Promising Research topics for Students With Learning Disabilities? Sharon Vaughn Regents Professor Sharon Vaughn Regents Professor University of Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Advertisements

Successful Learning Conference 2013 Making adjustments for students with special education needs, K–6 24 June 2013.
Progress Monitoring. Progress Monitoring Steps  Monitor the intervention’s progress as directed by individual student’s RtI plan  Establish a baseline.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Standards-Based IEPs Writing Goals and Objectives
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Strategies and Tools for Teaching English Language Learners with Disabilities April 9, 2005 Kristi Liu.
Anatomy of Direct Instruction EDTE 408 Principles of Teaching.
Students with Learning Disabilities
Integrating Math in the ESOL Curriculum MATH FOR ALL.
Educational (Achievement) Testing Difference between IQ, Aptitude, and Achievement Testing. IQ vs. Achievement- IQ tests are measures of broad abilities.
+ 21 st Century Skills and Academic Standards Kimberly Hetrick Berry Creek Middle School Eagle County School District.
1 Sharon Vaughn Center on Instruction -SpEd The University of Texas Note: Data presented in this power point is preliminary and may be adjusted after further.
Common Core State Standards & SBAC Field Test April, 2, 2014 Hill Regional Career High School Intended Outcomes: To gain a general understanding of the.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
Year 7 Transition Project. AIMS To provide support in literacy and study skills for year 7 pupils. The Helen Arkell Centre are providing twice weekly.
Effective Pedagogical Practices for Fragile Learners California Educational Research Association December 2011 Alicia Henderson, Ph.D. Franklin-McKinley.
Working with Students with Learning Disabilities By: Amanda Baker.
Navigating the Test Accommodation Process Between Secondary and Postsecondary Settings Nicole Ofiesh, Ph.D University of Arizona California State University,
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY (SLD). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY Documented evidence which indicates that general education interventions.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION State Board of Education Update on Student Performance First Analysis of Smarter Balanced Results September.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Crawford Central School District Math and ELA PA Core Alignment Project Created by Cheryl Krachkowski.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Fad or Fact? Individualization x Learning Styles The term learning styles refers to the view that different people learn information in different ways.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Copyright © 2007 by Allyn & Bacon Chapter 3 Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Introducing the Common Core Standards In June 2010, NJ adopted the new Common Core State Standards for Math and Language Arts Currently, 45 states have.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Sample Outcome Data from Makes Sense Strategies Research Impact on WRITING Impact on VOCABULARY Impact on INFORMATION PROCESSING SKILLS Impact on CONTENT.
Goals, Objectives, Outcomes Goals—general purpose of curriculum Objectives—more specific purposes that describe a learning outcome Outcomes—what learner.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
LaKenji Hastings, NWLC Assessment Program Specialist Georgia Milestones Parent Informational.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) LEARNING DISABILITIES (LD) By: Julia Bjerke, Monica Fontana Crystal Schlosser, & Jessica Ringwelski.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
REVIEW SECONDARY PROGRAM MODELS & THRUSTS General Education Target: Students with mildest of disabilities. Academic Focus Target: learners with mild learning.
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
TODAY’S SITUATION Teachers in a self-contained classroom, as well as those in core content classes such as Social Studies, Math, Science, and Language.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Coventry Public Schools
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Presentation transcript:

Promising Research topics for Students With Learning Disabilities? Sharon Vaughn Regents Professor Sharon Vaughn Regents Professor University of Texas With a little help from my friends: Amory Cable Jack Fletcher Doug and Lynn Fuchs Russell Gersten

History of Special Education  For many students with disabilities, the initial goal of special education was to ensure that they were provided an opportunity to attend and profit from education (FAPE).  The history of special education for students with LD focuses more on appropriate instruction.

“Whereas many typically achieving students can make up for lost time, learn well independently, and make up for mistakes made by educators, special education students cannot. The influence of research and evidence on decision making has even greater value for those students with disabilities who most require precision in their instructional and behavioral plans.” (Vaughn & Dammann, 2001, p.27) “Whereas many typically achieving students can make up for lost time, learn well independently, and make up for mistakes made by educators, special education students cannot. The influence of research and evidence on decision making has even greater value for those students with disabilities who most require precision in their instructional and behavioral plans.” (Vaughn & Dammann, 2001, p.27)

Research Issue # 10 How do we adequately IDENTIFY and CLASSIFY students with Learning Disabilities? WHY do we care?

Accuracy in Classification Essential:  Yields validity in the Construct  Provides for improved treatment  Issues of identification have long haunted the field of learning disabilities.

What is a Learning Disability? Is Charlie Brown LD?

Hypothetical Classification of LD: Marker Variables involving:  1. Word Recognition (Dyslexia)  2. Reading Fluency  3. Reading Comprehension  4. Math Computations (Dyscalculia)  5. Math Problem Solving  6. Written Expression (Handwriting, Spelling, Text Generation?)

Low Achievement is Necessary but Not Sufficient  Homogeneity is at the level of the academic skill  Processing subtypes currently do not explain independent variability

Research Issue #9: Should we understand underlying processes in Learning Disabilities ? The initial work in learning disabilities attempted to better link the underlying processes that “caused” the learning disability with possible cures or “remediation” of those underlying process disabilities.  Psychoeducational strengths and weaknesses  Concerns with linking process disabilities to treatment lead to strange and unreliable interventions

Does this mean all work on process deficits is hopeless? 1. Knowledge about the neurological underpinnings of learning and LD are not adequately understood. 2. The measurement needed to identify specific process disorders in learning has not been precise. 3. Matching the subtype of a learning problem with appropriate treatments has not been successfully conducted.

Do process oriented interventions live on? Modality-matched and multi-sensory approaches continue to be used as interventions for students with LD with no research to support their use. Finding from meta-analyses: There is no empirical support for the use of modality- matched or multi-sensory approaches for students with LD

Research Issue # 8 How do we Improve the Knowledge and Skills of Special Education Teachers Does Teacher Quality Matter? What are the Indicators of Teacher Quality? How do we Measure Teacher Quality?

Student Outcomes….  The ultimate goal of special education is to improve students social, behavioral, and academic outcomes  These outcomes are influenced by teacher’s practice.  Influencing teacher’s practice – how to effectively accomplish this requires further study.

Teacher practice Student outcomes

Research Issue #7 How do we Improve the Knowledge Based on Transition to Work? We need to understand much more about effective practices for individuals with learning disabilities as they transition to work and postsecondary We need to understand much more about effective practices for individuals with learning disabilities as they transition to work and postsecondary

 Students with LD will need access to post- secondary options  Investigations on how to effectively influence access and success in post- secondary settings are needed.  Investigations that increase school retention.

Research Issues #6 How do we provide effective interventions in STEM? Students with Learning Disabilities will be required to meet the increasing demands of  Science  Technology  Mathematics

Increasing knowledge… In Science, Technology, and Math will require knowledge of  effective instructional practices for improving concept learning to mastery,  effective instructional practices for accessing general education curriculum related to higher level thinking in ALGEBRA and SCIENCE

Research Issue #5 What writing interventions are effective? How to improve students’ written composition including knowledge of:  Effective practices for written expression across genres  Effective practices for basic writing elements such as handwriting/keyboarding; spelling

In particular, We need RIGOROUS, long term studies of effective practices in written composition and the elements of writing. Noteworthy is the need to look at effects over time and to examine transfer.

Research Issue #4 What language interventions are effective? What practices are associated with improved outcomes in expressive language development and listening comprehension for students with language/learning disabilities?

What do we know?  We know exceedingly little from rigorous studies of effective practices for improving expressive and receptive language outcomes for students with language/learning disabilities.

More research is needed  To identify effective language intervention practices for complex syntax, curriculum related vocabulary, receptive language and pragmatics (social communication)  To identify effective service delivery models  To examine optimal treatment dosage  To assess generalization and maintenance effects in longitudinal studies

Research Issue #3How do we effectively deliver instructional services? What practices are effective for teaching students who are learning disabled and English language learners?

Much of what we know about teaching students who are both learning disabled and English language learners has been adapted from the less-than-adequate research base on ELLs without disabilities.

Instructional practices for ELLs Instruction practices for students with LD Instruction for English Language Learners with LD ?

Research Issue #2: Models of Service? How Effective are various service delivery models for meeting the needs of students with Learning Disabilities including: Resource Room models, Inclusion, and Response to Intervention? How Effective are various service delivery models for meeting the needs of students with Learning Disabilities including: Resource Room models, Inclusion, and Response to Intervention?

Improving our understanding of practices associated with effective outcomes for students with learning disabilities based on the type of delivery service provided is required. Improving our understanding of practices associated with effective outcomes for students with learning disabilities based on the type of delivery service provided is required.

Research Issue #1 What Practices Improve Academic Outcomes for Students with LD ? When students fail to respond to traditionally effective instructional practices in reading, math, spelling, and writing --- what intensive interventions are associated with effective outcomes?

What do we know?  We have learned much in the last 2 decades about teaching students with learning difficulties.  We know considerably less about teaching students whose response to typically effective practices is low/very low.

What types of interventions hold promise for students with LD?

Academic Difficulty Intervention

We need studies to demonstrate support for: Controlling task difficulty (e.g., sequencing examples and problems to maintain high levels of success and matching task difficulty with student abilities and emerging skills) is associated with improved academic outcomes. Controlling task difficulty (e.g., sequencing examples and problems to maintain high levels of success and matching task difficulty with student abilities and emerging skills) is associated with improved academic outcomes.

The effectiveness of various group sizes in teaching students with LD: one on one very small group (n=3) small group (n=5) large group …… We need research that documents: We need research that documents:

We need research that  Better informs special education teachers on all practices related to effectively teaching students with learning disabilities And  Preparing them for success post secondary AND  Preparing them for academic and social success

Thank YOU!!!!