Literature and Law: New English Major Track Proposal Pat Angley FX Gleyzon Farrah Cato Barry Mauer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rich Veit Judy Nye Laura Jannone. Why a New First-Year Seminar First-year seminars are offered at more than 95% of American colleges and universities.
Advertisements

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Academic Leadership Retreat August 15, Prepping for Launch  Honed and simplified student learning outcomes.  Global Learning Cultural Events 
Pepperdine University Portfolio Assessment Background Research Recommendations Outcomes.
PLANT SCIENCES FOREST SCIENCE TURFGRASS SCIENCE AGROECOLOGY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTING HORTICULTURE Integrated Crop Management Plant Science Production Science.
Customisable Online Academic Skills Self-Assessment: Development and Initial Feedback Steve Briggs Nick Collis Nigel Upton.
PSU Anthropology Department Assessment Procedures Dr. Michele Gamburd
QU’s Core Curriculum Program. About Qatar University’s Core Curriculum Program What is QU’s Core Curriculum Program? What are Its Main Features?  What.
Development of Student Learning Outcomes for GE: lessons from a collaborative approach A Lawson General Education in California Conference, CSU Fullerton.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
Quality Enhancement Plan “Making Critical Connections” Bobbi Owen, Senior Associate Dean Undergraduate Education, College of Arts & Sciences Board of Trustees,
What assignments do university professors ask Nursing students to write? Roger Graves Director, Writing Across the Curriculum Professor, English and Film.
University Conference 2009 Overview and Brief Discussion of Survey Results Debi Cartwright David Hayes Mary Shapiro Thursday, February 19, 2009.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
Revised Requirement Course Proposal.  Change the Requirements for the Bachelor’s Degree from A to B. Successfully complete the General Education Requirements.
A Summary of Recommendations From the National Conference C. Brewer, U MT, 2/2010.
Information Competency: an overview Prepared by: Erlinda Estrada Judie Smith Mission College Library Santa Clara, CA.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Undergraduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
General Education (GE) Assessment College of Arts and Sciences.
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
QS 702 Phase II: Encouraging the Integration of Technology Into Higher Education.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Committee Update University Senate Linda S. Glaze Associate Provost for Undergraduate Studies.
Assessment Report School of TAHSS Department: English, Graduate Chair: Jennifer Haytock Date of Presentation: 1 October 2013.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report Brody School of Medicine.
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
BUILDING A PRIOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Office for Prior Learning Assessment Joyce Lapping, Director and Panel Presenter at NEASC 126 th Annual Meeting.
1 PENN STATE HARRISBURG CAPITAL COLLEGE Curricular Cooperation at Penn State: Major Themes and Goals
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.
Post-Tenure Review.  Section 7a of the Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure  Rules and Procedures for Annual and Special Post-Tenure Review.
FACULTY LEADING ACADEMIC PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation 2004 IUPUI Assessment Institute November 1, 2004 Val Whittlesey,
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
NYIT TUES Evaluation April 2013 Dr. Sarah McPherson NYIT School of Education.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Teaching the Writing Process. n Students learn to use the writing process as they write compositions in literature focus units and theme cycles and as.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
Curriculum Implementation Support Program (CISP).
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Five Steps to Creating Quality Assessment Plans and Reports Spring 2009.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
Integrating Content for More Authentic Student Learning Suzy Myers Language Arts and Literacy Consultant Kansas State Department of Education
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Composition Program Orientation New Common Syllabus Project Ellen Barton Director of Composition
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander
Assessment-driven Core Reform
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander
CORE CURRICULUM MEETING
Curricular Practical Training
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
RodKeller Associate Dean of Lower Division Collegiate and Developmental Education Interview August 15, 2012.
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Program/Department School of ___Health, Sciences, and Criminal Justice_______________ Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Dr. Peggy La.
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
CEA Final Report Much to celebrate!.
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Atmospheric Sciences On the Journey to Assessing Learning Outcomes
Curriculum Coordinator: Pamela Quinn Date of Presentation: 1/19/18
Presentation transcript:

Literature and Law: New English Major Track Proposal Pat Angley FX Gleyzon Farrah Cato Barry Mauer

The Focus of Our Project The Department of English is developing a Pre-Law track for English majors and needs to develop new courses and integrate them into a revised curriculum in order for this track to meet the requirements for approval by university committees. This past year when the track was originally taken forward to the university curricular level, criticism was raised that the course of study was not sufficiently differentiated from the literature track of the major. At the summer faculty development workshop, members of the department planned to address this criticism through devising new courses and drafting a distinct curricular track. We planned to work on courses that treat the Renaissance, civil rights literature, literary and visual propaganda, and early American letters.

Objectives Each 9-month faculty member of the team planned to work on developing an individual course for this track. These courses, however, will not be limited for enrollment to students in the track but will also serve students in other majors. The team as a whole planned to draft a proposed curriculum for the track, including a requirement for specific minors. The team as a whole planned to revise the paperwork required by the university for curricular revisions.

Implementation of Project Prior to the conference, the members of the team reviewed the tabled curricular proposal for the track with an eye toward revisions. Individual members of the team roughed out their course concept. During the conference, team members drafted an entire syllabus for each course and contributed to discussion of the overall curricular development of the track. After the conference, team members will revise syllabi in response to feedback and will take the draft of the track curriculum to the Department Undergraduate Studies Committee for review and, then, based on their feedback and any requested revisions are made, take the track proposal to the Department. If the Department approves, the track proposal will be sent on to the College curriculum committee.

Assessment Individual Course Assessment: The determination of having met the initial objectives will be demonstrated by university curricular approval of the courses. In terms of student outcomes, success in that area will be measured by student interest in each course, student perceptions of the quality of the course, and students' abilities in integrating a pre-law orientation to the material studied as evidenced by completed research papers. Track Proposal Assessment: The success of the development of the track proposal will be measured by whether or not it receives department, then college, and then university approval for adoption. The measures for the courses will have to be evaluated over a one- to two-year period because they need to be worked into the class schedules of the Department. The measures for the track proposal will be evaluated during the course of the curriculum review cycle.

Benefits These courses will benefit the university because each of them will promote interdisciplinary and contextual approaches to literary, textual, and cultural studies. They will benefit students in other pre-law areas who might want to think about legal issues in terms of cultural representations, perceptions, and stereotypes, which are approaches that may not be offered in their other course work. In these ways they will advance information fluency by demonstrating the need to integrate and synthesis data, information, and interpretations from different academic fields, historical periods, and cultural orientations.

Deliverables Revised Pre-Law Major Track Curriculum Literature and Law Syllabi Language and Law Syllabus