IN THE NAME OF GOD. CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC If there is a Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies with low FPR at first trimester? If we can.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antenatal Screening Dr Emma Parry CMFM
Advertisements

Stephanie Cooper, MD FRCSC Beyond Aneuploidy- Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes with First Trimester Screening: PAPP-A Prediction of Adverse Obstetrical.
Screening “the systematic application of a test procedure to identify individuals at sufficient risk to warrant diagnostic investigations” CVS 12wks Amniocentesis.
Care of the pregnant woman Year 2 Lent term. The Case 38 year old booked at 12 weeks gestation in the antenatal clinic Expecting her third baby 1 st baby.
Genetic Testing in Pregnancy
Second-trimester maternal serum screening
Towards Early Biochemical Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy in the First Trimester Niels Tørring 1, Olav B Petersen 2 1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry,
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحیم Hypertension in pregnancy R.Mohammadjafari.MD.Gynecologist.
Genetics and Primary Care
Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome: Where Do We Stand Today? David B. Fox, MD Riverside Methodist Hospital.
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
Special Tutorial Programme Professor Deirdre Murphy Trinity College.
GP Shared Care Maternal screening for adverse pregnancy outcome 14th March 2015 Dr Rosalie Grivell Consultant Obstetrician and Maternal Fetal Medicine.
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
NON – INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING
Prenatal Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Anomalies By: Linda DeFranco.
Enhanced Prenatal Screening Program
Pregnancy & Newborn Screening Developments
Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD November  Some 1- 2% of babies will have a major disability that dates from the prenatal period  Either  Chromosomal.
Photo: courtesy Travel Alberta.  The provision of information for individuals  Women have the right to access information about the health of their.
Introduction  Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal death.  Handicap in children and the vast majority of mortality and morbidity relates.
Women’s health in pregnancy and post- partum Michelle Wise BSc MD FRCSC MSc Senior Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, U of A Consultant.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Retrospective Analysis of Amniocentesis in UKMMC ZulidaR, MAJamil Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang,
First Trimester Screening
The State of Ohio Universal Prenatal Booking David S. McKenna, MD, RDMS Maternal-Fetal Medicine Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton OH.
Objectives Goals of the week scanGoals of the week scan Fetal nuchal translucency in the detection of aneuploidyFetal nuchal translucency in.
National Women’s Screening for Aneuploidy Dr Emma Parry CMFM Clinical Director Maternal-Fetal Medicine National Women’s Health.
In the name of god First Trimester Screening Dr.M.Moradi.
Is Antenatal Care Worthwhile? Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
UOG Journal Club: August 2011
The Antenatal clinic Year 2 Lent Term. For each of the cases Think about the factors which might affect the pregnancy or labour Make some recommendations.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations for Undergraduates
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Fetal outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital abnormality: A Retrospective study” Vallikkannu Narayanan.
VI. Hrvatski kongres o ginekološkoj endokrinologiji, humanoj reprodukciji i menopavzi s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem , Brijuni DARIJA STRAH.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and different reference ranges: Does it really matter? Lo W., Mustafa.
Vajiheh Marsoosi, M.D Associate Professor of TUMS Shariati Hospital.
The Role of Prenatal screening as part of Routine Obstetric Care
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)
HIGHER HUMAN BIOLOGY Unit 2 Physiology and Health 1. Ante-natal Screening.
Erika Castro, PGY 3 Cook County-Loyola-Provident Family Medicine Residency 2/27/2014 PRENATAL SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS COUNSELING
Dr Shuhaila Ahmad Associate Professor FetoMaternal Unit UKMMC.
Definition & Risk Factors of FGR FGR, also called IUGR is the term used to describe a fetus that has not reached its growth potential because of genetic.
Genetic Testing in Pregnancy Lisbeth M. Lazaron, MD March 2013.
Non-invasive Prenatal Testing
UOG Journal Club: January 2016 Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results.
UOG Journal Club: March 2016 Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of.
UOG Journal Club: July 2013 Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies M. M. Gil, M. S. Quezada, B. Bregant,
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
a systematic review and meta-analysis
Challenges of screening for fetal abnormalities
UOG Journal Club: February 2017
UOG Journal Club: June 2017 Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: comparison with NICE.
UOG Journal Club: July 2016 Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of preterm birth: a prospective cohort study J Min, HA Watson, NL Hezelgrave,
UOG Journal Club: January 2016
UOG Journal Club: March 2016
Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre
UOG Journal Club: May 2017 Increased nuchal translucency thickness and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders S.G. Hellmuth, L.H. Pedersen, C.B. Miltoft,
UOG Journal Club: May 2017 Increased nuchal translucency thickness and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders S.G. Hellmuth, L.H. Pedersen, C.B. Miltoft,
DO NOT ORDER at any gestational age.
Jeffrey A. Kuller, MD; Sean C. Blackwell, MD
UOG Journal Club: April 2017
UOG Journal Club: July 2012 Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation and risk of pre-eclampsia A. Khalil, R. Akolekar, A. Syngelaki, M. Elkhouli.
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts
UOG Journal Club: October 2018
Prenatal Screening for Genetic Conditions
Expert Perspectives on NIPT
NON – INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING
IN THE NAME OF GOD First trimester screening for aneuploidy
UOG Journal Club: September 2019
UOG Journal Club: October 2019
Presentation transcript:

IN THE NAME OF GOD

CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC If there is a Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies with low FPR at first trimester? If we can predict some adverse obstetrics outcomes like diabetes,macrosomia,preterm delivery at first trimester?

Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies M. M. Gil, M. S. Quezada, B. Bregant, M. Ferraro, K. H. Nicolaides Volume 42, Issue 1, Date: July 2013, pages 34–40

Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013 To explore the feasibility of routine maternal blood cfDNA testing in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 at 10 weeks’ gestation. Objective

Patients and Methods Prospective observational study Singleton pregnancy and live fetus with CRL 32–45 mm Women attending The Fetal Medicine Centre, London, between October 2012 and April 2013, were screened for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 by cfDNA testing at 10 wks and the combined test at 12 wks Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013

Clinical visit at 10 weeks: CRL Maternal blood sample Clinical visit at 12 weeks: Ultrasound scan:CRL,NT,NB,TR,DV,major abnormalities Pretest counseling Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013

Patients and Methods Protocol for pregnancy management according to results of maternal blood cfDNA testing and the combined test Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013 cfDNA test result for risk for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 High risk Low risk No result All cases NT>3.5 mm or major defects High risk on combined test CVS at 12 weeks Anomaly scan at 20 weeks for all Growth scan at 32 weeks for all Further management Additional scan at 28 wks if: PAPP-A <0.3 MoM Additional scan at 16 wks if: Fetal NT >3.5 mm TR, abnormal DV a-wave

Results Median maternal age of 37 (range 20-49) years; 98% had results within 14 days Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013 Presentation at 10 weeks (n=1111) CRL <32 mm (n=64; 5.8%) CRL >45 mm (n=50; 4.5%) Miscarriage (n=46; 4.1%) Twins (n=6; 0.9%) No trisomy (n=940) Trisomy 21 (n=11) Trisomy 18 (n=5) Trisomy 13 (n=1) No result (n=48; 4.8%) Result (n=27; 67.5%) Appropriate (n=941; 84.7%) cfDNA testing (n=1005) Inappropriate (n=170; 15.3%) Result (n=775; 95.2%) Repeat blood draw (n=40) No trisomy (n=27) No result (n=13; 32.5%) n=64

Results Findings/outcomes in the 17 pregnancies classified by cfDNA testing as being at high risk for aneuploidy cfDNA riskCombined test risk KaryotypePregnancy outcome No. of cases T21 risk >99%1:2T21TOP7 T21 risk >99%1:4T21TOP1 T21 risk >99%1:27T21TOP1 T21 risk >99%1:81Not doneMiscarriage1 T21 risk >99%1:65T21TOP1 T18 risk >99%1:2T18TOP2 T18 risk >99%1:39T18TOP1 T18 risk >99%1:71T18TOP1 T18 risk >99%1:5861NormalContinue1 T13 risk 34%1:4T13TOP1 Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013

Study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing cfDNA testing in early pregnancy screening for trisomies in singleton pregnancies Blood sampling at 10 weeks and USS at both 10 and 12 weeks retains the advantage of 1 st trimester diagnosis as for the combined test It is necessary to confirm +ve results of cfDNA testing by fetal karyotyping, as one of the cases of suspected trisomy 18 had a normal karyotype In this population (median maternal age, 36.7 yrs), the screen-positive rate on cfDNA testing was 1.7% vs 5.0% for the combined test (risk cut-off 1:100) Discussion Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013

The main advantages of cfDNA testing, compared with the combined test, are: Substantial reduction in FPR Reporting of results as very high or very low risk, which makes it easier for parents to decide in favour of or against invasive testing cfDNA testing has substantially reduced the rate of invasive testing but some women still desire a diagnostic test to provide certainty of exclusion of not only the common trisomies but all other aneuploidies Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013 Discussion

This study has shown that routine screening for trisomies by cfDNA testing at 10 weeks is feasible, allowing diagnosis of aneuploidies and the option of pregnancy termination within the first trimester Advantages of cfDNA testing: Substantial reduction in FPR Clear separation of high and low risk results Disadvantages of cfDNA testing: Need to investigate abnormal results by invasive testing Conclusions Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies Gil et al., UOG 2013

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC CLINIAL SCENARIO: A 40 y women G 2 P 1, G A =10 w referred for screening tests. She had a history of preterm delivery and GDM in previous pregnancy.If NIPT (cf DNA) is a sensitive test for early screening of trisomies? If we can predict adverse obstetric out comes like preterm delivery at first trimester?

SEARCH STRATEGY: Patient/Client Group: Pregnant women between 11 week and 13 weeks and 6 days. Intervention (or Assessment): If screen tests and placental perfusion tests predict adverse obstetric out comes at first trimester? Outcome(s): 1) Predict adverse obstetric out comes 2) Early screening for aneuploidies with lower false positive rate.

Level of evidence: Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies. 2a(2013). First-Trimester Prediction of Macrosomia. 2a (2010). Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from maternal factors, obstetric history and placental perfusion and function at 11–13 weeks. 2a (2011). Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11 to 13 weeks.2b (2011).

Summary/Conclusion According to this finding: We can use cfDNA test with low FPR for early screening of aneuploidies. At first trimester combining of maternal characteristics and biochemical testing predict GDM and macrosamia in pregnancy. Placental perfection testes at weeks are not altered in pregnancies resulting in spontaneous early delivery but the risk of preterm delivery is provided by maternal factors and obstetric history.