TRICARE Regional Appointment Standardization Business Rules Training Seminar Access to Care Management Business Rules (Block 7) David J. Corey, LTC, USA,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conducting Patient Safety Rounds with Staff. First Steps Set the stage –Unit and Hospital Leadership Support –Identify a “champion(s)” for each unit where.
Advertisements

Medical Home Port EMDEC BRIEF
Analysis to support CALEA Standards Prepared by: Christie Goddard.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
P a c i f i c TAOP Operations Chief, Program Operations 2008 TAOP Conference Seoul, Korea Today’s Challenges, Tomorrow’s Solutions.
How Do I Evaluate Workflow?
Enterprise Wide Referral and Authorization System (EWRAS) Business Rule Documentation Training Part 2.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy 1 Briefing: Medical Affirmative Claims ** Navy ** Date: 24 March 2010 Time: 1110 – 1200.
Technician Administration and Responsibilities DT Vol. 1 Chap 2 Facilitated by: HM2 Mancia.
Healthcare Operations Management © 2008 Health Administration Press. All rights reserved. 1.
Church Road Surgery Patient Feedback Questionnaire August 2013.
PACESetters 1 Purchasing Card (P-Card)Practices for a Transparent World presented by the Division of Finance July 1, 2013.
Page 1 Welcome to the TRICARE Regional Appointment Standardization Business Rules Training Seminar and May 2001 The right patient, to the right.
1 Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing The Case Manager’s Guide to Critical Incident.
Promoting high quality, cost effective drug therapy throughout the Military Health System MTF Prescription Restriction Program MTF Prescription Restriction.
Health Budgets & Financial Policy CY 2009 OIB Rate Package Release June 2009 Presented by UBO Project Support Team.
Enrollment and Effect of the TRICARE Dental Plan Among the Military Reserve Component Andrew K. York, CAPT, DC, USN David L. Moss, LTC, USA, DC Susan W.
1 Implementation and Training Provider Taxonomy Changes for HIPAA 837 Claims Processing Audience for Training Database Administrators Clinical users The.
INTERGRATING TB/HIV DATABASES INTERGRATING TB/HIV DATABASES Presenter: DR. LAMECK DIERO.
Improving the Productivity of Your Financial Operations Michael Holton Manager RSM McGladrey, Inc Subhead.
UPMC Matilda Theiss Health Center. UPMC hospital-based clinic  Only federally qualified health center within UPMC Serving a total of 1600 patients 
Use of OCAN in Crisis Intervention Webinar October, 2014.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: Civilian ER Billing Session: T
RECORDKEEPING and HC PROGRAM EVALUATION
The Role of Management Support in Implementing Innovative Clinical Practices Carol VanDeusen Lukas, EdD Mark M. Meterko, PhD David Mohr, PhD Marjorie Nealon.
Performance Dashboard
18 Weeks Referral To Treatment Waiting Times Standard
Application Training — Lead Management System. Slide 2 Module Agenda Module Break-upDuration (minutes) Lesson 1: Introduction to Lead Management System10.
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation Oregon Oregon Hillsboro Pediatric Clinic, LLC Hillsboro Pediatric Clinic,
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
Evaluating Tuberculosis Surveillance and Action in an Urban and Rural Setting Kristine Lykens, Ph.D. In collaboration with Anita Kurian, MPH, MBBS Patrick.
Confidential: Quality Improvement Material Case Management In a Primary Care Setting.
Day Weighted Resident Rosters New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services AND July-August 2010.
Naval Health Care New England COMMAND ORIENTATION TRICARE BRIEF HEALTH CARE OPERATIONS NOV 2005.
1 IMPLEMENTING INTERPRETING SERVICES Lourdes Sanchez, MS Manager, Medical Interpreter Services, United States Amsterdam, December 2004.
The Challenge and the Goal: Regaining the Custody/Control of Outpatient Medical Records.
Copyright © 2011, 2009, 2003 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 3 Appointment Scheduling.
TRICARE ON LINE (TOL) REGISTRATION & APPOINTMENTS Start date: 1 Nov 08 Updated 30 Oct 08.
HIPAA Presentation Washington D.C April 26, 2002 Presenter: Alice Polley, Vice President Clinical Services, Integrity Officer.
Encounter Data Validation: Review and Project Update August 25, 2015 Presenters: Amy Kearney, BA Director, Research and Analysis Team Thomas Miller, MA.
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
ANNOUNCEMENTS  Register for the Monthly Disease Surveillance Trainings to receive CMEs/CNEs: 1. Log-on or Request log-on ID/password:
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy Briefing: Strategic Plans for UBO Date: 24 March 2010 Time: 0800–0850.
1 Advanced Access Basics; Demand and Supply Calculations Catherine Tantau Tantau & Associates PO Box 179 Chicago Park, California,
Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable Robert J. Simione Managing Principal Simione Healthcare Consultants HOSPICE.
Building a Healthier Prince George’s County PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH ENTERPRISE ZONE Pamela B. Creekmur Health Officer Dr. Ernest.
Patient Centered Medical Home and Data Quality July 2015 “Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force” 1 Tri-Service Primary Care Advisory Board.
MHSA OMA Forms Overview Rev. 3/02/10. Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Child / Youth Ages 0-15 Transition Age Youth Ages Transition Age Youth Ages
Module 2: DEERS. Module Objectives After this module, you should be able to: Explain the purpose of DEERS Identify who determines TRICARE eligibility.
Improving specialty access with budget restrictions and limited staffing has been one of the major challenges while implementing.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Clerical & Support Staff Introduction to Moving ON Audits & Clinical Indicators.
How to collect monthly and quarterly quality indicators and enter data on-line Residential Care Program (click on the ▼button to continue this presentation)
Appointments summary Lawley Medical Practice 02Nov15.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MAC Billing — Navy Session: W
Oral Health Integration in Well Child Care A Collaboration of Group Health Cooperative, Washington Dental Service and WDS Foundation.
Lab Only Visits LAB for Non-Laboratorians Resource Patient Management System.
NEPF-ALIGNED STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION By Ms. Amanda Byrd.
System Implementation & Support
Student Support Study Methodology Training
Dr Chris Schofield Clinical Lead Liaison and CRHT
Sales Proposal for Prospect
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
Vascular Access Care Educating staff and patients on importance of receiving preventive vascular access care.
Recognize Excellence & Development
Naval Health Care New England COMMAND ORIENTATION TRICARE BRIEF
Beth Engelking, Assistant Commissioner Adult Protective Services
Advice & guidance.
Recognize Excellence & Development
Greetings! Tracy Garceau Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies
Presentation transcript:

TRICARE Regional Appointment Standardization Business Rules Training Seminar Access to Care Management Business Rules (Block 7) David J. Corey, LTC, USA, MS, FACHE Senior Program Analyst Health Services Operations Support, Program Operations, TRICARE Management Activity (703) / DSN

Page 2 Agenda  What does Access To Care do?  What are the business rules?  What are some of this systems problems?  What is happening with operational testing of the Access To Care functionality  What is being done to ensure that it is measured accurately?  What can sites do now to measure access?

Page 3 What does ATC do?  Since July 2000 a new functionality has been in CHCS.  Determines accessibility of medical care relative to Access to Care Standards for patient appointments booked in CHCS.  Evaluates compliance based on the 1999 Defense Authorization Act.  Measures time between the appointment request and the time of the “Booked” appointment.  Reports number and percentage of appointments which meet or do not meet the Access to Care Standard.

Page 4 What does ATC do?

Page 5 What does ATC do?  Measures appointment request times in:  Order Entry: Date/time appointment order entered/activated (CON,CLN,APR,ANC)  MCP: Date/time referral entered or date/time PCM appointment requested/made  PAS: Date/Time appointment requested/made  Wait list: Date/time of wait list request

Page 6 What does ATC do?  Information gathered:  Determines number of appointments and percentage of appointments which meet or do not meet the Access to Care Standard by:  MTF, Division, Department, Clinic, Provider  TRICARE designation  Captures patient refusal reason. Registers when patient was offered an appointment within the access standard but refused due to personal preferences  Patient refusal reason captured in separate category

Page 7 What does ATC do?  It provides a quantitative measure of each appointment transaction as it occurs  Provides real-time measure of an MTF’s ability to meet access standards for acute, routine, specialty and wellness care services that it provides  Augments the TRICARE Management Activity’s satisfaction survey of beneficiaries’ perception of how access was met

Page 8 What Does ATC Do?  Congress mandates with the Defense Authorization Act of 1999 that the Department of Defense must meet prescribed Access Standards for the care it provides its beneficiaries:  Acute Care: within 24 hours  Routine Care: within 7 days  Specialty Care: within 4 weeks  Wellness Care: within 4 weeks  ATC measure if standards are met

Page 9 Data Element Changes, Conversions, and File & Table Build  Access to Care Reporting  New field added to identify clinics included in Access to Care reporting.  Conversion defaulted the value in this new field to “Yes”.  Access to Care Category File  New file for Access to Care Categories  (Acute, Routine, Wellness, Specialty, Future Request)  Access to Care Category of Appointment  New field added to Patient Appointment file to capture the Access to Care Category of each “Booked” appointment.

Page 10 Data Element Changes, Conversions, and File & Table Build  Appointment Refusal Reason  Existing field  Conversion to add appointment refusal reason code: “ATC Declined - Patient preference”  Appointment Not Made -Time-out  Existing field.  Conversion to default the value in the Appointment Not Made Time-out to a maximum of 72 hours.

Page 11

Page 12 Access to Care Summary Report Definitions

Page 13 ATC Business Rules  Each MTF will need to identify Clinics (e.g. Primary Care) which they wish to include in Access to Care reporting. Turn the reporting flag to yes.  If reporting flag is turned to “no” information is still gathered and stored, but not reported.

Page 14 ATC Business Rules  The appointment request time will be based on the earliest time the appointment was requested, (e.g. when a patient is placed on a waitlist, when an appointment is requested via Order Entry, when an MCP referral is entered, or when a patient calls to request an appointment).  The date/time of the “Booked” appointment will be considered the date/time that the MTF’s obligation to provide care is met.

Page 15 ATC Business Rules  Some human intervention is required.  Human beings to include the PAS booking clerk, Health Care Finder, Triage Nurse will be required determined the needs of another human being, the patient, and select the appropriate access to care category that matches that need.  The provider decides when a patient should be seen when making a referral.

Page 16 ATC Business Rules (What does ATC really do?)  For Acute it searches for 24 hours worth of all appointments and types and reports if met, not met  For Routine it searches for 7 days worth of all appointments and types and reports if met, not met  For Wellness it searches for 30 days worth of all appointments and types and reports if met, not met  For Specialty it searches for 30 days worth of all appointments and types and reports if met, not met  For Future Request it searches for 90 days of all appointments and types and does not report, not met

Page 17 Information Uses  TMA wants to use ATC data to augment the satisfaction data contained in the TRICARE Operations Performance Statement survey  MTFs can use information to determine if access to care standards are being met  At the present time there is very little use of the data at MTFs

Page 18  Alpha test to improve accuracy of Access To Care data began on 1 January 2001 at three test sites:  Army: MEDDAC Fort Riley  Navy: NH Jacksonville  Air Force: Keesler Medical Center  Test lasts for 5 months.  Meeting every two weeks.  Completion will be 5-6 June. Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 19  Army, Navy, Air Force MTF involvement with appointment officer, appointment supervisor, appointments personnel, systems administrators.  Service headquarters, TRICARE Regions  TMA HPA&E, CITPO, TMA IMD, TMA APS Program Management. Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 20  Goals:  Establish if ATC data are accurate and what can be done to improve  Establish if data can be transmitted, stored and analyzed  Recommend systems change requests for the ATC functionality in CHCS  Develop MHS policy on the accurate collection, personnel education and reporting of ATC data Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 21  Preliminary research/review of data indicates:  All sites are collecting data.  If flag is turned off, then the clinic’s ATC data are not reported.  The 30 day search is wrong. It should be 4 weeks/28 days.  Consult tracking uses priority categories that do not correspond to the ATC Summary Report Categories  ASAP, Today, Emergency in CT maps to Acute  48 and 72 hours in CT maps to Routine  Routine in CT maps to Wellness Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 22  Accuracy of ATC data are dependent upon search  Appointments personnel are pressured to search for as many appointments as possible  Keesler AFB shows that 86 percent of searches are future  The future searches ARE NOT reported anywhere in the ATC Summary Report.  Cannot determine if numbers of searches relatively matches visits. Future is not included.  Two examples of the accuracy of ATC searches and why they are dependent on appointment personnel: Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 23 An Example Beneficiary calls wanting routine appointment (7 Day ATC Standard) Appointment operator does a routine search for 7 days of appointments Routine appointment available within 7 days? No Appointment found but did not meet access standards Yes Routine Appointment Found W/I 7 days. Meets the access standard Appointment Provided Stop Positive event, MTF meets routine standard Negative event, MTF does not meet routine standard CHCS/ Fort Detrick Data Base, Accurate Reports

Page 24 Another Example Posi- tive event, high proba- bility Beneficiary calls wanting routine appointment (7 Day ATC Standard) Appointment operator does a wellness search for 30 days of appointments Routine appointment available within 30 days? No Appointment found but did not meet access standard Yes Routine Appointment Found w/I 13 days, meets the access standard Appointment Provided Stop Negative Event, low probability CHCS/ Fort Detrick Data Base, Inaccurate Reports

Page 25  Impress on staff that accuracy of ATC data is important.  Appointments personnel education is critical.  Appointments searches must be based on patient’s needs.  Compare ATC Summary Report with a report similar to TAT.  Business rules would need to be created to “match” standardized appointment types to ATC categories.  Standard business rules and use of info=high quality data.  Several systems change requests will be required. Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 26  SCRs to be recommended:  Have the Future Searches reported in the ATC Summary Report. This has been completed.  Change the Wellness/Specialty 30 day search to 28 days  Change the CT priorities to allow for 24 hour, 72 hour and 30 day priorities and measure if met and report separately  Change the reports so that all ATC categories are reported by clinic, not clinics reported by ATC categories  Tie the day search to the appointment type to the ATC category Operational/Alpha Test For Access to Care

Page 27  Use guidance furnished in Appendix R to train your staff on appointment definitions and ATC categories  Impress on staff that accurate searches are important  Map your appointment types to the ATC categories  Convert to standardized appointment types  Appointments searches based on patient’s needs  The more you use data, the higher quality it attains. Print off reports by clinic and give them out to providers.  Review ATC Summary Reports with walk-ins, sick call and compare with the WWR. How Do You Keep the System Honest? What can you do now?

Page 28 ATC Categories Mapped to APS Types Page 28

Page 29 ATC and Appointment Standardization  Future strategy is to tie the day search to the appointment type to the ATC category  Should decrease the possibility of gaming of the present ATC program and simplify the process for appointments personnel.  TMA plans to use ATC for access measurement in conjunction with TOPS.  TMA TOC is exploring the production of ATC Reports.

Page 30 What we have search is for 7 days of appointments, any type Routine Search 7 days (1 Nov) Gives the clerk: Nov 1ROU Nov 1ACU Nov 1NEW Nov 2FOL Nov 2!NW Nov 3PAP Nov 4!AC Nov 4FOL Nov 5ROU Nov 5!ROU Nov 6FOL Nov 6FOL Nov 7ROU Nov 7FU Clerk picks: Nov 1ROU Nov 1ACU Nov 1NEW Nov 2FOL Nov 2!NW Nov 3PAP Nov 4!AC Nov 4FOL Nov 5ROU Nov 5!ROU Nov 6FOL Nov 6FOL Nov 7ROU Nov 7FU Appt booked with !AC on 4 Nov No relation between the Appt Type & ATC Category Result: ATC Category of 7 days is met!

Page 31 What we need search is for 7 days of appointment, routine type Routine Search 7 days (1 Nov) Gives the clerk: Nov 1ROUT Nov 2ROUT Nov 3ROUT Nov 4ROUT Nov 5ROUT Nov 5ROUT Nov 6ROUT Nov 6ROUT Nov 7ROUT Clerk picks: Nov 1ROUT Nov 2ROUT Nov 3ROUT Nov 4ROUT Nov 5ROUT Nov 5ROUT Nov 6ROUT Nov 6ROUT Nov 7ROUT Appt booked with ROUT on 4 Nov Alignment between the Appt Type & ATC Category Result: ATC Category is met!

Page 32  ATC gives Commanders, MTFs, Lead Agents and the Services access to care performance measurement now.  ATC and Appointment Standardization have the same goals.  Accurate measurement is key to success.  Both have the same timelines for implementation.  ATC is the TMA sanctioned solution to quantitatively measure performance.  Appointment standardization combined with ATC utilization will align demand management, optimization and feedback in one package. Conclusion