Andrew J. Wagner 1, Johanna C. Bendell 2, Jeffrey A. Morgan 1, James Butrynski 1, Suzanne George 1, George D. Demetri 1, Jill Fredrickson 3, Jill Spoerke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Advertisements

A Proposal for BMS (Dasatinib) in GIST Jon Trent, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Dept. of Sarcoma Medical Oncology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Wilson WH et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 686.
Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity.
IMPACT OF TUMOR MORCELLATION ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF UTERINE LEIOMYOSARCOMA César Serrano, Titilope Oduyebo, Judith Manola, Yang Feng, Michael G. Muto,
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
1 Results of the Phase 3, placebo-controlled trial (SUCCEED) evaluating the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus as maintenance therapy in advanced sarcoma patients.
Phase 1/2 Study of GSK , a Selective Inhibitor of Oncogenic Mutant BRAF Kinase in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma and Other Solid Tumors Kefford.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
A PHASE II TRIAL OF PERIFOSINE IN PATIENTS WITH CHEMO-INSENSITIVE SARCOMAS A SARCOMA ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH THROUGH COLLABORATION (SARC) STUDY Study Update.
Phase II Study of Dasatinib in Advanced Sarcomas SARC 009 Study PI: Scott Schuetze Registration and eCRF: CRAB Drug supply: BMS.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Sylvie Bonvalot 1 ; Cécile Le Pechoux 1 ; Thierry De Baere 1 ; Guy Kantor 2 ; Xavier Buy 2 ; Paul Sargos 2 ; Eberhard Stoeckle 2 ; Philippe Terrier 1 ;
A PHASE 2 STUDY OF TH-302 IN COMBINATION WITH DOXORUBICIN IN ADVANCED SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA Sant P Chawla, MD Sarcoma Oncology Center Santa Monica, CA Sant.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
SARC011/NO21157 Alberto Pappo, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center Houston, TX.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
The Investigational Agent MLN9708, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results from the Expansion.
Use of KRN330, A Fully Human Antibody Against A33, in Combination with Irinotecan for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) J.C. Bendell, 1.
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
Results of the X-PECT Study: A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) vs. placebo plus capecitabine.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Phase I Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide, in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic Ewing sarcoma : An Interim Update Edwin Choy, Gregory Cote, James.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Activity and Tolerability of Afatinib (BIBW 2992) and Cetuximab in NSCLC Patients with Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib or Gefitinib Janjigian YY et al.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
GDC-0449 in Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcomas: a French Sarcoma Group / French and US NCI phase II collaborative study Antoine Italiano, Axel Le Cesne,
A First-in-human, First-in-class, Phase I Study of Systemic Hedgehog Pathway Antagonist, GDC-0449, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors P.M. LoRusso,
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
First-in-man Phase I study of the oral dual PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with advanced solid tumors Howard Burris 1, Jordi Rodon 2, Sunil.
Targeting ALK Receptor Tyrosine Kinase in Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor (IMT) James E Butrynski 1, David R D’Adamo 2, Andrew Wolanski 1, Linda Ahn.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
Phase II Study of Dasatinib (BMS ) in Advanced Sarcomas and Chordoma Coordinating Center: U Michigan.
Raafat R. Abdel-Malek, MD, FRCR Ass. Prof Clinical Oncology Cairo University, Egypt Efficacy & Toxicity of Sunitinib in mRCC patients in Egypt.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combining with Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic or Advanced Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal.
FINAL RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF PERIFOSINE IN COMBINATION WITH CAPECITABINE (P-CAP) VS. PLACEBO PLUS CAPECITABINE (CAP) IN PATIENTS WITH.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
May 29 - June 2, 2015 TIGER-X: Rociletinib Activity in EGFR T790M Mutant NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* *CCO.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A) Shows Favorable Tolerability, Promising Activity in Urothelial Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference.
KEYNOTE-021: Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab Active in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
KEYNOTE-028: Pembrolizumab in PD-L1+, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Neoadjuvant Palbociclib + Anastrozole in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
BIBF 1120 (Nintedanib) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer:
A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of weekly MK-0646, an Insulin Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) monoclonal antibody in patients.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 732.
Phase I/II Study of Lorlatinib in Advanced ALK+ or ROS1+ NSCLC
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
LOTUS: Investigation of Ipatasertib, a Novel Akt Inhibitor, in Combination With Paclitaxel as Frontline Therapy for Metastatic TNBC CCO Independent Conference.
Combined Inhibition of PD-L1, MEK, and BRAF Active in Advanced Melanoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
KEYNOTE-023: Pembrolizumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Shows Promising Activity and Safety in R/R MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF EVEROLIMUS PLUS EXEMESTANE IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER BEYOND THE SECOND LINE TREATMENT: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE M. Giampaglia,
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presented By Johanna Bendell at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Phase II trial of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
Presentation transcript:

Andrew J. Wagner 1, Johanna C. Bendell 2, Jeffrey A. Morgan 1, James Butrynski 1, Suzanne George 1, George D. Demetri 1, Jill Fredrickson 3, Jill Spoerke 3, Doris Apt 3, Jennifer Lauchle 3, Gordon Jayson 4, Johann S. de Bono 5, Howard A. Burris 2, Jean-Charles Soria 6 1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA 2 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA 3 Exploratory Clinical Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA 4 The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK 5 Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK 6 Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Tolerability and anti-tumor activity of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GDC-0980 in patients with GIST and other sarcomas on two Phase I studies

2 2 GDC-0980, a Potent PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor  The PI3K-PTEN-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is dysregulated in multiple cancers  Multiple mechanisms in GIST and other sarcomas – Activation of RTKs, RAS, PI3K – Loss of PTEN, NF1, TSC1/2 Kinase IsoformIC 50 p110 α4.8 nM p110β26.8 nM p110γ13.8 nM p110δ6.7 nM mTOR Ki17.3 nM  GDC-0980 is a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of Class I PI3 and mTOR kinases  Anti-tumor activity demonstrated in several cancer xenograft models Wallin JJ, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011; 10:

3 3 Study Design QD Dosing Schedule Screening D1 Cycle 1: DLT Assessment (D1-35) Cycle 2 D8 D28 D36 D15 FDG- PET D22 D50 PK D64D56 Tumor Assess. Tumor Assess. PIK3CA, PTEN status FDG-PET Tumor Assessment Study Objectives: Safety, PK, PD, Anti-tumor activity Tumor TypePatients (n=115) GDC-0980 Dose - Schedule Escalation: All Tumor Types Expansion: All Tumor Types to 70 mg - QD 21d and 28d 30 mg and 40 mg - QD 28d (RP2D) Sarcoma11 2 to 40 mg - QD 21d and 28d 5 pts at RP2D GIST11 2 to 70 mg - QD 21d and 28d 4 pts at RP2D Assessments FDG- PET

4 4 Study Design QW Dosing Schedule Assessments Study Objectives: Safety, PK, PD, Anti-tumor activity D-28D29D22D15D8D1D43D36D50D57 2 x DCE-MRI Biopsy FDG-PET Tumor Assessment DCE-MRI Biopsy FDG-PET Tumor Assessment Tumor Assess. FDG-PET Screening Cycle 1: DLT AssessmentCycle 2 Tumor TypePatientsGDC-0980 Dose All Tumor Types 38 6 to 200 mg Sarcoma7 4 pts at 25 to100 mg 3 pts at 150 mg GIST6 2 pts at 6 mg 4 pts at 150 or 200 mg

5 5 Safety and Tolerability QD Schedule ScheduleDose (mg) DLTs (n) DLTs / significant SAEs 21d20/ /3- 320/7- 500/6G5 colitis (n=1) 702/8G3 Rash G4 Hyperglycemia G3 sympt. Hyperglyc. G2, G3 pneumonitis (1 each) 400/4- 28d400/14G3, G5 pneumonitis (1 each) 500/5- Dose Escalation Expansion RP2D Drug-related Grade > 3 AEs 40 mg (n=50) Stg. 1 and 2 Any AE26 (52%) Hyperglycemia9 (18%) Rash4 (8%) Diarrhea5 (10%) Fatigue2 (4%) Abnormal LFTs4 (8%) Pneumonia *^4*^ (8%) Pneumonitis ^4^ (8%) Mucosal inflammation3 (6%) Colitis0 (0%) Nausea1 (2%) Stomatitis2 (4%) incl. 2 pts with Pneumonocystis jiroveci Pneumonia ^ Gr 5 AEs: Pneumonitis, Pneumonitis/Pneumonia, Pneumonocystis jiroveci Pneumonia (1 pt each) Additional Gr ≥3 AEs observed at 40 mg QD in 1 patient each: Alopecia, asthenia, dehydration, dry skin, hyperbilirubinaemia, hypoxia, leucocytoclastic vasculitis, lymphopenia, vomiting

6 6 Safety and Tolerability QW Schedule DLT Assessment Dose (mg) DLTs (n) DLTs 60/6- 120/5- 250/3- 500/ / /11G3 Hyperglycemia* 2001/6G3 Hyperglycemia* Drug-related Grade > 3 AEs 150 mg (n=11) 200 mg (n=6) Hyperglycemia4 (36.4)6* (100%) Dysgeusia1 (9.1%)- No Grade ≥3 AE at doses of 6 – 100 mg QW Adverse Events * Includes one event of symptomatic Grade 4 hyperglycemia * defined as a repeated episode of fasting G3 HG that occurred after initiation of oral anti- hyperglycemic therapy

7 7 PK Profile and PI3K Pathway Inhibition QD Schedule # PIK3CA mutant Dose-proportional increases in AUC and Cmax, half-life of 6-18 hours Decreases in pAKT in PRP of ≥ 90% observed at GDC-0980 doses ≥ 16 mg FDG-PET pathway inhibition observed in ~50% pts at RP2D (30 mg, 40 mg) PK Profile pAKT in platelet-rich plasma Best overall FDG-PET response 40 mg Cohort # # # # # # # # PR # # # # % Mean Change SUVmax

8 8 PK Profile and PI3K Pathway Inhibition QW Schedule Dose-proportional increases in AUC and Cmax, half-life of 8-15 hours PK Profile PD on Pre-Postdose Biopsies Robust pathway modulation for both PI3K and mTOR downstream readouts pS6 H-Score Pathology Score 12 mg 25 mg 50 mg pS6pPRAS40pAKT

9 9 Time on Study Sarcoma Patients QD Schedule QW Schedule PEComa Chondrosarcoma Metastatic Diffuse-Type Giant Cell Tumor (PVNS) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Angiosarcoma Myxofibrosarcoma Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Solitary Fibrous Tumor Bone Sarcoma Synovial Sarcoma Chondrosarcoma Epithelioid Sarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Median ToS 2.6m ( m) Median ToS 2.9 m ( m) PTEN loss

10 Tumor Response Sarcoma Patients QD ScheduleQW Schedule PTEN loss

11 Time on Study GIST Patients QD Schedule QW Schedule Median ToS 3.5 m ( m) Median ToS 1.4 ( ) SDH-deficient PDGFRA mutant Exon 9 mutant

12 Tumor Response GIST Patients QD ScheduleQW Schedule

13 Conclusions: Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor GDC-0980  Safety and Tolerability – Generally well tolerated with manageable toxicities on QD and QW schedule  PK/PD – Favorable PK profile – Evidence of target modulation at or below recommended Phase II doses  Activity – Prolonged disease control observed for rare sarcoma and GIST patients  Status  Further evaluation in the Phase Ib (QD schedule) and other Phase II studies (endometrial, renal cell carcinoma) ongoing.  Further study in GIST and selected sarcomas needed

14 Acknowledgements We thank the patients who participated in the study and their families We thank the study teams from the participating sites:  Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA  Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA  Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK  The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK  Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France We thank the contributors from Genentech Inc:  Biostatistics: Ru-Fang Yeh  Pharmacology: Joseph R. Ware, Gillian Smelick  Biomarker: Mark Lackner, Hartmut Koeppen, Yibing Yan