U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of Emission Control Theory Support Automotive – Engine Performance Topics covered in this presentation: Types of Emissions Emission Control Devices.
Advertisements

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Cooling System.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001 Seth MillhornDon Hancock Shawn KimbleyHeber Lemmon Zack BeelerJeremy Staab Patrick HessPhil Auth Karen DenBraven Making.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
Automobiles 1 Automobiles. Automobiles 2 Question: A car burns gasoline to obtain energy but allows some heat to escape into the air. Could a mechanically.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
MOHAWK ® CATALYTIC CONVERTER. Introduction Millions of cars on the road are a source of air pollution. The amount of pollution that all the cars produce.
NDSU Clean Snowmobile Presented by: Michael Niehoff Jared Quinlan Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
Internal Combustion Engines. Engines External combustion engine Internal combustion engine Steam engine Gas turbine engine Steam engine Gas turbine engine.
Catalytic converters A catalytic converter is a device used to reduce the toxicity of emissions from an internal combustion engine. First widely introduced.
Exhaust System. Exhaust system components: 1-Catalytic Converter 1-Catalytic Converter 2-Muffler 2-Muffler 3-Resonator 3-Resonator 4-Tail pipe 4-Tail.
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Design and Testing of a Four-Stroke Snowmobile with Catalytic Exhaust Treatment Scott Miers and Ryan Hayes.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
Technology For 2007 And Beyond Dr. Steve Charlton Executive Director – Advanced Engineering Cummins Inc.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
California Off-road Mobile Source Technology Review JOHN DEERE LE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY John Deere Consumer Products February 2, 2000.
Port Fuel Injection VS. Direct Fuel Injection The Basics of DFI The main focus of DFI is to effectively and precisely control the fuel-to-air ratio. To.
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Chapter 5 Light vehicle engine systems © Pearson Education Ltd Copying permitted for purchasing institution only. This material is not copyright.
1Korea University of Technology and Education 2 Generation Common Rail VGT Variable Swirl 32Bit Computer Elec. Controlled EGR Flap C P F Electronically.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
North Dakota State Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Steve Miller Danika Gieske Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
and Emissions Reduction
Prepared by: Kamil Bin Sahidin
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
First in Service First in Value
Emission Control Topics covered in this presentation:
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2001
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Emission Control Systems
Automobiles.
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
2018 North Dakota State University Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
2019 SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE DESIGN PRESENTATION
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
Last Year’s Foundation
Automotive Technology Principles, Diagnosis, and Service
Presentation transcript:

U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW

T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed and administered by students under the direction of the Department of Mechanical Engineering The team is funded by industry sponsorship and engineering foundations

P RESENTATION S UMMARY Design Priorities and Strategy Results and Conclusions Consumer and Outfitter Perspective

D ESIGN P RIORITIES Examine feasibility of 2-Stroke vs. 4-Stroke solutions in achieving goals of : –Reduced Exhaust Emissions –Reduced Vehicle Noise –Improved Handling & Engine Performance –Improved Fuel Economy –Minimized Technology Implementation Costs

I NITIAL C OMPARISON 4-Stroke : Better emissions Lower noise Lower power to weight ratio Higher production cost 2-Stroke : High level of UHC emission Higher noise level Higher power to weight ratio Lower production cost

C OMPARISON S YSTEMS 4-Stroke : 1997 Arctic Cat ZRT 800 chassis with a 2000 Suzuki GSX-R750 engine chosen for its stock fuel injection, size, weight, and power 2-Stroke : CSC2000 Second place sled, a 1998 Polaris Indy Trail chassis with a modified 2000 Polaris 500 XCSP carbureted engine chosen for its proven performance, reliability, and availability

4-S TROKE I MPLEMENTATION Transmission removed to reduce weight & size Dry sump system implemented to reduce engine height and replace stock components Secondary shaft used to transfer power from crankshaft to clutch and accessory pumps

4-S TROKE : E MISSION R EDUCTION Fuel injection to ensure precise fuel control in all situations Catalytic converter installed Oxygenated fuel utilized

2-S TROKE : E MISSION R EDUCTION Engine modifications were completed to improve the combustion process Catalytic converter installed Secondary air injection Oxygenated fuel utilized Biodegradable synthetic lubricant Precision carburettor tuning for conditions

C ATALYTIC C ONVERTER 3 way, dual bed, catalytic converter Combats all negative emissions scenarios, except particulates, including poor air/fuel ratio, short circuiting, and overheating Flow Palladium Coated Platinum & Rhodium Coated

A IR I NJECTION R EACTION (AIR) Air injection was implemented to assist in the conversion of unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) and carbon monoxide (CO) through the addition of oxygen Expansion chamber with catalytic converter Secondary air injection blower O 2 Sensor

N OISE R EDUCTION Exhaust silencing Sound deadening insulation Other areas

E XHAUST S ILENCING Silencer developed using diffusing, side resonant, and absorption type silencer designs and all available space

O THER N OISE C ONSIDERATIONS The impact of track noise on total vehicle noise was examined and solutions investigated Track “Curtains”

O THER I MPROVEMENTS After market components added to improve traction, handling, and rideability Components installed to reduce drive train friction and improve efficiency

C OMPARISON R ESULTS 4-Stroke emitted slightly lower noise levels 4-Stroke exhibited lower emission levels 2-Stroke weighs less providing better handling Engine performance is comparable 2-Stroke offers superior reliability

D ESIGN C ONCLUSIONS Similar exhaust after treatment, noise reduction, handling, driveability, and efficiency improvements can be implemented on both 4- Stroke and 2-Stroke solutions Each solution provides improved emissions and noise Refinement of 4-stroke alternative will improve reliability and simplicity 2-Stroke solution best meets the goals of Team Eco-Snow

C ONSUMER AND O UTFITTER P ERSPECTIVE Implementation costs of each solution are less than $1000 US, $1570 Can 2-Stroke alternative combines reduced emissions and noise with increased power and performance in a simple, economical package 4-Stroke alternative provides increased emissions and noise reductions for sensitive areas Both options can be easily incorporated into existing snowmobile designs

Q UESTIONS ?