Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP) Version 6 – General Purpose Thermo-Fluid Network Analysis Software Alok Majumdar, Andre Leclair, Ric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Advertisements

Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Introduction Process Simulation.
First Law of Thermodynamics - Open Systems
Chapter 4 Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes (Open Systems)
Lecture# 9 MASS AND ENERGY ANALYSIS OF CONTROL VOLUMES
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
Chemstations, Inc – Houston, TX – – An Overview of Process Simulation What is needed? What are the steps?
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
The Advanced Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics The retrospect of the science and the thermodynamics Q&A -1- 9/16/2005(1) Ji-Sheng Chang.
Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)
University of South Carolina FCR Laboratory Dept. of Chemical Engineering By W. K. Lee, S. Shimpalee, J. Glandt and J. W. Van Zee Fuel Cell Research Laboratory.
ABSTRACT Many new devices and applications are being created that involve transporting droplets from one place to another. A common method of achieving.
Computer Assisted Process Design---HYSYS Bo Hu. Introduction HYSYS is only one process simulation program out of a number. Steady State Processes ASPEN.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Instructor: André Bakker
General Formulation - A Turbojet Engine
PTT 201/4 THERMODYNAMIC SEM 1 (2013/2014) CHAPTER 7: Entropy.
THERMODYNAMICS LAB Properties of Pure Substances
Stirling-type pulse-tube refrigerator for 4 K
CHAPTER II PROCESS DYNAMICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING
MEL140 Properties of pure substances. Pure substance A pure substance has the same chemical composition throughout. Are the following confined in a fixed.
Modeling the Internal Flow of a Droplet Craig Ferguson.
Network Analysis - Introduction Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Analysis, Modelling and Simulation of Energy Systems, SEE-T9 Mads Pagh Nielsen Procedures and Functions PROCEDURE TEST(A,B,C:X,Y)... X :=... Y :=... END.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
1 So far… We’ve developed a general energy balance We’ve developed a general material balance We’ve only actually looked at systems that are under steady.
ERT 206 THERMODYNAMICS WAN KHAIRUNNISA WAN RAMLI
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S16-1MAR120, Section 16, December 2001 SECTION 16 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS.
Mathematical Equations of CFD
Optimization of cryogenic chilldown and loading operation using SINDA/FLUINT A. Kashani (1), D.G. Luchinsky (2), E. Ponizovskaya-Devine (3), M. Khasin.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Modeling of Compressor and Combustor Flows Suresh Menon, Lakshmi N. Sankar Won Wook Kim S. Pannala, S.
Dynamic Modeling of Two- Phase Helium Pipe Flow in the Cryosystem at the Canadian Light Source Chris Regier, Ph.D. Candidate University of Calgary Schulich.
Properties of Pure Substances Chapter 3. Why do we need physical properties?  As we analyze thermodynamic systems we describe them using physical properties.
Convective Heat Transfer in Porous Media filled with Compressible Fluid subjected to Magnetic Field Watit Pakdee* and Bawonsak Yuwaganit Center R & D on.
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Jet-A Vaporization Computer Model A Fortran Code Written by Prof. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University International Aircraft.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.
Dr. Jason Roney Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
1 MAE 5310: COMBUSTION FUNDAMENTALS Lecture 2: Thermochemistry Review August 25, 2011 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
FALL 2015 Esra Sorgüven Öner
Introduction Chapter 1. Training Manual March 15, 2001 Inventory # Prerequisites Prerequisites for the Heat Transfer Seminar include: –Successful.
Chapter 7 ENTROPY Dr. Kagan ERYURUK
MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEAT TRANSFER  This equation governs the Cartesian, temperature distribution for a three-dimensional unsteady, heat transfer problem.
Multiple Species Chapter 7. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Objectives The FLOTRAN multiple species capabilities. Dilute mixture option.
TESTING AND ANALYTICAL MODELING FOR PURGING PROCESS OF A CRYOGENIC LINE A. Hedayat 1, P. V. Mazurkivich 1, M. A. Nelson 1, and A. K. Majumdar 2 (C2PoL0)
Conifer Cast 2.5 New Features: Numerical Options GMRES Iteration Option for Pressure- Velocity Coupling Tilt Pour Casting Custom Flow-3D Parameters Three.
Evaluation of a rate form of the equation of state L.H. Fick, P.G. Rousseau, C.G. du Toit North-West University Energy Postgraduate Conference 2013.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
Gas Bottle Blow-Down Analysis. Introduction This lesson provides the means to estimate the gas state in a pressure vessel during or after depressurization.
Higher Order Runge-Kutta Methods for Fluid Mechanics Problems Abhishek Mishra Graduate Student, Aerospace Engineering Course Presentation MATH 6646.
Dr. Owen Clarkin School of Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering Summary of Energy Topics Chapter 1: Thermodynamics / Energy Introduction Chapter 2: Systems.
September, Modeling of LHP Temperature Control in EcosimPro F.Romera, R.Pérez, C.Gregori, E.Turrion, D.Mishkinis, A. Torres.
1 Numerical Modeling of Cryogenic Fluid Management.
Stirling-type pulse-tube refrigerator for 4 K M.A. Etaati 1 Supervisors: R.M.M. Mattheij 1, A.S. Tijsseling 1, A.T.A.M. de Waele 2 1 Mathematics & Computer.
Numerical Investigation of Flow Boiling in Double-layer Microchannel Heat Sink.
Transient Analysis of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in a Polymer-based Micro Flat Heat Pipe with Hybrid Wicks Mehdi Famouria, Gerardo Carbajalb, Chen Lia.
ERT 214 Material and Energy Balance / Imbangan Bahan dan Tenaga
Mass Transfer transport of one constituent from a region of higher concentration to that of a lower concentration.
Conifer Cast 2.5 New Features: Numerical Options
Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes (Open Systems)
GENERAL VIEW OF KRATOS MULTIPHYSICS
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
Lecture Objectives Review for exam Discuss midterm project
topic8_NS_vectorForm_F02
Chapter 3 Properties of Engineering Working Fluid
topic8_NS_vectorForm_F02
4 CHAPTER The First Law of Thermodynamics: Control Volumes.
Presentation transcript:

Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP) Version 6 – General Purpose Thermo-Fluid Network Analysis Software Alok Majumdar, Andre Leclair, Ric Moore NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center & Paul Schallhorn NASA/Kennedy Space Center Thermal Fluids Analysis Workshop (TFAWS) August 15-19, 2011, Newport News, VA

Additional Capabilities of Version 6 Content Introduction Additional Capabilities of Version 6 Fluid Mixture Option with Phase Change Pressure Regulator Model with Forward Looking Algorithm Prescribed Flow Option Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver SI Option Concluding Remarks

Introduction GFSSP stands for Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program It is a general-purpose computer program to compute pressure, temperature and flow distribution in a flow network It was primarily developed to analyze Internal Flow Analysis of a Turbopump Transient Flow Analysis of a Propulsion System GFSSP development started in 1994 with an objective to provide a generalized and easy to use flow analysis tool for thermo-fluid systems

Development History Version 1.4 (Steady State) was released in 1996 Version 2.01 (Thermodynamic Transient) was released in 1998 Version 3.0 (User Subroutine) was released in 1999 Graphical User Interface, VTASC was developed in 2000 Selected for NASA Software of the Year Award in 2001 Version 4.0 (Fluid Transient and post-processing capability) is released in 2003 Version 5 (Conjugate Heat Transfer) is released in 2007

Network Definition = Boundary Node = Internal Node = Branch H 2 N O + O +N GFSSP calculates pressure, temperature, and concentrations at nodes and calculates flow rates through branches.

Graphical User Interface (VTASC) Solver & Property Module Program Structure Graphical User Interface (VTASC) Solver & Property Module User Subroutines Input Data File New Physics Time dependent process non-linear boundary conditions External source term Customized output New resistance / fluid option Output Data File Equation Generator Equation Solver Fluid Property Program Creates Flow Circuit Runs GFSSP Displays results graphically

Mathematical Closure Unknown Variables Available Equations to Solve 1. Pressure 1. Mass Conservation Equation 2. Flowrate 2. Momentum Conservation Equation 3. Fluid Temperature 3. Energy Conservation Equation of Fluid 4. Solid Temperature 4. Energy Conservation Equation of Solid 5. Specie Concentrations 5. Conservation Equations for Mass Fraction of Species 6. Mass 6. Thermodynamic Equation of State 7

Graphical User Interface

Capabilities Steady or unsteady flow Compressible or incompressible flow Single fluid or mixture 25 flow resistance and 33 fluid options Options for new components and physics through User Subroutine Options for new fluid through table look-up Conjugate Heat Transfer Interface with Thermal Analysis Code, SINDA-G/PATRAN Translator of SINDA/Fluint Model

Additional Capabilities of Version 6 Fluid Mixture Option with Phase Change Pressure Regulator Model with Forward Looking Algorithm Prescribed Flow Option Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver SI Option

Fluid Mixture Option with Phase Change The mixture capability in earlier versions of GFSSP does not allow phase change in any constituent of the mixture In liquid propulsion applications, there are situations where one of the constituents is saturated, i.e. mixture of liquid and vapor in equilibrium For example during purging of liquid oxygen by ambient helium, a mixture of helium, LO2 and GO2 exist Why is there such a limitation? Because the energy conservation equation of the mixture is solved in terms of temperature For calculating phase change, energy equation for each species must be solved in terms of enthalpy or entropy

Mathematical Formulation Mass Conservation Mixture Mass Concentration of Species Momentum Conservation Mixture Momentum Energy Conservation Temperature option Energy Conservation is formulated in terms of temperature Applicable for gas mixture Enthalpy option – 1 Temperature is calculated by an iterative Newton-Raphson method Enthalpy option - 2 Separate Energy Equations are solved for Individual Species Applicable for liquid-gas mixture with phase change 12

Enthalpy Option - 1 Mixture Enthalpy Equation Temperature Equation Temperature equation is solved iteratively adjusting Ti until right hand side of Temperature equation becomes zero 13

Separate Energy Equation for Individual Species (SEEIS) – Enthalpy Option - 2

Thermodynamic Properties Temperature and other properties of individual species are calculated from node pressure and enthalpy of the species: The nodal properties are calculated by averaging the properties of species: Temperature is currently calculated by averaging based on molar concentration of species Alternate method of temperature calculation based on Vapor Liquid Equilibrium for multi-component, multi-phase mixture is in progress 15

Pressure Regulator Model with Forward Looking Algorithm In Marching Algorithm, area is guessed and adjusted only once in each time step Adjustment of area is calculated based on difference between calculated and desired pressure Area adjustment can be done by backward differencing algorithm (Schallhorn-Majumdar) or forward looking algorithm (Schallhorn-Hass) Schallhorn-Hass Algorithm has been implemented in GFSSP Version 602

Backward & Forward Differencing Algorithm Forward Differencing Scheme Backward Differencing Scheme

Application of Forward Looking Algorithm Reference: Forward Looking Pressure Regulator Algorithm for Improved Modeling Performance with the Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program by Paul Schallhorn & Neal Hass, AIAA Paper No. 2004-3667 Air tank Ambient Pressure Regulator Exit

(Schallhorn & Haas Algorithm) Pressure History (Schallhorn & Haas Algorithm) Tank Pressure Note oscillations over time Pressure downstream of regulator

Fixed Flow Option A new branch option has been introduced to fix flowrate in a given branch The fixed flow branch can only be located adjacent to a Boundary Node For unsteady option, a history file will be needed to specify flowrate and area at all timesteps With this new option a user can prescribe either pressure or flowrate as boundary condition Flow Regulator option is also available in unsteady mode to fix flowrate in an internal branch

Algorithm for Fixed Flow Option(Schallhorn) System Characteristics Pump Characteristics Operating Point System Characteristics Pump Characteristics Operating Point

New Resistance Option – Fixed Flow

Properties of Fixed Flow Option Area Flowrate

Results of Fixed Flow Option

Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver Higher fidelity solutions are often needed that are not within the capacity of system level codes. GFSSP’s momentum equation has been extended to perform multi-dimensional calculation

Predicted Stream Traces Velocity Field and Pressure Contours Shear Driven Square Cavity Centerline Velocity Distribution Shear Driven Square Cavity Centerline Velocity Distribution Shear Driven Square Cavity Centerline Velocity Distribution Predicted Stream Traces Velocity Field and Pressure Contours

S I Option SI Option is for input/output GFSSP solver works in Engineering Unit User Subroutine must be in Engineering Unit

Concluding Remarks GFSSP Version 6 will have additional capabilities to model: Fluid Mixture Option with Phase Change Pressure Regulator Model with Forward Looking Algorithm Prescribed Flow Option Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver SI Option GFSSP is available (with no cost) to all Federal Government Organizations and their Contractors Concepts/NREC has the license for commercial distribution to domestic and international Companies or Universities A process is in work to make an educational version available to all Accredited US Universities for teaching and research

Acknowledgement The authors wish to acknowledge Melissa Van Dyke of NASA/MSFC and KSC’s Launch Service Program for the support of the work

References Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program - Majumdar; Alok Kumar, Bailey; John W. ; Schallhorn; Paul Alan ; Steadman; Todd E. , United States Patent No. 6,748,349, June 8, 2004 Majumdar, A. K., “Method and Apparatus for Predicting Unsteady Pressure and Flow Rate Distribution in a Fluid Network,” United States Patent No. US 7,542,885 B1, June 2, 2009. Hass, Neal and Schallhorn, Paul, “Method of simulating flow-through area of a pressure regulator”, United States Patent No. US 7890311 ,February 15, 2011 Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (Version 5) – User’s Manual by Alok Majumdar, Todd Steadman and Ric Moore (available in http://gfssp.msfc.nasa.gov/links.html ) Majumdar, A. K., “A Second Law Based Unstructured Finite Volume Procedure for Generalized Flow Simulation”, Paper No. AIAA 99-0934, 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Conference and Exhibit, January 11-14, 1999, Reno, Nevada.

References Majumdar, A. & Steadman, T, “Numerical Modeling of Pressurization of a Propellant Tank”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol 17, No.2, March-April 2001, pp- 385-390. Cross, M.F., Majumdar, A. K., Bennett, J.C., and Malla, R. B., “Modeling of Chill Down in Cryogenic Transfer Lines”, Volume 39, No. 2, March-April, 2002, pp 284-289. LeClair, Andre & Majumdar, Alok, “Computational Model of the Chilldown and Propellant Loading of the Space Shuttle External Tank”, AIAA-2010-6561, 46th AIAA / ASME / SAE / ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, July 25-28, 2010, Nashville, TN Majumdar, A and Ravindran, S.S., “Numerical Prediction of Conjugate Heat Transfer in Fluid Network”, Volume 27, No. 3, May-June 2011, pp 620-630. Schallhorn, Paul & Majumdar, Alok, “Implementation of Finite Volume based Navier Stokes Algorithm within General Purpose Flow Network Code”, submitted for 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting to be held on 9-12 January, 2012 in Nashville, Tennessee.