Magnasanti by Vincent Ocasla on SimCity3000. Is it possible to produce a Just Urban Environment? I.« Justice as Fairness », a quick overview of John Rawls’

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Justice & Economic Distribution (2)

Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.

John Rawls A Theory of Justice.

Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy

2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.

Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?

Kristin Mike Olvina Santigo Cassie Carlson Travis Langolf LP5- Ethical Theories Presentation Performance Assessment Task 6 10/27/2009.

Constitutional Economics. The prisoners' dilemma - the benefits of cooperation –Mueller – Theft as a “prisoner’s dilemma” –Why should theft be illegal?

Space, place and society Premise - the urban is a constellation of –spaces, –places and –social practices and planning is a discipline and profession whose.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:

Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,

John Rawls' theory of justice ~ slide 1 John Rawls’ theory of justice zIn A Theory of Justice –1. The basis for the theory äA revised version of.

Ethics, Part 2 Normative Codes. a) DEONTOOGICAL: [161-65] i) DUTY-BASED ii) CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -UNIVERSALIZING ACTS iii) MAXIM OF RESPECT iv) MOTIVES.

RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.

John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.

THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham

Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.

RAWLS 2 CRITIQUES OF RAWLS.

Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.

New interventions into human ageing and social justice Dr. phil. Hans-Joerg Ehni Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tuebingen.

Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.

Andrea Wellenstein, Jill Kollmann, Heather Lammers, and Britni Klein Monday at 1:30-4:30 Ethical Theories Presentations April 6 th, 2010.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Class 11 Slides Shifting From Efficient Allocation to Fair Distribution of Resources If Suppliers Are More Than Passive Actors in the Markets for Health.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons

JUSTICE OR FAIRNESS APPROACH

Ethics Theory and Business Practice

What is Economic Justice? Presented by Dr. Norman R Cloutier, Director, University of Wisconsin-Parkside Center for Economic Education, at WCSS, March.

Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.

Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.

Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.

John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.

JOHN DOE PERIOD 8. AT LEAST 80% OF HUMANITY LIVES ON LESS THAN $10 A DAY.

Prescriptive Approaches to Ethics Geoffrey G. Bell, PhD, CA University of Minnesota Duluth October 2003.

CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.

Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.

Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.

John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.

Consenting Adults Reading By Robert Pollock. Moral Equivalency? American academia and media were rife with the notion that the United States and the Soviet.

Justice Jeopardy From Justice as Fairness: A Restatement written by John Rawls Created By: Abigail Uyan, Bernice Ines, and Laura Feng October 6, 2008.

Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”

Space, Place and Education 1 Maria Rönnlund, Applied Educational Sciences, Umeå university Joint seminar week, University of Sussex,

Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.

University of Papua New Guinea Guest Lecture Lecture: Philosophy of Economics.

WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)

Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.

Political theory and law

Introduction to Politics and International Studies Reach Summer School

History of Philosophy.

Political theory and law

John Rawls Ronald Dworkin

Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance

College of St. Benedict/St John’s University

John Rawls’ theory of justice

Concepts of Geography A Primer…..

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher

Theories of justice.

Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.

Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp The Second Article on Rawls.

Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.

John Rawls Theory of Justice.

Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.

Presentation transcript:

Magnasanti by Vincent Ocasla on SimCity3000

Is it possible to produce a Just Urban Environment? I.« Justice as Fairness », a quick overview of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice. II.How to apply spatially this Rawlsian conception. III.Seeking rationally a Just model of Urban Development.

I. « Justice as fairness » J. Rawls There are 2 Main principles: -A fair repartition of the advantages and burdens of social cooperation -The maximin principle.

II. « Seeking Spatial Justice » E. Soja - Pareto optimality: Nothing can change without damaging the well- being of at least one member of the society. - Territorial Justice: « a form of spatial organization which maximizes the prospects of the least fortunate region. » D. Harvey

III. Thinking a « Distributive Center » -The « veil of ignorance » J. Rawls -The center/periphery dichotomy -« Capitalism has survived by occupying space » H. Lefebvre -From the « Predator center » to the « Distributive Center ».

Bibliography: BRET Bernard, « Interpréter les inégalités socio-spatiales à la lumière de la Théorie de la Justice de John Rawls », Annales de géographie, 2009/1 n° , p SOJA Edward, « Seeking Spatial Justice », University of Minnesota Press, 2010, p75-95 RAWLS John, « A theory of Justice », Belknap Press, 1999, Part 1 « Theory ».