© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Advertisements

Criminal Justice Today
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Re-Entry and Recidivism
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER SIXSIX.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 15 Release from Incarceration.
Sentencing and Punishment
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
Probation Modification and Termination
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE A Brief Introduction, 5/E by Frank Schmalleger ©2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Probation,
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
When Prisoners Come Home: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges Joan Petersilia, Ph.D. Department of Criminology, Law & Society University of California,
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Chapter 7 Probation Modification and Termination.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Test to the 21st Century Frank Schamalleger Corrections Chapter 12 Copyright ©2011, 2009, 2007, 2005 by Pearson.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Chapter 11 Prisoner Reentry.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
© 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. 1 Chapter 11 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Chapter 14 Alternatives: Community.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry 1.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice CHAPTER Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice, 12e Howard Abadinsky Copyright © 2015, © 2012 by Pearson Education,
Chapter 4 Probation Goals and ideologies Setting and enforcing conditions Revoking liberty Legal basis and imposing the sentence Agency organization.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Chapter 9 Flashcards. citation a legal document roughly equivalent to a traffic ticket.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
Criminal Law for the Criminal Justice Professional Norman M. Garland Third Edition Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
The Impact of Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) Violators & Time Served on IDOC’s Population David E. Olson, Ph.D. & Donald Stemen, Ph.D. Department of.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Criminal Justice Poll Diamond State Consulting
Prisoner Reentry and Parole:
Types of Release Indeterminate Sentences Determinate Sentences
Community Supervision Modification & Termination
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Criminal Justice Poll Diamond State Consulting
Class Name, Instructor Name
Community Corrections
The History of Parole & Mandatory Release
Probation and Parole.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Criminal Justice Poll Diamond State Consulting
Presentation transcript:

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill PAROLE PAROLE: Early Release and Reintegratiom Photo © Corbis, used with permission.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS PAROLE: The conditional release of a prisoner, prior to completion of the imposed sentence, under the supervision of a parole officer. PARDON: An executive act that legally excuses a convicted offender from a criminal penalty.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS DISCRETIONARY RELEASE: Early release based on the paroling authority’s assessment of eligibility. MANDATORY RELEASE: Early release after a time period specified by law.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill HISTORICAL NOTES on PAROLE Rooted in 18 th -century English penal practice. Maconochie’s “ticket-of-leave,” 1840s. Crofton’s conditional release system, First parole legislation: Massachusetts, First parole program implemented at New York’s Elmira Reformatory, late 1870s. Wickersham Commission lists four “essential elements” of a good parole program, s: Research finds prison rehabilitation programs have few positive benefits. Present day: Increasing support for abolition.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill The Wickersham Commission The Commission’s 1931 report cited four “essential elements” of good parole systems:  Indeterminate sentencing laws.  Quality release preparation.  Parole officer’s familiarization with offender’s home and environmental conditions before offender’s release.  Sufficient staffing levels.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS PAROLE ELIGIBILITY DATE: The earliest date on which an inmate might be paroled. PAROLING AUTHORITY: A person or correctional agency (often called a parole board or parole commission) that has the authority to grant parole, revoke parole, and discharge from parole.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS SALIENT FACTOR SCORE (SFS): Scale, developed from a risk-screening instrument, used to predict parole outcome. PAROLEE: A person conditionally released from prison to community supervision.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CATEGORY PERCENTAGE Male 86 Female 14 White 39 Black 42 Hispanic 18 Other1 State 89 Federal 11 ADULTS on PAROLE: SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS Gender Race Level © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill ADULTS on PAROLE, 1995– , , , , , , , ,141

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill PAROLE REVOCATION Reasons for revocation: – Technical violation of parole conditions. – Arrest for a new offense. Two-thirds of parolees are rearrested within three years, usually within the first six months after release. Currently, rearrests comprise 35% of all new prison admissions, up from 17% in % of rearrests are for new offense.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill REENTRY COURT Manages the return to the community of individuals released from prison. U.S. Department of Justice proposes reentry courts have six core elements: – Assessment and planning. – Active judicial oversight. – Case management of support services. – Accountability to the community. – Graduated sanctions. – Rewarding success.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill LEGAL DECISIONS ON PAROLE Morrissey v. Brewer (1972): Due process mandates both a preliminary and a final hearing before parole can be revoked. Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973): Parolees are entitled to legal representation at all revocation hearings. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex (1979): Parole is a privilege, not a right, and only limited due process rights apply.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill ABOLITION of DISCRETIONARY RELEASE A goal of parole opponents since the 1930s. The movement resurfaced during the 1970s, when discussions on the concept of “just deserts” grew out of the extraordinary increases in the nation’s crime rate during that period. By the end of 2000, the federal government and 16 states abolished discretionary release for all offenders. Another four states abolished it for certain violent offenses or crimes against a person.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill