Service Integration: Service Integration for Our Grandkids Jim Allison Manager of Planning Capitol Corridor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
Advertisements

Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Silicon Valley Leadership Group – Transportation Policy Committee (March 5, 2014) David B. Kutrosky, Managing Director Capitol Corridor (Sacramento-Oakland/San.
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/Plan Ohio Department of Transportation with Parsons Brinckerhoff SCORT.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
1 Passenger Rail Solutions – Balanced Approach 2009 Ark-La-Tex Rail Summit May 9, 2009 – Marshall, TX Joe Adams, Vice President – Public Affairs.
CSSC Regional Rail Partners, September 18, 2012 Chesapeake Connector : Freight and Passenger Rail Benefits Study.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
ACEforward The new regional initiative to improve our connection between the Central Valley and the Bay Area.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 LOSSAN Pacific Surfliner Rail Service Update.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
Title Slide California High Speed Rail Authority Board Meeting September 28, 2005.
Urban Rapid Transit John Dulin Garrett Page Surbhi Kapoor.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
California State Rail Plan Overview Presentation Tribal Informational Meeting – March 1,
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Caltrain Modernization Program Update Palo Alto City Council Rail Committee August 10, 2012.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
1 1 CRTPA Board Meeting 09/20/2010. CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX) CSX Transportation – serves every major population and industrial center east of the Mississippi;
California Integrated Logistics Center. A BART TRAIN FOR FREIGHT Moving freight through the Port of Oakland without increasing highway congestion Faster.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
North Carolina Rail Division Staff of about 50 Mission to: Improve & expand passenger rail service Improve safety at crossings Provide industrial access.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Capitol Corridor: A Performance-Based Management Model FRA Best Practices - State IPR Corridor Management AASHTO – SCORT Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 DRAFT Bay Area Regional Rail Plan August 2007 Workshops.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Michigan Accelerated Rail Service Passenger & Freight Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Faster, Better, Cheaper, Safer,
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
Metropolitan Bakersfield High- Speed Rail Terminal Analysis and Evaluation A Presentation to the California High-Speed Rail Authority By the Kern Council.
Prop 1B: Infrastructure Bonds 2007 Bay Area Vendor Fair Oakland, CA May 24,2007 Bay Area Transportation:
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
1 Round One Public Outreach Workshops Fall 2005 Presented to: Women’s Transportation Seminar 2007 Annual Conference May 2, 2007 Presented by: Therese McMillan.
Northern California Goods Movement Challenges: The I-580 Altamont Corridor Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC Presentation to Congressman Richard Pombo.
U.S. Freight Railroad Infrastructure: Current and Future Issues Craig F. Rockey Vice President - Policy and Economics Association of American Railroads.
2015 Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium Stephanie Lane, Director CSX Industrial Development November 13, 2015.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
1 Tampa Bay Transportation Management Leadership Group September 4, 2015.
Capitol Corridor Sea Level Rise Adaptation Shirley Qian, Planner.
California Intercity Passenger Rail Service Governance: Local Authority American Public Transportation Association December 2, 2015.
Summary and Wrap-up Discussion 8 July 2015
The White Paper from 2001 to 2010 Vision White Paper  Issued by the EC  Consultation from stakeholders, Parliament and Council  Will set out.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern California to the world and the nation.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Transportation Infrastructure Perspective Ross Chittenden Deputy Executive Director, Contra Costa Transportation Authority.
Linking Northern, Central and Southern
FAST Phase I is a $500 million investment to:
Downtown Valdosta Truck Traffic Mitigation Study
VicRoads – Movement & Place
VicRoads – Movement & Place
AN INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA’S FUTURE
Presentation transcript:

Service Integration: Service Integration for Our Grandkids Jim Allison Manager of Planning Capitol Corridor

Service Conception - Product of the 1990s  Prop 116 (1990) – The intercity passenger rail concept is made into reality  Lives changed, communities linked, freeways not widened, people befriending people, etc., all because of these trains  Californian are using what they voted for in 1990

Statewide Rail Network: Integration for Freight and Passenger Rail – Too Integrated?  Freight Rail industry – economically vital & energy efficient – Asia trade – US exports - US domestic energy – Rail 12x more energy efficient than trucks and almost twice as efficient as ships (units of energy consumed per ton-mile) – Can freight rail grow so that trucking freight grows faster than trucking on our freeways? with pesky passenger trains in the way?  Passenger Rail – Prop 116 investments nearing the end of their lifecycle – CA Population – at 38 million today - 60 million by 2050 – Prop 116 Peak hour trains = capacity of a freeway lane – Today – Asia and European rail operators carry the peak hour capacity of an entire freeway– even super-freeways – By 2050 (60 years from Prop 116) will that one lane of capacity support the mobility choices of our grandchildren?

Statewide Rail Network: Integration for 2040, 2050, 2060, 2070…  For all forms of rail - Integration means: – Re-examining current approaches that restrict adaptation to future needs (economic, environmental) – Creating policies and governance built upon system interdependence and function – Using tools ranging from land use planning to technology to optimize mobility options for people  What are we getting done now that will create the “normal” our grandchildren will experience?

"European railway map" by PeterEastern (talk) using data from OpenStreetMap and contributors - slippy map version. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikipedia - Service Integration: Rail Meshes with People’s Mobility Needs, Economies, and Environment

California Rail: Private and Public  Red: Publicly owned  Black: Privately owned  Many lines (private and public) no longer exist as functioning railroads

The Intercity Gap in Public Ownership  Highspeed Rail: – Phase 1 (Blue) & Phase 2 (Gold)  California’s rail ownership – Inter-urban/urban transit systems Caltrain, BART, Metrolink – Former industry service - now abandoned routes  Our BEST: Intercity ownership between Fullerton and San Diego

Ownership/Density Gap  % more people  Prop 116 bond legacy not equipped for 2050  Increasing urbanization/GHG redux/HSR require an adaptive CA Intercity Rail system  Control of ROW required to improve intercity frequency  Freight rail can’t be marginalized

 1-hour travel time between Sacramento and Oakland  Clockface frequency with 90 daily trains between Sacramento and San Jose  Minimize freight and passenger railroad interference  Increase railroad safety (grade separations, signal technology) 2015 Service 2040 Baseline (2015 Service Levels) 2040 Vision with Growth* 1,402,3002,267,2006,112,567 % increase above 2015 service 62%336% *Average ridership growth for several alignment alternatives considered in the Vision Plan Update (2014). Initial Vision Plan Ridership Estimates Vision Plan Key Concepts Service Integration is: Planning for Future Mobility Needs Now

CCJPA Vision Plan: Key Focus Areas San Jose – Oakland Coliseum  Wetland and sea level rise considerations  Several alternative alignment options exist with similar speed and capacity Oakland  Changes to ROW in Jack London Square are critical  No inexpensive options for potential grade-separated alignments Richmond – Suisun/Fairfield  Route proximity to Bay presents existing storm surge and future sea level rise risks  Alternative speedier alignments include Franklin Canyon tunnels or straighter coastal route and a new high-level crossing Suisun/Fairfield - Sacramento  Reconstructed or new freight connections and routes are necessary to separate freight and passenger rail traffic Oakland - Richmond  No alternative at-grade alignments available in this segment  ROW acquisition requires participation of multiple partners Sacramento - Auburn  Roseville 3 rd Track Project will expand current capacity to operate up to 10 roundtrip trains in this segment  Opens options to increase service levels to Auburn Mega-Region Mobility: Big Challenges – Crucial Opportunities

CCJPA’s Vision Plan Trilogy * 12 CCJPA Adopted Commencing development Commence when #2 is sufficiently along * Any future movie rights will be the property of CCJPA