January 2000The First Data from BELLE1 First Data from BELLE HEP Seminar TRIUMF Daniel Marlow Princeton University January 10, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
Advertisements

Physics with antiprotons: CP violation in D-mesons Klaus Peters Ruhr-Universität Bochum KVI Groningen Jan 7, 2003.
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
November 19, 1999CP Violation in B Meson Decays1 Math/Physics Undergraduate Colloquium Daniel Marlow Princeton University November 19, 1999.
APR01 APS Recent results from Belle: Reflections on Beauty Kay Kinoshita University of Cincinnati Belle Collaboration.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Is B s 0 production by neutrino interactions interesting? Presented at the Super-B factory workshop as an alternative approach Nickolas Solomey 21 April.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
October 1999The First Events from BELLE First Events from BELLE HEP Seminar Brookhaven National Lab Daniel Marlow Princeton University October 21, 1999.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Jan 28th, 2009Colin Jessop at Notre Dame An experiment to measure CP violation in B mesons Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
June 2000Status of BELLE1 Beyond e + e - Workshop The Homestead Glen Arbor, MI Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University June 17, 2000.
July 2000Results from BELLE1 IV th Rencontres du Vietnam Hanoi, Vietnam Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University July 22, 2000.
March 2000The First Data from BELLE1 First Data from BELLE HEP Seminar University of Chicago Daniel Marlow Princeton University March 13, 2000.
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
February 2001B Factory Detectors1 B-Factory Detectors 9 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Daniel Marlow Princeton University February 23, 2001.
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
Measurement of CP violation with the LHCb experiment at CERN
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Rare B Decays at Belle Hsuan-Cheng Huang ( 黃宣誠 ) National Taiwan University 2 nd BCP NTU, Taipei June 7 - 9, 2002.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
4/2/2001SUNY Stony Brook, April 2, CP Violation in the B Meson System: The Belle Measurement of sin2  1 Eric Prebys, Princeton University for the.
CP VIOLATION at B-factories A.Bondar (Budker INP,Novosibirsk) Measurements of large CPV in b  c c s modes Search for New Physics: CPV in b  s penguin.
 c Physics at the Energy Threshold John Yelton U. of Florida CLEO experiment A review of what we know, and what we do not know, about the  c, with an.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering in ZEUS The HERA collider NC Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA The ZEUS detector Neutral current cross section.
November 2001CP Violation at Belle Observation of CP Violation at Belle HEP Seminar Brookhaven National Lab Daniel Marlow Princeton University November.
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Super-KEKB Collaboration
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
CP Violation lectures Measurement of the time dependence of B0B0bar oscillation using inclusive dilepton events [BABAR-CONF-00/10] G. Cerminara.
How charm data may help for φ3 measurement at B-factories
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
9th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
Presentation transcript:

January 2000The First Data from BELLE1 First Data from BELLE HEP Seminar TRIUMF Daniel Marlow Princeton University January 10, 2000

January 2000The First Data from BELLE2 Physics Motivation Direct CP violation is perhaps the simplest case. Consider the CP mirror processes: The CP asymmetry is defined as The decay amplitudes are Note that the weak phase changes sign.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE3 Direct CP Violation Note that Yielding We need some sort of interference, two amplitudes, for example

January 2000The First Data from BELLE4 Direct CP Violation Despite its conceptual and experimental simplicity, there are two problems with direct CP violation: Cases where there are two comparable amplitudes that are large are (probably) rare. The strong phases are poorly understood, making it difficult to extract the weak (KM) phases that are of greatest interest. This leads one in the direction of asymmetric B factories aimed at the study of indirect CP violation.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE5 Indirect CP Violation In this approach we provide the interference using state mixing, i.e.,

January 2000The First Data from BELLE6 Indirect CP Violation Thus for a decay where is a CP eigenstate, we have two “indistinguishable” decay paths Working through the algebra, yields a time- dependent CP asymmetry Where and are the weak phases for the mixing and decay diagrams, respectively and

January 2000The First Data from BELLE7 The Kobayashi-Maskawa Mixing Scheme Where the second matrix is the Wolfenstein parameterization. Quark mixing is described via The “d b” unitarity relation yields

January 2000The First Data from BELLE8 CP Phases in the Gold-Plated Mode Decay Mixing The KM phase comes from the mixing.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE9 The Unitarity Triangle The gold-plated mode determines the angle which is also called.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE10 Existing Constraints Existing measurements of mixing and limit the allowed region in the plane.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE11 The Measurement tag CP Need to: Measure momenta ID leptons & K’s Measure vertices

January 2000The First Data from BELLE12 The Measurement The time-dependent asymmetry appears mainly as a mean shift in the distribution between events tagged as decays and events tagged as decays.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE13 The KEK-B Asymmetric Collider KEK-B is similar to PEP- II in many ways, although there is a (potentially) important difference in the way in which the beams are brought into collision.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE14 Beam Crossing Schemes By colliding the beams at an angle, the KEK-B design achieves a simplified interaction region. Moreover, every RF bucket (2 ns spacing) can be filled to achieve maximum luminosity. However, this approach risks destabilizing couplings between transverse and longitudinal modes of the machines. A crab-crossing cavity is under development in case this proves to be a problem.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE15 Linac Parameters

January 2000The First Data from BELLE16 Ring Parameters

January 2000The First Data from BELLE17 Luminosity

January 2000The First Data from BELLE18

January 2000The First Data from BELLE19 The BELLE Collaboration About 10 Countries, 50 Institutes, & 200 People

January 2000The First Data from BELLE20 Key Belle Milestones Early 1990’s - Japanese groups begin working. January Collaboration forms. April TDR Submitted. …lots of work by lots of people in lots of places... Dec 18, Belle detector completed (including SVD) Jan 26, First cosmic ray with full detector. May 1, Belle rolled into place. June 1, First hadronic event!!!!! June 1999/July 1999 first serious running

January 2000The First Data from BELLE21 June 1, 1999: Our First Hadronic Event

January 2000The First Data from BELLE22 More Fun: SVD Included

January 2000The First Data from BELLE23 First J/  Candidate J/  ee – M(ee) = 3.1 GeV

January 2000The First Data from BELLE24 SVD Performance

January 2000The First Data from BELLE25 SVD Performance Bhabha miss distance

January 2000The First Data from BELLE26 SVD Performance

January 2000The First Data from BELLE27 SVD Tomography X-Z distribution of primary vertices for all triggers, including beam gas. The IP, the beam crossing angle, and various flanges etc in the IR are clearly evident.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE28 CDC Performance

January 2000The First Data from BELLE29 CDC Performance (Cosmic Rays)

January 2000The First Data from BELLE30 Particle ID (dE/dx, ToF, & Aerogel)

January 2000The First Data from BELLE31 Particle ID (dE/dx, ToF, & Aerogel)

January 2000The First Data from BELLE32 CsI EM Calorimeter Performance

January 2000The First Data from BELLE33 More CsI

January 2000The First Data from BELLE34 Electron ID

January 2000The First Data from BELLE35 Muon ID Replace with Abe san plot.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE36 Detection First ~1000 hadronic events.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE37 Physics from the First Runs: Energy Scan

January 2000The First Data from BELLE38 Lepton-pair Spectrum Replace with new plots.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE39 A “Typical” Dimuon event J/  – M(  ) = 3.1 GeV –both muons tracks clearly evident in magnet return yoke This event is consistent with although there were no hits in the RPCs

January 2000The First Data from BELLE40 candidate

January 2000The First Data from BELLE41 candidate

January 2000The First Data from BELLE42 Charm Mass Plots

January 2000The First Data from BELLE43 Charmed Baryon

January 2000The First Data from BELLE44 Unstable Particles

January 2000The First Data from BELLE45 Unstable Particles Impossible without PID

January 2000The First Data from BELLE46 D Lifetimes Decay-time distribution.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE47 D Lifetimes

January 2000The First Data from BELLE48 Background Backgrounds are a major problem. –High occupancy –High trigger rates –Radiation damage In general, the BELLE design did not address these issues (simplicity in design received greater emphasis). We have fairly consistently been at the limit (and in some cases beyond) of what the detector can handle.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE49 Backgrounds Steps to mitigate the solution have thus far allowed us to keep our heads above water. –20 um gold added to inside of beampipe –changes to CDC electronics –changes in beam pipe –implementation of a rad-tolerant SVD

January 2000The First Data from BELLE50 Conclusions & Outlook We have acquired about 250/pb of data, a tiny fraction of the 100/fb that is our Phase-I goal, but a good start nonetheless. The KEK-B accelerator is working with luminosity of before shutdown. The entire Belle detector, including the DAQ and offline reconstruction software, is working. We continue in a constant struggle to increase the luminosity while fighting background.

January 2000The First Data from BELLE51 Conclusions & Outlook A new “high emittance” tune implemented just prior to the most recent disaster showed some promise. We’ll see what happens in mid-January when we come back on.