OPTICAL ARCHITECTURES FOR MOBILE BACK- AND FRONTHAULING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C-RAN: the Next Big Thing after LTE
Advertisements

International Telecommunication Union Workshop on End-to-End Quality of Service.What is it? How do we get it? Geneva, 1-3 October 2003 Are Existing Performance.
Heavy Reading Packet-Optical Transport Evolution – May 19, NYC Ralph Santitoro Carrier Ethernet Market Development
Hardware Impairments in Large-scale MISO Systems
Ralph Santitoro Carrier Ethernet Market Development 22 March 2011 Connection-Oriented Ethernet for Cloud-based Unified Communications.
The role of virtualisation in the dense wireless networks of the future Sokol Kosta CINI.
ECE 5221 Personal Communication Systems Prepared by: Dr. Ivica Kostanic Lecture 24 – Basics of 3G – UMTS (3) Spring 2011.
Final Year Project Presentation FYP 08 Arsalan Tariq Mir Saad Najeeb Syed Ammar Faheem.
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation
Scheduling in Wireless Systems. 2 CDMA2000: Overall Architecture Mobile Station.
Data Communications and Networking
- PON Architecture for Wireless Backhaul October 28, 2009 Paul Wilford.
All rights reserved © 2001, Alcatel, Paris. ITG-Fachgruppe „IP und Mobility“ Kamp-Lintfort, 20 June 2001 Multistandard Radio Access Network for Wireless.
Aida BotonjićTieto1 LTE Aida Botonjić. Aida BotonjićTieto2 Why LTE? Applications: Interactive gaming DVD quality video Data download/upload Targets: High.
12/10/2006ConfidentialSlide 1 Video Streaming over UMTS: practical issues Stefan Rugel, Klaus Schäfer February 2008.
Emerging Technologies in Wireless LANs. Replacement for traditional Ethernet LANs Several Municipalities Portland, OR Philadelphia, PA San Francisco,
Introducing the Specifications of the MEF
A. Paulraj Stanford University & Iospan Wireless Broadband Wireless The MIMO Advantage Wireless Internet and Mobile Computing SNRC/Accel Symposium Stanford.
Wireless Internet Center for Advanced Technology NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Center Challenges and Impact of User-provided Networking.
Wireless Ethernet Backhaul : A Carrier’s Perspective
Transport SDN: Key Drivers & Elements
Ralph Santitoro March 25, 2010 Delivering Next-Generation Services How Packet Optical Networking and Connection-Oriented Ethernet Are Changing Metro Networks.
Copyright: Valiant Communications Limited Slide 1 2 x E1/T1 over Ethernet Multiplexer (TDMoIP) 2 x E1/T1 over Ethernet Multiplexer (TDMoIP) Product.
Pooria Kamran Rashani Advanced Requirements Engineering Spring 2012.
1 Introduction to Optical Networks. 2 Telecommunications Network Architecture.
Slide 1 Backhauling the world for next generation mobile networks Lance Hiley, Cambridge Broadband Networks.
CPRI-T (Fronthaul through transport of CPRI signal from RRH to the C-RAN baseband.) Jishnu Aravindakshan.
Chapter 7- Mobile and Wi-Fi Networks Taking signals on and off the air Connections to other networks Need to manage spectrum Managing and billing for services.
Grant agreement n° Convergence of Heterogeneous Network and IT infrastructures in Support of Fixed and Mobile Cloud Services.
1 William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
L.R.He, B.M.G. Cheetham Mobile Systems Architecture Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, M13 9PL, U.K.
All Rights Reserved, Copyright©2008, FUJITSU LIMITED. and FUJITSU LABORATORIES LIMITED. REV Technology Considerations for LTE-Advanced 3GPP TSG.
____ __ ____ _____ ____ ______ _____ _____ ____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth.
Wireless Cloud GENi-FIRE Workshop Washington D.C. September 17 th, 2015 Ivan Seskar WINLAB (Wireless Information Network Laboratory) Rutgers University.
Wide Area Networks. Wide Area Networks WAN Bridging of any distance Usually for covering of a country or a continent Topology normally is irregular due.
® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved 1 ® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved ADTRAN & Smart Grid January 21, 2010 Kevin Morgan Director, Product Marketing.
Connecting in the Wireless Networks ACE-RUS School & Symposium May 7, 2012.
1 | © 2015 Infinera Network Evolution – What is happening to our metro networks and why? Sten Nordell CTO Metro Business Group.
ARQ Proxy (for WiFi networks) Ischia island, Italy Sept. 11, 2007 Dzmitry Kliazovich Nadhir Ben Halima Fabrizio Granelli University of Trento, Italy.
3GPP2 LTE Workshop SEOUL, Korea, 27 th– 28 th June GPP LTE Status Status Source Source 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman ETSI TC MSG Chairman.
3GPP2 Evolution Workshop Multimedia Codecs and Protocols 3GPP2 TSG-C SWG1.2.
1. 2 WP-CDMA Distinguishing Features 1.Uplink Common Packet Channel (All Rates) Common Packet Channel will transport all data rates up to and including.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 ALCATEL-LUCENT SHANGHAI BELL. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. lightRadio TM Network MH Wireless Brieifing Center.
Introduction to Telecommunications, 2/e By M.A.Rosengrant Copyright (c) 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 28–1 A next generation.
Burst Transmission, Burst Switching and Dynamic Circuit Switching Prof. Leonid Kazovsky, PNRL Stanford presented by 리준걸 INC Lab. Seoul Nat’l.
HSPA/HSDPA (Beyond 3G) PRESENTED BY- NEHA ANAND NUPUR ANAND ROLL NO-50 ROLL NO-55.
June 9, 2011 MAKING INNOVATION WORK FOR YOU: WIRELESS DATA, SMALL CELLS.
1 Wireless Networks Lecture 21 WCDMA (Part I) Dr. Ghalib A. Shah.
LTE Introduction Tzu-chin Liu 15th March 2012.
Presentation Title Rethink Fronthaul for UCN PresenterDr. Chih-Lin I SessionSession #6: Strategic Topic #2: 5G Document Name/Version GSC20_Session#6_5G_Chih_IEEE.
Goals and objectives Project(s): MBH IA Phase 4 Transport for 5G Networks Purpose of the contribution: Input to MBH IA Phase 4 Abstract: Overview on the.
Mobile Ethernet-based Networking and Transport Services
Examining the Fronthaul Network Segment on the 5G Road Why Hybrid Optical WDM Access and Wireless Technologies are required? Philippe Chanclou, Sebastien.
D-RAN In-Building Systems
LTE Long Term Evolution
Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
NITRD Complex Engineered Networks Panel II: What are the grand challenges in networking methodologies? Robert Doverspike (AT&T Labs – Research) Sept 20-21,
DETNET crosshauling requirements draft-bernardos-detnet-crosshaul-requirements Carlos J. Bernardos (UC3M), Antonio de la Oliva (UC3M), Luca Cominardi (InterDigital),
教育部補助「行動寬頻尖端技術跨校教學聯盟第三期計畫-行動寬頻網路與應用-小細胞基站聯盟中心」 Cloud RAN: 雲端無線接取網路與應用 課程單元:LTE Fronthaul and Backhaul Architecture (Draft) 計畫主持人:許蒼嶺 授課教師:萬欽德 教材編撰:編撰人.
draft-huang-detnet-xhaul-00
ARQ Proxy for Cross-Layer Error Control Optimization in 3G LTE
P802.1CM Time-Sensitive Networking for Fronthaul
Jinseok Choi, Brian L. Evans and *Alan Gatherer
LTE Long Term Evolution
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
An Overview on LTE.
Mobile Synchronization Trends 4G to 4.5G to 5G
RAN Functional Decomposition the options and interfaces…
XRAN (eCPRI) S-Plane Sync Update
Standardization and Innovations from Emerging Markets The Road Ahead
Presentation transcript:

OPTICAL ARCHITECTURES FOR MOBILE BACK- AND FRONTHAULING Thomas Pfeiffer, Frank Schaich - Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs Stuttgart OFC/NFOEC wireless backhauling workshop - Los Angeles, 5.3.2012

Backhauling or fronthauling ? EPC : Evolved Packet Core BBU : Baseband Unit RAN : Radio Access Network core network metro cell (200 m diam.) EPC centralized BBU IP backhaul CPRI fronthaul macro cell (1 km diam.) conventional RAN cloud RAN IP backhaul or CPRI fronthaul ? = conventional RAN or cloud RAN ? … most likely both of them

Choice of transmission technology : optical only Fiber transmission systems protocol : IP, CPRI, others (digital; RoF not considered here) direct or over PON, Ethernet, … multiplexing : TDM, WDM, TWDM, … topology : ptp, ptmp, ring architecture: dedicated ? overlay ? shared with FTTx ? Metrics technical metrics : bandwidth (scaleability, user statistics), latency, jitter environmental factors : temperature, humidity, mechanical location factors : availability of local powering, footprint, accesseability economic metrics : infrastructure : ownership, availability of dark fibers, digging cost, leasing cost, opportunity for sharing location factors : power supply and power consumption, rights of way

Backhauling and fronthauling bandwidth in LTE IP peak bandwidth per site typ. for macro cell CPRI bandwidth per site * 8/15 in case of WCDMA typ. for macro cell IP backhauling = variable bitrate antennas may be grouped (e.g. beamforming) : each group counts as one single element - user traffic statistics apply : - shown above are achievable peak rates on air i/f - avged. values may be less by an order of mag CPRI fronthauling = constant bitrate - each antenna counts separately (individual streams) - 8B/10B can be removed for transport over Ethernet compression can be applied to reduce to 1:3

Impact from traffic statistics Backhaul and fronthaul network dimensions and architecture shall account for traffic statistics traffic statistics per cell  statistical multiplex gain on IP backhaul variations of total cell traffic over the day  load sharing (pooling gain) in cloud RAN taken from Alcatel-Lucent Technology lightRadioTM White Paper „Economic analysis“ (2011)

Latency in LTE : limited by synchronous UL HARQ The allowed RRH eNB transmission time is limited to <<1 msec It comes at the expense of a reduced processing time in the eNB n Orig. TX n+4 n+8 NACK 1st RTX UE eNB t [ms] 3 msec fixed delay defined by LTE standard eNB processing 1. PHY: UL frame decoding 2. MAC: ACK/NACK creation 3. PHY: DL frame creation n Orig. TX n+4 n+8 NACK 1st RTX UE eNB reduced time for eNB processing t [ms] RRH round trip time (10 µsec / km) + transport system processing time

IP backhaul by 10G-PON : urban area, macro cells Serving area around traditional CO 32 macro cells, backhauled by single dedicated 10G-PON - peak rate = 10Gbps per site;  sufficient even for extreme loads - average rate = 320 Mbps per site  can be increased by using multiple 10G-PONs, WDM-stacked - link length = 20 km  reaches any site within the area over realistic cable routes Possible migration towards serving from consolidated Super-CO via WDM stacking : hybrid WDM/TDM long reach 10G-PONs (cf. PIEMAN, MUSE, SARDANA for example architectures + upcoming NGPON2 standardisation for specs (tbd) ) max. 20 km power splitter Central Office eNBs 1 4 Router 2 8 OLT ONT CO serving area: diam. 6 km macro cell: diam. 1 km

IP backhaul (ct‘d) : urban area, macro + metro cells Scenario: serving area around CO with 32 macro cells: 10G peak / 320M avge.  10G-PON, 1:32 split (3 sectors * 8 antennas * 100 MHz) (XGPON1 or XGPON2) 16 metros per macro : 1.7G peak / 26M avge.  8 x GPON, 1:64 split each (1 sector * 4 antennas * 100 MHz) (stacking via low cost WDM) low cost WDM-PON by cyclic wavelength allocation within 40 nm band  cf. Pöhlmann, Pfeiffer: ECOC 2011, paper We.9.C.1 CO serving area: diam. 6 km macro cell: diam. 1 km metro cells max. 20 km hybrid splitter: 10G - power splitter GPON - cyclic AWG Central Office eNBs 1 2 8 metro (8 x 64) macro (32 x) 10G-PON GPON macro area 16 dipl exer power splitter l 10G + lj GPON 4 Router WDM1r (diplexer) GPON #1 … #8 10G PON cyclic AWG OLTs

Centralized processing : variants and benefits BBU clustering : move BBU hardware from BTS into common central space simplified hardware at antenna sites (footprint, electrical power) and in BBU (indoor specs) „zero latency“ links between BBUs allow for implementing CoMP and ICIC algorithms BBU pooling : share hardware elements between multiple colocated BBUs additional benefit : ease of load-sharing between clusters Either variant requires CPRI links to remote antenna sites transmission bandwidths easily reach levels that render TDM-PON unattractive small split factors (1:2 or 1:4) constant bitrate, i.e. no statistical multiplex gain strict latency limits (<<1 msec) require zero framing/buffering etc. delays most viable solutions employ ptp-links via fiber, if available … wavelength : ptp-WDM overlay on TDM-PON or „pure“ WDM-PON

CPRI fronthaul via WDM overlay on LR-PON (ACCORDANCE project) MCO … Metro Central Office RN … remote node

Enable BBU pooling, but not via CPRI : alternatives IP backhauling core network EPC classical eNB PDCP RLC RF MAC PHY BIP variable increased optical link bandwidth split within L2 core network EPC central unit (cluster) PDCP RLC MAC slim eNB RF PHY ≥ BIP variable split within L1 core network EPC central unit (cluster) PDCP RLC MAC PHY extended RRH RF e.g. 0.2 * BCPRI fixed CPRI fronthauling core network EPC central unit (cluster) PDCP RLC MAC PHY CPRI RRH RF BCPRI fixed - simpler remote unit - possible pooling gains

Back-Up

Conventional Approach Example XG-PON1 upstream, 4 Wavelength Subbands SB1 – SB4 1260nm 1265nm 1270nm 1275nm 1280nm Wavelength band is separated in four subbands for wavelength stacking Randomly distributed DFB laser wavelengths in the 20nm band 1260nm 1265nm 1270nm 1275nm 1280nm DFB laser wavelength can be tuned by heating or cooling by ≈ 0.08nm/K. Tuning range up to 3nm.

TWDM 40/10G with ultra-low cost WDM upstream (ALU proposal, ECOC 2011) wavelength sets WSDM (wavelength set division multiplexing) Operational principle: - cyclic optical filter at Rx, 50 or 100 GHz grid narrow range Tx tuneability instead of full band accomplished by integrated heater stripe (no TEC) otherwise conventional transmitter technology Downstream : 4 x 10G TDM DWDM channels, 100GHz spacing, 1575-1580nm band - OLT : l-stabilised DFB transmitter - ONU : FP based tunable filter Upstream : 4 x 2.5G TDMA wavelength sets, 50GHz grid, 1260-1280nm band - OLT : filtered with cylical AWG - ONU : partially tunable DFB with integrated heater