1 Sparsh Navin – University of Birmingham for the ALICE collaboration Trigger Efficiencies in ALICE and Diffraction in PYTHIA Diffractive and electromagnetic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Advertisements

Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Julia Velkovska Selected CMS Results from pp collisions 27th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Winter Park, Colorado Feb 6-13, 2011.
Event Generation with HERWIG Nick Brook University of Bristol Introduction Multiple Interactions in HERWIG Parameter Tuning B-production.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
ALICE activities by Yonsei Ju Hwan Kang (Yonsei University) Heavy Ion Meeting Dec , 2012, Chonnam National University, Gwangju.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Beomkyu Kim. 2 A Large Ion Collider Experiment 3 p+p studies in ALICE experiment ALICE is the only dedicated heavy ­ion experiment at LHC ALICE also.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
CMS results on soft diffraction Konstantin Goulianos (on behalf of the CMS collaboration ) The Rockefeller University EDS BLOIS 2013, 15 th Conference.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Hadron Structure 2009 Factorisation in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague Representing H1 and ZEUS experiments Hadron structure.
Andrei Rostovtsev Moscow, ITEP Low-x, June 2013 (Eilat) On behalf of H1 Collaboration.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
Predictions of Soft Processes at the LHC Implemented in PYTHIA8 Konstantin Goulianos* The Rockefeller University 1 low-x 2012 CyprusSoft Processes at LHC.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
1 Diffractive heavy quark production in AA collisions at the LHC at NLO* Mairon Melo Machado GFPAE – IF – UFRGS
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Mayda M. Velasco MBUEWO Sept. 6-7, 2010 Latest CMS Minimum Bias Results.
A. Pulvirenti - Resonances measurement in pp and PbPb with ALICE 1 Outline The Study of Short-Lived Resonances with the ALICE Experiment at the LHC Ayben.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
QCD Prospects for ATLAS Rainer Stamen Universität Mainz On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration QCD 06 Montpellier, July 3rd 2006.
Ultra-peripheral heavy ion results from CMS Michael Murray, DIS2015, 29 th April 2015 CMS: HIN :
Improving ATLAS hard diffraction measurements with the STEP award Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 18/10/2013.
INFN - PadovaBeauty Measurements in pp with the Central Detector 1 Beauty Measurements in p-p with the Central Detector F. Antinori, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese,
DIS 2011, Newport News, April 2011Joakim Nystrand, University of Bergen 1 Small-x and forward measurements in ALICE Joakim Nystrand University of.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Energy Dependence of the UE
Charged-particle multiplicity with ALICE at LHC
Workshop “MC for the LHC” - CERN
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Hadronic resonances from ALICE in pp collisions
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Lake Louise Winter Institute
High Multiplicity Events in p+p Collisions at LHC Energy
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Hadronic resonances from ALICE in pp collisions
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Single Diffractive Higgs Production at the LHC *
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
First ALICE Results from Proton-Proton Collisions
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
Presentation transcript:

1 Sparsh Navin – University of Birmingham for the ALICE collaboration Trigger Efficiencies in ALICE and Diffraction in PYTHIA Diffractive and electromagnetic processes at the LHC, Trento 2010

2 Outline ALICE and pp trigger efficiencies ALICE detectors for first physics with protons Process Types First physics trigger efficiencies Diffraction and PYTHIA Kinematic comparison – PYTHIA 6.4 and PHOJET Diffraction in PYTHIA – then and now Comparison of kinematic plots – PYHTIA Summary

3 A Large Ion Collider Experiment Primary purpose – heavy ion detector for Pb-Pb collisions at 5.5 TeV First physics programme is pp at 0.9, 2.36, 7 (maybe 10) and 14 TeV - Time and space alignments - pp bench mark to study genuine Pb-Pb effects Special features for pp collisions: - Low magnetic field => low pT cut-off, tracking resolution from 100 MeV/c - Excellent PID over broad range of momenta - Primary vertex resolution (100μm for pp, 10 μm for Pb-Pb) pp Physics contributions: - Physics cross checks with previous results - Good description of underlying event and high multiplicity collisions 1 st measurements:, multiplicity and momentum distributions and

4 A Large Ion Collider Experiment m underground 16 m high 26 m long 10,000 tonnes 0.5 T magnetic field V0A z = 3.3m ITS (Inner Tracking System) TPC (Time Projection Chamber) SPD – Inner layers - 3.9cm 7.6cm radii - better than 100μm resolution - provide the SPD trigger signal Main gas-filled tracking detector Provide the V0A and V0C trigger signals Time resolution better than 1ns V0C z=-0.9m ZDC at ZN ZP ZEM at 7 m

5 5 Process Types True cross sections at LHC energies are not known Scaling of cross sections with energy is model dependent PHOJET Default fractions PYTHIA 0.134SD DD0.127 Figure from Torbjörn Sjöstrand, MCnet school, 2008.

6 66 V0AV0C Outgoing undiffracted p beam Diffractive system Single Diffraction (SD) Pseudorapidity gap

7 77 V0AV0C Diffractive system (2) Diffractive system (1) Double Diffraction (DD) Pseudorapidity gap

8 888 V0AV0C Non Diffractive (ND) No pseudorapidity gap

9 9 First Physics Triggers Minimum Bias Triggers MB1SPD or (V0A or V0C) MB3SPD and (V0A and V0C) Different efficiencies for different  Triggers (MB1, MB3)  Type of process (SD, DD, ND)  Event generator (Pythia and Phojet) Global Fast Or (GFO) is the trigger from the Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) Actual trigger used – at least 2 pixels in coincidence with beams

10 Trigger Efficiencies and corrections Need to know the fraction (f) and the efficiency (e) for each process. Efficiency is process, trigger and generator dependent Eg: MB1 = SPD or V0A or V0C ProcessSDDDND Fraction (f) Efficiency (e) ProcessSDDDND Fraction (f) Efficiency (e) MB1 efficiencies: Pythia: 92.9% Phojet: 96.4% Reason for difference: f – uncertainty in fractions e – uncertainty in kinematics Major difference is in diffractive events ~2-4% effect each

11 Kinematics – eta ND 7 TeV

12 Kinematics – eta SD 7 TeV

13 Kinematics – pT ND 7 TeV

14 Kinematics – pT SD 7 TeV

15 Kinematics – multiplicity ND 7 TeV

16 Kinematics – multiplicity SD 7 TeV

17 Diffraction in PYTHIA – “old” Event Generation: Diffractive cross sections given by model by Schuler and Sjöstrand (Phys. Rev. D 49, 2257 (1994)) Diffractive mass ( ) and momentum transfer (t) generated according to: Particle Production: above mass of incoming particles => isotropic decay into 2- body state More massive system treated as a string with quantum numbers of the original hadron

18 Pomeron couples to valence quarks Dominates at small Diffraction in “old” PYTHIA – stretching the string Version (Fortran) q and g contributions are set by a user-defined fixed ratio Version 8.1 (C++) Slope p and normalisation N set by user mass ( ) dependence Gluonic domination at large Has a gluon (g) and quark (q) contribution Pomeron couples to gluon Dominates at large

19 Diffraction in PYTHIA – “new” Event Generation: Cross sections - same way as before Diffractive mass ( ) and momentum transfer (t) picked by Pomeron flux model Particle Production: Pomeron-p collisions Pomeron PDF with - dependence from H1 data - H DPDF Fit Jets and H Fits A and B - Pion PDF also available Standard PYTHIA machinery for multiple interactions, parton showers, hadronization Mass separation: For non-perturbative description (as before) - longitudinally stretched strings For perturbative Work done with Torbjörn Sjöstrand - MCnet

20 Energy dependent Only SS provides separate t spectrum for DD Pomeron Flux factor

21 PYTHIA “old” vs “new” - eta 7 TeV

22 PYTHIA “old” vs “new” - pT 7 TeV

23 PYTHIA “old” vs “new” - multiplicity 7 TeV

24 Comments Diffractive hard scattering cross section: In the massless limit Not known from first principles Multiple interactions => screening of diffractive rates

25 Does cut-off depend on the diffractive mass? Introduce a screening factor to go from ep to pp collisions Momentum sum of PDFs H DPDF LO fit Tuning to data Future Plans - PYTHIA Include Central Diffraction LRG

26 Summary The ALICE detectors and trigger for the first pp physics programme were discussed Trigger efficiencies are model dependent - PYTHIA and PHOJET Earlier versions of PYTHIA had a primitive description of diffraction No hard diffraction – caused the difference in pT and multiplicity tails compared to PHOJET New version (8.130) has Pomeron description of diffraction Hard collisions can be simulated Better agreement with PHOJET

27 ALICE first paper Extraction of fractions from data - ALICE Diffraction in Phojet Back up slides

28 ALICE first paper - arXiv: [hep-ex] Trigger – atleast 2 fired chips in coincidence with bunches – 284 events Magnetic field off; SPD used for analysis; SDD, SSD and V0 used for cross checks and background ID and removal. In the region Trigger efficiency obtained from MC PYTHIA D6T and PHOJET 1.12: SD – 48% to 58%, DD – 53% to 76%, ND – 98% to 99% Fractions taken from UA5: SD –, DD -, ND – Trigger efficiencies: Inelastic - 87% to 91%, NSD – 94% to 97% Results obtained with PYTHIA, difference between PYTHIA and PHOJET used to estimate systematic uncertainty. -Inelastic -NSD

29 Extraction of fractions Trigger on bunch crossing Define 8 uncorrelated trigger types using SPD, V0A and V0C Meausre calc measured Program works out combinations of fractions to generate so as to minimise - Z.Matthews 20/03/09, ALICE first physics meeting

30 Central elements of Phojet - R. Engel workshop on soft diffraction at LHC 26/6/09 Two component Pomeron Only one pomeron with soft and hard contributions Topological identification of different terms (Dual parton model) Soft and hard partons differ in impact parameter distribution Application of existing parton density parametrisation Initial and final state radiation (leading logQ^2 parton showers)