Georgia: LG Monitoring and Project Impact Evaluation Washington DC, 23 March, 2015 David Labadze – LG Monitoring Expert David Egiashvili – LGAF Country.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of HIV/AIDS and ARV Treatment in Georgia
Advertisements

Good Governance in Land Administration Peru Case Study Victor Endo February 2008.
Establishing a self-sustaining registry: Georgia's experience World Bank, Washington DC 24 April, 2012 The world Bank Annual Conference on Land and Poverty.
Applying the LGAF to Peru: insights and follow up Victor Endo Administracion del Territorio Consultores Member of the Advisory Committee of the Project.
MONITORING OF LAND LAW IMPLEMENTATION INTEGRATION OF M&E SYSTEM IN LAND SECTOR AND PROVINCIAL LGAF IN VIETNAM.
IRRV ANNUAL SCOTTISH CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION ‘SCOTLAND : LOOKING TO THE FUTURE’ 2-3 SEPTEMBER 2009 Crieff Hydro Hotel Crieff.
UNECE - Working Party on Land Administration Workshop October 2014, Vienna, Austria Mika-Petteri Törhönen Senior Land Policy Specialist 20 Years.
March 23, 2015, Washington, DC Land Governance Assessment Framework and Land Governance Monitoring in ECA Region Annual World Bank Conference on Land and.
Expert Meeting on Land Administration Systems- Priorities in The Third World University of Melbourne 9 –11 November 2005 Ian Lloyd Director Land Equity.
Legal and Institutional framework for land and real estate property markets in Hungary András Osskó COST Workshop SOPRON, Hungary October 2003.
Costs of Real Estate Transactions in Hungary B. Berdár Gy. Fenyő B. Márkus J. Nyiri B. Berdár Gy. Fenyő B. Márkus J. Nyiri.
NATIONAL LAND GOVERNANCE MONITORING SYSTEM: UKRAINE Denys Nizalov, Kyiv Economics Institute/ Kyiv School of Economics Sergei Kubakh, Kyiv Economics Institute/
Linking administrative data to improve land governance: The example of Georgia Eka Meskhidze - Head of International Relations Unit, NAPR David Labadze.
Key issues for improving and monitoring land governance in Moldova
Country Experience In Improving Governance of Tenure of Land, Turkey.
The Korea Case: Transparency in Land Administration
Strategic Objectives of the Georgian Health System New Vision For Better Health MEDEA 2011 Ministry of Labor Health and Social Affairs.
LAND DISPUTES Arvydas Bagdonavičius Deputy Director Aidas Petrošius Spokeman
Modernization of Land Administration in Lithuania Kestutis Sabaliauskas Director General, SECR Romualdas Kasperavicius.
Provincial land governance monitoring – The first step in the pilot project Dang Hung Vo Nguyen Van Thang Vu Cuong (presenter) March
Assessment of NACLR institutional capacity before and after the financial crisis Eduard Gherghe Director, ICT Department.
Слайд1 8 th Session of Congress, 5-6 June 2014, Yekaterinburg Taxation of immovable assets in Cross-border transactions and issues of tax evasion Reporter:
Establishing a land governance monitoring System in Rwanda Results from stakeholders’ consultations Thierry Hoza Ngoga.
Experience in Developing and Maintaining the Real Estate Infrastructure in Azerbaijan Karam Hasanov Chairperson of the State Committee on Property Issues,
Rumyana Tonchovska, Sr. Land Administration-IT Officer, FAO Kathrine Kelm, Sr. Land Administration expert, World Bank Aanchal Anand, Junior Professional.
UN ECE R EAL E STATE M ARKET A DVISORY G ROUP (REM)Forum UNECE REM Policy Framework for Sustainable Real Estate Markets Policy Principles for Improved.
Women’s Political Participation Project: Women’s Political Participation International Gender Policy Network Women’s Fund and Memory Research Center (GEORGIA)
INTEGRATION OF MAIN STATE REGISTERS - LITHUANIAN EXPERIENCE
Domestic Violence in Georgia Tbilisi September, 2010.
Georgia: Land Monitoring and assessment of gap in tax revenue ANNUAL WORLD BANK CONFERENCE ON LAND AND POVERTY 2015: LINKING LAND TENURE AND USE FOR SHARED.
Access to Information in Georgia 2015 Levan Avalishvili.
TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN URBAN FORUM, 9th/10th MARCH 2010 DEVELOPMENT OF THE DANISH VALUATION SYSTEM JOERN JENSEN CHAIRMAN OF OUTER DISTRICTS OF FREDERIKSBERG.
Gender Statistics and measuring domestic violence in Georgia Lia Charekishvili Head of Social Infrastructure Statistics Sub- Division, Responsible for.
REAL ESTATE VALUATION IN TURKEY: FUTURE DIRECTIONS 2016 World Bank Conference on Land And Poverty, Washington DC, March 14-18, 2016 Mehmet CETE, Turkey.
MAXIMIZING BENEFITS OF INTEGRATED PROPERTY DATA Presented by Aidas Petrošius Advisor to Director General
Mass Valuation System Vilnius Latvia Territory – km2 Local government ( ) Inhabitants : Total - 2,013 mil Towns -
Management of Real Property Valuation System in Latvia Aleksandrs Eļkins REAL PROPERTY VALUATION DEPARTMENT Division of analysis and valuation development.
Monitoring & Reporting Land Governance in Ukraine Washington, DC - 14 March, 2016 Land.kse.org.ua Denys Nizalov, University of Kent/ KEI at KSE Rostyslav.
World Bank 2016 Land and Poverty Conference Scaling up Responsible Land Governance Using LGAF as an Input into Ongoing and future Law Revision: Lessons.
Armenia Action B th – 23 rd March 2012 Mrs Vibeke Skov Møller Address Register The Danish experience.
REAL ESTATE TAXATION SYSTEM IN ALBANIA AND CHALLENGES FOR A EUROPEAN FISCAL SYSTEM Puleri Thodhori 1 Kripa Dorina 2 1) 2) University of Tirana, Faculty.
Afghanistan Independent Land Authority متعهد به رشد اجتماعی و اقتصادی Committed to Social & Economic Growth Land-NPP: A Tool to Implement.
Improving Governance of Land Resources in Ukraine Klaus Deininger, World Bank Kyiv- 6 June,
March 17, 2016, Washington, DC Addressing Land Governance Issues across ECA Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty 2016 ECA Land Agenda: Where.
«An assessment of the socio-economic benefits of the Hellenic National Cadaster» Panos Lolonis, Ph.D. Member of the Scientific Council NATIONAL CADASTRE.
Georgian National Study
Land Markets with big benefits – and risks
Belarus: Cadastre Template 2.0
Daniel Ayalew Ali, Klaus Deininger
LAR in aspect of the cadastral managing – capacity building
National Technical University of Athens
Panel Findings Moving towards real time in land governance monitoring in a decentralised setting: Rwanda’s experience Grace Nishimwe Washington, 20th March.
The Gender Asset Gap Project in Ghana
MARINE NATSVALADZE, NINO BERAIA
Domestic Violence in Georgia
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION REFORM IN UKRAINE
Tourism Sector In Figures
Monitoring & Reporting Land Governance in Ukraine
Klaus Deininger, Nizalov Denys, Wael Zakout, Kathrine Kelm
Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security Data for transparent.
A SMALL COUNTRY WITH GIANT HEART
Tourism Sector In Figures
Introduction of GIS in Population Census of Georgia 2014
Trust Fund "Supporting Transparent Land Governance in Ukraine"
Tourism Sector In Figures
Land and Poverty Conference 2018:
Klaus Deininger, World Bank, US Denys Nizalov, KEI at KSE, Ukraine
Key Considerations for Planning and Management of Census Operations
Air pollution reduction program in the Ulaanbaatar city’s Ger area
Key Considerations for Planning and Management of Census Operations
Presentation transcript:

Georgia: LG Monitoring and Project Impact Evaluation Washington DC, 23 March, 2015 David Labadze – LG Monitoring Expert David Egiashvili – LGAF Country Coordinator Denys Nizalov – Land Monitoring Coordinator, Kyiv School of Economics Kateryna Chmelova – Data Analyst 1

Background for Land Governance Monitoring LGAF – 2011; LGAF Update 2012; Pilot implementation of Land Governance Monitoring System – 2013; Retrospective monitoring of Land Governance – ; Land Governance Monitoring System – 2013; 2

Monitoring Indicators A.Number (and prices where possible) of registered transactions of different types – ( ); B.Receipts of land tax revenue – ( ); C.Share of communal, private, and state land mapped – (2013); D.Cases of expropriation and privatization – (2013); E.Number of land-related conflicts in the courts – ( ); F.Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in women’s/men’s name or in joint ownership – ( ); 3 Note: Pilot Implementation (2013) ; Retrospective update ( )

Data Sources 4 Note: Pilot Implementation (2013) ; Retrospective update ( ) National Agency of Public Registry Land Inventory (2006) Land Cadaster ( ) Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Court (from District Level) ( ); Neighbor disputes Immovable property ownership Lease, agricultural land lease Mortgage Inheritance-related disputes, etc. Revenue Service ( ) Land and real estate tax revenues by municipalities Road Department (Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development) (2013);

Group A. Number and prices of registered transactions 5

* 2012 is adjusted for number of transactions of ownership registration of agricultural land connected with the reform of 2012 (472,446 transactions ) 6 Indicator A. Number of Land and Real Estate Transactions Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) total 000 pop % of all trans total 000 pop % of all trans total 000 pop % of all trans total 000 pop % of all trans Linear Objects3, , , , Real Estate212, , , , Agricultural Land158, , , , Non-agricultural Land 110, , , , Total483, , , ,

Region Housing (%) Agr (%) non-agr (%) Housing (%) Agr (%) non-agr (%) Tbilisi Ajara A.R Guria Imereti Kakheti Mtskheta-Mtianeti Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti Samtskhe-Javakheti Kvemo Kartli Shida Kartli Georgia Regional distribution of transactions 7 Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Indicator A.

8 Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( )

9 Agricultural Average and Median Sale Price Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Indicator A.

10 Non-Agricultural Average and Median Sale Price Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Indicator A.

Non-agricultural land Agricultural land Housing Median Price per Sq. M, real USD *Corrected for outliers Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( )

Agricultural Land Sale Median Prices and Total Revenue Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Median prices (USD per HA) Total Revenue (per 1000 of population)

Non-Agricultural Land Sale Median Prices and Total Revenue Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Median prices (USD per HA) Total Revenue (per 1000 of population)

14 *Total area includes land sold to organizations Area (HA) sold by Citizenship of owners, Agricultural land Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( )

15 Area (HA) sold by Citizenship of owners, Non-Agricultural land *Total area includes land sold to organizations Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( )

16 Average Price by Citizenship of owners, Agricultural land Non- Agricultural land Housing USD/ha USD/sqm Native77,016834, Foreign151,3551,083, * Difference in means is statistically significant Indicator A. Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property (2011- Sept 2014)

17 Group B. Receipts of land tax revenue

Taxes, Indicator B. Data: Revenue Service (2014) Agricultural LandNon-Agricultural Land Regions Tax payers Declared # of parcels Declared area (HA) Taxes collected (1000 GEL) Tax payers Declared # of parcels Declared area (HA) Taxes collected (1000 GEL) Ajara A.R Apkhazeti A.R Guria Imereti Kakheti Kvemo Kartli Mtskheta Racha- Lechkhumi Samegrelo- Zemo Svaneti Samtskhe- Javakheti Shida Kartli Tbilisi Total

Taxes (in GEL) and Area (in HA), Indicator B. Data: Revenue Service ( )

20 Group C. Share of communal, private, and state land mapped

Land area by category CategoryArea (Ha)% Residential33,2001% Industry92,0002% Agriculture1,600,00039% Pasture899,00022% Wood and forestry890,00021% Public12,0000% Infrastructure58,6001% Water70,3002% Other422,00010% No visible use64,6002% Total (Georgia)4,141,700100% 21 Indicator C. * For inventoried territories Data: land inventory,

22 Group D. Cases of expropriation and privatization

Cases of Expropriation, 2013 NameNumber Rate (GEL per Sq.M) Area (Ha) Ajara A.R Imereti Shida Kartli Total (Georgia) Indicator D. Data: Road Department (Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development) (2013)

Non- agricultural land #of parcels8741, area (HA) Agricultural land #of parcels2,1176, area (HA)26, , , Real Estate#of transactions4841, Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property ( ) Cases of Privatization, Indicator D.

25 Group E. Number of land- related conflicts in the courts

Dispute Cases in District (City) Courts 26 Indicator E. Data: Court (2014) Regions Cases started % of total per 000 of popul. Accepted Rejected Unconsidered Terminated Archieved Appealed Cases closed Closed/ Started cases Tbilisi Ajara A.R Guria Imereti Kakheti Mtskheta-Mtianeti Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti Samtskhe-Javakheti Kvemo Kartli Shida Kartli Apkhazeti A.R.30.06n\a Total (Georgia)

Dynamics of Dispute Cases in Courts 27 Indicator E. Data: Court ( )

Group F. Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in women’s and men’s name and in joint property In progress: NAPR has linked the Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property and CRA DB’s and imported the gender information. 28 Indicator F.

29 Agricultural Land Parcels by Owners Indicator F.

30 Residential Land Parcels by Owners Indicator F.

31 Average Price by gender of buyer, Agricultural land Non-Agricultural land Housing USD/ha USD/sqm Female101,264865, Male63,201702, Organizations10,171304,0471,060 The differences in average prices are statistically significant Data: Registry of Real Estate and Immovable Property (2011- Sept 2014) Indicator F.

Stakeholders Workshops Tbilisi World Bank Regional Office 32

A.Number (and prices where possible) of registered transactions of different types; B.Receipts of land tax revenue; C.Share of communal, private, and state land mapped; D.Cases of expropriation and privatization; E.Number of land-related conflicts in the courts; F.Share of agricultural/residential land registered and mapped in women’s/men’s name or in joint ownership; 33 Monitoring Indicators for Sakrebulo Level

Project Impact Evaluation Retrospective monitoring of pilot sakrebulos; Retrospective monitoring of neighbor sakrebulos (raions); Quarterly monitoring sakrebulos during and after project implementation; Comparative analysis for project impact evaluation; 34

Next Steps Better engagement of Stakeholders and providers of information; Involving decision makers; Start Project Impact Evaluation; Development of analytical and dissemination of results; Short and long term development of monitoring system; 35

Thank you for your attention David Labadze LGAF Data Expert – David Egiashvili LGAF Country Coordinator - Denys Nizalov Land Monitoring Coordinator, Kyiv School of Economics – Kateryna Chmelova Data Analyst - 36