The Teleological Argument “Design Must Have a Designer” William Paley

The Teleological Argument To gain an understanding of the Teleological Argument To understand how the theory of evolution might present a challenge to the design argument To consider my own viewpoint on the Teleological Argument

The Argument for Design telos = purpose The teleological argument starts with the idea that many things in nature appear as if they have been designed for a specific purpose. Many philosophers have asked the question: “Does nature have a designer?”

Can design happen by accident? Draw a simple flower pattern on a piece of paper and cut out the pieces. Pick up the pieces and drop them onto your desk. Try this a few times. It’s very unlikely that the pieces will form a flower shape by chance. The only way to get a perfect flower design is to arrange them yourself.

Evidence of Design in Nature? What special abilities do some plants have? Which animals have special features to help them: See/hear/smell? Move around? Protect themselves? Communicate? What unique skills and abilities do humans have? Can you think any other examples of possible design in nature? e.g the solar system

Definition of Analogy A form of reasoning in which a similarity between two or more things is inferred from a known similarity between them in other respects. (Collins English Dictionary)

William Paley (1743-1805) William Paley argued that nature must have a designer. He used an analogy to explain his view. If you found a watch you would see that it is very complex and conclude that an intelligent being, a watchmaker, had designed it for the purpose of telling the time. Paley noted that many things in nature were just as complex as a watch.

Like the watch, the human eye is very complex. It also has a specific purpose (helping us to see). Paley argued that if a watch has a designer then the eye must too. Paley believed that God, like the watchmaker, had carefully designed the universe.

William Paley’s Watch Analogy The Watch The Eye Is complex Has a purpose (tells the time) Is very complex Has a purpose (helps us see) Has a designer (a watchmaker) (God)

Some questions on the teleological argument. What is the meaning of the Greek word telos? Why did William Paley compare God to a watchmaker? Give three examples from nature that might support William Paley’s argument.

David Hume (1711-1776) The Scottish philosopher David Hume claimed that Paley’s watch analogy was flawed because: It’s not right to compare a watch to an eye because there are important differences between them (one is living while the other is manmade).

What examples can you give of poor design in nature? Hume also claimed that even if the world was designed, we can’t be sure it was designed by an intelligent god. There are many examples of poor design in nature. Also we can’t be sure whether the world was designed by one god or many. What examples can you give of poor design in nature?

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) The main challenge to the design argument came from Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. According to Darwin complex life forms evolved from simple ones over millions of years through the process of natural selection.

Darwin and the Tree of Life Video How does the Bible explain the creation of living things? What did Charles Darwin notice about the animals of the Galapagos Islands? How have animal breeders used artificial selection to produce different breeds of animals like dogs? How could the similar process of natural selection happen in the wild? Why was Darwin’s book “The Origin of Species” shocking to many people at the time? According to the theory of evolution what were the first living things like? How has the discovery of DNA added to the theory of evolution?

William Paley’s design argument Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution Use the table to show the differences between the ideas of William Paley and Charles Darwin? William Paley’s design argument Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution

William Paley’s design argument Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution Living things were created and designed by God. All the different species were created in just a few days. God created complex species which have remained fixed. Living things evolved naturally. A designer may not be needed. Different species evolved slowly over millions of years. The first living things were simple. They became more complex over time.

For many Christians like Conor Cunningham it is possible to believe in the theory of evolution and still believe in God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Sk_4qz_m0

Did Darwin Kill God? Copy and complete: Some Christians have a literal view of the Genesis creation story. They believe that … Other Christians see the Genesis creation story as a symbolic or allegorical story. They think that … “The theory of evolution proves that God does not exist.” How far do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.

Creationism vs Evolution I think the creation story in the book of Genesis is literally true. The theory of evolution must be false. I think the Genesis story is a symbolic story - not a scientific account of creation. God may have played a part in the process of evolution. I think Darwin’s theory of evolution is correct. This must mean that God does not exist. Write down the viewpoint you agree with most. Give reasons to support your view.

http://www.wtsof.tv/watch/S17E21-the-monkey-suit www.venganza.org