Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 2010 CIBMTR Summary Slides SUM10_1.ppt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 2012 Summary Slides SUM12_1.ppt.
Advertisements

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Lynn Savoie September 30, 2006.
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in Older Individuals Keith M. Sullivan, MD Duke University Medical Center ASBMT Corporate Retreat September 2012.
Blood and Marrow Transplant: The basics…what you need to know Resident Education Lecture Series.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Blood and marrow stem cell transplantation A.Basi ADULT HEMATOLOGIST,ONCOLOGIST IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Overview Willis H Navarro, MD Medical Director, Transplant Services, NMDP Associate Clinical Professor,
CHIMERISM & DLI Dr. Serdar ŞIVGIN Kayseri Feb, 2011.
The role of transplant for CML in the imatinib era Dr Wendy Ingram Consultant Haematologist University Hospital of Wales.
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 2011 Summary Slides Worldwide SUM-WW11_1.ppt.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Advances in SCT in Acute Leukemia 충남대학교병원 혈액종양내과 조 덕 연.
DR. YETUNDE T. ISRAEL-AINA PAEDIATRICIAN, UNIVERSITY OF BENIN TEACHING HOSPITAL, BENIN CITY BENIN BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANT WORKSHOP, UNIVERSITY OF BENIN.
林建廷 April 28,  IPSS for MDS (FAB classification) ◦ Greenberg P et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic.
Supplementary Table 1. Impact of pretransplant factors on the incidence of pulmonary complications FactorUnivariate RR (95% CI)P-valueMultivariate RR *1.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation- HSCT. Principle of HSCT Myeloablation and eradication of residual disease with hogh dose conditioning regimen.
5-Azacitidine For Myelodysplasia Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Field T et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009:[Epub ahead of print].
Transplant Creations1 Treatment & Transplant Program to improve disease outcome Transplant Creations Marlies Van Hoef.
DONOR LYMPHOCYTE INFUS I ON (DLI) Dr. Serdar ŞIVGIN February 2011 Kayseri.
Allogeneic “Mini” Transplantation Mark B. Juckett M.D. June 4, 2004.
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the Brentuximab.
Optimizing Timing of Transplant in Hodgkin Lymphoma Ginna G. Laport, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Blood & Marrow Transplantation Stanford.
Bone marrow Transplant in Paediatric Haematology
The Evolving Role of Transplantation in Lymphoma
Blood Cancers in older adults Cancer and Older Adults 19 November 2015 Matthew Foster, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Leukemia, Lymphoma and Myeloma.
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM ELL TRANSPLANTATION (HSCT) A process in which abnormal, malignant, or non- functioning marrow cells are replaced with normal marrow.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Introduction to the NHLBI Context. Agenda  Introduction to the NMDP / CIBMTR  Forms being curated  Progress update  Description of review process.
HAPLOIDENTICAL STEM CELL TRANSPLANT
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Current Status and Future Directions
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
Margaret L. Green, Wendy M. Leisenring, Hu Xie, Roland B. Walter, Marco Mielcarek, Brenda M. Sandmaier, Stanley R. Riddell and Michael Boeckh Blood NUM.
HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM ELL TRANSPLANTATION (HSCT) A process in which abnormal, malignant, or non- functioning marrow cells are replaced with normal marrow.
New Approaches for Transplant Patients Linda J Burns, MD Medical Director, Health Services Research Program National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be the.
Peripheral-Blood Stem Cells versus Bone Marrow from Unrelated Donors N Engl J Med 2012;367: R3 Sunhee park/Prof. Kyung-sam cho.
Survey summary PTCL clinical practice recommendations
Blood and Marrow Transplant: The basics…what you need to know
RIC UCBT Transplantation of Umbilical Cord Blood from Unrelated Donors in Patients with Haematological Diseases using a Reduced Intensity Conditioning.
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 2010 CIBMTR Summary Slides INTRODUCTION: The Summary Slides are an annual report.
Supplemental table 1 Patients' characteristics Variables Number
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)
Comparable results of umbilical cord blood and HLA-matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity preparative regimen.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative procedure for a variety of malignant and nonmalignant conditions. Historically,
EBMT Activity Survey Teams 39,313 Patients 43,636 Transplants
Gupta V, Tallman MS, Weisdorf DJ
EBMT Activity Survey Teams Patients Transplants
Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Relapsed Hematological Malignancies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Prognostic Relevance of the Initial.
In Stem Cell Transplantation by Limiting the Morbidity of Graft-versus-Host Disease Tolerance to Myeloablative Conditioning is Improved  Nicolas Novitzky,
by Jayesh Mehta Blood Volume 112(2): July 15, 2008
Assessment of Allogeneic HCT in Older Patients with AML and MDS: A CIBMTR Analysis McClune B et al. ASCO/ASH Symposium 2009;The Best of ASH Special & Plenary.
ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION for MULTIPLE MYELOMA
Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adults and Children with Malignant and Nonmalignant Diseases: End of the Beginning and Future.
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with AML
Comparison of Outcomes after HLA-Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor Transplantation for Children with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia  Mei-Jie.
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,
Comparison of Cord Blood Transplantation with Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation in Patients Older than Fifty Years  Masatsugu Tanaka, Koichi Miyamura,
Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Relapsed Hematological Malignancies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Prognostic Relevance of the Initial.
Twenty Years of Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Pediatric Acute Leukemia Facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program  Margaret L.
Kasiani C. Myers, Stella M. Davies 
Effect of Conditioning Regimen Intensity on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation  Betul Oran, John E. Wagner, Todd.
Cutaneous Complications in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Impact of Biopsy on Patient Management  Oana Paun, Tycel Phillips, Pingfu Fu, Roberto.
High Alloreactivity of Low-Dose Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients with Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Introduction. Title: Activities and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Japan.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in FLT3-ITD–Positive Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: The Role for FLT3 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Post-
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
Survival after HLA-Matched Sibling Donor HCT for ALL, Age ≥18 Years,
Mary Eapen  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 
Presentation transcript:

Current Uses and Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 2010 CIBMTR Summary Slides SUM10_1.ppt

Location of transplant centers participating in CIBMTR 2008 SUM10_2.ppt Slide

Transplants SUM10_3.ppt Slide 3 Transplant activity worldwide '80'81'82'83'84'85'86'87'88'89'90'91'92'93'94'95'96'97'98'99'00'01'02'03'04'05'06'07'08'09 Autologous Allogeneic 20,000 25,000 35,000 30,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0

Transplants '80'81'82'83'84'85'86'87'88'89'90'91'92'93'94'95'96'97'98'99'00'01'02'03'04'05'06'07'08'09 Autologous Related Donor Unrelated Donor 10,000 8,000 18,000 12,000 6,000 4,000 2, ,000 14,000 SUM10_4.ppt Slide 4 Transplant activity in the U.S

Transplants, % SUM10_7.ppt Slide 5 Allogeneic stem cell sources, by recipient age Age 20 yrsAge 20 yrs Bone Marrow (BM) Peripheral Blood (PB) Cord Blood (CB)

Transplants, % SUM10_8.ppt Slide 6 Autologous stem cell sources, by recipient age Age 20 yrsAge 20 yrs Bone Marrow (BM) Peripheral Blood (PB) BM + PB

Transplants, % SUM10_9.ppt Slide 7 Trends in transplantation, by transplant type and recipient age* Allogeneic TransplantsAutologous Transplants  20 yrs yrs yrs yrs 60 yrs * Transplants for AML, ALL, NHL, Hodgkin Disease, Multiple Myeloma

Trends in transplantation, by transplant type and recipient age* Transplants, % Allogeneic TransplantsAutologous Transplants * Transplants for AML, ALL, NHL, Hodgkin Disease, Multiple Myeloma SUM10_29.ppt Slide 8  60 years  60 years  50 years  50 years

3,000 5,500 2,000 1, ,000 2,500 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplant in North America 2008 SUM10_11.ppt Slide 9 Number of Transplants Multiple Myeloma NHLAMLHDALLMDS/MPDAplastic Anemia CMLOther Leuk Other Cancer Non- Malig Disease Allogeneic (Total N=6,672) Autologous (Total N=10,302)

Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplant for ages 20 years in North America 2008 SUM10_12.ppt Slide 10 Number of Transplants Number of Transplants Other Cancer ALLAMLHDMDS/MPDAplastic Anemia NHLOther Leuk Non- Malig Disease Allogeneic (Total N=1,496) Autologous (Total N=880) CML

Indications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in North America 2008 SUM10_13.ppt Slide 11 3,000 2,000 1, ,000 2,500 Number of Transplants Multiple Myeloma NHLAMLHDALLMDS/MPDAplastic Anemia CMLOther Leuk Other Cancer Non- Malig Disease Related Donor (Total N=3,282) Unrelated Donor (Total N=3,389)

SUM10_14.ppt Allogeneic transplants in patients 20 years, by donor type and graft source, registered with CIBMTR, Slide 12 Number of Transplants * * Data incomplete 5,000 2,000 1, ,000 3,500 3,000 4,000 2,500 4,500 Number of Transplants Related, BM or PB Unrelated, BM or PB Unrelated, CB

SUM10_15.ppt Allogeneic transplant in patients 20 years, by donor type and graft source, registered with CIBMTR, Slide 13 Number of Transplants * * Data incomplete 13,000 7,000 6,000 2, ,000 10,000 9,000 11,000 8,000 12,000 1,000 3,000 5,000 Number of Transplants Related, BM or PB Unrelated, BM Unrelated, PB Unrelated, CB

SUM10_16.ppt Unrelated donor stem cell sources by recipient age Slide 14 Transplants, % Age 20 yrsAge 20 yrs Bone Marrow (BM) Peripheral Blood (PB) Cord Blood (CB)

SUM10_17.ppt Unrelated cord blood transplantation registered with CIBMTR Slide 15 Number of Transplants Number of Transplants * * Data incomplete  16 years  16 years

One-Year Survival, % One-year survival after myeloablative conditioning for acute leukemias in any remission phase, CML or MDS, age 50 years, by year of transplant and graft source, SUM10_18.ppt Slide Sibling Donor Unrelated Donor

SUM10_19.ppt 100-day mortality after autologous transplantation Slide 17 Mortality, % Acute LeukemiaNon-Hodgkin Lymphoma Hodgkin DiseaseMultiple Myeloma Early Disease Intermediate/Advance Disease Sensitive Resistant Other

SUM10_20.ppt 100-day mortality after HLA-identical sibling transplantation Slide 18 Mortality, % AMLCMLMDS/MPSImmune Deficiency Early Disease Intermediate Disease Advance Disease Chronic Phase Accelerated Phase Blast Phase Other ALLAplastic Anemia

SUM10_21.ppt 100-day mortality after unrelated donor transplantation Slide 19 Mortality, % AMLCMLMDS/MPSImmune Deficiency Early Disease Intermediate Disease Advance Disease Chronic Phase Accelerated Phase Blast Phase Other ALLAplastic Anemia

Causes of death after transplantations done in SUM10_22.ppt Slide 20 Infection (17%) Other Cause (19%) Organ Failure (12%) Primary Disease (35%) IPn*(5%) GVHD (12%) Infection (14%) Other (22%) GVHD (10%) Primary Disease (43%) IPn*(3%) Organ Failure (8%) Infection (5%) Other Cause (17%) Organ Failure (4%) IPn*(1%) Primary Disease (73%) *IPn = Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome Autologous Unrelated donor HLA-identical sibling

Number of Transplants 9,000 11,000 7,000 6,000 3, ,000 8,000 10,000 4,000 2,000 1, * * Data incomplete Reduced Intensity Conditioning, Age 50 years Reduced Intensity Conditioning, Age  50 years Standard Myeloablative Conditioning SUM10_23.ppt Allogeneic transplantations by conditioning regimen intensity and patient age, registered with CIBMTR Slide 21

SUM10_24.ppt Allogeneic transplantations using reduced- intensity conditioning, by donor type, registered with CIBMTR Slide 22 Number of Transplants 2,000 3,000 1, ,500 2, * * Data incomplete Unrelated CB Unrelated PB/BM Related

Transplants 2,000 3,000 1, ,500 2,500 Number of allogeneic transplants, by disease, registered with CIBMTR SUM10_25.ppt Slide * * Data incomplete AML ALL CML AA LYM / MM / CLL

SUM10_26.ppt Number of allogeneic transplants for AML, by disease status, registered with CIBMTR Slide 24 Transplants 1,400 1, , * * Data incomplete Early Disease Intermediate Disease Advanced Disease

SUM10_27.ppt Number of allogeneic transplantations for ALL, by disease status, registered with CIBMTR Slide 25 Transplants 1, * * Data incomplete Early Disease Intermediate Disease Advanced Disease

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for AML, by disease status, Early (N=6,898) SUM10_32.ppt Intermediate (N=1,805) Advanced (N=3,011) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 26

Years Probability of survival after unrelated donor transplant for AML, by disease status, Early (N=3,658) SUM10_33.ppt Intermediate (N=2,774) Advanced (N=3,242) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 27

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for AML, age 20 years, by disease status, Early (N=1,384) SUM09_34.ppt Intermediate (N=285) Advanced (N=309) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 28

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for AML with reduced-intensity conditioning, by disease status, Early (N=1,129) SUM10_35.ppt Intermediate (N=377) Advanced (N=571) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 29

Years Probability of survival after unrelated donor transplant for AML with reduced-intensity conditioning, by disease status, Early (N=951) SUM10_36.ppt Intermediate (N=585) Advanced (N=728) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 30

Years Probability of survival after autologous transplant for AML, by disease status, Early (N=2,319) SUM10_38.ppt Intermediate (N=769) Advanced (N=221) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 31

Years Probability of survival after allogeneic transplant for MDS, age 20 years, by disease status and donor type, Early, HLA-matched sibling (N=63) SUM10_39.ppt Early, unrelated (N=145) Advanced, HLA-matched sibling (N=114) Advanced, unrelated (N=190) Probability of Survival, % P = Slide 32

Years Probability of survival after allogeneic transplant for MDS, age 20 years, by disease status and donor type, Early, HLA-matched sibling (N=599) SUM10_40.ppt Early, unrelated (N=509) Advanced, HLA-matched sibling (N=1,237) Advanced, unrelated (N=1,142) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 33

Years Probability of survival after allogeneic transplant for MDS with reduced-intensity conditioning, by disease status and donor type, SUM10_41.ppt Probability of Survival, % P < Early, unrelated (N=202) Early, HLA-matched sibling (N=217) Advanced, HLA-matched sibling (N=366) Advanced, unrelated (N=383) Slide 34

Years Early (N=915) SUM10_42.ppt Intermediate (N=1,313) Advanced (N=243) Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for ALL, age 20 years, by disease status, Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 35

Years Early (N=831) SUM10_43.ppt Intermediate (N=2,041) Advanced (N=340) Probability of survival after unrelated donor transplant for ALL, age 20 years, by disease status, Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 36

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for ALL, age 20 years, by disease status, Early (N=1,993) SUM10_44.ppt Intermediate (N=700) Advanced (N=716) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 37

Years Probability of survival after unrelated donor transplant for ALL, age 20 years, by disease status, Early (N=1,363) SUM09_45.ppt Intermediate (N=934) Advanced (N=784) Probability of Survival, % P < Slide 38

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor transplant for CML, by disease status and transplant year, SUM10_46.ppt CP, (N=2,302) Probability of Survival, % CP, (N=2,412) AP, (N=314) AP, (N=301) P < Slide 39

Years Probability of survival after autologous and HLA-matched sibling donor transplants for CLL, autologous transplant (N=399) Myeloablative conditioning(N=458) Probability of Survival, % Reduced-intensity conditioning (N=679) P < SUM10_47.ppt Slide 40

Years Probability of survival after allogeneic transplant for severe aplastic anemia, by donor type and age, HLA-matched sibling, 20 y (N=1,388) HLA-matched sibling, 20 y (N=1,408) Unrelated, 20 y (N=562) Unrelated, 20 y (N=532) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_48.ppt Slide 41

Years Probability of survival after autologous transplant for Hodgkin disease, by disease status, Complete remission (N=2,437) Not in CR, resistant (N=699) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_49.ppt Slide 42 Not in CR, sensitive (N=3,237)

Years Probability of survival after allogeneic transplant for Hodgkin disease, by donor type and conditioning regimen, HLA-matched sibling, myeloablative (N=190) Unrelated, myeloablative (N=71) Unrelated, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=110) Probability of Survival, % P = SUM10_50.ppt Slide 43 HLA-matched sibling, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=153)

Years Probability of survival after autologous transplant for follicular lymphoma, by disease status, Chemosensitive (N=1,995) Chemoresistant (N=160) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_51.ppt Slide 44

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor allogeneic transplant for follicular lymphoma, by disease status and conditioning regimen, Chemosensitive, reduced – intensity conditioning (N=388) Chemoresistant, reduced – intensity conditioning (N=64) Probability of Survival, % Chemosensitive, myeloablative (N=351) P = SUM10_52.ppt Slide 45 Chemoresistant, myeloablative (N=85)

Years Probability of survival after autologous transplant for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, by disease status, Chemosensitive (N=6,203) Chemoresistant (N=447) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_53.ppt Slide 46

Years Probability of survival after HLA-matched sibling donor allogeneic transplant for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, by disease status and conditioning regimen, Chemoresistant, myeloablative (N=98) Chemosensitive, myeloablative (N=315) Chemosensitive, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=122) Chemoresistant, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=43) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_54.ppt Slide 47

Years Probability of survival after transplant for mantle cell lymphoma, by donor type and conditioning regimen, autologous transplant (N=2,390) HLA-matched sibling, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=229) Unrelated, reduced-intensity conditioning (N=184) HLA-matched sibling, myeloablative (N=284) Unrelated, myeloablative (N=94) Probability of Survival, % P < SUM10_55.ppt Slide 48

Years Probability of Survival, % Probability of survival after transplant for multiple myeloma, by donor type HLA-matched sibling, Allo (N=878) autologous transplant (N=22,254) Unrelated, Allo (N=143) P < SUM10_56.ppt Slide 49