D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hadron production in hard scattering Event GeneratorGEANT.
Advertisements

Simulations and feasibility studies of low mass vector mesons identification in CBM Jerzy Cibor 1 Rados ł aw Karabowicz 2 Zbigniew Majka 2 Pawe ł Staszel.
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
Open Charm Everard CORDIER (Heidelberg) Grako meeting HD, April 28, 2006Everard Cordier.
Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
INTRODUCTION One of the major experimental challenges of the Compressed Baryonic Matter (CBM) experiment is the measurement of the D-meson hadronic decay.
1 J.M. Heuser et al. CBM Silicon Tracker Requirements for the Silicon Tracking System of CBM Johann M. Heuser, M. Deveaux (GSI) C. Müntz, J. Stroth (University.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 The model: Input Charge generation The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
Monday, April 27, Feasibility of J/ψ measurement in p+A 25GeV Partha Pratim Bhaduri (VECC) Anand Kumar Dubey (VECC) S. Chattopadhyay.
1 Simulations Purpose of the simulation codes Structure of the E866 simulation codes Issues of simulations for E906 Jen-Chieh Peng University of Illinois.
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.
Review and Perspective of Muon Studies Marco Destefanis Università degli Studi di Torino PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI (Germany) September 5-9, 2011.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
Fall DNP Meeting,  meson production in Au-Au and d-Au collision at \ /s NN = 200 GeV Dipali Pal Vanderbilt University (for the PHENIX collaboration)
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
The LHC collider in Geneva
Feasibility of   γγ study with ECAL
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Samples and MC Selection
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Perspectives on strangeness physics with the CBM experiment at FAIR
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal and Background simulation Tracking & Vertexing Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation Trigger feasibility study Outline

Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry SBM framework last edition (3 first Sts in vacuum); "standard" and 700  m thickness STS geometry; 7 stations at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 cm; stations at 5 and10 cm  m others 200  m single Au target 500  m,  = 10  m (double) hit displacement (Gaussian smearing) at CbmStsDoubleHitProducer.cxx GEANT3, UrQmd (25 Gev) and D 0  K -,  + (by V.Friese) generators; no Magnetic Field, but dP/P = 1%

Signal and Background simulation Signal events D 0  K -,  + Background – 10 4 UrQmd events mixed 10 3 events IM(GeV/c 2 )

Tracking & Vertexing Tracking & Vertexing developed by I.Kisel: CbmITrack, CbmStsmctracks2rsegs,CbmStsRefit CbmStsPerformance; CbmStsPrimaryVertex, StsSecondaryVertex    CbmStsAnalysis: Event Topology (MC), RSEGs analysis K (K 0 S ;  0 ;  - ;  - ; D 0 ) K0SK0S 00  - - IM (GeV/c 2 )

Tracking & Vertexing Z v (cm)  = 57  m MC Z v – RECO Z v (cm)

Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation Impact Parameter (IP > 80  m); Z-vertex for D 0  K -,  + (Z 2 > 250  m); P D 0 pointing to the Primary Vertex; P t K -,  + > 0.5 (0.45) GeV; P K -,  + >1.5 GeV;  2 < 5 for the Secondary vertex (cm)

Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation P t K -,  + and P K -,  + cuts optimisation (GeV) Signal Background

Variables and cuts. Cuts optimisation P D 0 pointing to the Primary Vertex cut optimisation SignalBackground  (cm)

Trigger feasibility study Trigger feasibility study 11 events Background 10 4 events IP,P,P t VzVz D 0 pont;  2 all cuts –No Particle ID –realistic tracking and vertexing –~400 reduction factor –~10-3 D0 per event with –BR~3.65% –~900 charged hadrons per event IM (GeV/c 2 )

Trigger feasibility study Trigger feasibility study IM (GeV/c 2 ) MC Reco IP,P,P t cuts Reco all cuts 10 3 mix events: Urqmd+D 0  K -,  + IP,P,P t cuts cut signal  IP K -  + 28 % Z-vertex54 % P D 0 pointing 99 % Pt K-,+Pt K-,+ 61 % P K -,  + 58 % all cuts7.5 % Trig RF~600 S/B ratio~0.8

Outline Outline MC simulation shows feasibility to measure D 0  K - +  + with CBM STS "standard" detector geometry Developed cuts allows to create Trigger model with RF ~ 600 and S/B ratio ~ 0.8 (more with PID) 700  m thickness STS stations study is going on Magnetic Field