LOGO Disorders Associated with GPRs Members: 王建博、秦涛、李中印、王宇
The structural and signal transmit mechanism of the class-C G- protein-coupled receptors
First What is this? One of the five classes GPCRs How does the GPCRs classified? Based on sequence similarity. class-A:Rhodopsin( 视紫红质 )-like receptors class-B:secretin( 分泌素 )-like receptors class-C:mGlu-like receptors
What are class-C GPCRs include? neurotransmitters receptors glutamate( 谷氨酸盐 ) receptors GABA receptors the calcium-sensing receptor sweet taste receptors pheromone( 信息素 )receptors
Difference A large extracellular domain——VFT VFT : Venus Flytrap (bilobate 双叶形 ) Can be regulared by allosteric modulator (变构调节剂) Dimer ——homo or heter
The structural Four parts 1.VFT(Venus Flytrap): the agonist binding site 2.CRD(cysteine-rich domain) 3.HD(heptahelical domain) C-term
VFT Tow parts:Lobe-I&Lobe-II Two conformations : Open(inactive) & Closed(active) antagonist & agonist ( 抑制剂 ) ( 激动剂 )
Lobe-I Lobe-II
CRD The structure and function are unknown absent CRD:GABA receptor
HD ( Heptahelical domain ) Heptahelical long C-terminal tail Activity site positive & negative allosteric modulators independency
How is the signal transduced from one domain to the other?
Homodimeric receptors mGlu receptor A disulfide-linked dimer Cys-residues Class-C GPCRs are constitutive dimers Lobe-I Lobe-II
Heterodimeric receptors GABA B receptor Absent disulfide bridge no covalent( 共价的 ) linkage May have interaction between intracellular tail ER retention signal (GABA B1 )
Activation mechanism of class-C GPCRs interaction between the VFTs
LOGO On mGlus receptor (Roo, resting-open-open) (Aco, active-closed-open) (Acc, active-closed-closed)
Are both Aco & Acc conformations lead to similar properties? Mutated mGlu VFT composed of two distinct binding sites
Roo, none activity Aco, half activity Acc, full activity(Ca 2+ )
Why? Roo state: This interface revealed major charge repulsion Aco state: the interface consists of a number of ionic interactions Acc state: four acidic side chains are facing each other, creating a cationbinding site
Only have two conformations A signal agonist can fully activate a receptor Surprisingly GABA B receptor in which GABA binds in the GABA B1 VFT only On GABA B receptor
But GABA B2 is necessary for GABA B only those possessing both the GABA B1 and GABA B2 VFTs display agonist-induced activity Why Unknown
Allosteric coupling between the extracellular and HD within the dimer
On GABA B receptor HD of GABA B2 is a important part Experiment I Mutations into either the i2 or i3 loop of GABA B2 suppressed G-protein activation. The equivalent mutation in GABA B1 had a minor effect
Experiment II GABA B1 VFT GABA B2 VFT GABA B2 HD Demonstrating that the HD of GABA B2 possesses enough of the molecular determinants required for G-protein coupling
GABA B2 HD expressed alone can be activated by CGP7930, a positive allosteric modulator of the GABA B receptor. So.. trans-activation occurs in the GABA B receptor Experiment III
Another Experiment GABA B1 VFT +GABA B2 HD =can not be activated (GABA B1 VFT + GABA B2 HD) +(GABA B2 VFT + GABA B1 HD) = can be activated In this combination subunits cis-activation occurs GABA B1 VFT GABA B2 HD GABA B2 VFT GABA B1 HD
In a word, dimer conformation takes a very important part in GABA B receptors
On mGlu receptor Both cis- and trans-activation occur in mGlu receptors Because the homodimeric structure
Allosteric functioning of the HD of class C GPCRs
HD can exist in three states HDg states : totally inactive state HD states : Low active efficiency state HD* states : High active efficiency state
HD can be regulared by positive & negative allosteric modulators ( 变 构调节剂 )
Allosteric modulators are compounds able to regulate the activity of a receptor by binding at a site distinct from that where endogenous ligands bind
Classification negative allosteric modulators inhibit constitutive activity of the receptor positive allosteric modulators activate the receptor, can enhance either the potency (力量) or the efficacy (效力), or both
Difference Negative ——directly Positive——indirectly(with agonist)
SO… the action of negative allosteric modulators is less dependent on the concentration of endogenous ligand(agonist) But positive allosteric modulators is highly dependent on agonist
Experiment Bay 7620:negative allosteric modulators Ro : positive allosteric modulators EC50 :value of glutamate
Why we intrested in allosteric modulators? Both positive & negative modulators are highly receptor subtype selective. less side effect, long effect Hydrophobic, allowing them to cross the blood brain barrier more easily