Atrial Fibrillation Steve McGlynn Specialist Principal Pharmacist (Cardiology), Greater Glasgow and Clyde Honorary Clinical Lecture, University of Strathclyde
Some types of arrhythmia Supraventricular Sinus Nodal Sinus bradycardia Sinus tachycardia Sinus arrhythmia Atrial Atrial tachycardia Atrial flutter Atrial fibrillation AV Nodal AVNSVT Heart blocks Junctional Ventricular Escape rhythms Ventricular tachycardia Ventricular fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation A heart rhythm disorder (arrhythmia). It usually involves a rapid heart rate, in which the upper heart chambers (atria) are stimulated to contract in a very disorganized and abnormal manner. A type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia The most common arrhythmia
Aetiology Rheumatic heart disease Coronary heart disease (MI) Hypertension Myopericarditis Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Cardiac surgery Thyrotoxicosis Infection Alcohol abuse Pulmonary embolism Caffeine Exercise Lone AF
NHS QIS Clinical Standards Audit 2010: AF PREVALENCE IN SCOTLAND NHS QIS Clinical Standards April Heart Disease NHS Board Residence (HB)Population with AF Submitted Practices Population Percentage (%) NumeratorDenominator Ayrshire & Arran1,512112,2921.3% Dumfries & Galloway48329,5811.6% Fife1,35796,9891.4% Forth Valley2,064142,2641.5% Greater Glasgow & Clyde9,625673,3051.4% Highland79060,5981.4% Lanarkshire1,700129,3391.3% Lothian1,35498,9181.3% Orkney694,1891.4% Shetland1389,8491.6% Tayside23712,6171.4% Western Isles1416,8931.9% SCOTLAND19,4701,376,8341.4%
Classification New / Recent onset < 48 hours Paroxysmal variable duration self terminating Persistent Non-self terminating Cardiovertable Permanent Non-self terminating Non-cardiovertable
Symptoms / Signs Breathlessness / dyspnoea Palpitations Syncope / dizziness Chest discomfort Stroke / TIA 6 x risk of CVA 2 x risk of death 18 x risk of CVA if rheumatic heart disease Irregularly irregular pulse Atrial rate bpm Ventricular rate depends on degree of AV block bpm Peripheral rate slower (pulse deficit)
Investigations Electrocardiogram (ECG) All patients May need ambulatory monitoring Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) Establish baseline Identify structural heart disease Risk stratification for anti-thrombotic therapy Transoesophogeal echocardiography (TOE) Further valve assessment If TTE inconclusive / difficult
Normal Sinus Rhythm
‘Fast’ AF
‘Slow’ AF
Investigations Electrocardiogram (ECG) All patients May need ambulatory monitoring Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) Baseline Structural heart disease Risk stratification for anti-thrombotic therapy Transoesophogeal echocardiography (TOE) Further valve assessment TTE inconclusive / difficult
Diagnosis Based on: ECG Presentation Response to treatment
Treatment objectives Rhythm / rate control Stroke prevention
Treatment strategies New / Recent onset Cardioversion Rhythm control Paroxysmal Rate control or cardioversion during paroxysm Rhythm control if needed Persistent Cardioversion Rhythm control Peri-cardioversion thromboprophylaxis Permanent Rate control Thromboprophylaxis
Pharmacological Options Class Ic Anti-arrhythmics Flecainide / Propafenone Rhythm control May also be pro-arrhythmic Class II Anti-arrhythmics Beta-blockers Mainly rate control Control rate during exercise and at rest Generally first choice Choice depends on co-morbidities
Class III Anti-arryhthmics Amiodarone / Dronedarone Mainly rhythm control May be pro-arrhythmic Concerns over toxicity Class IV Anti-arryhthmics Calcium channel blockers (verapamil / diltiazem only) Rate control only Alternative to beta-blockers if no heart failure Digoxin Rate control only Does not control rate during exercise Third choice unless others contra-indicated
Acute AF Treatment will depend on: History of AF Time to presentation (<> 24 hours) Co-morbidities (CHD, CHF/LVSD etc) Likelihood of success (History)
Rate Vs. Rhythm control Rhythm control not feasible or safe Beta-blocker Verapamil Digoxin (CHF) Rhythm control if possible and safe DC cardioversion (if possible) Amiodarone (CHD or CHF/LVSD) Flecainide (Paroxysmal AF)
Paroxymal AF Rhythm control* Beta-blocker Class 1c agent or sotalol If CHD - sotalol If LVD: Amiodarone Dronedarone? Not if heart failure *May be “Pill in the pocket” Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Aspirin mg warfarin to INR 2-3 See later
Persistent AF Rhythm control Beta blocker No structural heart disease: Class 1c* or sotalol Structural heart disease: amiodarone Rate control As for permanent AF * not if CHD present Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Pre-cardioversion thromboprophylaxis of at least 3 weeks If rate control, as for permanent AF
Permanent AF Beta blocker or Calcium channel blocker and/or Digoxin Amiodarone? Option if poor rate control on above Dronedarone? Increased mortality Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Aspirin mg Warfarin to INR 2-3 See later
Stroke prevention (non-rheumatic AF)
Stroke Risk Assessment (CHADS 2 ) CChronic Heart Failure(1 point) HHypertension (1 point) AAge > 75 years (1 point) DDiabetes (1 point) SStroke, TIA or systemic embolisation (2 points) Score < 2: low risk, aspirin* or anticoagulant Score ≥ 2: high risk, anticoagulant indicated *Evidence for aspirin is weak
Stroke Risk Assessment (CHA 2 DS 2 VASc) Alternative to CHADS 2 CChronic Heart Failure(1 point) HHypertension (1 point) AAge > 75 years (2 points) DDiabetes (1 point) SStroke, TIA or systemic embolisation (2 points) Vvascular disease (1 point) AAge years (1 point) ScSex category (1 point if female) Score ≥2 = High risk – anticoagulate unless contraindicated
Bleeding Risk Assessment (HAS-BLED) 1 point each for: Hypertension Abnormal renal/liver function (1 for each) Stroke Bleeding history or predisposition Labile INR Elderly (age over 65) Drugs*/alcohol** concomitantly (1 for each) *Drugs that increase bleeding, e.g. aspirin ** Alcohol excess
Anticoagulants Warfarin remains standard anticoagulant at present 3 new oral anticoagulants Dabigatran (Direct thrombin inhibitor) Licensed by MHRA Approved by SMC Rivaroxiban (Factor Xa inhibitor) Licensed by MHRA Apixaban (Factor Xa inhibitor) Fixed doses No monitoring At least as effective as warfarin Safer than warfarin? Dabigatran capsules not stable outside of original blister Very difficult to reverse effect unlike warfarin Much more expensive (even allowing for INR costs) Place in therapy not clear yet
Dabigatran Consensus NHS in Healthcare Improvement Scotland Working Group: National consensus on dabigatran The consensus statement states that: on balance of risks and benefits, warfarin remains the anticoagulant of clinical choice for moderate or high risk atrial fibrillation patients (CHA2DS2- VASc ≥ 2) with good INR control, and clinicians should consider prescribing dabigatran in patients with: poor INR control (less than 60% of time in INR range) despite evidence that they are complying, or allergy to or intolerable side effects from coumarin anticoagulants.
Conclusions AF is a common condition. Patients may be unaware of its presence and are therefore at risk of a stroke Effective treatment strategies exist to control symptoms Effective treatment strategies exist to reduce the risk of stroke Patient education and choice are central to improving the likelihood of treatment success