MICE

10 Diffuser at Do the stupid thing and move the diffuser forward to mm –Predictably get a mismatch in spectrometer –This is with the same energy cut –Event rate higher by factor ~ 1.7 at z = –Need to iterate with coil currents in the beam line G4MICE mismatch

11 Longitudinal Phase Space Requirements Need to be able to produce beams of between 140 MeV and 240 MeV (TRD) – Also require  (E) ~ 25 MeV –Really this just means p z between ~100 and ~270 MeV I won’t worry about timing

12 Baseline - Longitudinal Energy and Pz –~ Fine for 200 MeV –But we lose a lot of statistics G4MICE

13 Summary The baseline solution for the diffusers is fine to a point –Needs some further work –This has begun… Outline for route has been established Need to try very hard to get the diffuser outside of the solenoid bore Tools are under development!