New Zealand’s Second Universal Periodic Review: an opportunity for change.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.
Advertisements

Child Friendly Local Governance
Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
URUGUAY’s efforts to address synergies among the Conventions Workshop on synergies and cooperation with other conventions 2-4 July 2003 Espoo, Finland.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
WIIFM? The LAI and You LAI Action Plan: Promoting Libraries, Supporting Members Philip Cohen, Vice President.
Domestication and Implementation Package D The duty to report to treaty monitoring bodies © The Article 5 Initiative, 2013.
UPR – the role of National Human Rights Institutions Duncan Wilson, Head of Strategy and Legal Geneva, Inter-Parliamentary Union, 12 November 2012.
Importance and Perspectives of Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and Roles of Civil Society Organisations. Asian and the Pacific Disabled People’s Organizations.
On the Road to 2016: The Role of Civil Society in Contributing to International Drug Policy Mr. Jean-Luc Lemahieu, Director, Division for Policy Analysis.
Andrea Ori, HoO Regional Office for North Africa Cairo, November 2012 Regional Governance Week Social Accountability in a Changing Region The Role.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Lobbying for Food Security: FAO advocacy interventions
UNCT Engagement in Human Rights – Results and Lessons in Uzbekistan UNITED NATIONS in Uzbekistan.
The Current Debate on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Assistant Secretary-General Thomas Gass December 2014.
Twenty Years Later ICPD Beyond 2014 A Briefing on the ICPD Beyond 2014 Review Process 2012.
Human Rights Advocacy “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
Summary Report of CSO Meeting GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW), Southern Africa 15 th July 2013 Livingstone, Zambia (
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
PRESENTATION The Structured Dialogue. What? A participative process for young people and decision-makers to discuss and elaborate recommendations jointly.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
Opportunities for Civil Society in AICHR TOR Review & Amendment Yuyun Wahyuningrum, Senior Advisor on ASEAN and Human Rights, Human Rights Working Group,
United Nations Non-Governmental Liaison Service. Project Background Addressing International Issues?  Global Financial Architectural Reform  Global.
Challenges of Global Alcohol Policy Developments FIVS Public Policy Conference 7-9 April 2014 Brussels, Belgium.
Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
‘Every Newborn’ Country Consultations Country Consultation Objectives Main objective: To provide an opportunity to engage key stakeholders in participatory.
REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN’S NATIONAL POLICIES AND LEGISLATION: REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITMENTS MADE ON UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS ON WOMEN, PEACE.
INTERACTION WITH THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM
Universal Periodic Review – Australia 2015 Anna Brown 22 October
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Roles of GEF National Focal Points & Experiences in GEF Coordination and Integration Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland,
Summary UPR Cross Sectoral Steering Group What is the UPR? Women’s rights under the UPR How can you get involved and next steps? Why.
Civil society organisations’ engagement on the UPR – The Zambian Case 7 th International Training Session on the UN Human Rights Council Universal Periodic.
The UPR within the context of the UN Human Rights System.
Civil society participation in the Universal Periodic Review.
for a Fair Globalization ILO Declaration on Social Justice The International Labour Organization Summary of main provisions and key messages.
“Beyond 2008” A Briefing 11th European Conference on Rehabilitation and Drug Policy Working together – Partners for Change Ljubljana, 6 June,
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
Dr. Maria-Carme Torras i Calvo Chair, IFLA Information Literacy Section Dr. Sharon Mader Secretary, IFLA Information Literacy Section Global Partnerships.
Ministry for Women, Youth, Children and Persons with Disabilities.
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW (UPR) “UNDP Human Rights and Justice Community of Practice meeting” 29 April 2008, Geneva.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
1 Way forward for Kenya’s Universal Periodic Review Considerations and Strategies Hellen K. Mutellah Steering Committee Member KSC- UPR.
The Road To Athens Yasser Hassan First Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Egypt.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability Regional Governance Week Social Accountability in a Changing Region Cairo,
Riga’s AC Baseline Review Säästva Eesti Institute Heidi Tuhkanen, SEI-Tallinn Centre
Vitalice Meja Reality of Aid Africa. While the Paris Declaration (PD) hardly mentions civil society the AAA recognises it as a development actor “in its.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #14b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.
Global Geospatial Information Management (GGIM) A UN-DESA Initiative in collaboration with Cartographic Section, DFS Stefan Schweinfest UNSD.
GFG-BACG Meeting: Harnosand, Sweden March 14,
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability: Opportunities for inclusiveness Regional Governance Week Social Accountability.
IMPLEMENTING THE AFRICA DATA CONSENSUS: PLAN OF ACTION AND ROAD MAP 1.
The United States Trade Representative  Is an agency within the Executive Office of the President  Approximately 200 people work at USTR  Negotiate.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
International Human Rights Mechanisms: An NGO Perspective Ben Schokman June
Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction Building resilient communities and nations by putting the interests and concerns of.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
ICSW CENTRAL AND WEST AFRICAN REGION INTER AGENCY MEETING ON THE SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOOR GENEVA 22nd and 23th NOVEMBER 2010 MONITORING OF HONG KONG GENERAL.
Social Protection Global Technical Team Retreat,
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
The independent role of NHRI and NGOs in the TB and UPR processes OHCHR Treaty Body Capacity Building Programme References 1. Office of the High Commissioner.
One of the most valuable stakeholders in the GEF is civil society
Primary Health Care Improvement Global Stakeholder Meting, Geneva
Presentation transcript:

New Zealand’s Second Universal Periodic Review: an opportunity for change

Human rights Human rights belong to and are about all of us Universal periodic review process (UPR) is a unique opportunity to: –influence Aotearoa New Zealand’s human rights landscape –improve realisation of rights across all sectors 2

3

Presentation overview Overview of the UPR process Outline the opportunity to contribute –Will link to the facilitated discussions which take place at the end of this conference Overview of forthcoming development of New Zealand’s second National Plan of Action 4

5

What is the UPR? Review of human rights record of all United Nations Member States Cooperative, state-driven process Led by United Nations Human Rights Council (Geneva) UPR process designed to ensure equal treatment among states in assessing its human rights situation 6

What is the UPR? Process created 2006 By October 2011, UPR of all United Nations Member States completed A core element of the UN Human Rights Council 7

What is the UPR? Formal consideration of Aotearoa New Zealand’s human rights record by United Nations Human Rights Council Member States Periodic: every 4½ years Result of each UPR: reflected in an “outcome report” Outcome report lists recommendations the State under review either decline to accept or commits to implement before its next UPR 8

What is the UPR based on? Three main documents: –National Report on national human rights situation prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 20 pages maximum –Compilation of treaty body and UN special procedures information prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights 10 pages maximum –Summary of information from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission and civil society prepared by Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights 10 pages maximum 9

Why engage in the UPR? Valuable opportunity to raise awareness about human rights All human rights obligations can be addressed State acceptance of UPR recommendations signals strong political commitment to implement them in the following 4½ years - international accountability 10

Opportunity for civil society? Yes: voice of civil society –NGO recommendations can officially be made to New Zealand –NGO information becomes part of the official documentation prepared for the review 11

Opportunity for civil society Yes: partnership and collaboration –Opportunity to strengthen civil society - government relationship –Opportunity to encourage an ongoing, open and transparent human rights dialogue in NZ –Opportunity to collaborate with other civil society actors and establish new partnerships 12

13 Can attend as observer NGO if accredited

Key dates Stakeholder submissions (and Human Rights Commission) due 17 June 2013 Government/national report due 28 October 2013 Review: January/February 2014 Adoption of outcome document: April/May

Making a submission Individual/individual organisation report (5 pages max. + annexes) Joint report (10 pages max. + annexes) Endorse a national NGO report –Groups coordinating submissions: ACYA, Human Rights Foundation, Peace Movement Aotearoa 15

Making a submission NGO submissions are reviewed by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR then prepares summary document 16

Making a submission Emphasise key points Focus on last four and a half years since first UPR (2009) Focus on areas of concern to you/your communities Solutions focussed Concise Include paragraph on background of submitter 17

Making a submission Comply with technical guidelines of OHCHR: –Included in the Practical Guide for Civil Society – Universal Periodic Review published by the OHCHRPractical Guide for Civil Society – Universal Periodic Review 18

19

20

Making a submission New online submissions system: 21

Participation in wider process Government consultation International accountability Presence in Geneva 22

23

Adoption of outcomes Speaking rights –Priority given to coalition/joint statements Written statement Lobby government 24

Implementation On-going dialogue Monitor Work with government and other stakeholders to engage

National Plan of Action Developed 2014, jointly with Government, civil society and the Commission New Zealand’s Plan of Action Draw on commitments made by government to the UPR Focus on targeted, concrete solutions to improve the situation for all New Zealanders Action plan for five years – New Zealand’s human rights agenda

Questions? 27

More information