Software with a View of Weather Observation Statistics by Kevin M. Wilson Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ECMWF MetTraining Course- Data Assimilation and use of satellite data (3 May 2005) The Global Observing System Overview of data sources Data coverage Data.

Advertisements

Weather Station Data Quality and Interpolation Issues in Modeling Joe Russo International Workshop on Plant Epidemiology Surveillance for the Pest Forecasting.

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES FOR LOW LEVEL FLIGHTS IN ROMANIA

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.

WMO Migration Plan Principles of the WMO Migration Plan.

1 Hans Huang: WRF 4D-Var Seminar at UCD 5th October 2006 WRF 4D-Var The Weather Research and Forecasting model based 4-Dimensional Variational data assimilation.

Hans Huang: WRFDA 2013 overview 1 DA WRFDA 2013 Overview Hans Huang NCAR Acknowledgements: WRFDA team and many visitors, NCAR, CWB, AirDat, NRL, BMB, NSF-OPP,

Outline of Talk Introduction Toolbox functionality Results Conclusions and future development.

Weather Station Models What do they mean? How do you translate them?

S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich.

1 ATOVS and SSM/I assimilation at the Met Office Stephen English, Dave Jones, Andrew Smith, Fiona Hilton and Keith Whyte.

Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington

Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on Mesoscale Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Dr. Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite.

Convective indexes calculated from HIRLAM output St.Petersburg The Russian State Hydrometeorological University Faculty of Meteorology Meteorological Forecasting.

Observation Pre-processor for WRF-Var

Details for Today: DATE:18 th November 2004 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Literature exercise Model Assimilation 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models of Climate.

Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Observation impact in East Asia and western North Pacific regions using.

MADIS to LITTLE_R Converter MADIS observation types MADIS to LITTE_R converter Future work.

Impact of targeted dropsonde observations on the typhoon forecasts during T-PARC Hyun Mee Kim, Byoung-Joo Jung, Sung Min Kim Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences,

Advances in the use of observations in the ALADIN/HU 3D-Var system Roger RANDRIAMAMPIANINA, Regina SZOTÁK and Gabriella Csima Hungarian Meteorological.

Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorological Division 09/22/2008 Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with WRF Variational Data Assimilation System Qingnong.

24.6 Predicting the Weather

Mid-Term review of 2007 CWB project P.I.: Y-H. Kuo 1,2 Y.-R. Guo 1 (WRF-Var lead) H. Liu 3 (WRF-EnKF lead) J. Braun 2 (Ground-based GPS lead) CWB Visitor:

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich,

OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS

Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.

Requirements from KENDA on the verification NetCDF feedback files: -produced by analysis system (LETKF) and ‘stat’ utility ((to.

WRF-Var Setup, Run and Diagnostics

Weather forecasting by computer Michael Revell NIWA

Training Seminar on ICT for GTS (Bangkok, September 2002) - Slide 1 Overview of the WWW monitoring.

GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.

Current and Future Use of Satellite Data in NWP at Environment Canada Satellite Direct Readout Conference 2011 Miami, USA David Bradley, Gilles Verner,

Impact of FORMOSAT-3 GPS Data Assimilation on WRF model during 2007 Mei-yu season in Taiwan Shyuan-Ru Miaw, Pay-Liam Lin Department of Atmospheric Sciences.

Impact of ProbeX-IOP (KEOP) observations on the predictive skill of heavy rainfall in the middle part of Korea Hee-Sang Lee and Seung-Woo Lee Forecast.

COSMIC Retreat 2008 Impact of COSMIC on typhoon prediction Bill Kuo and Ted Iwabuchi.

Real-time adaptive observation guidance and observation system experiments for Typhoons observed in T-PARC Byoung-Joo Jung 1, Hyun Mee Kim 1, Yeon-Hee.

1 Development of GTS and Data Exchange in China National Meteorological Information Center, CMA.

Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.

A STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF AMPS 10-KM AND 3.3-KM DOMAINS Michael G. Duda, Kevin W. Manning, and Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology.

WMO RTC-Turkey facilities, Alanya, Turkey Templates and Regulations

Navigation NAU 102 Lesson 32. Weather Instruments The safety of crew, passengers, cargo and the ship itself is dependent on making good weather decisions.

NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR

Atmospheric Sciences 370 Observing Systems January 2012.

Instruments. In Situ In situ instruments measure what is occurring in their immediate proximity. E.g., a thermometer or a wind vane. Remote sensing uses.

Real-time forecasting for the Antarctic: An evaluation of the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System (AMPS) David H. Bromwich 1, Andrew J. Monaghan 1, Kevin.

David H. Bromwich 1, 2 and Francis O. Otieno 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 2 Atmospheric.

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.

WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.

Applied Meteorology Unit 1 Observation Denial and Performance of a Local Mesoscale Model Leela R. Watson William H. Bauman.

Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.

Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Korea Meteorological Administration, May 2015 Satellite Data Application in KMA’s NWP Systems Presented.

Chapter 20 Section 5 Forecasting Weather Objectives: -Compare and contrast the different technologies used to gather weather data -Analyze weather symbols,

Quality Monitoring in JMA

AMPS Update – July 2010 Kevin W. Manning Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for.

Weather Station Model.

National Meteorological Satellite Center

MME & MET ADMINISTRATION

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES FOR LOW LEVEL FLIGHTS IN ROMANIA

Steve Colwell British Antarctic Survey

Run WRF 3D-VAR Shu-hua Chen1 and Dale Barker2

Better Forecasting Bureau

WEATHER STATION MODEL Wind Speed Cloud Cover Temperature Wind

Radar Data Assimilation

RA VI Migration Plan. RA VI Migration Plan Specific features of RA VI Migration Plan.

gWRF Workflow and Input Data Requirements

Handbook on Meteorological Observations

ICG-WIGOS-5 Jitze van der Meulen, repr. CAeM

Airborne Weather Sensors

New York State Mesoscale Weather Network

Presentation transcript:

Software with a View of Weather Observation Statistics by Kevin M. Wilson Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR

TOTAL = 12565, MISS. = , SYNOP = 428, METAR = 127, SHIP = 32, BUOY = 164, BOGUS = 0, TEMP = 26, AMDAR = 696, AIREP = 75, PILOT = 23, SATEM = 0, SATOB = 10931, GPSPW = 0, GPSZD = 0, GPSRF = 63, GPSEP = 0, SSMT1 = 0, SSMT2 = 0, TOVS = 0, QSCAT = 0, PROFL = 0, AIRSR = 0, OTHER = 0, Filtered_obs combines only 20 categories those are Amdar+Airep=Airep, GoAMV & PeAMV = Satob’s (Geostationary obs), & PROFL is also missing.

SRFC = SLP, PW (DATA,QC,ERROR). EACH = PRES, SPEED, DIR, HEIGHT, TEMP, DEW PT, HUMID (DATA,QC,ERROR)*LEVELS. INFO_FMT = (A12,1X,A19,1X,A40,1X,I6,3(F12.3,11X),6X,A5) SRFC_FMT = (F12.3,I4,F7.2,F12.3,I4,F7.3) EACH_FMT = (3(F12.3,I4,F7.2),11X,3(F12.3,I4,F7.2),11X,3(F12.3,I4,F7.2))) # # FM-12 SYNOP _00:00:00 MOSSEL BAY (CAPE ST. BLAIZE) / SOUTH AFR

Statistical report on observations used by WRF for a given period. Date of Report: , covering one forecast. ======================================================= Number of obs available for the forecast = 7811 Number of obs used in the forecast = 7396 Number of obs rejected in the forecast = 415 Percentage of obs used in the forecast = 94 Incoming SYNOPs: 422 SYNOPs rejected : 179 ( 42.4%) SYNOPs used in this analysis: 243 ( 57.6%) Incoming BUOYs: 133 BUOYs rejected: 133 (100.0%) BUOYs used in this analysis: 0 ( 0.0%) This format is used for <>_Period_Stats_rpt.txt & the <>_Stats_obs.txt files.

Statistical report on observations used by WRF in AMPS for a 19 day period. This report covers forecasts (00 UTC, 12 UTC) for the following days

Total SYNOPs available for these forecasts: SYNOPs used in these forecasts: (55.4%) SYNOPs rejected in these forecasts : 8928 (44.6%) Total METARs available for these forecasts : 4632 METARs used in these forecasts : 2402 (51.9%) METARs rejected in these forecasts : 2230 (48.1%) Total SHIPs available for these forecasts : 795 SHIPs used in these forecasts : 597 (75.1%) SHIPs rejected in these forecasts : 198 (24.9%) Total BUOYs available for these forecasts : 4874 BUOYs used in these forecasts : 0 (100.0%) BUOYs rejected in these forecasts : 4874 (100.0%)

CASEY station report for the following dates ======================================================== Number of CASEY obs available for the forecast period = 8 Number of CASEY obs used in the forecast period = 2 Number of CASEY obs rejected in the forecast period = 6 Percentage of CASEY obs used in the forecast period = 25.0 The percentage of rejected obs in the forecast period = 75.0 Total SYNOPs available for the forecast period : 6 SYNOPs used in the forecast period : 0 ( 0.0%) SYNOPs rejected in the forecast period : 6 (100.0%) Total TEMPs available for the forecast period : 2 TEMPs used in the forecast period : 2 (100.0%) TEMPs rejected in the forecast period : 0 ( 0.0%)