4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Optical Tape Measure May 04-30 Team Members: Faculty Advisors: Nick Freese (EE) Dr. Aleksander Dogandzic Bruce Fu (EE) Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team members: Sven SoellEE Miao QinCprE Hwa-Sung RyuCprE Pek-Yee TeohEE Abstract In most homes combustion gases are produced by appliances such as gas-fired.
Advertisements

Team 7 / May 24, 2006 Web Based Automation & Security Client Capstone Design Advisor Prof. David Bourner Team Members Lloyd Emokpae (team Lead) Vikash.
Dec I/O Laboratory Development Industrial Review Board Presentation December 12 th, 2001 Cpr E 211 Microcontroller Evolution.
Wireless Stereo Audio Communicator for Television Use Dec /10/2002 Team Members: Advisors/Clients: Matthew Hamilton Dr. John Lamont Eric Hagen Prof.
Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply - Phase 2 May 04-08
Precision Variable Frequency Drive May Client: Jim Walker Advisor: Dr. Ajjarapu Team Members: Matt Shriver Jason Kilzer Nick Nation Dave Reinhardt.
Inventory Control in Stores Dec05-09 Team: Jeff Benson Frederick Brown Christopher Reed Brian Wagner Date: December 6, 2005 Client: ISU Senior Design Program.
PIC Evaluation & Development Board Project Team Chad Berg – CprE Luke Bishop – CprE Tyson Stichka – EE Nick Veys - CprE Financial Budget Abstract/Background.
WCBI Team Information Team number: Client: Faculty Advisors: Technical Advisors: Team Members: May02-11 Square D Company (Greg Wiese) Glenn Hillesland.
PIC Evaluation/ Development Board Dec02-12 December 10, 2002 Client: ECpE Department Faculty Advisors: Dr. Rover, Dr. Weber Chad Berg, Luke Bishop, Tyson.
Figure 1 Personal Efforts Estimated Resources Financial Budget and Other Resources Table 1 Project Requirements Design Objective Concise, non-intimidating,
Multiple-output, Variable-output DC Power Supply May03-22 Team Members: Erik Johnson Joel Jorgensen Peter Holm Philip Schulz Clients – Prof. Patterson,
Communication Device for Handicapped Kids Dec Client Heartland Area Agency Sue Young Advisor Yao Ma Advisor Yao Ma Alex Leith Brian Grove Steve Peters.
Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter September 18, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot.
02/06/031 State of the Art Battery Charger Team: Richard Musumhi Bo Bo Oo Pascal Openshaw Chris Privitere Client: Senior Design 2/6/2003 Team May
EE 491 Project Presentation May07-04 – PDA Based UAS Remote Video Terminal Team Members: Devin Carney Jonathan Farmer Matt Henkes Rene Rios Faculty Advisor:
May Team Information Client Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University Faculty Advisor Professor Gary Tuttle Team Members.
Device Interface Board for Wireless LAN Testing Team May Client ECpE Department Faculty Advisor Dr. Weber Team Members Matthew Dahms – EE Justine.
Temperature Controller for Infrared Paint Curing September 13, 2001 Dec01-11 Team Members Michael Burman, CprE Jonathan Johnson, EE Matthew McMullen, CprE.
Abstract Introduction Project Requirements Resources Proposed Approach and Consideration Closing Summary General Information Faculty Advisor Dr. Gerald.
Garage Parking Indicator Iowa State University Senior Design Dec Faculty Advisor: Dr. Gary Tuttle Client: Senior Design Lars Kulseng (CprE) Kevin.
Abstract Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Personnel Efforts Item DescriptionCost STK300 Microcontrollerdonated (Kanda) GM28 Cellular.
Optical Encoder for a Game Steering Wheel May Team members Sam DahlkeCpr E Peter FecteauCpr E Dan PatesEE Lorenzo SubidoEE Advisors Dr. James Davis.
Abstract Proposed Approach Solution Development Project Requirements Estimated Resources Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer.
Pump Controller Team Number: May06-12 Team Members Dwayne Stammer CprE Francois Munyakazi EE Dan Paulsen CprE/EE Faculity Advisor Nicola Elia Client Viking.
Project OSCAR Octagonal Speech-Controlled Autonomous Robot ONGO-01.
Software Engineering Management Lecture 1 The Software Process.
Radio-Controlled Duck Decoy May April 30 th, 2003 Team Members: Faculty Advisors: Jason Freerksen Prof. Robert Weber Kooi-Tjek Lau Prof. Clive Woods.
Alternative Lower Cost Hearing Aid Dec03-10 Client: Herb Harmison Advisor: Edwin Jones Jr. Team Members: Hassan Qureshi Hamdan Al-Mehrezi Trong Do Nathan.
Multiple Robot Network Team May Clients: Brian Johnson, Shayne Schiltz, and Amy Wilmeth April 26, 2001.
May05-36: Boone Cemetery Management Software Boone Cemetery Management Software May05-36 Greg Thede, Director, Boone Parks Department Dr. Kothari Joseph.
Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS) May Client: National Instruments Advisors: Dr. Mani Mina, Dr. Diane Rover Group Members:
Senior Design Laboratory Design Dec 05-01
Defining Procedures for Decision Analysis May & Engr A April 30, 2002 Client & Faculty Advisors –Dr. Keith Adams –Dr. John Lamont –Dr. Ralph.
Automated Nightlight May06-19 Project May06-19 Website: seniord.ee.iastate.edu/may0619 Client: ECpE Senior Design Faculty Advisor: Dr. Degang Chen
FPGA Controlled Laser Assembly FPGA Controlled Laser Assembly Project Dec03-07October 8, 2003 Client National Instruments Faculty Advisors Professor Mani.
Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter December 9, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot.
Project Team: May December 5 th, 2005 Client Iowa State University – Senior Design Faculty Advisor Dr. Degang J. Chen Team Members Wesley Adreon.
Problem Statement Expanding the capabilities of an auto repair paint drying system that uses newly developed ultraviolet (UV) light activated paint. This.
Abstract Traffic accidents often occur when a major athletic event or concert is held at Iowa State University. This is a result of drivers not being able.
Campus Locator Definition Phase May04-04 Client: Senior Design Advisors: Dr. Lamont & Prof. Patterson Team Members Justin Davis Justin Gruca Rachel Hadaway.
Project Web Site: Client: Jim Walker Advisor: Professor Ajjarapu Abstract.
Testing Considerations Because of potential life threatening consequences resulting from device malfunction, it is critical that the device be fully tested.
SDMay06-08 Industrial Review Panel Smart House Ventilation System April, 25 th 2006.
Abstract Introduction End Product & Deliverables Resources Project Requirements Team Members: Faculty Advisors: Client: Team Members: Faculty Advisors:
High-Performance FPGA-Controlled Amplifier Phase IV May April 27 th, 2005.
Abstract Inexpensive ultrasonic tape measures are available that can only measure perpendicular distances to fairly large, flat surfaces. Complex environments.
Optical Encoder for a Game Steering Wheel May05-26 Client: Thomas Enterprises Advisors: Dr. James Davis Dr. Douglas Jacobson Team Members: Sam Dahlke,
Accuracy In Your Back Pocket Mid Semester Presentation October 13, 2015.
Introduction ProjectRequirements Project Requirements In a previous senior design project, a wireless front-end was added to Iowa State University’s Teradyne.
Abstract Introduction Assumptions & Limitations Design Objectives Functional Requirements Design Constraints Technical Approach Measurable Milestones End.
Alternative Energy Evaluation May06-16 Team Members: Steve ChebuharEE Anhtuan DinhEE Ryan FerneauCprE Justin JorgensenEE Client : Professor Ralph Patterson.
Device Interface Board for Wireless LAN Testing
PC Based Spectrum Analyzer April 29, 2003 May03-10 Faculty Advisor: Dr. DJ Chen Michael Cain Paul Heil Eric Rasmussen Aung Thuya Client: Teradyne Inc.
Problem Statement The goal of this project is to complete the basic automated functions of the Dream Green putting surface. The objective is to produce.
Abstract Keeping multiple children safe and accounted for can be a daunting task. When someone loses track of a child, even for a little while, anxiety.
Abstract Parking your vehicle in the garage is a task that most of us take for granted. We head home from work or school, raise the garage door and drive.
ELVIS Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite: Phase II Abstract Problem Statement The goal of this project is to convert the EE 201 labs.
Clients/Faculty Advisors Dr. Eric Bartlett May01-14 Team Members David Herrick Brian Kerhin Chris Kirk Ayush Sharma Incremental Learning With Neural Networks.
Improved Driver Education May Client:Iowa Department of Transportation Advisors:John Lamont Ralph Patterson III Max Porter Duane Smith April 25 th,
Device Interface Board for Wireless LAN Testing Team May Client ECpE Department Faculty Advisor Dr. Weber Team Members Nathan Gibbs – EE Adnan Kapadia.
Software Engineering Management
Dec03-11 Portable Gas Safety Sensor December 9, 2003
Multiple-Output, Variable-Output DC Power Supply - Phase 2 May 04-08
A Secure Wireless Interface between Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs)
Garage Parking Indicator
Automated Printed Circuit Board Development
Coin Operated Washer/Dryer Phase 2 May April 27,2004
FPGA Controlled Amplifier Module May 06-14
Planetarium Resuscitation Ongo-06 February 14th, 2002
Presentation transcript:

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Optical Tape Measure May Team Members: Faculty Advisors: Nick Freese (EE) Dr. Aleksander Dogandzic Bruce Fu (EE) Dr. Degang Chen Jason Thompson (CprE) Client: Eugene Zimmer (EE) Senior Design

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Presentation Outline Introduction Project Activity Description Resources and Schedules Closing Materials

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Definitions Laser Driver: a device used to generate a specified pulsed output voltage to a laser Photodiode: semiconductor that produces current as a result of the absorption of photons Resolution: the speed of our designs time to digital converter

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Introductory Materials Problem Statement Solution Approach Operating Environment Intended Users and Uses Assumptions and Limitations End Product

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Problem Statement Standard tape measures are cumbersome Difficult to use in complex environments Ultrasonic devices have limited capabilities

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Solution Approach Design an optical tape measure Laser guided to designate the exact point of measurement

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Environment and Users Operating environment considerations –Possible indoor and outdoor conditions –Physical abuse such as dropping Intended Users –General home owners –Construction workers –Surveyors –Architects

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Intended Uses General measurement Surveying Mining Recreational sports Industry

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Assumptions and Limitations Assumptions –The object points to be measured are stationary –The reflecting surface will be sufficiently reflective and nearly perpendicular to the incident pulse Limitations –Device must measure up to 100 feet –Accuracy must be within ± 0.5% –Dimensions must not exceed 6” x 8” x 3” –Cost of the prototype must be less than $355 –Device must be easily portable

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure End Product End product description –A small, durable, lightweight optical tape measure –A user’s manual –A maintenance manual –Test results

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Project Activities Accomplishments Definition Activities Approaches Considered Design Overview Implementation Activities Testing

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Accomplishments Defined project specifications Researched various technologies Ordered necessary circuit components Created an error model of the distance versus timer count Nearly completed device functionality testing Partially completed module integration testing

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Definition Activities Two initial issues –Distance between two points or from the device –Interfacing with a computer to create a model of a room or building

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Approaches Considered Possibilities –Pulse Time of Flight –Modulated Beam Systems –Triangulation

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Triangulation Advantages –No high frequency timer or phase detector –Overall more simple –Less Expensive Disadvantages –Less accurate –Requires at least two lasers –Setup cumbersome and inadaptable

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Modulated Beam System Advantages –No high frequency timer –Fewer systematic error possibilities Disadvantages –A high frequency modulator is needed –Less accurate at farther distances

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Pulse Time of Flight Advantages –More accurate at farther distances –More information readily available –Times could be averaged over several pulses Disadvantages –Requires a high frequency timer –Slightly more expensive –Ambient light could be problematic

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Design Overview Microcontroller Timer TransmitterDisplay Receiver Button Start Stop Distance ≈ 3 * 10 8 m/s * 3.28 ft/m * time

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Implementation Activities Concerns –Resolution –Rise and fall times –Laser output power and pulsing capabilities –Optimal receiver wavelength –Operating voltage

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Implementation Activities Time to digital converter DEI laser driver

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Implementation Activities OSRAM pulsed laser diode and photodiode PIC microcontroller LCD display SPL PL85SFH 203 PFA

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Testing Activities Functionality Tests –Individual modules –Module integration –Final system Error Analysis Tests –Accuracy –Environmental effects

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Resources and Schedules Personnel Effort Other Resources Final Project Costs Schedules

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Personnel Effort Team MemberHours Freese, Nick161 Fu, Bruce155 Thompson, Jason157 Zimmer, Eugene153 Total626

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Personnel Effort

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Other Resources

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Final Project Costs ItemsCost Poster$68.00 Laser Driver$ Electronic Components$69.79 Sub Total$ Labor at $10.00 per hour Freese, Nick$1610 Fu, Bruce$1550 Thompson, Jason$1570 Zimmer, Eugene$1550 Total$

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Schedules Tasks Sept.Oct.Nov.Dec.Jan.Feb.MarchAprilMay Project Definition Technology Research Final Design Implementing Testing Documenting & Reporting - Planned - Actual

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Closing Materials Project Evaluation Commercialization Recommendations for Additional Work Lessons Learned Risk and Risk Management Summary

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Project Evaluation Problem Definition (Fully Met) Research (Fully Met) Technology Selection (Fully Met) End Product Design (Fully Met) Acquire All Parts (Fully Met) Product Implementation (Partially Met) Testing and Revisions (Partially Met) Documentation (Fully Met)

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Commercialization Capable of being fully commercialized Production Cost: $264 Street Cost: $343 Possible market –Forestry, Surveying, Construction Replace inaccurate ultra sonic measuring devices.

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Additional Work Commercialized version requires –Working prototype –Increased functionality –Cost optimization

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Lessons Learned Successful Project –Project Plan –Poster –Design/Final Report Things to do differently –Ordering parts –Second semester communication –Plan more time for implementation

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Lessons Learned Technical Knowledge Gained –Microcontroller use –LCD control –Lasers and photodiodes –Time to digital converter Non-Technical Knowledge Gained –Communication importance –Time management considerations

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Risk and Risk Management Anticipated Risks –Project Management Kept communication lines open Stuck to the project plan –Member Attitudes Addressed problems early –Product Risks Chose safe laser Cut expensive parts

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Closing Summary Problem –Ultrasonic Tape Measures –Inaccurate, hard to use Solution –Optical Tape Measure –Time of laser flight –Accurate measurement

4/28/2004Optical Tape Measure Questions? Optical Tape Measure May 04-30