North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Advertisements

Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
SAVE OUR CITY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Commercial Revitalization.
Eliot Route 236 TIF District Sewer Extension Economic Impact Analysis April 11, 2012.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.
Smart Growth Makes Money: Transit Oriented Development.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
Taking the Mystery out of Economic Development Tools Chris Eng, Chisago County HRA-EDA.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Equitable Transit Oriented Development the Denver perspective.
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
April 8, 2008 Dakota County Regional Chamber of Commerce Dakota County Transportation Update.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
City of Charlotte Tina M. Votaw Transit Planner/TOD Specialist.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Economic Development Financing Tools 101. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Generic term for using future tax revenue to pay for something today Usually used.
3 rd Annual California Passenger Rail Summit Innovative Transportation Financing Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public Transportation Association.
1 RTD TOD Program University of Denver November 2004.
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
June 2011  Route  Operations & Riders  Benefits  Construction  Operations & Maintenance  Potential System Manager  Next Steps & Conclusion Overview.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Public Sector Incentives The Missing Piece of the Retail Development Puzzle? Jim M. Page, CCE, IOM President and CEO Chamber of Commerce of West Alabama.
1 Program of Projects Study The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment Forum March 21, 2013 Move LA - "LA's Got Lines"
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
Land Development Transport Investment Accessibili ty The Role of Transportation Investments in Shaping Land Development Robert Cervero UC Berkeley.
Urban Renewal Feasibility Study Tashman Johnson LLC, Urban Land Economics, Elaine Howard Consulting LLC, SERA Architects.
Draft Business/Finance Plan Overview & Draft Business Terms RED LINE REGIONAL RAIL PROJECT Economic Development Committee January 10, 2012.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
City of Carrollton Transit Oriented Development January 5, 2008 Peter J. Braster TOD Manager.
Hiawatha Transit Corridor Evaluation June 15, 2005 Mark Fuhrmann Todd Graham.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Project NSTL Kara Clay Joshua Rucker. Purpose To revitalize North Saint Louis City and bring prosperity O Jobs O Sustainability O Long lasting Business.
Regional Transportation & Land Use IREM / BOMA Real Estate Forecast Breakfast 2009 Rich Macias, Director Regional & Comprehensive Planning Southern California.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
Cornelius Candidate Projects For Funding Total Candidate Projects$ 22 million –Rail Improvements ($10 million) –Local CIP Projects NC-115 upgrades ($ 1.9.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Revenues Sources for Transportation Financing Jeffery A. Richard Foster Pepper & Shefelman.
Quick Facts – City of Auburn We are Working on It.
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
Meadowbrook Property Fiscal Impact Analysis October 6, 2009.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
Successor Agency Organizational Chart Redevelopment Manager Project Manager Building Inspector II Accounting Specialist Lupe Gomez Charles Scott Lupita.
Public Infrastructure Funding Request Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Special Assessments.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Most dollars yet to be deployed
Montgomery County Planning Commission
Regional Roads Committee
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Update
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS.
Genesys Health System Campus & Community Revitalization
Strategy to Fund Regional Infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007

North Corridor Commuter Rail Project Snapshot Project – Upgrade of existing tracks on existing right-of-way – 10 stations – 39 Public Crossings – 5 trainsets (420 seats each) Service – 22 trains per day (Phase 1) – Two-way service – 30-minute headway during rush – Hourly service off-peak – Top Speed: mph

North Corridor Commuter Rail Igniting The Region’s Economic Engine 83,000 jobs within ½ mile of North Corridor Stations by ,000 new residential units at planned TODs $2 billion in identified TOD projects 250,000 residents within the corridor by 2030 – North Mecklenburg/South Iredell Growth: 179% 4,600 daily riders – Most riders new to transit – Assumes completion of I-77

The Simple Facts I-77 Headed For Breakdown Lane Traffic Volume Is Exploding – Interstate : 87,000 vehicles per day 2030: 170,000 vehicles per day – Local Trips 2007: 490, : 1,241,700 I-77 Expansion A Distant Hope – Cost: $ million in today’s dollars – No funding for design & construction – Completion: 2030 More I-77 Shutdowns – More than 1,000 traffic accidents on I-77 (Exits 10-42) in 2004

Davidson Mount MourneTerminus Project Cost Funding State (25%) CATS (34%) Charlotte Gateway Station Iredell County/Mooresville 18 Unfunded North Corridor Commuter Rail Project Costs & Funding

Leveraging Incremental Tax Revenues To Fund Rail & Local Improvements Proposal: – Create Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Districts – Use incremental taxes generated within the TIF District to fund cost of rail & other local improvements Bond Proceeds Would Fund – – Local road, utility & parking improvements to enhance & support transit and downtown development – North Corridor Commuter Rail Station & Crossing Costs Source of Bonds – TIF (Amendment One) – Local Certifications of Participation (COPS) – Railroad Infrastructure Financing (RIFF)

Justifying The Use of Incremental Tax Revenues Transit & Local Improvements Generate New Tax Revenue More multi-family housing (TOD vs. Existing Zoning) Greater quality & concentration of retail & office Faster build-out around transit station (3-5 years) Faster, greater sales tax revenues from construction & commercial activities TOD property increases value faster than surrounding areas – San Jose: +23% for commercial – Dallas: +39% for residential & 53% for office Funds Local “Catalyst” Projects With No Near-term Funding Source Road improvements Parking Utility upgrades

Example Of Incremental Tax Revenue Generated By Transit Griffith Lakes – 70-acre parcel at proposed Harris Station – Plan A: No Transit 200,000 sq. ft of warehouse Tax Value: $12 million Tax revenues: $152,000 per year – Plan B: With Transit 1,800 homes; 800,000 sq. ft commercial Tax Value: $610 million Tax revenues: $7.8 million per year

Example Of Incremental Tax Revenue Generated By Transit Gandy’s Eastfield Station Project at proposed Eastfield Station – Plan A: No Transit 460 homes; 25,000 sq. ft commercial Tax Value: $80 million Tax revenues: $1,024,000 per year – Plan B: With Transit 950 homes; 35,000 sq. ft commercial Tax Value: $158 million Tax revenues: $2,022,400 per year

Understanding TIF 1.Bonds issued to fund the transit and catalyst projects 2.Only incremental taxes – taxes collected in excess of current tax base -- can be used to service bond debt 3.Only a portion of incremental taxes can be used to pay debt service Typical TIF: % or more of taxes used for debt service North Corridor: 35-50% of new taxes reserved for County services North Corridor: 20% of new taxes reserved for Town/City services

North Corridor Financial Analysis Identify TIF Districts Sized To Fund Infrastructure Needs Analyze Existing Assessed Value of Property Within TIF District Calculate Future Growth Without Any TIF Investment – As-Of-Right zoning – Existing development plans – National TOD experience Calculate Future Growth With TIF Investment – Local and adopted plans – TOD projects already underway or planned – Reasonable growth on developable sites Calculate Bonding Capacity Funded By Incremental Taxes Generated By Future Growth

Building Off Experience Cherokee Investment Partners – Experienced Master/ Brownfield Developer – Experts in Tax Increment Financing – Significant real estate investments – Major project financing expertise Cherokee is Helping To: – Quantify future value of the property – Assess availability of TIF to finance rail and local infrastructure needs

Davidson Future Growth Scenario Current Assessed Value of TIF District − $ million − 11.5% of Total Tax Base Future Build Out − 1,445 residential units − 212,000 sq. ft office − 227,000 sq. ft. retail Future Assessed Value ($ 2007) − $ 472 million Incremental Growth Value − $ million Incremental Taxes − $ 2.4 million/year

Davidson Candidate Projects For Funding Total Potential Candidate Projects$ 22 million – Rail Improvements ($10 million) – Local CIP Projects Potts Sloan Area Improvements ($1 million) Downtown Parking Deck ($6 million) Downtown Road Improvements ($5 million)

Cornelius Future Growth Scenario Current Assessed Value of TIF District − $ 32.6 million − 1% of Total Tax Base Future Build Out − 1,439 residential units − 540,000 sq. ft commercial Future Assessed Value ($ 2007) − $ 478 million Incremental Future Value − $ million Incremental Taxes − $2.8 million