Special Education Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Li Feng Tim R. Sass Dept. of Finance & Econ.Dept. of Economics Texas State UniversityFlorida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Teacher Education & Induction in the US Johnny Lott & John Carter.
Woodcreek High School Spring AP Night.
Teacher Training, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Douglas Harris Tim R. Sass Dept. of Educational Dept. of Economics Policy Studies Florida State.
Teacher Training Educators and Economists’ Perspectives
Acceleration What factors should be considered When accelerating gifted students to ensure their success?
SUMMARY Indiana’s Proposed Rules for Educator Preparation and Accountability (REPA) Updated Oct. 21, Requires Emphasis on Content-Knowledge. Proposed.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
Human Capital Policies in Education: Further Research on Teachers and Principals 5 rd Annual CALDER Conference January 27 th, 2012.
Informing Policy: State Longitudinal Data Systems Jane Hannaway, Director The Urban Institute CALDER
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
Using State Longitudinal Data Systems for Education Policy Research : The NC Experience Helen F. Ladd CALDER and Duke University Caldercenter.org
February 2005Pamela Luft, Ph.D. Why Deaf Education Program Graduates Are Highly Qualified Professionals Pamela Luft Kent State University
What Makes For a Good Teacher and Who Can Tell? Douglas N. Harris Tim R. Sass Dept. of Ed. Policy Studies Dept. of Economics Univ. of Wisconsin Florida.
SCHOOLING POLICIES FOR QUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University May 2013.
Research Using State Longitudinal Data Systems: Accomplishments and Challenges – The Case of Florida Tim R. Sass.
Special Data Opportunities in Florida David N. Figlio University of Florida and National Bureau of Economic Research.
With a Concentration in Educational Business Services In conjunction with AASBO.
The Teacher of Literature (Requisites and Demands)
Different Skills? Identifying Differentially Effective Teachers of English Language Learners Ben Master, Susanna Loeb, Camille Whitney, James Wyckoff 5.
-- Preliminary, Do Not Quote Without Permission -- VALUE-ADDED MODELS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF TEACHER QUALITY Douglas HarrisTim R. Sass Dept. of Ed. LeadershipDept.
Ivy Tech Community College Indiana’s Education Roundtable May 24, 2011.
Charter School Competition: An Examination of Michigan Anthony Galston Economics Student.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
The Narrowing Gap in NYC Teacher Qualifications and its Implications for Student Achievement Don Boyd, Hamp Lankford, Susanna Loeb, Jonah Rockoff, & Jim.
Human Capital Policies in Education: Further Research on Teachers and Principals 5 rd Annual CALDER Conference January 27 th, 2012.
BLOCK SCHEDULING June 8, TRADITIONAL 6-HOUR SCHOOL DAY A typical student will engage in 6-8 different activities in 3 different locations A teacher.
+ “Post-Secondary Preparation via Dual Enrollment Course Participation” Dr. Joni L. Swanson – Dec CELL Conference Indianapolis, Indiana.
The Determinants of Student Achievement: Different Estimates for Different Measures Tim Sass Department of Economics Florida State University CALDER Conference.
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores The following slides show the relationship of the teacher VAM score with various classroom characteristics The observed.
1. 1. All students read “on level” by end of 3 rd grade 2. 85% or more of all students will score at or above proficient in Spring % or more.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Teacher Coaching: The Missing Link in Teacher Professional Development Randy Keyworth The Wing Institute.
Special Education Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Li Feng Tim R. Sass Dept. of Finance & Econ.Dept. of Economics Texas State UniversityFlorida.
RESEARCH ON MEASURING TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS Roxanne Stansbury EDU 250.
Closing the Opportunity to Learn Gap for Students with Disabilities Cross-State Research Results Opportunity To Learn– Instructional Alignment Least Restrictive.
The Inter-temporal Stability of Teacher Effect Estimates J. R. Lockwood Daniel F. McCaffrey Tim R. Sass The RAND Corporation The RAND Corporation Florida.
Summer  Review research and current practices  Overview of ESEA and ARRA  Share state data  Examine evaluation systems  Discuss Oregon’s transition.
Eighth Annual Summit on Evidence-Based Education Teacher Professional Development.
Don Boyd, Pam Grossman, Karen Hammerness, Hamp Lankford, Susanna Loeb, Matt Ronfeldt & Jim Wyckoff This work is supported.
Portability of Teacher Effectiveness across School Settings Zeyu Xu, Umut Ozek, Matthew Corritore May 29, 2016 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Evaluation.
Bonnie S. Billingsley, Professor Virginia Tech College of Liberal Arts & Human Sciences School of Education, Department of Teaching & Learning
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in this applies to all teaching professionals (non-teaching.
Educational Challenges of English Language Learners.
New Directions in Pupil Learning Assessment: Emerging Models from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative California State University, Northridge Beverly.
Socorro Independent School District Pre-Advanced and Advanced Placement Program 2015.
Arkansas State Report Card Are We 5 th or 49 th ? July 8, 2013 Arkansas Rural Ed Association.
Why should you care about diversity?. 2 There are significant disparities in the education, economic well- being, and health of children in the U.S. based.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
Teacher effectiveness. Kane, Rockoff and Staiger (2007)
KRISTIE WOOD EDU /26/15 Birth-Second Grade Teacher  Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators  Praxis Content Area Test  Hold a bachelor's degree.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Florida Department of Education’s Florida Department of Education’s Teacher Evaluation System Student Learning Growth.
 Federally-funded project  Hands-on science classrooms.
VAM Training. Florida’s value-added model developed by Florida educators  The Department convened a committee of stakeholders (Student Growth Implementation.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification Presentation at the IES Research Conference June 2009 Jill Constantine Mathematica.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Portability of Teacher Effectiveness across School Settings
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar
Advanced Placement (AP), College Prep, and College Ready Courses
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Li Feng Tim R. Sass Dept. of Finance & Econ.Dept. of Economics Texas State UniversityFlorida State University

Achievement of Students with Disabilities Policy Relevance 14 percent of public school students have disabilities Achievement gap between students with disabilities and their typical peers widens as they move into higher grades 13 percent of schools that do not meet AYP standards fail solely because they have not achieved standards set for their students with disabilities

Prior Related Literature Teacher Training and Student Achievement in the General Student Population Pre-service Training College Major/Coursework of Teachers  Betts, Zau and Rice (2003)  Aaronson, et al. (2007)  Harris and Sass (2008) Teach for America  Boyd, et al. (2006)  Kane, Rockoff and Staiger (2006)  Xu, Hannaway and Taylor (2008)

Prior Related Literature Teacher Training and Student Achievement in the General Student Population Pre-Service Training Other “Alternative Certification” Programs  Sass (2008)  Constantine, et al. (2009) Generally Find no Advantage for Education Majors/Traditionally Prepared Teachers in Promoting Student Achievement

Prior Related Literature Teacher Training and Student Achievement in the General Student Population In-Service Training Jacob and Lefgren (2004)  Exogenously imposed professional development had no significant effects on teacher effectiveness in math or reading Harris and Sass (2008)  Inconsistent evidence on effects of current and prior professional development course taking by teachers on student achievement

Prior Related Literature Special Education Teacher Training and Classroom Practice Sindelar, Daunic and Reynolds (2004) Graduates of a traditional special education teacher preparation program scored higher on measures of classroom performance and principal ratings than teachers from alternative certification programs Nougaret, Scruggs and Mastropieri (2005) Traditionally licensed special education teachers better than emergency licensed teachers on several dimensions, including planning and preparation, classroom environment and instruction

Econometric Model and Estimation Strategies Standard “Gain Score” Value-Added Model with Student Covariates Include indicators for deciles of prior achievement level to deal with non-linearities and floor effects

Econometric Model and Estimation Strategies Challenges for Value-Added Modeling of Students with Disabilities Determining Teacher(s) Responsible for Instruction Students may be taking both regular education and special education classes in a subject Students can have multiple regular-education-course teachers and multiple special-education-course teachers

Course Taking Patterns of Students with Disabilities in Math by Grade Level, 2004/05 – Percent by Category

Course Taking Patterns of Students with Disabilities in Reading by Grade Level, 2004/05 – Percent by Category

Econometric Model and Estimation Strategies Challenges for Value-Added Modeling of Students with Disabilities Course Selection is Endogenous Students with more significant disabilities more likely to be in special education courses  Combining students in different settings is problematic if student ability is not completely accounted for

Student Characteristics by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Achievement Level And Disability Type Only Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. Courses Reg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses ( Normed) Achievement Speech/Lang. Dis Specific Learning Dis Intellectual Dis Physical Dis Emotional Dis Other Dis

Econometric Model and Estimation Strategies To Address Dual Problems of Multiple Teachers and Endogenous Course Selection, Estimate Value-Added Models for Three Sub-samples of Students Students taking one or more regular education courses in subject from a single teacher and no special education courses Students taking one or more special education courses in subject from a single teacher and no regular education courses Students taking one or more regular education courses in subject from a single teacher and one or more special education courses in subject from a single teacher

Sample for Analysis All Students in Florida Receiving Exceptional Education Services (Other Than Gifted) With at Least One Achievement Gain Score Grades 4-10 Math and Reading FCAT-NRT Exam (Stanford Achievement Exam) 2000/ /05 Sample restricted to: Students with at most one regular ed. and one special ed. instructor in subject Classes with a single “primary instructor”

Effects of Teacher Experience on Student Achievement Gains by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Experience LevelOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher 1-2 Years *** (5.84) ** (2.17) 3-4 Years *** (4.68) *** (3.25) 5-9 Years *** (7.11) ** (2.28) Special Ed. Teacher 1-2 Years ** (2.23) * (1.66) 3-4 Years * (1.92) (1.31) 5-9 Years *** (2.77) ** (2.29)

Effects of Teacher Experience on Student Achievement Gains by Reading Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Experience LevelOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher 1-2 Years *** (4.11) (0.57) 3-4 Years ** (2.20) * (1.93) 5-9 Years *** (4.24) (1.40) Special Ed. Teacher 1-2 Years *** (3.50) (1.11) 3-4 Years ** (2.41) (0.45) 5-9 Years ** (2.43) ** (2.31)

Effects of Teacher Sp. Ed. PD on Student Achievement Gains by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Timing of Professional Development Only Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. Courses Reg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Reg. Ed. Teacher - Year t (0.051) (0.01) - Year t (0.30) (1.29) - Year t (0.85) (1.32) - Year t (1.54) (0.09) Special Ed. Teacher - Year t (0.39) (1.29) - Year t (0.72) (0.06) - Year t * (1.69) (0.99) - Year t (1.56) (0.99)

Effects of Teacher Sp. Ed. PD on Student Achievement Gains by Reading Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Timing of Professional Development Only Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. Courses Reg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Reg. Ed. Teacher - Year t (1.53) (1.25) - Year t (0.28) (0.31) - Year t * (1.74) (0.26) - Year t *** (3.34) (0.16) Special Ed. Teacher - Year t (0.05) (0.07) - Year t (0.18) (0.25) - Year t (1.32) ** (2.14) - Year t (0.30) (1.14)

Effects of Teacher Adv. Degrees on Student Achievement Gains by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/TeacherOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Advanced Degree *** (3.01) (0.61) Special Ed. Teacher Advanced Degree * (1.77) * (1.74)

Effects of Teacher Adv. Degrees on Student Achievement Gains by Reading Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/TeacherOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Advanced Degree (1.05) (0.64) Special Ed. Teacher Advanced Degree * (1.80) (0.05)

Effects of Certification Status on Student Achievement Gains by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Certification Status Only Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Professional Cert *** (3.01) (0.80) Sp. Ed. Cert (0.04) (1.58) Special Ed. Teacher Professional Cert (0.84) * (1.78) Sp. Ed. Cert (0.35) ** (2.47)

Effects of Certification Status on Student Achievement Gains by Reading Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/Teacher and Certification Status Only Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Professional Cert *** (2.90) ** (2.20) Sp. Ed. Cert (0.89) * (1.81) Special Ed. Teacher Professional Cert (1.02) (0.83) Sp. Ed. Cert * (1.91) *** (4.40)

Effects of Exc. Child Ed. Credits on Student Achievement Gains by Math Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/TeacherOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Exceptional Child Ed. Credits ** (2.57) (0.21) First BA – Special Ed * (1.93) (0.02) Special Ed. Teacher Exceptional Child Ed. Credits (0.99) * (1.65) First BA – Special Ed (0.04) (1.31)

Effects of Exc. Child Ed. Credits on Student Achievement Gains by Reading Course Taking Pattern, 99/00-04/05 Course/TeacherOnly Reg. Ed. Courses Only Sp. Ed. CoursesReg. Ed. and Sp. Ed. Courses Regular Ed. Teacher Exceptional Child Ed. Credits (1.32) (0.60) First BA – Special Ed ** (2.07) (1.04) Special Ed. Teacher Exceptional Child Ed. Credits (0.22) ** (2.29) First BA – Special Ed (1.08) ** (2.35)

Summary of Findings Returns to teacher experience generally smaller in special education courses, particularly in math Little evidence that professional development in special ed. makes teachers more effective Possible exception – regular education reading courses Attainment of advanced degrees associated with higher value-added in math Contrary to typical findings in general student population

Summary of Findings Special education certification associated with greater learning gains of students in special education courses, particularly in reading Other measures of pre-service preparation of teachers of special education courses, including hours of coursework and attainment of a bachelor’s degree in special education, also show positive correlation between with student achievement gains