1 THE BIOTECHNOLOGY POLICY AND BIOSAFETY MECHANISMS FOR GMOs IN KENYA George M. Siboe, School of Biological Sciences University of Nairobi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Initiatives for the Development and Promotion of Biotechnology in Sri Lanka Dr. M.C.N. Jayasuriya.
Advertisements

Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Trade and Health National Assessment The World Health Organisations Diagnostic Tool on Trade and Health Presented by: Corinna Hawkes, Consultant
4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Update on ISPM 15 IPPC Secretariat June 2012.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Erie Tamale Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR Post-Clearance Audit (PCA)
Model Act: Proposed Provisions for a Transparent, Effective and Workable Biosafety Regulatory Framework Stanley H. Abramson, Esq. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin.
“Towards a Regional Approach to Biotechnology Policy in Southern Africa “ By Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19.
BIOSAFETY IN HEALTH RESEARCH Annah R. Takombwa – Acting Technical Affairs Manager, National Biotechnology Authority.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
LIMITLESS POTENTIAL | LIMITLESS OPPORTUNITIES | LIMITLESS IMPACT Copyright University of Reading IMPACT AND THE LIFE SCIENCES Anthony Atkin (Research Impact.
Advancing environmental sustainability in WHO/PAHO and in the health sector.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
NATIONAL SAICM IMPLEMENTATION: DEVELOPING A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Gillian Guthrie Ministry of Local Government and Environment June 19, 2006 THE CASE OF.
Cartagena protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International debates (COP- MOP) Stakeholders’ workshop on the Biosafety.
Genetic advances will only be acceptable if their application is carried out ethically, with due regard to autonomy, justice, education and the beliefs.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand 15 – 27 May 2006.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Australia’s policy and regulatory framework for gene technology QMAC 2003 (Dr) Sue D Meek Gene Technology Regulator.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Ole Kr. Fauchald Introduction to biodiversity n What is ”biodiversity”? ä Distinguish between levels of biodiversity ä Development of biodiversity.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
Biosafety and Bioethics Dr. Sarah bukhari Ass.Prof. pharmaceutical microbiology.
An Introduction to CPB and Importance of BCH to CPB Obligations.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
1 Proposal To Extend the Application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biosafety Protocol to the Hong Kong SAR.
Keller and Heckman LLP Market Access and Trade Barriers and Practices: The Role of the Precautionary Principle and Other Non-Scientific Factors in Regulating.
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY NDA- DEAT BILATERAL MEETING 1 August 2003 Presenter : M. Mbengashe.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
IPASA presentation to Portfolio Committee on Health 31 October 2014 Abeda Williams.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Reduction of Mercury in Products Action Plans. 2 Action Plan  describes the activities to be carried out and the related implementation strategies for.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
International Security Management Standards. BS ISO/IEC 17799:2005 BS ISO/IEC 27001:2005 First edition – ISO/IEC 17799:2000 Second edition ISO/IEC 17799:2005.
1 Program For Results Financing OP/BP 9.00 Agi Kiss WB Safeguards Training Workshop Almaty, December 2012.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Supporting the right to know for trade in certain hazardous chemicals International High-level expert Conference on Chemical Safety and Rotterdam Convention:
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Capacity Building for the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety by the German Development Co-operation: German Federal Ministry for Economic.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT Zonal Level REDD+ Awareness Creation Workshop MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST Tigray Regional State, Mekele September 3 &
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Need for a Regulatory program.
Priority Agricultural Policies and Standards to Advance Agricultural Trade and Access to Inputs Regional Feed the Future and Trade Africa Meeting
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR GHS IMPLEMENTATION: the perspective of Civil Society Contact : Dr Olga Speranskaya Co-Chair, IPEN
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
ROLE OF KEPHIS IN SAFE HANDLING, TRANSFER AND USE OF GMOS.
Before Drafting Legislation
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Presentation transcript:

1 THE BIOTECHNOLOGY POLICY AND BIOSAFETY MECHANISMS FOR GMOs IN KENYA George M. Siboe, School of Biological Sciences University of Nairobi

2 EXPERTS SOUND ALERT OVER RISING CASES OF DIABETETES IN KENYA! –More than 1.2 million people suffering from diabetes (Charity Ngilu, 30 th june 2007)

3 I.INTRODUCTION Purpose of this presentation To outline Kenya’s policy on biotechnology with specific reference to GMOs. 2.To outline the biosafety framework against which decisions are made about the activities involving GMOs in Kenya. INTRODUCTION

4 The biosafety Framework for GMOs: What is biotechnology? Biosafety refers maximizing on benefits of biotechnology as we ensure protection to human health and the environment from possible adverse effects of the products. The Genesis: The 1975 Asilomar `Declaration’: Scientists at an international meeting expressed concern over the potential effect of modern biotechnology and designed strict restrictions on the use of recombination (r DNA) techniques. –Consequently, International conventions and protocols came into being to implement and enforce the scientists’ recommendation on rDNA techniques (Gene technology). Example (Gartagena protocol).

5 The Instruments of the National Biosafety Regulatory Framework 1.The proposed Biosafety Act, The National biotechnology Policy, –Guidelines on handling requests involving GMOs. –Guidelines on inspection and monitoring of GMOs.

6 II.KENYA’S POLICY ON BIOTECHNOLOGY In principle and Practice, Kenya has adopted Gene technology for purpose of: –Improving the quality of human welfare. –Maximizing productivity in Agriculture and industry –Protecting the environment. BUT ensuring that the application of the technology and the use of products are safe to human health and the environment

7 The Policy ---- Institutionalizes scientific risk assessment and management as a basis for approval of GMOs for research field trail and commercialization.

8 The Policy ---- Provides clear principles on following priority areas:- 1.Agricultural biotech: - to adopt productivity enhancing biotechnology. 2.Education: - to strengthen science education because biotech is a knowledge–driven and research intensive industry. 3.Bioresources: - To use biotechnology interaction to exploit the rich biodiversity and traditional knowledge associated with it for industrial product development. 4.Environmental Biotechnology: To use appropriate biotechnology to address: (i) Environmental pollution. (ii) Eco- restoration for degraded habitants. (iii) Aforestation and reforestation (iv) Bioremediation of waste

9 The Policy Medical Biotechnology To use the crème technology for development of –Vaccines –Vitamins –Hormones –Gene therapy –Diagnostic kits –Development of traditional herbal medicines into superior industrial therapeutic products.

10 The Policy Industry and trade: The focus is to use Gene technology for value addition to primary commodities e.g. conversion of local bioresources into: –Biofuels –Biofertilizers –Pharmaceuticals –Food processing products

11 The Policy ---- The policy provides guidance to key issues that need attention in order for the country to gain a strategic position in modern biotechnology platform, and these include:- 1.Capacity building and mobilization of resources: –Human resource development –Infrastructure, facilities and equipment –Prioritization and co-ordination of research and development –Financial and business support

12 The Policy ---- Public protection and support: 1) Intellectual property rights Government fund to support the filing of patents. 2) Protection of traditional knowledge and resources Emphasizes royalties, patenting, access to information and benefit sharing of profits from biotech.

13 The Policy ) Products from GMOs:- All products containing engineered genes or derived from GMOs must meet requirements of the laws of Kenya governing:- –Biosafety (The proposed biosafety Act 2007) –Environment (EMCA) –Sanitary and phytosanitary standards (P/Health, KEPHIS, DVS & KEBS) –Food and pharmaceutical standards (P/Health) Release of GMOs only after careful and comprehensive Risk Assessment and ethical considerations.

14 The Policy )Public education and awareness : –To create balanced public awareness on biotech issues and investment opportunities. –Ensure access to information on development of biotech held by public authorities –Ensure public participation in decision making process. 5)Ethical issues Kenya will not allow the use of science to propagate unethical practices e.g. socially negative trends in biotechnology development like: –Human cloning –Use of stem cells obtained unethically –Introduction, use, or release into Kenya of any GMOs that have terminator gene sequences

15 III.Biosafety legal instruments and process for the regulation of GMOs Why do we need a separate legislation to regulate GMOs? 1.To provide for measures to promote the responsible development, production and use of GMOs. –E.g. The proposed Biosafety Act 2007 demands that Approvals of activities involving GMOs for containment use, introduction into the environment, placing on the market, or in transit must be preceded by a Science-based RISK ASSESSMENT of any effects on human health and the environment.

16 Why separate legislation )Ensures that more information is made public e.g. Assessment reports on the suitability of GMOs for marketing. 3)Facilitates efficient and transparent decision-making process on GMOs for Kenya to benefit from biotechnology investment.

17 The Procedure for Handling requests involving GMOs in Kenya Application to NBC (NBA) secretariat IBC Relevant experts screen for completeness Secretariat acknowledges Receipt (May request for additional information) Risk Assessment by Experts Report to NBA NBA decision to allow or not to allow.

18 The procedure for the analysis of risk from GMOs Applicant lodges application with NBC: Technical Screening: Hazard identification Science-based Risk assessment Risk Management Plan Risk management - Giving effect to Plan:

19 Risk management - Giving effect to Plan: Pre- conditions:  Training, prepare site, upgrade facilities etc During & after project/release:  Monitoring, usually by the applicant  Surveillance/inspection by Regulatory Agent for compliance with legislation and conditions (Each ensuring that the project or product is not causing significant/unanticipated impacts on health or the environment during project & until impacts are no longer likely.) Risk Management Plan We consider:  Available options to remove or mitigate each of the risks of consequence  Whether the level of risk that remains is acceptable  Whether the steps required to remove or mitigate the risk are acceptable and/or feasible Then:  Decline to allow activity as too risky; OR  Set out risk management requirements for allowing application to proceed Risk assessment We Analyze and evaluate the risks by:  Assessing the probability of harm from human or environmental exposure to each hazard  Identifying possible consequences to health or the environment from exposure to each hazard  Assessing the level of certainty of the  estimates  Identifying risks that are consequential and which are not of any consequence Hazard identification  Identification of types and sources of hazard to human health or environmental?  Ensuring that all hazards are identified Technical Screening:

20 DON’T WORRY, BE HAPPY THANK YOU