Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley 10-30-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Advertisements

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 University A University B Team # Logo 1 Logo 2.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
DUNLOP LUNAX-II Conceptual Design Review Star Mission to the Moon-X1 Dan Hawk, Dr Schmitt, Dr Konings-Dudin October 13, 2009.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #23 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #23.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Team Name Launch Readiness Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
SloshSAT Conceptual Design Review Dr. Robert Walch Sage Andorka Dan Welsh Zach Sears Maurice Woods III Motoaki Honda Ryan Estrick 14 Oct
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
2016 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
Critical Design Review Team Name
JASMM Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
Launch Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley

User notes: You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. This template is the barebones of what is needed. This template is the barebones of what is needed.

Mission Overview What is your objective? What is your objective? The objective our mission is to build a payload that will create an interest in the program at the Metro State College of Denver This payload is going to take Gyroscopic measurements, acceleration measurements, and digital photographs, and store them for later analysis

Mission Overview Cont. What do you expect to prove, discover, or learn from your experiment? We expect to learn how to integrate a payload into the standard payload can as well as integrate with other payloads in the can and rocket body We expect to learn how to integrate a payload into the standard payload can as well as integrate with other payloads in the can and rocket body We expect to learn the behavior of a rocket in flight through the data we receive We expect to learn the behavior of a rocket in flight through the data we receive

Mission Overview Cont. Brief overview of underlying science/theory We plan to emulate the payload we learned to build at the RockOn work shop in 2008 with some minimal configuration changes We plan to emulate the payload we learned to build at the RockOn work shop in 2008 with some minimal configuration changes Changes include implementing a set of gyroscopes, and a digital still camera, and media storage

Mission Overview Cont. What other related research/experimentation has been done in the past? This payload was built in the DemoSat IV mission as well as built for the RockOn Workshop in 2008 This payload was built in the DemoSat IV mission as well as built for the RockOn Workshop in 2008Results? This mission has produced accurate reliable data in the past, that we used to correlate real time video of the payload using acceleration, gyroscopic motion and mathematics This mission has produced accurate reliable data in the past, that we used to correlate real time video of the payload using acceleration, gyroscopic motion and mathematics

Mission Overview Cont. Mission Requirements We only require space to implement our payload in addition to an optical port to take digital still photographs We only require space to implement our payload in addition to an optical port to take digital still photographs Our payload will also need to be as close to the central axis of the vehicle as possible Our payload will also need to be as close to the central axis of the vehicle as possible

Mission Overview Cont. Benefits (Who will benefit from your experiment and how?) The overall goal is to use this mission as a pilot to draw attention to the Space Grant program, to build and develop an opportunity that all the students participating in the program can understand how the experience can enhance their career. The overall goal is to use this mission as a pilot to draw attention to the Space Grant program, to build and develop an opportunity that all the students participating in the program can understand how the experience can enhance their career.

Mission Overview Cont. Benefits (Who will benefit from your experiment and how?) Benefits (Who will benefit from your experiment and how?) The overall goal is to build and develop a program that all the students participating in the program can gain a learning experience from Engineers, scientists and the like that are interested in more accurate behavior of the flight of rockets

Design (How will you meet your objective) (Multiple Slides) Required Hardware Parts Parts The parts list is huge, here is brief list, we need one standard RockOn payload, one digital camera, three gyroscopes, two 9 volt batteries, two SD cards, and a myriad of incidentals Drawings Drawings Still in the works, will come soon

Design Cont. Command & D.H. Gyros Batteries G Switch Accelerometers Digital Storage Media Camera

Mass allotted- 4.25lbs. Estimated mass usage- 2.5lbs including camera and plate Estimated mass usage- 2.5lbs including camera and plate Volume allotted ” cubed plate 9.2” in Diameter, 1” in height plate 9.2” in Diameter, 1” in height Camera dimensions are 3.71”x 2.53”x1.69” this will require some tricky integration techniques Camera dimensions are 3.71”x 2.53”x1.69” this will require some tricky integration techniques Payload activation? What have you planned for? G switch activation for the camera and for the data collection module G switch activation for the camera and for the data collection module How does it comply with Wallops “no volt” requirement completely completely Rocket Interface Rocket Interface Shorting wires RockSat Payload Canister User Guide Compliance

Shared Can Logistics Plan Institutions/Universities in can Institutions/Universities in can Metro State, CSU, and UNC Summary of each mission (one-liner) Summary of each mission (one-liner) Standard power and data payload Water inertial measurement payload Photo and flight behavior payload Plan for collaboration on interfacing Plan for collaboration on interfacing By PDR know relative locations in can There is a meeting planned for November with all the schools for collaboration

Organizational Chart Organizational Chart Matthew Hanley- Student Program Manager, Team Leader Daniel Bass- Team Member Preliminary mass/monetary budgets Preliminary mass/monetary budgets Preliminary mass = about 2 lbs. Preliminary monetary budget= $ Management

Management Cont. Schedule Schedule DemoSat/RockSat Schedule (Part 1) 8/18/2008 RockSat Payload User’s Guide Released 9/8/2008 Submit Intent to Fly Form 9/30/2008 Online Progress Report 1 Due 10/15/2008 Conceptual Design Review (CoDR) Due 10/30/2008 Online Progress Report 2 Due 11/14/2008 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Due 11/28/2008 Online Progress Report 3 Due 12/12/2008 Critical Design Review (CDR) Due

Management Cont. DemoSat/RockSat Schedule (Part 2) 1/30/2009 Online Progress Report 4 Due 2/20/2009 Individual Subsystem Testing Reports Due 2/27/2009 Online Progress Report 5 Due 3/27/2009 Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Due 4/17/2009 First Full Mission Simulation Test Report Due 4/30/2009 Online Progress Report 6 Due 5/22/2009 Second Full Mission Simulation Test Report Due 5/29/2009 Online Progress Report 7 Due 6/10/2009 Launch Readiness Review (LRR) Teleconference 06-(22-24)-2009 MOI and Vibration Testing at WFF 6/24/2009 RockSat Payload Canister Integration with WFF 6/26/2009 Launch Day

Conclusions Issues and concerns Issues and concerns We intend to stay on track with the Space Grant schedule provided We also would like to consider using 1/3 of the can size since we are trying to incorporate a camera in the mission Also a little concerned about integration, final placement of the missions inside the can might be a problem. Closing remarks Closing remarks We are excited about the opportunity to launch our project this year, again another unforgettable experience from Space Grant