CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Advertisements

ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Using Potential Field Models to Learn About CME Coronal Context and Consequences J.G. Luhmann and Yan Li (Space Sciences Lab, UCB) C.N. Arge (CIRES, U.
“Insights” on Coronal Hole Magnetic Fields From a High-Order PFSS Model D.J. Bercik and J.G. Luhmann Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley 1 FEW 2011, Aug 24.
SHINE Campaign Event: 1-2 May 1998 Brian Welsch (& Yan Li) Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley Introduction: Data, Context, etc. Work: Completed & Ongoing.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Heliospheric MHD Models (for the LWS Community) LWS Workshop, Boulder, CO, March 23-26, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 and Vic Pizzo 2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
A General Cone Model Approach to Heliospheric CMEs and SEP Modeling Magnetogram-based quiet corona and solar wind model The SEPs are modeled as a passive.
M3 Session AIA/HMI Science Meeting D-1 : M3-Magnetic Field Data Products Data Product Development Session Chairs: R. Larsen/Y. Liu Status: [draft]
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Synoptic maps and applications Yan Li Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley, CA HMI team meeting, Jan 27, 2005, Stanford.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
1 WSA Model and Forecasts Nick Arge Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory.
CISM solar wind metrics M.J. Owens and the CISM Validation and Metrics Team Boston University, Boston MA Abstract. The Center for Space-Weather Modeling.
SSL (UC Berkeley): Prospective Codes to Transfer to the CCMC Developers: W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, G.H. Fisher, B.T. Welsch, and Y. Fan (HAO/NCAR)
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Expanded Observatory support (redundancy, verification) CME (Empirical) propagation (Cone Model) (ICME strength and arrival time) Electrodynamics model.
Data-Driven Simulations of AR8210 W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley SHINE Workshop 2004.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
2002 May 1MURI VMG mini-workshop1` Solar MURI Vector Magnetogram Mini-Workshop Using Vector Magnetograms in Theoretical Models: Plan of Action.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
Luhmann1 An NSF Science and Technology Center led by Boston University, involving solar partners at SAIC, U of Colorado, BU, HAO, Stanford, NRL, AFRL,
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Pros and Cons of Various Magnetic Field Extrapolation Techniques Marc DeRosa Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Lab WG5 - SHINE 2007.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
R. Oran csem.engin.umich.edu SHINE 09 May 2005 Campaign Event: Introducing Turbulence Rona Oran Igor V. Sokolov Richard Frazin Ward Manchester Tamas I.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
The Solar Wind.
AFRL/CISM Collaborations
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
The Community Coordinated Modeling Center: A Brief Overview NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Lika Guhathakurta
Validation of the SWMF Coupled Model for Solar Corona – Inner Heliosphere – CME With the Observations of the May 12, 1997 Event Ofer Cohen(1), Igor V.
Synoptic Network Workshop (HAO/NCAR, April 2013) Space Weather and Synoptic Observations V J Pizzo – NOAA/SWPC.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
GONG Magnetograms Impact on CCMC Modeling NASA Goddard Space Flight Center P.MacNeice, L.Rastaetter, M.Hesse, A.Chulaki, M.Kuznetsova, A.Taktakishvili,
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Solar Wind and CMEs with the Space Weather Modeling Framework
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Presentation transcript:

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Inner Magnetosphere Coupled Modeling Scheme Solar Corona SAIC Solar Wind ENLIL Ionosphere T*GCM Active Regions SEP Ring Current Radiation Belts Geocorona and Exosphere Plasmasphere MI Coupling Magnetosphere LFM Solar CISM

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Solar CISM Participants

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Solar CISM Organizational Activities Since STC Selection  Participated in BU Kickoff Meeting (Sept. ‘02)  Met with collaborators at ‘02 SPD and SHINE Meetings  Posted SolarCISM website (  Collaborated on CISM-related SF Exploratorium EPO proposal to NASA IDEAS Program  Held first annual SSL SolarCISM meeting in Dec. ‘02 (26 participants from 14 institutions)  Advertised two UCB CISM positions (NRL liaison and UCB Senior Fellow for SEP), also filled HAO liaison position  Interacted with KT group on CISM Empirical Model contribution for corona/solar wind (Arge)  Identified potential Access Grid rooms at UCB, SAIC, Stanford now working with BU to purchase and install equipment  Participated in bimonthly executive telecons  Multi-institution working subgroups met at HAO/U of Colo., UCB, and SAIC

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Solar CISM Website Now Available 

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 SAIC and CIRES/NOAA SEC Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling For CISM: Pre-STC and 1st Year CISM Results  Performed propagation of 2D CME in the coupled model, studied results.  Performed large-angle 3D CME in the coupled model.  Performed 3D simulation of emerging Active Region.  Developing new MPI version of the coronal code which is currently in testing.  Introduced rotation into the 2D CME calculation: spiral magnetic field modifies shock characteristics.  Investigated in situ properties of simulated CMEs.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Coronal/Heliospheric Modeling For CISM (Continued)  Developing new MPI version of the coronal code which is currently in testing.  Introduced rotation into the 2D CME calculation: spiral magnetic field modifies shock characteristics.  Investigated in situ properties of simulated CMEs.  Studied the extension of the Wang-Sheeley approach using the NOAA/SEC heliospheric MHD model.  Investigated STEREO views of a simulated CME.  Publications: 1) Odstrcil et al., J. Geophys. Res. 107, /2002JA009334, ) Riley et al., Astrophys. J. 578, 972, ) Linker et al., Phys. Plasmas, to appear, 2003

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Current SAIC + U. Colorado CISM Effort Two dimensional flux rope eruption simulation undergoing improvements (e.g. in coronal/solar wind model coupling and spatial resolution)

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Expanding Magnetic Flux Rope - Initial 3D Version Developed Model Interface Compressed Plasma Shock Magnetic Leg Ejected Plasma

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Evidence of Post-Eruption Reconnection Jet - samples of visualizations and diagnostics

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Conditions for Energetic Particles Magnetic field lines, as observed at given locations can be: (a)part of the magnetic flux rope; (b) connected to the solar surface; or (c)disconnected from the solar surface. Shock Front Surface Magnetic Field Lines theta = 90 deg theta = 60 deg theta = 70 deg theta = 80 deg

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Multi-Perspective Imaging - sample of application to heliospheric imaging observations from SMEI and STEREO

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC Emerging active region magnetic fields effects on the coronal field configuration Steps to provide constructed magnetic field maps to SAIC to be the boundary condition for their MHD models: 1.Perform a local ANMHD simulation of an emerging fluxrope. 2.Use the radial component of the fluxrope as it emerges up into the photosphere to be the active region field. 3.Make a global background field, i.e., a dipole field. 4.Insert the series of simulated active region field into the background field. 5.SAIC uses the series of synthetic synoptic maps as boundary condition and starts with a potential field to perform their global MHD model to generate coronal field lines, coronal hole areas and coronal streamer belt images.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Current UCB + SAIC CISM Effort Initiation of Coronal Eruptions UCB simulation of emergence of an active region from below the photosphere into the corona –provides sample boundary conditions for the SAIC corona model.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Current UCB + SAIC Effort (continued) a) Transverse magnetic field vectors b) Transverse velocity vectors and radial magnetic field contours The simulated emerging active region model coupling tells us how to better use observations to drive the coronal model.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Left: ANMHD flux rope as it emerges up to the photosphere. Field lines are overplotted on the gray scale active region images. Right: constructed global magnetic field maps using a dipole background and the radial component of the emerging flux rope simulation.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 SAIC’s global MHD model results using the constructed maps as the inner boundary condition. The evolving photospheric field maps are here shown in a blue-white-red color scheme. The green lines are initially closed field lines, and black lines are initially open. SAIC’s global MHD model results. The green lines are initially closed field lines, and black lines are initially open. The dark gray areas are coronal holes.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 A different perspective of the global MHD field lines with the active region located at the right side. As the active region emerges, the field lines and streamer belt are distorted. Simulated coronal images using the plasma density of the MHD model to calculate polarization brightness (pB). The streamer belt on the right is distorted and separates into two streamers. The transient behavior is under investigation.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 HAO + U of Colorado + NOAA/SEC + UCB + Lockheed CISM Effort HAO  Synoptic map project (de Toma, Arge, Gibson, & Mayer)  Global coronal magnetic field-solar wind relationships (Gibson & Arge) NOAA/SEC  Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA) empirical coronal/solar wind model (Arge, Pizzo, & Mayer)  WSA coronal and Odstrcil MHD solar wind model coupling (Odstrcil, Arge, & Pizzo) CU/LASP  Incorporation of the WSA model into the CISM Sun-to-Earth Empirical Model (CSEM) (Baker, Weigel, Arge, & Mayer) UC Berkeley  Solar event studies (Luhmann, Arge, & Li) Lockheed  Incorporation of Schrijver-Derosa photospheric field evolution model into WSA. (Arge, Schrijver, & DeRosa)

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 HAO + U of Colorado + Stanford Synoptic Map Projects At HAO:  Routine construction of solar/coronal synoptic maps  He Å  H  (HAO)  White light  Photospheric field (NOAA/SEC)  IDL software package will be made available to solar community.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 HAO + U of Colorado + Stanford Synoptic Map Projects Event-specific modified maps Magnetic field from WSOMagnetic field from MDI mag Intensity from MDI EIT 171Å EIT 254Å EIT 195Å EIT 304Å At Stanford:

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Near Solar Maximum 2.5 R  21.5 R  Schatten Current Sheet Model (SCS): 2.5 – 21.5 R  Coupled Model: PFSS+SCS L1 U of Colorado + NOAA/SEC Empirical Wang- Sheeley-Arge Model provided to CISM KT group Near Solar Minimum 1D Modified Kinematic Solar Wind Model Potential Field Source Surface Model (PFSS): 1.0 – 2.5 R 

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Level 1 Data Flow Diagram for WSA IDLFortran PERL Hourly Ace DATA Assemble latest WSO Daily Updated Synoptic Map 23 Convert LOS Photospheric B Field to Radial, Interpolate Grid, & Subtract Monopole 5 Potential Field Source Surface Model with Field Line Tracing 4 Generate Date File Predict Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity at 1 AU 6 7 Plot Photospheric Field, Derived Coronal Holes, Source Surface Field, Solar Wind Speed Latest Synoptic Map Date, Time, File name of Synoptic Maps Interpolated Map Date File for Last Three Rotations Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Predictions for Last Three Rotations Photospheric Field Derived Coronal Holes Source Surface Field Field Expansion Factor Output from Previous PFSS Model Runs (Last 3 Rotations) Plot Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Predictions Against Real-Time ACE Observations 9 Magnetograms Retrieve Latest WSO Magnetograms 1 8 Retrieve Last 24 Hours of ACE Velocity & IMF Observations

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 U of Colorado + NOAA/SEC WSA Coronal - Odstrcil MHD Solar Wind Model Coupling  PFSS model now generalized to work for different grid resolutions.  A new & improved photospheric field remapping routine written.  Work on improving the interface between the models.  Working to inter-calibrate models better.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Calibration Study – Near Solar Minimum ( CR 1954 ) 0.1 AU 1 AU Low inclination of the streamer belt causes difficulties in timing of fast streams

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Calibration Study – Near Solar Maximum ( CR 1954 ) 0.1 AU 1 AU Source-Surface models are applicable at solar maximum Amplitudes need to be balanced

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Selected CISM Solar Event: May 12, 1997 CME Photospheric field from SOHO MDI SOHO EIT EUV observations SOHO LASCO C2 and C3 observations

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Selected CISM Solar Event: May 12, 1997 CME (continued)  This flare was probably caused by magnetic cancellation  The filament disappeared during the flare but did not appear to erupt SOHO MDI MagnetogramsHiraiso/CRL H_alpha

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Selected CISM Solar Event: May 12, 1997 CME (continued) WIND and SAMPEX observations

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC + Stanford Driving MHD codes with sequences of magnetograms  Physically consistent evolution at bottom plane in a simulation: Terms on LHS describe evolution driven by horizontal motion; RHS describes evolution due to flux emergence or submergence  This requires knowledge of vector components of B and v.  How do we determine v self-consistently from a sequence of vector magnetograms (which give only B)?  Price for ignoring the problem: Incorrect coronal magnetic topology

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC + Stanford Driving MHD codes with sequences of magnetograms Vector magnetic field data show no obvious change before and after the flare.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC + Stanford (continued) Exploring methods for finding the velocity boundary conditions:  Stokes Profiles could be used to get v z  Local Correlation Tracking (LCT) can find a velocity field v  (But is it correct?)  Vertical component of induction equation provides a constraint equation on v from a sequence of vector magnetograms (but solution is under-constrained)  Kusano et al. used combination of LCT and vertical induction equation to solve for v z  Longcope has developed a solution by adding an additional constraint: minimize the horizonal kinetic energy. Method appears to work in some cases, but not yet thoroughly tested. AR 8038 May 12, 1997

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC + Stanford (continued) Stanford force-free models may help set up the initial conditions for MHD simulations Potential field models Non-linear force-free models Active region field lines Synoptic display of global field lines R s

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 UCB + SAIC + Stanford (continued) Non-linear force-free fields contain free energy to be released in the eruptive events, while the potential field doesn’t. Extrapolation of the force-free field incorporates all three components of the magnetic field, and therefore reflects a more realistic structure of the corona.  Description of non-linear force-free field modeling approach  The technique used is the Boundary Element Method (BEM) developed by Yan, et al. ( Yan & Sakurai, 2000);  The technique needs the three components of the magnetic field at the surface as inputs;  To prepare the vector magnetograms for boundary conditions:  compute potential field from the synoptic maps of magnetic field;  obtain the three components of the potential field on the surface;  replace the vector field data where observation of vector magnetic field are unavailable.

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 U of Colorado and UCB Solar Event: May 12, 1997 Solar Wind and Stream Context Derived Coronal Holes and Photospheric Field Polarity Solar Wind Speed at Source Surface (2.5Rs) Solar Wind Speed Predictions & Observations Predictions Observations IMF Polarity Predictions & Observations Stream source region May 12 th CME (suggests solar wind stream following the ICME comes from the southern hemisphere)

CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March 2003 Solar CISM Modeling Near-Term Issues and Challenges  Improve ambient solar wind MHD simulation to give realistic speeds and stream structure  Collect needed resources for model coupling and driving (e.g. potential or force-free field models and/or synoptic maps as initial states + boundary conditions, vector magnetograms)  Develop solar energetic particle (SEP) modeling capability  Establish NRL connection  Standardize simulation and other data formats and visualization tools  Track progress (e.g. against implementation plan, metrics)