GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey With.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Geoscience Australia’s Online GPS Processing Service (AUSPOS)
Advertisements

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver.
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey.
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Background Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich 1, Charles Geoghegan 3 1 National Geodetic.
BigAnt * Engineering and Experimental Results * Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Dmitry Tatarnikov 1, Gerald L Mader 2, Andria.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Mapping the GPS Multipath Environment Using the Signal-to- Noise Ratio (SNR) Andria Bilich*, Kristine M. Larson + * Geosciences Research Division, National.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
AUSPOS Online GPS Processing Service John Manning, John Dawson.Ramesh Govind Geoscience Australia.
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
Recent IERS Site Survey of Multiple Co-located Geodetic Techniques by NGS Kendall Fancher, Dru Smith, Steve Breidenbach, Jeff Olsen, Nagendra Paudel NOAA’s.
Status of Multi-GNSS Monitoring Network Establishment Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Satoshi Kogure APEC GIT/15 June 14, 2011.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
Relative vs Absolute Antenna Calibrations: How, when, and why do they differ? A Comparison of Antenna Calibration Catalogs Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Simultaneous Estimations of Ground Target Location and Aircraft Direction Heading via Image Sequence and GPS Carrier-Phase Data Luke K.Wang, Shan-Chih.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
New Vertical Datum Implementation Plan FGDC Silver Spring, MD. July 30, 2013 Mark C. Eckl Chief of the Observation and Analysis Division, National Geodetic.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
10/7/ Innovative Solutions International Satellite Navigation Division ION NTM 01 Capabilities of the WAAS and EGNOS For Time Transfer SBAS, an Alternate.
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
InCORS INDIANA’S STATEWIDE GNSS-GPS REAL TIME NETWORK Presented by Derek Fuller, PLS Land & Aerial Survey Office.
Compatibility of Receiver Types for GLONASS Widelane Ambiguity Resolution Simon Banville, Paul Collins and François Lahaye Geodetic Survey Division, Natural.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
Direction of Arrival Estimation by Moving Antenna for Multipath GNSS Channel Characterization Mohammad Hatef Keshvadi Position, Location And Navigation.
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Gerald L Mader 2, Andria L Bilich 1 1 National Geodetic Survey, NOAA/NOS, Boulder CO;
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey GPS Products & Services.
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
Making good from bad: Can we use GPS multipath to measure soil moisture? Kristine M. Larson Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
PPP Workshop: Reaching Full Potential
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
IGS Workshop 2008, June 2-6, Miami Beach First activities of the IGS Antenna Working Group — Comparison of ground- and space-based satellite antenna maps.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.
M. Gende, C. Brunini Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. Improving Single Frequency Positioning Using SIRGAS Ionospheric Products.
Three-Method Absolute Antenna Calibration Comparison Andria Bilich (1), Martin Schmitz (2), Barbara Görres (3), Philipp Zeimetz (3), Gerald Mader (1),
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Guidelines for Positioning the Oregon Real-time GPS Network Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT 31 July 2013 NGS Real-time GPS Network Webinar.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
GPS ANTENNA CALIBRATION AT THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY Dr. Gerald L. Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey, NOS/NOAA Silver Spring,
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
SC – VRS Network To Support Surveying and Machine Control.
InCORS INDIANA’S STATEWIDE GNSS-GPS REAL TIME NETWORK Presented by Eric N Banschbach, PLS Land & Aerial Survey Office 97 th Annual Purdue Road School March.
GNSS Tropospheric Products
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 17
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Antenna Working Group Progress on recommendations made at the 2016 IGS workshop in Sydney, Australia Presented to the IGS Governing Board and Associate.
GNSS Background for OPUS Projects
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Progress in antenna calibrations — Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

GNSS Absolute Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey Andria Bilich & Gerald Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey With contributions from: Steven Breidenbach, Hong Chen, Kendall Fancher, Charles Geoghegan, David Gietka, Heeyul Han, Dennis Lokken, Frank Marion, Jaya Neti, Jarir Saleh

Outline Motivation NGS methods and observation models Example results NGS Calibration Services 9/23/2010ION GNSS 20102

Where do I receive the signal? Antenna reference point (ARP) Antenna element Nonphysical and inconstant point floating in space? 9/23/20103ION GNSS 2010

What is GNSS Antenna Calibration? Create a “map” of antenna characteristics Mean point being positioned (PC0) Spatial variations (PCV) 9/23/2010ION GNSS PC0 [ENU] PCV (el) PCV (az,el)

What Is The Effect of PC0/PCV? Antenna element introduces elevation- (and azimuth-) dependent advance/delay to the carrier phase observation = PC0 + PCV – Effect on heights (with respect to elevation cutoff) – Alias into troposphere estimate – <= 10cm height errors on mixed-antenna baselines Mixed-antenna and longer baselines demand good antenna calibrations Published values are idealized (environment- free) 9/23/20105ION GNSS 2010

NGS Motivations and Goals Serve high precision needs of U.S. surveying and geodesy communities Simultaneous multi-freq, multi-GNSS calibrations 2-D (elevation, azimuth) phase center patterns Free calibration service w/ quick turn-around Calibration values publicly distributed via Internet Compatibility with IGS ANTEX values 9/23/2010ION GNSS 20106

NGS Calibration Facility and Methods 9/23/2010ION GNSS 20107

Calibration Setup Single differences Short baseline (5 m) Simplified multipath environment Common clock (heading receiver) Remaining factors = phase centers (ref, test), differential multipath, hardware bias 9/23/20108ION GNSS 2010

Time Difference of Single Differences Closely spaced time pairs + robot motion = PC0/PCV at reference antenna removed slowly varying biases (differential MP, hardware bias) minimized 9/23/20109ION GNSS 2010 Fixed reference antenna Test antenna

Why Robot? Introduce angle changes for TDSD Better spatial coverage 9/23/201010ION GNSS 2010

Modelled Factors E N V PC0 [ENU] PCV (az,el) A priori position Frame rotation(s) between robot and local frame Rotation arm length Phase windup (antenna motion) 9/23/201011ION GNSS 2010

NGS Calibration Results 9/23/2010ION GNSS mm

Trimble Zephyr Geodetic 2 (TRM ) 9/23/2010ION GNSS (mm)NorthEastUp IGS

TRM phase center pattern 9/23/2010ION GNSS mm

Deviation from IGS type mean 9/23/2010ION GNSS mm

Ashtech Geodetic III ‘Whopper’ (ASH700718B) 9/23/2010ION GNSS (mm)NorthEastUp IGS

ASH700718B phase center pattern 9/23/2010ION GNSS mm

Deviation from IGS type mean 9/23/2010ION GNSS mm

NGS Calibration Services 9/23/2010ION GNSS

PC0/PCV Distribution Freely available Distribution via website: /ANTCAL /ANTCAL Data formats for different software: – NGS format (relative and absolute) – ANTEX (absolute) 9/23/2010ION GNSS

NGS Calibration Services Formal policy document – Calibration process and stages – Eligibility for calibration – Rights and responsibilities Request calibration via web form Tracking system with automated customer notification s 9/23/2010ION GNSS

Conclusions and Outlook Good agreement with IGS type means Pending approval from International GNSS Service (IGS) Soon to be “open for business” For more information – – or 9/23/2010ION GNSS