LNF, 20 febbraio 2004 1 R(t) Relations from inclusive MDT tubes drift time distributions M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Behaviour of MicroMega chambers in magnetic field: analysis of H2 June data Outline: (0) Introduction (1) Data set used and noise filtering (2)Cluster.
Advertisements

N.D.GagunashviliUniversity of Akureyri, Iceland Pearson´s χ 2 Test Modifications for Comparison of Unweighted and Weighted Histograms and Two Weighted.
1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,
CSC Simulated Charge Tim Cox, Jay Hauser, Greg Rakness, Rick Wilkinson CSC Charge Simulation1.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Far Detector Timing Calibration Andy Blake Cambridge University November 2004.
FTPC calibration status Joern Putschke for the STAR FTPC group STAR Analysis Meeting 2002 October 22-24, 2002.
Measurement of gas gain fluctuations M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy TPC Jamboree, Orsay, 12/05/2009.
Chamber parameters that we can modify and that affect the rising time Number of ionisation clusters produced in the drift gap: Poisson Distribution Probability.
10 September, 2003Edda Gschwendtner1 TPG Drift Studies Edda Gschwendtner Geneva University/CERN.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Straw spatial resolution (beam test 2007 and 2008) A.Zinchenko, S.Shkarovskiy.
Gas Studies with H8 Water Contamination and Series Effect Flow rate effects Changes in CO2 percentage Air Contamination (2001 measurements)
Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Simulating the Effects of Wire Sag in ATLAS’s Monitored Drift Tubes Ashley Thrall, Vassar College ‘04 Dan Levin, Mentor REU Presentations August 5, 2004.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
LNF, 26 gennaio Test Beam 2003 Data Analysis and MonteCarlo Studies M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati.
BOS Testbeam Results in 2001 MPI & LMU, Munich 1. Drift time spectra 2. RT-relation 3. Resolution - HV & threshold dependance -Comparison with the 1999.
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
Micromegas TPC Results from beam tests 7-module design ILD TPC mechanics and integration D. Attié, M. Carty, P. Colas, G. De Lentdecker, M. Dixit, M. Riallot,
GEM-TPC Resolution Studies ECFA/DESY LC Workshop Prague, November 2002 Dean Karlen University of Victoria / TRIUMF.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
Atsushi Aoza ( saga University ) A Simulation Study of GEM gating at ILC-TPC A.Ishikawa, A.Sugiyama, H.Fujishima, K.Kadomatsu(Saga U.) K.Fujii,M.Kobayashi,
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
29/09/2010 1Wenxin.Wang_EUDET annual workshop D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, M. Riallot, YunHa Shin, S. Turnbull, W. Wang and all the LC-TPC collaboration.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer 1 has ~355,000 drift tubes installed into 1200 precision Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) tracking chambers arrayed over a 22 m high,
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
The effect of surface roughness
1 Design of active-target TPC. Contents I.Physics requirements II.Basic structure III.Gas property IV.Electric field Distortion by ground Distortion of.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Test manual Some important information p. 2-3Some important information p. 2-3 Noise studies p.4-7Noise studies p.4-7 Operation with.
Detailed description of the algorithm used for the simulation of the cluster counting For the studies of CluCou we have used standard programs like MAGBOLTZ,
Adele Rimoldi, Pavia University & INFN – CERN G4usersWorkshop Nov H8 Muon Testbeam Simulation CERN - 14 November, 2002 and the Physics Validation.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Review of Micromegas Tracking Detectors for CLAS12 – May 7, 2009 Reviewers: Madhu Dixit, Mac Mestayer Presentations covered the following topics: –detector.
Tao Peng and Robert J. Le Roy
Single tube detection efficiency BIS-MDT GARFIELD Simulation GARFIELD Simulation Anode wire voltage as a function of the distance from the wire Electric.
FTPC calibration status & plans for Y03 Joern Putschke for the STAR FTPC group STAR Calibration Meeting 2002 November 7, 2002.
meeting, Oct. 1 st 2015 meeting, Oct. 1 st Gas Pixel: TRD + Tracker.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano, Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
KEK Cosmic Tests Run Status + Summary Dan Burke 22/01/06.
A. Calcaterra, R. de Sangro, G. Felici, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo INFN LNF XIII SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session Elba, 30 May.
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Inference concerning two population variances
gamma ray polarisation measurement
Activities on straw tube simulation
Simulation of Properties of COMPASS Drift-Chamber Prototypes
Llea Nasira Samuel Benedict College Charlotte Wood-Harrington
National Technical University of Athens Faculty of Applied Sciences
techniques and studies
Univerity of rome “Tor Vergata”
J/   analysis: results for ICHEP
Design of active-target TPC
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
Update on POLA-01 measurements in Catania
Presentation transcript:

LNF, 20 febbraio R(t) Relations from inclusive MDT tubes drift time distributions M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 2 Outline Introduction Garfield simulation  Drift velocity  R distribution  Arrival time distribution R(t) relation  t0 determination  Results  Residual Conclusions

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 3 R(t) relation determination: the idea Drift velocity is not constant as a function of R: v (E (R) ) In principle the distribution of the tracks with respect to R is flat, BUT:  Cluster fluctuations  Charge fluctuations   -rays  Inefficiency at the borders These effects have to be included in the “autocalibration” procedure Is there an alternative method to define the R – t relation?  We know the time distribution (from data)  We can use the simulation to determine the R distribution R(t) relation is expected to be non-linear, due to the Ar/CO 2 gas mixture and to the radial electric field

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 4 R(t) relation determination: the idea Garfield simulation includes all these effects. Even though Garfield does not reproduce with adequate precision the drift velocity, it allows to determine a “correct” R distribution, independent on the gas mixture (hypothesis to be verified): Recipe: “correct” R distribution Garfield time spectrum + time spectrum from data + = R(t) relation Garfield drift velocity for a given gas mixture = “correct” R distribution

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 5 Garfield: gas mixture Garfield-Magboltz used to calculate properties of three different gas-mixture:  Ar 93%, CO2 7% (standard mixture)  GAS_MIX_1  GAS_MIX_ ppm H20  GAS_MIX_2  Ar (93.25-x)%, CO2 (6.75-x)% + x=100ppm H20  GAS_MIX_3 Use of 100 ppm content of water vapor suggested by previous studies (ATL-COM-MUON )

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 6 Garfield: Drift velocity determination v(E) Determination of the drift velocity starting from given values of the electric field E (V/cm) E fieldv_drift v_drift vs E GAS_MIX_1 Does not require tracking Magboltz

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 7 Drift velocity as a function of R can be automatically determined Using the v(R) function we can calculate the maximum drift time by integration Garfield: Drift velocity determination v(R) Each value of E(V/cm) corresponds to a value of R (cm): E field v_drift R v_drift vs r GAS_MIX_2 GAS_MIX_3

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 8 Garfield: Arrival time distribution MC: GAS_MIX_ tracks t0=0 is the time given by the primary muon threshold: 25 e t is the drift time of the 25 th electron transfer-function (1-t/(2*0.0213))*(t/0.0213)*exp(-t/0.0213)

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 9 Garfield: R distribution R distribution can be determined from the time spectrum and the drift velocity, for each different gas mixture Hypothesis: R distributions should be the same for different gas mixture MC: GAS_MIX_2 Yes! MC: GAS_MIX_1 MC: GAS_MIX_2

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 10 T0 determination MC: GAS_MIX_2 Translate horizontally MC spectra to superimpose it with the data histo Register the value of the shift: t0 =585 counts (BIL2, ml1&ml2) RUN 1559 tmin = 0 tmax = 925 counts tmin = 0 tmax = 925 counts multilayer 1 multilayer 2

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 11 R(t) determination 1) We start with 2 histogram: DATA from t0 to tmax MC from Rmin to Rmax 2) We divide the tmax-tmin interval in n bins, each one containing an equal number of events Ntot/n 3) Similarly, we divide the Rmax-Rmin interval in n bins 4) We use the extreme of all these intervals do define TDC values and R values. 5) The relationship between the corresponding values provide us with the R(t) relation we were looking DATAMC

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 12 R(t) relation: results Garfield+data Calib preliminary

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 13 Residuals for run 1559 cm

LNF, 20 febbraio 2004M. Barone 14 Conclusions An alternative method for the determination of R(t) relations has been proposed. Benefits: a lot of statistics R(t) relation can be determined for each tube no dependence on the tracking method Technical details have to be better investigated and the mechanism has to be tuned “clean” TDC spectra Analysis of more runs MC: more statistics Understand and quantify the limit of this method …..