Abstract Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy First, Followed by Chemoradiation and Then Surgery, in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer A. Cercek, K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-operative Imatinib for metastatic, recurrent and locally advanced GISTs E. Efthimiou, S Mudan E. Efthimiou, S Mudan On behalf of the Sarcoma Group.
Advertisements

Neoadjuvant therapy for Rectal cancer
Diagnosis.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Rectal Case #3 Contributors: J. Milburn Jessup, MD Cancer Diagnosis Program, DCTD, NCI, Rockville, Maryland.
Rectal Cancer: A Complete Clinical Response…Now what?
Alexander Stein University Cancer Center Hamburg, Germany
Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Curative Palliative Neoadjuvant Radiation therapy the results of a phase III study from Beijing demonstrated a survival benefit.
PET after Chemotherapy in Rhabdomyosarcoma Connective Tissue Oncology Society November 19, 2005 Michelle L. Klem, Leonard H. Wexler, Ravinder Grewal, Heiko.
Breast conservation in Locally advanced breast cancer Department of Endocrine Surgery College of Medicine Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi, Kerala.
Prospective Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Oral Capecitabine followed by Total Mesorectal Exicision (TME) in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Long term results.
A phase I study on the combination of neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus pazopanib in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment of Rectal Cancer.
Pneumonectomy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemo-radiation Therapy K. Okabe, H. Tao, T. Tanaka, T. Hayashi, K. Yoshiyama,
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
Definition of oxaliplatin sensitivity in pts with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy A. de Gramont, B. Chibaudel,
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
ASCO 2009 Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 Plus Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-line Treatment of Patients (Pts) With Metastatic.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
The Impact of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in the Preoperative Multimodality Treatment of Patients with Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-04 1 Capecitabine.
Outcome of Primary Tumor in Patients With Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Receiving Combination Chemotherapy Without Surgery As Initial Treatment.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin versus 5-FU alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: First results.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
The treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal: A single institution experience P. Pathak, B. King, A. Ohinata, P. Das, C.H.
Phase II Trial of Chemotherapy in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated High Grade Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Brigitte Widemann,
AUDIT OF DOWN-STAGING CHEMORADIATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED RECTAL CANCER DR J J NICOLL NORTH CUMBRIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS SEPTEMBER 2012.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Adjuvant chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer?. What is the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy? Do patients achieving a pathological complete response need chemotherapy?
Management of the primary in Stage IV colorectal cancer Erin Kennedy, MD, PhD, FRCSC Colorectal Surgery Mount Sinai Hospital University of Toronto.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Pre-Operative Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Potential Role of Chemotherapy Robert A. Wolff, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine.
The Influence of Age on Morbidity in Primary High Grade Sarcoma of the Extremity K. Alektiar, M. Brennan, S. Singer Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Preliminary Results of the MRC CR07 / NCIC CO16 Randomized Trial Short course pre-op vs selective post-op chemo-RT for rectal cancer Local Recurrence after.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Neoadjuvant FOLFOX with Bevacizumab but without Pelvic Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Schrag D et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 3511.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Alliance A021101: Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX + Chemoradiation in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015.
Staging of rectal cancer by EUS: depth of infiltration in T3 cancers is important Christian Jürgensen, MD, Andreas Teubner, MD, Jörg-Olaf Habeck, MD, Friederike.
AUTHORS: DR VERNA VANDERPUYE,: DR JOEL YARNEY,: FRANCIS ASAMOAH:
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
TREATMENT ARM B: Cycles 1–3: Cycles 4+: 5-FU continuous infusion
Dr Jessica Jenkins Consultant Oncologist
Evaluate the results of concomitance chemoradiotherapy postoperative treatment for rectal cancer in stage II-III At K Hospital from 2012 to 2016 Speaker:
or other irinotecan-based regimens
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
and the NSABP Investigators
Presentation transcript:

Abstract Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy First, Followed by Chemoradiation and Then Surgery, in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer A. Cercek, K. A. Goodman, C. Hajj, E. Weisberger, N. H. Segal, D. L. Reidy-Lagunes, Z. K. Stadler, A. Wu,M. R. Weiser, P. B. Paty, J. G. Guillem, G.M. Nash, L. K. F. Temple, J. Garcia-Aguilar, L. B. Saltz Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Abstract Results Methods Patient Characteristics Conclusions FOLFOX and CRT before planned TME leads to substantial tumor regression and rate of pathCRs The regimen is well tolerated and leads to a high rate of delivery of all planned therapy Our recommended treatment schema includes interim imaging with MRI and/or endorectal ultrasound to assess for response to therapy This treatment strategy of completing all chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy before planned surgery offers the opportunity for selective non-surgical management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Background: Standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and post-operative chemotherapy. To address earlier systemic chemotherapy to target micrometastases. while treating the primary tumor, we began offering FOLFOX as initial treatment for patients with high-risk LARC. Purpose: To report safety and efficacy of initial FOLFOX before CRT on tumor downsizing and pathologic complete response (pathCR) in LARC. Patients and Methods: IRB waiver was obtained to review records of stage II/III rectal cancer patients (pts) treated at our institution between 2007 and Of approximately 300 LARC pts treated with CRT, 61 received FOLFOX as initial therapy. Results: Of the 61 pts, 57 received induction FOLFOX (median 7 cycles) then CRT, 4 pts had an excellent response, declined CRT, and had TME. Twelve pts did not undergo TME; 9 had a complete clinical response (CCR) and were managed non-operatively; 1 declined despite persistent tumor, 1 due to comorbidities, and 1 developed metastatic disease. 22/61 patients (36%) had either pathCR (n=13) or CCR (n=9). Of the 49 pts who underwent TME, all had R0 resections, 23 (47%) had tumor response >90%, including 13 (27%) pathCR. 28 pts received all 8 cycles of FOLFOX, 8 had pathCR (29%) and 3 CCR (11%). There were no SAEs requiring delay in treatment during FOLFOX or CRT. Conclusion: FOLFOX and CRT before planned TME results in substantial tumor regression, a high rate of delivery of planned therapy, substantial rate of pathCRs and the potential for non-operative management in select patients. A waiver of authorization was obtained from the MSKCC IRB to review an institutional database of colorectal cancer patients. The electronic medical records were searched to identify patients who met the following criteria: a)presentation to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with clinical (either MRI or ERUS) stage II/III (T3/4, N1-2) rectal cancer between 2007 and 2012 b)No prior primary tumor-directed surgery, stenting or RT c)Received induction chemotherapy with FOLFOX (5FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) or CapeOx followed by CRT (total dose if 5040cGY) then TME d)Patients had interim imaging with either MRI or surgical evaluation e)Pathology reports were reviewed to assess complete and partial response rates. Results Baseline Characteristics Number of Patients Total = 61 % Sex Male Female % 46% Age, years Average Range Performance Status (ECOG) % 31% Initial Diagnosis Stage (MRI or ERUS) T3N0 T3N1 T3N2 T4N0 T4N1 T4N % 43% 39% 2% 6% 4% Response to treatment Total number of patients with TME N=49 Pathologic Complete Response 13 (27%) >90% treatment effect23 (47%) Node positive clinical diagnosis N=46 Node negative ypN0 30 (65%) All patients completed all planned chemo and CRT There were no grade 4 toxicities or SAE Toxicities were consistent with those previously reported for FOLFOX. Grade 3 toxicities from CRT included diarrhea (4%), fatigue (1%), nausea (1%) and neutropenia (1%). All patients achieved R0 resections No patients progressed in the primary on treatment Median follow up of 15.5 months (range 47.6mo mo) Of 61 patients 22 (36%) either had a pathCR (13) or complete clinical response (9) Of 49 patients who underwent TME 23 (47%) had tumor response > 90% 13 (27%) had pathCR Results