Hanford Thyroid Disease Study (HTDS) Final Report Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Advisory Team for Environment, Food, and Health.
Advertisements

Battlement Mesa Health Impact Assessment and Exposure/Health Study Stakeholders Meeting Roxana Witter, MD, MSPH John Adgate, PhD, MSPH Lee Newman, MD,
Radiation Benefit and Risk Assessment ©Health Physics Society.
Topics John Parmer, PhD Health Communication Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1) What is Health Literacy? 2) National Action Plan.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
CFSAN’s Peer Review for Risk Assessments Robert L. Buchanan, Sherri Dennis, and Marianne Miliotis.
1. Review- What is Science Explain- What kinds of understandings does science contribute about the natural world Form an Opinion- Do you think that scientists.
Reading the Dental Literature
Science and Policy Issues in the Control & Management of Environmental Hazards Introduction Connecting the Dots: Science and Policy Issues in the Control.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
What is Body Mass Index (BMI) What is Body Mass Index (BMI)
Groundwater Arsenic Concentrations and Cancer Incidence Rates: A Regional Comparison in Oregon Harmony Fleming, MS Anna K Harding, PhD Department of Public.
Biology in Focus, HSC Course Glenda Childrawi, Margaret Robson and Stephanie Hollis A Search For Better Health Topic 11: Epidemiology.
Radiation Dose Limits for Adult Subjects Henry D. Royal, M.D. Associate Director Division of Nuclear Medicine Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Professor.
Radon Overview Introduction: Radon and Radon Exposure Health Effects.
Introduction to Earth Science Chapter 1. Essential Questions 1.What does an Earth Scientist study? 2.What information do various maps give to an Earth.
OCR Cambridge National in Science (Level 1/2) R073 How scientists test their ideas.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
2004 Falls County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
The Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration: Moving Forward Together Christopher Braden, MD Director, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
Thomas S. Tenforde NCRP President 67 th Meeting of the NEA Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health Paris, France May 12-14, 2009 Overview of.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Thomas S. Tenforde President Presentation.
Beyond Dose Assessment Using Risk with Full Disclosure of Uncertainty in Public and Scientific Communication F. Owen Hoffman, David C. Kocher and A. Iulian.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Studying Injuries Using the National Hospital Discharge Survey Marni Hall, Ph.D. Hospital Care Statistics Branch, Division of Health Care Statistics.
The Scientific Method involves a series of steps that are used to investigate a natural occurrence.
Major Components of FDA’s Action Plan for Acrylamide Richard Canady, PhD DABT US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
June 8, 2004Seafood: Assessing the Benefits and Risks1 of 17 Assessing and Managing the Risks Associated With Eating Seafood Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Professor.
Children’s Mental Health Plan Advisory Committee Meeting June 17, 2014.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Slide 1 Breastfeeding Rates among U.S. Children, CDC National Immunization Survey Data Kelley S. Scanlon, PhD, RD Katherine Shealy, MPH, IBCLC, RLC Division.
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview What Is Science? Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
The International Workshop on Radiation and Thyroid Cancer (Day 2 ) Dose EstimationEffects Identification Dose Response Relationship Risk Estimation.
Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.
Estimation of the risk factors in chronic respiratory diseases of the children Cebanu Sergiu State Medical and Pharmaceutical University “Nicolae Testemitanu”
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Occupational exposure to.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
Unit 1-Inquiry What is the Scientific Method? O The scientific method is a process for experimentation that is used to explore observations and answer.
Experimental Design. Scientific Method Review ASK A QUESTION Develop a question that can be solved through experimentation. FORM A HYPOTHESIS Predict.
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview What Is Science? Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?
Epidemiological Research. Epidemiology A branch of medical science that deals with the incidence, distribution, and control of disease in a population.
Environmental Public Health Indicators: The CDC Approach Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Environmental and Social Influences on Tobacco Use Among 18 to 24 Year-Olds in Idaho Dr. John Hetherington Clearwater Research, Inc. Influences on Young.
Research Design Quantitative. Quantitative Research Design Quantitative Research is the cornerstone of evidence-based practice It provides the knowledge.
The Scientific Method involves a series of steps that are used to investigate a natural occurrence.
An Overview DCC Annual Retreat February 20, 2012.
The Scientific Method involves a series of steps that are used to investigate a natural occurrence.
Taxonomy & Phylogeny. B-5.6 Summarize ways that scientists use data from a variety of sources to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary.
The Scientific Method involves a series of steps that are used to investigate a natural occurrence.
Looking for statistical twins
A Search For Better Health Topic 11: Epidemiology
Risk, Perception, Assessment, and Management Pertemuan 3
Program Review June 2004 Good Morning
Module 6 Rotavirus vaccine AEFI monitoring
A Regional Perspective on Developing Children’s Environmental Health Indicators: The North American Experience Workshop on Environmental Threats to the.
Module 6 Rotavirus vaccine AEFI monitoring
The “Green Run”.
Dirty Bombs.
Module 6 Rotavirus vaccine AEFI monitoring
Module 6 Rotavirus vaccine AEFI monitoring
Module 6 Rotavirus vaccine AEFI monitoring
Creating a good research question…
Presentation transcript:

Hanford Thyroid Disease Study (HTDS) Final Report Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention June 21, 2002

HTDS Overview A study of thyroid disease among people exposed to iodine-131 from Hanford. The question: “Did this exposure result in increased incidence of thyroid disease?”

Why study thyroid disease? Iodine-131 was a primary source of radiation from Hanford. Iodine-131 concentrates in the thyroid gland.

About the thyroid Located at base of neck. Affects energy, temperature, weight and mood. Thyroid disease includes abnormal functions and abnormal growth.

What happened at Hanford Built to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. Large amounts of radioactive iodine-131 released into the air from 1944 through Drinking contaminated milk was a major way people were exposed.

How the study came about Public concern led to release of Hanford data. Scientific panel reviewed what happened. Panel recommendations led to: –Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project –HTDS

Type of study: Dose Response Dose Disease Does greater radiation dose result in increased incidence of thyroid disease?

Example of strong dose response Dose Disease

Example of weak dose response Dose Disease

Example of no dose response Dose Disease

Study Design Universally accepted approach. One study group with similar characteristics but different levels of exposure. Similar characteristics: –All were young children at time of highest releases. –All are from Hanford region.

Participant Selection Scientists identified a sampling of 5,199 birth certificates from seven counties. 3,440 people were able to participate. Participants represent a wide range of radiation doses.

Study Implementation All participants examined for thyroid disease. Detailed information collected for estimating participants’ radiation dose. Scientists analyzed the data. All dose estimates and data analyses recalculated and checked after release of draft report.

Findings The percentages of people with each kind of thyroid disease were about the same regardless of participants’ radiation dose. No increase in risk observed with increasing dose. The occurrence of thyroid disease was about the same as has been reported in other populations.

Meaning of the findings Hanford radiation may have had an effect on health but no increase in risk of thyroid disease was observed. If there is an increased risk of thyroid disease from exposure to Hanford’s iodine-131, it is probably too small to observe using the best scientific methods available.

Comparison to other radiation studies No other study is directly comparable. Drawing comparisons is difficult because many factors affect thyroid health: –General health, age, gender, family health history. –Type of radiation, dose, dose rate, age at time of exposure, amount of iodine in diet. Hanford has a unique profile of exposure.

How reliable are the data? HTDS used most advanced methods available to reconstruct what happened 50 years ago. Dose estimation is inherently uncertain. Several alternative approaches used to account for uncertainty. No change in results.

Public involvement and scientific review Entire process open to public input and scientific review. HTDS Advisory Committee met regularly. Public meetings and written comments to CDC. National Academy of Sciences peer reviewed the pilot study, analysis plan and draft report. Independent scientists’ reviews throughout.

Work conducted since release of HTDS Draft Report Revised the software used for estimating doses. Recalculated all dose estimates. Re-did all data analyses. Researched audiences and developed communications plan

Closing thoughts For more information: If you are concerned about exposure to iodine-131 or experience thyroid disease symptoms, you are encouraged to see your doctor for a thyroid evaluation. Thank you for coming.