Responding to Soil Contamination in the Moanataiari Subdivision And when the NES does and does not apply May 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spanish Royal Decree for the statement of polluted soils Real Decreto 9/2005 (B.O.E nº15, 18 of January, 2005) JRC Meeting, 3-4 February, 2005 The criteria.
Advertisements

1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
NATO June 2007 Tour de table presentation Nadine DUESO Coordinator Contaminated sites department ADEME - FRANCE.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
21 st Annual Conference. Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels Developing Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels for International Service Station Sites.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Outline What is the precautionary principle? Precautionary principle in the context of DSM Obligation to apply the precautionary approach Precautionary.
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
REMEDIATION OF INCE CENTRAL ESTATE IN WIGAN A Part 2A Site Tony Brown, SiLC – Director of Ground Engineering John Crowther, SiLC - Technical Director 22.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Basic NEScessities of Life The first 2 months of implementation February 2012 James Corbett, Auckland Council Penny Kneebone, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd.
PPRT PREVENTION DES RISQUES ET LUTTE CONTRE LES POLLUTIONS Safe Communities & a Sustainable Hazaedous Industry : Present and Future Discussion.
Module 7: Management Strategies and Potential ARARs.
Your head on a block-Part 2A decisions Dr Naomi Earl Associate Director Head of Human Health Risk Assessment Land Quality Atkins Limited
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
1 Meeting with Contacts for TB Assessment. Learning Objectives After this session, participants will be able to: 1.Explain why contact assessments are.
OH&S Management System
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Comparison of Risk Assessment for Radioactive and Chemical Contaminants Similarities, Differences and Scope for Comparison BRMF/SAFESPUR Workshop, 30 September.
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
Decision making process / basic options assessment Mercury Storage and Disposal LAC Two Countries Project Gustavo Solórzano Ochoa, Consultan t Montevideo,
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
“The Dose makes the Poison”
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
INTRODUCTION TO TOXICOLOGY SIDNEY GREEN, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACOLOGY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE HOWARD UNIVERISTY.
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
Implications of the Current State of Scientific Knowledge David W K Acheson, M.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Carousel Tract Environmental Remediation Project Update by Expert Panel to Regional Board July 11, 2013.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Risk Assessment.
Public Health and Risk Assessment (2nd of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology) Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam July 2009 Green Plaza Hotel Da Nang MPV Group.
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
An Overview of Coastal Management Issues Overview and Scrutiny Co-ordinating and Call-in Committee, 10 March Andrew Wainwright, Environmental Health.
Above and Beyond Drinking Water Guidelines: Health Canada’s challenges and progress Richard Carrier Head, Chemical Assessment Section Water Quality Science.
Health Consultation Cincinnati Country Day School Lead Site Cincinnati, OH Ashley Roberts February 9,2009.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
OH&S Management System
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Site Plan Control By-law
OH&S Management System
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Thames Coromandel District Council
Management of Pollution Risks at Activity Cessation GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-421) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets the HSE requirements for the management.
Presentation transcript:

Responding to Soil Contamination in the Moanataiari Subdivision And when the NES does and does not apply May 2012

Messages of this presentation: Managing human health risk remains the key issue Until triggered, the NES does not apply to ongoing lawfully established activities, regardless of the soil contamination until there is a change in use, subdivision, earthworks To more valuably inform of risk and appropriate response, health risk assessment work is required In the meantime, health risk is being managed within the guidelines issued by the MoH and WDHB

What is the NES? A regulation under the Resource Management Act, 1991 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health (NES) – NZ Regulation in force since 1 January 2012 – Purpose – a planning tool to ensure: Identification and assessment of land affected by contaminated soil Appropriate assessment of contaminated land at the time of land being developed, subdivided, or disturbed; and, If necessary, remediation or contaminant containment to make land safe for human use – Reflects NZ government policy on acceptable increased risk Acceptable risk level is 1 in 100,000 – Developed Soil Contaminant Standards (SCS) for priority contaminants

How does the NES apply to Moanataiari? The NES – Only triggered if the land is subdivided, developed or disturbed – Unless triggered, cannot require remediation to be undertaken, even if the land is unfit for its current use – Once triggered, consents may be required to undertake activities/land use

Acceptable Risk Level Contaminants in soil can have adverse effects on human health Based on a number of factors, including the reference health standard: – Estimated daily amount that can be taken into the body without exceeding an acceptable risk level The arsenic concentration in soil for a standard residential scenario that gives rise to this dose is 20 mg/kg (SCS for arsenic)

What is a Soil Contaminant Standard The SCS is a New Zealand risk based standard to protect human health that: (NES or otherwise) – Serves to indicate whether there is a potential risk to human health – When exceeded, serves as conservative clean-up targets for many situations, i.e., where further investigation or site- specific risk assessment is not warranted or economic – Informs on-site management actions to address human health risk issues – Triggers further investigation to better assess the risk and/or determine site-specific criteria as a Tier 2 assessment

How was arsenic SCS derived? Arsenic is considered a non-threshold contaminant (cancer causing) Up to date methodology used that is not inconsistent with other countries Uses New Zealand derived criteria: SCS (Soil ingestion) =RHS x ED x 10 6 IR adj x EF Where: RHS = Reference health standard (mg/kg BW/day) ED = Life time exposure (days) IR adj = Age adjusted ingestion rate (mg/day) EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)

Arsenic SCS Assumptions Assumptions – Contaminants are 100% bioavailable Only a (as yet unknown) fraction of arsenic in the soil will be absorbed and able to harm health – 10% produce consumption for standard residential scenario Not all households grow their own food

Current situation The detailed site investigations on individual properties completed Total arsenic and lead concentrations in the soils on Moanataiari exceed the SCS These soils also exceed soil guideline values for thallium The NES has not been triggered for these properties

What's next? Undertake a Tier 2 Health Risk Assessment – The criteria that can be altered are limited – Test the assumptions, especially bioavailability Trial underway – Develop site specific soil values for Moanataiari Long term management of risks to human health – Consider the community’s expectations – Understand options to remediate/mitigate or manage the risks to health – Determine methods for monitoring and maintaining any health protection measures.

END

References Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 ( ch=ts_regulation_contaminants_resel&p=1&sr=1) ch=ts_regulation_contaminants_resel&p=1&sr=1 Users' Guide: National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health ( contaminants-in-soil/) contaminants-in-soil/ Methodology for Deriving Standards for Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health ( contaminants-in-soil/index.html) contaminants-in-soil/index.html Toxicological Intake Values for Priority Contaminants in Soil ( contaminants-in-soil/index.html) contaminants-in-soil/index.html