降雨誘發廣域山崩模型之力學 參數逆分析實際案例 報告者:陳麒任 指導教授:董家鈞. Introduction Classification of landslide assessment: Qualitative analysis Empirical method Quantitative analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS IN GEOLOGY Miloš Marjanović Lesson
Advertisements

F. C. DAI AND C. F. LEE A Spatiotemporal Probabilistic Modelling of Storm-Induced Shallow Landslide Using Aerial Photographs and Logistic Regression 報告者:蔡雨澄.
Brief introduction on Logistic Regression
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Infinite Slope Analysis
Hillslope morphology Ch 8. Hillslope Types Soil-mantled Soil-mantled –Transport-limited –Shape: smooth, rounded Bare bedrock or thin soils Bare bedrock.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Mine dewatering for pit slope stability
報告者:蕭鈺 指導老師:倪春發 老師 2010/12/ Introduction 2. Rocca Pitigliana Test Site 3. Monitoring System 4. Hydrologic Modeling 5. Results and Discussion 6.
Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford,
Bruno Basso Dept. Crop, Forest and Environmental Sciences University of Basilicata, Italy Contacts Joe T Ritchie: Bruno Basso :
降雨誘發淺層山崩模型土壤強 度參數逆分析之比較與驗證 Adviser: 董家鈞、劉家男 Student: 陳麒任.
Infiltration Infiltration is the process by which water penetrates from ground surface into the soil. Infiltration rate is governed by: rainfall rate hydraulic.
Hydro-Mechanical Properties and Stability Analysis of Four Landslide-Prone Hillslopes in Western North Carolina 30 October 2013 York W. Lewis 1, Alexandra.
EGU General Assembly 2014 May 2nd, 2014, Vienna
REALTIME FORECASTING OF SHALLOW LANDSLIDES USING RADAR-DERIVED RAINFALL Ryohei Misumi, Masayuki Maki, Koyuru Iwanami, Ken-ichi Maruyama and Sang-Goon Park.
SCHEDULE OUTLINE In Class Exam 2 Landsliding Types Mechanics Sensitivity Probability.
INFINITE SLOPE ANALYSIS THE SIMPLEST WAY TO MODEL LANDSLIDES!
Decision Theory Naïve Bayes ROC Curves
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
The Hydrologic (Water) Cycle. Surface Water Oceans Rivers and streams Lakes and ponds Springs – groundwater becomes surface water.
Lucila Ohno-Machado An introduction to calibration and discrimination methods HST951 Medical Decision Support Harvard Medical School Massachusetts Institute.
What is compaction? A simple ground improvement technique, where the soil is densified through external compactive effort. + water = Compactive effort.
Decision Tree Models in Data Mining
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 9: hillslope processes FT#4 preview slope transport processes Mohr-Coulomb slope stability criterion HW#2.
Toby’s & Jake’s notes combined
Slope Stability 4281’ Crozet Tunnel. Central America??
Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model Andrew Simon, Andrea Curini, Eddy Langendoen, and Robert Thomas USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford,
1.Landslides - brittle failure Modeling Landscapes - Force Balance Rockslide spawns debris flow in British Columbia, GSC.
CS433: Modeling and Simulation Dr. Anis Koubâa Al-Imam Mohammad bin Saud University 15 October 2010 Lecture 05: Statistical Analysis Tools.
1. In the Pyrenees: A. Steep slopes. B. The high availability of debris in both channels and hillslopes. C. The presence of metamorphic and Flysch rock.
Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford,
台灣西部濱海區沉積岩的 孔隙率與滲透率關係 報告者:余允辰 指導教授:董家鈞 老師 報告日期: 2010/10/14.
Jia-Jyun Dong, Yu-Hsiang Tung, Chien-Chih Chen, Jyh-Jong Liao, Yii-Wen Pan 學 生 :陳奕愷 Logistic regression model for predicting the failure probability of.
FACTOR OF SAFETY Determining slope stability in Holtwood, PA in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy Kristina Lofman November 27, 2012 EPS 109.
Surface Water Hydrology: Infiltration – Green and Ampt Method
Lateral Earth Pressure
The high mountain cryosphere: processes and risks GEO 415 / 856 Jérome Faillettaz & Christian Huggel Slope stability & mass flows II: rock slides & landslides,
YANG Weimin 1, ∗, WU Shuren 1, ZHANG Yongshuang 1, SHI Jusong 1, XIANG Lingzhi 2 Research on Formation Mechanism of the Debris Flow on Slope Induced by.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Bearing Capacity ظرفيت باربري.
A Deterministic Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model (BSTEM Version 5.4) Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National.
Introduction to the TOPMODEL
Chapter1: Introduction Chapter2: Overview of Supervised Learning
Landslides - brittle failure Modeling Landslides - Force Balance Rockslide spawns debris flow in British Columbia, GSC.
4. Properties of Materials Sediment (size) Physical States of Soil Concepts of Stress and Strain Normal and Shear Stress Additional Resistance Components.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Modelling of landslide release
Deterministic landslide hazard assessment
Modelling in Physical Geography Martin Mergili, University of Vienna
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
論文作者:林三賢教授 廖振程博士 報告者:吳志偉 指導老師:陳正宗 終身特聘教授
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Modelling in Physical Geography Martin Mergili, University of Vienna
MAIERATO, ITALY LANDSLIDE (2010)
Infiltration and unsaturated flow (Mays p )
Aquifer Anisotropy and general flow equations
Hydrology and drainage
Infiltration and unsaturated flow
Modeling Landscapes - Force Balance
Po Shan Road, Hong Kong, 18 June 1972
Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools (LITT) PPT-Tool (1) Probabilistic Approach to Physically Based Rainfall-Induced.
OBJECTIVES Evaluation of;
Fluvial Hydraulics CH-3
Chapter 15 (2) Slope Stability
ICL Landslide Teaching Tools PPT-tool (1)
Numerical Analysis of slopes
Civil Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

降雨誘發廣域山崩模型之力學 參數逆分析實際案例 報告者:陳麒任 指導教授:董家鈞

Introduction Classification of landslide assessment: Qualitative analysis Empirical method Quantitative analysis Statistic method Discriminant analysis Logistic regression Conditional Probability Approach Artificial intelligence Fuzzy Theory neural network Deterministic analysis Infinite –slope stability analysis 2

Deterministic analysis of rain fall-induced landslides Observed landslide inventory Deterministic analysis Parameters Back calculate Lab test DEM Slope Soil depth Rainfall intensity hydraulic conductivity In situ test or Empirical methods Remote sensing unit weight of soil Lab test Deterministic analysis Predicted landslide inventory DEM Slope Soil depth Rainfall intensity Godt et al. (2008) Cohesion Friction angle hydraulic conductivity In situ test or Empirical methods Remote sensing unit weight of soil Back analysis of strength has advantages over lab testing in that the scale is much larger. (Gilbert,1998) 3

Confusion matrix Observed Unstable Stable Predicted Unstable Stable True Positives (TP) False Positives (FP) False Negatives (FN) True Negatives (TN) Efficiency: ( + )/( )Sensitivity: /( + )Specificity: /( + ) trial and error Cohesion =1 to 50 kPa Friction angle=1 ° to 50 ° Cohesion =1 to 50 kPa Friction angle=1 ° to 50 ° Deterministic analysis Predicted landslide inventory Observed landslide inventory Observed Predicted 4

1)Maximum Efficiency( 林衍丞, 2009) 。 2)Maximum AUC ( 林衍丞, 2009) 。 3)Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90%( 中興工程顧問社 , 2004) 。 1)Maximum Efficiency( 林衍丞, 2009) 。 2)Maximum AUC ( 林衍丞, 2009) 。 3)Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90%( 中興工程顧問社 , 2004) 。 Criterion ROC 林衍承 (2009) FS=1FS=1.5 Sensitivity 4)Maximum Develop Sensitivity 5)Maximum the average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity 4)Maximum Develop Sensitivity 5)Maximum the average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity Sensitivity: /( + ) Specificity FS=0.5 5

6 Observed Predicted Observed Predicted 100%

7 6)Minimum distance between the corner(1,1,1) and the plane.

Objective 1.Compare results of each criterion 2.Back calculate the parameters (friction angle and cohesion) 8

Rainfall-induced landslide model – This research use TRIGRS, a Fortran program developed by USGS. The Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope- Stability. – Parameters : precipitation intensity, slope, soil depth, initial water- table depth, saturated vertical hydraulic conductivity, hydraulic diffusivity, cohesion for effective stress, angle of internal friction for effective stress, total unit weight of soil. 9

Theoretical Basis Infinite-slope stability – Landslide with planar failure surfaces. – Slide depth is much smaller than length and width. where c’ is soil cohesion for effective stress, Φ’ is the soil friction angle for effective stress, γ w is unit weight of groundwater, and γ s is soil unit weight, β is slope angle, ψ is pressure head. 10

Richards equation coordinate system One-dimensional form (linear diffusion equation) (initial condition) (boundary condition) Transient vertical groundwater 11

Combined Iverson(2000) and Savage et al.(2003). 12

Flow Chart TRIGRS Cohesion=1,50 Friction angle=1,50 Parameter Predicted landslide inventory Observed landslide inventory Sensitivity Efficiency Specificity Criterion Cohesion Friction angle 13 Discussion

Study Area 14

Input Data Slope Soil depth 15

parameterCohesion (kPa) Friction angle(°) Unit weight of soil(kN/m 3 ) saturated vertical hydraulic conductivity(m/ s) Initial infiltration rate (m/s) hydraulic diffusivity (m 2 /s) initial water-table depth (m) Value E-41E-62E-2Assume equal to soil depth Input parameters Iverson (2000) 、吳佳郡 (2006) 、中興工程 顧問公司 (2004) 、 Paolo (2001) 和 Lancaster (2002) 2001/7/29 ~ 2001/7/30 Storm event 16

Result of maximum AUC criterion Five largest AUC parameters Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is It’s hard to distinguish the most suitable parameter. Cohesion( kPa) Friction angle AUCSensitivityEfficiencySpecificityDevelop sensitivity True value Cohesion( kPa) Friction angle AUCSensitivityEfficiencySpecificityDevelop sensitivity

Landslide inventory Five largest Efficiency parameters Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is 489. Cohesion( kPa) Friction angle AUCSensitivityEfficiencySpecificityDevelop sensitivity Cohesion=47 kPa Friction angle=39 degree 18

Sensitivity First Cohesion(kPa)Friction angle SensitivityEfficiencySpecificity Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% Specificity First Cohesion(kPa)Friction angle SensitivityEfficiencySpecificity Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is 18 19

Develop Sensitivity criterion Five largest Develop Sensitivity parameters Cohesion(k Pa) Friction angle Develop sensitivity SensitivityEfficiencySpecificity Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is 7 20

Cohesion=23kPa Friction angle=32degree 21

The average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity criterion Cohesion( kPa) Friction angle AverageSensitivityEfficiencySpecificityDevelop sensitivity Five largest value parameters Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is

Cohesion=20kPa Friction angle=29degree 23

24 Minimum distance between the (1,1,1) and the plane Cohesion( kPa) Friction angle DistanceSensitivityEfficiencySpecificityDevelop sensitivity Five largest value parameters Parameter number of maximum value within 1% is 6.

Criterion Parameter number of maximum value within 1% AUC1467 Efficiency489 Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% 18 Develop Sensitivity7 Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity77 Minimum distance between the (1,1,1) and the plane 6 C: Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% D: Develop Sensitivity E: Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity F: Minimum distance between the corner and the plane 25

26 Criterion Average distance Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% 7.7 Develop Sensitivity8.7 Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity 7.0 Minimum distance between the (1,1,1) and the plane 4.1 C: Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% D: Develop Sensitivity E: Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity F: Minimum distance between the corner and the plane

27 Criterion Average value C(kPa) φ Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% 2231 Develop Sensitivity2137 Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity 2325 Minimum distance between the (1,1,1) and the plane 2226 C: Efficiency greater than 80%, Sensitivity greater than 60% and Specificity greater than 90% D: Develop Sensitivity E: Average of Efficiency, Sensitivity and Specificity F: Minimum distance between the corner and the plane

Future work Using Bayesian inference to calculate the probability of parameters. 28

29