The Madrid Trade Mark System Dr Simon Goodman Partner, Reddie & Grose London and Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Advertisements

International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
Trademark Protection Under the Madrid Protocol: Strategic Considerations Presented by John Scruton.
Trademarks as a Business Asset and the Power of Branding Heinz Goddar / Ludwig Kouker April 26/28, /28HG-3 26/28/04/2014 – Trademarks in.
Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.
T.J. Romano Kolisch Hartwell, P.C. Portland, OR
LAUNCHING NEW PRODUCTS - PART II Protecting forms & new models in the market INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (updated 2006) Caroline Schwab - Program Officer Small.
LANGUAGE AND PATENTS Gillian Davies Montréal, July 2005.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq. Gavin Law Offices, PLC GRIPLA October 28, 2010 International Trademark Treaties and.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
The Unitary Patent One single patent covering 25 EU members October 2013 Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido Patent Examiners,
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND YOUR RIGHTS Helen Johnstone Seminar 12 July 2006 EAST MIDLANDS INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION.
Open Competition Intellectual Property Specialists (AST 3/ AD6) OHIM, Alicante – Spain Open for application: October 31st 2013 Apply before : December.
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
Protecting your knowledge and creativity, the basis of your success. Patents in European Union national, European, unitary Presentation for.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
The Madrid system for the International Registration of Marks Basic and General Principles when Filing an International Application Podgorica June 6, 2011.
Protecting Designs via the Hague Agreement March 18, 2010 Thibault Fayette Senior Counsel The Procter & Gamble Company.
Trade Marks & Branding for Not-for- Profit Organisations Presented by: Jason Watson, Partner Saioa Echevarria Idianez, Trade Marks Attorney FAL MARKS &
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 59 TH COUNCIL MEETING “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FROM A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE IT CLICK” Linda Wang TAY.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS.
Protecting your knowledge and creativity, the basis of your success. Trademark registration in Poland: European and national rights Intellectual.
ADVANTAGES FOR PAKISTAN AND OTHER DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN JOINING THE MADRID PROTOCOL.
“Protecting your brand”.   Trade Mark (TM) – (Brand) a sign that is graphically represented and identifies and distinguishes the goods and services.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Strategic Use for SME’s of the Madrid and Hague Systems Betty Berendson, Senior Information Officer Information.
Conference on the Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol The Accession of the European Community to the Madrid Protocol - the long.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION IN GHANA BY MRS. SARAH NORKOR ANKU, STATE ATTORNEY REGISTRAR-GENRAL’S DEPARTMENT 27/1/2016.
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
The Madrid Protocol: Key Benefits, Risks and Strategies.
Options for protecting your trademarks in the European Union A Presentation by Mark Kennedy – OHIM External Relations KIPO Seminar on The Community Trade.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
Unit 3 Seminar International Issues in IP Law. Unit 3 – International Issues in IP Law Unit 3 will focus on Chapters 8, 16 & 21 –Make sure to download.
NORTH AFRICA REGIONAL UPDATE MOHAMED ELDIB. TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABOUT ELDIB & CO  NORTH AFRICA OVERVIEW  LATEST DEVELOPMENTS  IP OVERVIEW  STATISTICS.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
What is intellectual property and
Recent Developments at the International Level
Registering your brand
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq
IP Awareness and Enforcement: Modular Based Actions for SMEs
Trade Mark Registration
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Deputy Registrar of Trademarks & GI
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
EGYPO Organisational structure
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

The Madrid Trade Mark System Dr Simon Goodman Partner, Reddie & Grose London and Cambridge

Reddie & Grose - 17 Partners -European Patent Attorneys. -European Trade Mark Attorneys. -Chartered Patent Attorneys. -Registered Trade Mark Attorneys.  Based in London and Cambridge

The Madrid System  What is it?  How does it work? The nuts and bolts.  Why would you use it?  Why wouldn’t you use it?  Is it a good thing? And when will India join?  Questions / Discussion.

The Madrid System  Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks. -“The Madrid Agreement”. -Concluded 1891; Came into effect  Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks. -“The Madrid Protocol”. -Concluded 1989; Came into effect  India Joins Madrid Protocol 2008?

Structure  Trade Mark Registrations are National rights  Community Trade Mark is an exception to this. -CTM registration is a unitary right covering the entire EU, overlapping with National Rights.  Madrid System leads to International Registrations. -These are not enforceable rights. -But bundles of National or Regional registrations.

WIPO  International trade mark applications are handled by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).  WIPO acts as a middle-man between the applicant and National and Regional Trade Mark Offices.  Which countries can an International application lead to?

Who can apply?  Only those entitled by virtue of a relationship with a Member country (Country or Origin).  Madrid Agreement. - Cascade 1.Country where applicant has a real and effective effective industrial or commercial establishment. 2.Country where the applicant is domiciled. 3.Country of which applicant is a national.  Madrid Protocol. - Same bases 1, 2 and 3, but applicant can choose.

Where can you apply?  Entitled in a Madrid Agreement member country? -can file an application under the Agreement.  Entitled in a Madrid Protocol member country? -can file an application under the Protocol.  Entitled in a country that is a member of both? -can file an application under both.  Entitled in India? - Protocol only, designating Protocol member countries. Cannot designate countries that are only Madrid Agreement members.

Procedure 1  Madrid Protocol application must be filed at the Trade Mark Office of the Country of Origin.  Based on a “home” registration or application in the Country of Origin.  Application sets out: Trade Mark. Goods and Services. Applicant. Applicant’s entitlement to file. Home application or registration. At least one designation.  In an official language of Madrid Protocol: English, French, Spanish.

Procedure 2  The Office of the Country of Origin certifies certain particulars of the application: -Do the Mark and Goods and Services correspond to the home application or registration? -The date and number of the home application or registration. -The date of filing of the International application. -If applicable, whether the Submission fee has been paid.  The Office then forwards application to WIPO in Geneva.

Procedure 3  WIPO checks the application for formal deficiencies, and the list of goods and services for clarity and classification.  WIPO has the final say on the form and classification of goods and services.  WIPO collects official fees.

Fees  Basic fee.  And: -Complementary fee for each designation. -Supplementary fee for each class over 3. OR -Individual fees.  Some countries require the Complementary fee.  Others set Individual fees; these cannot exceed their fees for a National or Regional application.

Procedure 4  When WIPO procedure is complete, WIPO; -Registers the mark in the International Register, -Publishes details in the International Gazette, -Issues Registration Certificate; and -Notifies Offices of designated Contracting Parties.

(151) (180) (171) 10 (732) JOHN LEWIS PLC 171 Victoria Street, LONDON, SW1E 5NN (GB) (812) GB (842) Public Limited Company United Kingdom (740) Linda J Harland C/o Reddie & Grose 16 Theobalds Road London WC1X 8PL (GB) (540) JONELLE (511) 24 Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; bed and table covers. Tissus et produits textiles, non compris dans d'autres classes; couvertures de lit et de table. (822) GB, , (832) AT, GR, IE, NO, PT

Procedure 5  Offices of Contracting Parties then have 12 or 18 months to raise any objections.  Each Office examines the application according to its normal procedures; - Trade Mark Office examination. - Publication. - Third Party Opposition period.  If no objections arise, some Offices of Contracting Parties tell WIPO, who tell the applicant.

Procedure 5  If objections arise, the Office of the Contracting Party sends a “Notification of Provisional Refusal” to WIPO, setting a response term.  WIPO notifies the applicant.  The applicant responds directly to the Office of the Contracting Party.  This usually (always?) requires a local Address for Service, and appointment of a local attorney.

Procedure 6 (and last)  If applicant overcomes objections and/or oppositions, then a Registration is granted in that country/region.  Scope of goods and services may be narrowed as a result of objections.  So the scope of the designation may be narrower than that of the International Registration. It cannot be broader.  Scope can differ in different countries.

Other Features 1  Adding Designations -After filing an International Application you can add new Designations at any time. - File through Office of Country of Origin or WIPO. - WIPO collects fees and notifies Office of Contracting Party. - Office has 12 or 18 months to raise objections. - Registration granted or refused.

Other Features 2  Dependency and Central Attack - For 5 years after International Application filing date, if the home application or registration is narrowed or limited in any way, then the International Registration is correspondingly narrowed or limited. - If basic application or registration is invalidated, then so is the International Registration. - Under the Madrid Arrangement, this is terminal. - Under the Madrid Protocol, conversion into national applications is possible.

Features 3  Centralised Procedures - Renewal fee payment. - Change of name recordal. - Assignment recordal. - Licence recordal.

Why use it?  Pro’s: - Simplicity - if no objections are raised. - requires good advice. - Single application. - Centralised register and renewals.  Con’s: - Complexity - if objections are raised. - Central attack. - Home country is outside International Registration - Dependence on home country practice.

Costs  Low, if no objections are raised, but not as low as applicants might wish.  Madrid Agreement Complementary fee is very low.  Madrid Protocol fees usually comparable to normal National or Regional fees.  Cost savings in local attorney fees if no objections are raised.

How Successful is the Madrid System? 1892Madrid Agreement 1880’sInvention of the motor car. 1890’sInvention of the radio. 1897Ahmedabad telephone service started. 1900’sInvention of the aeroplane. 1900’sFounding of Reddie & Grose. 1978Patent Cooperation Treaty 1996Madrid Protocol

How Successful is the Madrid System? Madrid Agreement 57 members* Madrid Protocol 74 members Patent Cooperation Treaty 138 members * Of which 7 are not also Madrid Protocol members

Is it a Good Thing?  An International Trade Mark Registration System sounds great.  But is it used less than one might expect?  Why don’t more countries join it?  Why does the PCT seem more successful?  Will the Madrid System become as ubiquitous as the PCT?

What do others think?  “Relax. The entire exercise might become a cakewalk with India deciding to become a signatory to the Madrid Protocol.” (Goliath: Business Knowledge on Demand)  “Although the Madrid Protocol is not the utopian solution, it definitely is the best system presently available…” (    ROMARIN and Madrid Express

Thank you Any Questions? Dr Simon Goodman, Reddie & Grose