Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Advertisements

International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
Trademark Portfolio Management
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
UNITARY PATENT Challenges for the EPO - Advantages for the users Georg Artelsmair6 September 2012.
1 “ A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TRADEMARK PROTECTION BETWEEN JAPAN AND MONGOLIA UNDER THE MADRID PROTOCOL” For future development of Trademark Protection in.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations MPU Review of International Application.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
Trademark Protection Under the Madrid Protocol: Strategic Considerations Presented by John Scruton.
Seminar and Roundtable on the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Tel Aviv February 8 and 9, Eric FONTAINE Assistant Team Coordinator.
Trademarks as a Business Asset and the Power of Branding Heinz Goddar / Ludwig Kouker April 26/28, /28HG-3 26/28/04/2014 – Trademarks in.
The Madrid Trade Mark System Dr Simon Goodman Partner, Reddie & Grose London and Cambridge.
T.J. Romano Kolisch Hartwell, P.C. Portland, OR
Madrid – A System for Businesses Madrid Seminar Washington 23 October 2013 Rodrigo Garcia-Conde Examiner.
LANGUAGE AND PATENTS Gillian Davies Montréal, July 2005.
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq. Gavin Law Offices, PLC GRIPLA October 28, 2010 International Trademark Treaties and.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
The Madrid System Basic features and recent developments
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS André Ntamack Tel Aviv, July 4-5, 2007.
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
The Madrid system for the International Registration of Marks Basic and General Principles when Filing an International Application Podgorica June 6, 2011.
Jerusalem July 2010 André Ntamack
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 59 TH COUNCIL MEETING “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE IT CLICK” Linda Wang TAY.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS.
World Intellectual Property Organization Recent Developments in the Field of Trademarks and the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks.
Trademarks in Latvia Agency TRIA ROBIT 5 Vilandes Street, Riga LV-1010, Riga, Latvia P. O. Box 22, LV Tel.:
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
OEPM The European Patent with unitary effect: Gateway to a European Union Patent? Perspectives from non-participating member States. Raquel Sampedro Head.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Strategic Use for SME’s of the Madrid and Hague Systems Betty Berendson, Senior Information Officer Information.
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
World Intellectual Property Organization The 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs WIPO National.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
The Madrid Protocol: Key Benefits, Risks and Strategies.
Options for protecting your trademarks in the European Union A Presentation by Mark Kennedy – OHIM External Relations KIPO Seminar on The Community Trade.
1 HOW TO PROTECT A MARK? Giulio C. Zanetti, IDLO Turin, November 6, 2009.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
NORTH AFRICA REGIONAL UPDATE MOHAMED ELDIB. TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABOUT ELDIB & CO  NORTH AFRICA OVERVIEW  LATEST DEVELOPMENTS  IP OVERVIEW  STATISTICS.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs Sub-regional seminar organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Geographical Indications
SME's and Trademarks OHIM's initiatives for raising of awarenes on the importance of Trade Mark protection Beate Schmidt – Cancellation and Litigation.
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq
SPCs and the unitary patent package
EC Accession to the Madrid Protocol
Deputy Registrar of Trademarks & GI
Design Law 2018 Strategies for using the Hague System
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
Gordon HUMPHREYS Chairperson of the 5th Board of Appeal
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and Lisbon, Brands and Designs Sector THE MADRID SYSTEM

Role of the International Bureau INTERNATIONAL BUREAU Applicant Formality Examination No Irregularities Records in the int’l Register Publishes in the Gazette County A County B County C Issues a registration certificate Notifies Designated Contracting Parties

Effects of the International Registration Refusals International Registration

Effects of International Registration National application National registration as from the date of the international registration in the absence of refusal

Effects of the International Registration – Article 4 – The International Registration = A National Application until the expiry of the time limit to issue a refusal A National Registration once the time limit to issue a refusal has expired (assuming no refusal or refusal withdrawn)

Designations of Contacting Parties: Agreement International application governed exclusively by the Agreement Use official form MM1 A AP A A FranceAlgeria

Designations of Contacting Parties: Protocol International application governed exclusively by the Protocol Use official form MM2 P P! AP P or Viet Nam AP France Japan P

Designations of Contacting Parties: Mixed International application governed by both the Agreement and the Protocol Use official form MM3 A P! AP A or Viet Nam AP France Algeria A+PA+P

Designated Contracting Parties What is the role of the Office of the Designated Contracting Parties? No specific role But possibility to issue a Refusal

Designated Contracting Parties may notify the IB of Substantive Examination within set time limits (12 or 18 months) Provisional Refusal Grant of Protection* = National Registration OFFICE OF DESIGNATED CONTRACTING PARTY Confirmation of Refusal Withdrawal of Refusal = National Registration * No Office shall be obliged to send statements of grant of protection before January 1, 2011.

Time Limits Notification of provisional refusal: 12 months Mandatory under Agreement Optional under Protocol 18 months Optional under Article 5(2)(b) of the Protocol “ 18 months + ” in case of opposition Article 5(2)(c) of the Protocol

Non-Valid Grounds for Refusal Formal grounds Classification of the goods and services (Rule 12) Multi-class registration (Article 5(1)) Limited goods or services (Article 5(1))

Latest developments: Statements of ground of protection

Interfaces between the Madrid System and the Community Trade Mark

MS & CTM - Similarities Single filing mechanisms for international protection Cost effectiveness over national filings Administrative efficiency over national filings

MS & CTM – Fundamental Differences (1) MS Bundle of national rights Part of national systems CTM Unitary right Overlaid onto national systems Implications

MS & CTM – Fundamental Differences (2) ImplicationsMS No inherent conflict with national systems CTM High number of oppositions

MS & CTM – Other Points of Comparison (1) Geographical scopeMS Goes well beyond EU CTM EU only

MS & CTM – Other Points of Comparison (2) InvalidityMS Once dependency is over, invalidation only via national actions CTM Always vulnerable to destruction of unitary nature by invalidation in one Member State

MS & CTM – Other Points of Comparison (3) Language MS French only – MA French/English/Spanish - MP CTM 5 working languages [English, French, Italian, Spanish, German]

MS & CTM – the Link (1) Designate CTM within MP application Base MP application on CTM

MS & CTM – the Link (2) CTM as designation Usually a good option “Opting back” choices – safety net

MS & CTM – What’s the Answer? (1) Neither system should predominate Complementary

MS & CTM – What’s the Answer? (2) Costs in a given set of circumstances Filing costs – easy to estimate Prosecution costs – harder Oppositions – almost impossible

Thank You