Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Aquifers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J-Field Edgewood Aberdeen Proving Ground. Description From 1940 to 1970s, the Army disposed of chemical agents, high explosives and chemical wastes. APG.
Advertisements

2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
John Lynch, P.E. Palisade Software Miami Users Conference October 25,
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
1 Brave New World Emerging Tools for NAPL Remediation Jim Cummings Technology Innovation Office/USEPA Chicago, Illinois Dec 2002.
Overview of New EPA Superfund Groundwater Guidance and Tools
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
PROTECT: Puerto Rico Testsite for Exploring Contamination Threats Why modeling? The prediction of water resources and the assessment.
Using CSIA for Biodegradation Assessment: Potential, Practicalities and Pitfalls B. Sherwood Lollar University of Toronto S. Mancini, M. Elsner, P. Morrill,
B EMIDJI C RUDE O IL S PILL Darren Cartwright Stephen Toone.
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Using isotopic analysis to determine the source and fate of groundwater contamination.
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
Background Site of a former Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Contaminants accumulated in sludge drying beds and surge pond, they subsequently leaked into.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Employee Presentation p 1
Geologic, Hydraulic, and Geochemical Controls on Fate, Transport, and Remediation of VOCs USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
1 Case Summary: Electrical Resistance Heating ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Portland, Oregon Jennifer Sutter, Project Manager Oregon DEQ EPA Technology Innovation.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock: Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
1 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION OF A HIGHLY CONTAMINATED BEDROCK SITE - The Oxygen Infusion Phase - J. Morrow D. Side By :
Overview of Remedial Approaches at Superfund Fractured Bedrock Sites Edward Gilbert, CPG Technology Assessment Branch Technology Innovation and Field Services.
Using GIS to Assess Potential Abiotic Degradation of Chlorinated Ethenes Tim Glover and Theodore Parks MACTEC Engineering and Consulting Kennesaw, GA USA.
4 Application of Environmental Isotopes in Studies of Biodegradation of Organic Contaminants in Groundwater Ramon Aravena, Department of Earth Sciences,
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Typical Design of a Production or Monitoring Well.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
Ministry of Environment and Energy Danish EPA Ad Hoc International Working Group on Contaminated Land ”Natural attenuation in Denmark” by Kim Dahlstrøm,
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Pump & Treat Experience at the NECCO Park Landfill Niagara Falls, New York Paul F. Mazierski, PG Senior Project Leader.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
SOURCE WATER PROTECTION IN KARST SHENANDOAH VALLEY WATER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 28, 2008 WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
TCE and 1,2-DCE Biotransformation Inside a Biologically Active Zone Anthony W. Holder, Philip B. Bedient, and Joseph B. Hughes Environmental Science and.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
Biological Treatment of Residual DNAPL
Fractured Rock Sites –Challenges and Significance for the Superfund Program EPA Fractured Rock Workshop John Prince EPA Region 2 Remedy Selection/Design.
RI/FS/RD/RA USEPA Region III PADEP Golder Associates Inc. Berks Landfill Superfund Site.
Hydraulic Fracturing Tom Carr, Lauren Dynes, and Pete Strader.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Feasibility Study Workplan Park – Euclid RP Group Community Advisory Board Meeting May 23, 2013.
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
Groundwater Pollution
1 Source Removal- Policy and Practice in the FDEP Robert C. Cowdery, P.E. Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section Division of Waste Management Florida Department.
Former Spellman Engineering Site Project Update Meeting March 18, 2008 William C. Denman, P.E. Remedial Project Manager (404)
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
Application of CSIA in Assessing and Cleaning Organics-Contaminated Sites Dr. Yi Wang Director, ZymaX Forensics Isotope April 5, Brownfields 2011.
CORRELATION BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN GROUNDWATER-STREAM WATER MIXING ZONE Heejung Kim, Seong-Sun Lee, Yunjung.
BUILDING STRONG ® TNT Source Area Ground Water Remediation Former Nansemond Ordnance Depot Formerly Used Defense Site June 2, 2016.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Cover Slide TCEQ logo.
Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona
ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
East Hennepin Avenue Site
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
Presented by: Kerry Martin, P.G., DCRP Technical Specialist
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Aquifers Allen M. Shapiro, USGS USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014

Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock The Importance of Natural Attenuation in the Groundwater Management at Sites of Contamination in Fractured Rock Aquifers Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) is currently evaluated as a groundwater remediation strategy, like other groundwater remediation strategies (e.g., Pump-and-Treat, Thermal Treatments, In Situ Chemical Oxidation, etc.) If the Remedial Action Objective is to restore groundwater, remediation strategies are evaluated on achieving ARARS (Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements) in a “Reasonable Time Frame” MNA has been successfully applied at a large number of sites of groundwater contamination over the past 15 years, including some sites in fractured rock There are many (federal, industrial, and state) sites, where achieving ARARs in a “Reasonable Time Frame” is unlikely in fractured rock Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Technical Challenges to Remediation in Fractured Rock in a Reasonable Time Frame Difficulties in characterizing complex distribution of contaminants (e.g., source zone, flow paths, contaminant mass in flow-limited regions of the aquifer) Long-residence times of contaminants in flow-limited regions of the aquifer Challenges to remedial technologies in transforming/destroying contaminant mass in source zone and dissolved-phase plume in flow-limited regions of the aquifer Estimate of TCE Mass in Fractures and Rock Matrix Weathered rock Unweathered rock Naval Air Warfare Center, West Trenton, NJ Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

The Magnitude of the Problem Program/Agency Number of Contaminated Facilities Number of Sites Estimated Cost Complete ($B) DoD 4,329 $12.8 CERCLA 1,364 $16 - $23 RCRA 2,844 $32.4 UST 87,983 $11 DOE 3,650 $17.3 - $20.9 Other Federal Sites >3,000 $15 - $22 State Sites >23,000 $5 TOTAL >126,000 $110 - $127 National Research Council, 2013 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

The Magnitude of the Problem Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock >126,000 sites have residual groundwater contamination that prevents “closure” . . . likely an underestimate. . .e.g., counting of “facilities” and “sites” differ between programs, does not include DoD facilities with Remedy in Place (RIP) or Response Complete (RC), etc. Cost of remediation $110 - $127 Billion. . .likely an underestimate given technical limitations of achieving Unlimited Use/Unrestricted Exposure (UU/UE). . . Estimated ~10% of sites (~12,000 sites) are “complex” . . . restoration unlikely for decades or centuries. . . ~10% of all sites will account for ~70% of total cleanup costs [Ehlers and Kavanaugh, 2013] . . . National Research Council, 2013 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Are “Closed” Sites “Closed” ? Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Analysis of 80 Delisted NPL Groundwater Sites 14 4 19 2 12 6 5 MCL Characterization MCLs Achieved: Active Remedy: No LTM MCLs Achieved: Active Remedy: LTM MCLs Not Achieved: LTM MCLs Not Achieved: Deleted Based on Risk Assessment: No LTM Based on Risk Assessment: LTM Remedial Objective Other Than Meeting MCLs MCL Achievement Unknown Not a Groundwater Site MCLs Achieved: No Active Remedy: No LTM National Research Council, 2013 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

ARARs Waiver – Technical Impracticability Schofield Barracks (U.S. Army), Oahu, Hawaii 17,000 acre facility Land fill, sewage, industrial and vehicle waste, explosives Water supply well impacted by TCE (100 ppb) Basaltic rock Thin, horizontal lava flows (hydraulic conductivity 100’s to 1,000’s ft/day) Intrusive dikes compartmentalize groundwater Groundwater 500-600 ft below land surface U.S. Army applied for upfront TI Waiver as part of ROD, 1996 Air strippers on drinking water wells, 1986 Monitoring wells Delisted from NPL, 2000 5-year reviews Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

ARARs Waiver – Technical Impracticability (?) Letterkenny Army Depot, Chambersburg, PA Testing, storage, overhaul of track vehicles Storage, transportation of industrial chemicals, petroleum Storage, modification of ammunition Groundwater contaminated with TCE, PCBs Soils contaminated with heavy metals, VOCs Facility divided into 7 Operable Units (OUs) Facility overlies limestone and dolomite Structural faulting in the area Karstic features (sink holes, caverns, springs) In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) applied to VOC contamination in groundwater without success Letterkenny Army Depot U.S. Army has been unable to obtain a TI waiver for selected OUs Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

ARARs Waiver – Technical Impracticability 77 TI waivers (up through November 2010) Hydrogeologic Setting Type of Contaminant ~3/4 of TI waivers attributed to hydrogeology or nature of contamination Deeb et al., 2011 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

ARARs Waiver – Technical Impracticability 77 TI waivers (up through November 2010) Distribution of TI Waivers by EPA Regions TI Waivers Granted Over Time Approximately ½ of states have not had a TI waiver Distribution of CERCLA sites is not evenly distributed over EPA regions Hydrogeologic conditions differ from region to region Deeb et al., 2011 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock The Importance of Natural Attenuation in the Groundwater Management at Sites of Contamination in Fractured Rock Aquifers Large number of sites are characterized as “complex”. . .ARARs unlikely to be achieved in decades to centuries. . . Unlikely that stakeholders will accept wide spread application of ARARs Waivers (Technical Impracticability) at fractured rock sites Need to consider longer time frames of remediation and remedial strategies that may evolve over time, recognizing that some active remedies may reach a point of diminishing returns. . .Natural Attenuation will likely be a component in the management of a large number of fractured rock sites. . . There is a need to document the existence of Natural Attenuation and understand the long-term prospects for continued Natural Attenuation Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Monitored Natural Attenuation Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock EPA Protocol (1999) MNA – encompasses all natural attenuation processes (not just biological) – preference for those processes that degrade or destroy contaminants Conditions at each site are unique, but common framework is applied in documenting natural attenuation Lines of evidence (1999) Historical chemical data indicating decrease in contaminants of concern along flowpaths Hydrogeological and geochemical data to demonstrate (indirectly) types of natural attenuation processes and rates Field or microcosm studies Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Monitored Natural Attenuation Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Recent Advances Development of microbiological tools. . Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) . . .explicitly identify presence of Dehaloccoides (Dhc) species in groundwater known to carry out reductive dechlorination Compound Specific Isotope Analysis (CSIA) . . .ratio of carbon isotopes. . .dechlorination preferentially metabolizes 12C in comparison 13C, changing the isotope ratio of TCE, cis-DCE, VC, and ethene as reductive dechlorination continues. . .clearly identifies that decreases in concentrations of chlorinated ethenes are a product of dechlorination rather dilution. . . Statistical model correlating presence of Dhc with geochemical parameters . . .oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), methane, and nitrate + nitrite Recent advances provide quantitative (lines of) evidence for reductive dechlorination Wilson 2010 Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Monitored Natural Attenuation Attributes that Lead to Success Detailed understanding of flowpaths from source to receptors – design of monitoring well network – a challenge in fractured rock Source zone control – to prevent further downgradient contamination – remediation or containment Monitoring that demonstrates substantial reduction in contaminant concentration over a decade or more – reductions in concentrations by order of magnitude Monitoring includes geochemical and microbial parameters that document groundwater is an appropriate habitat for attenuation Quantitative evaluation of spatial distribution of contaminants and their degradation products (usually through mathematical modeling tools) Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Monitored Natural Attenuation Application to Fractured Rock Successful applications of MNA in dissolved phase plume in fractured rock document for selected areally extensive plumes . . .1000’s of feet. . . see, e.g., Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (MN) - sandstone, Bell Aerospace Textron Wheatfield Plant (NY) - dolomite Plumes over 1000’s of meters – monitoring wells interpreted as if along a single flow path Current struggle to interpret MNA in fractured rock over dimensions where flowpaths are convoluted (10’s -100’s of meters) “Flowpath-independent” interpretation of MNA (see, e.g., Bradley et al., 2009) - an attempt to address this issue at discrete monitoring locations Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Monitored Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Observations Natural attenuation (biotic and abiotic processes) will likely become an issue at some point in the life span of remedial activities at fractured rock sites Estimates of attenuation will to change over time. . .one cannot expect degradation rates to remain constant. . .for long time frames, one will need to document the processes and conditions that will maintain natural attenuation Over dimensions of 10’s – 100’s of meters, monitoring wells may not characterize representative flowpaths . . .under such conditions in fractured rock, it is difficult to infer if attenuation will reduce (spatially distributed) concentrations and contaminant mass Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock

Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock Suggested References Bradley, P. M., Lacombe, P. J., Imbrigiotta, T. E., Chapelle, F. H., and Goode, D. J., 2009, Flowpath independent monitoring of reductive dechlorination potential in a fractured rock aquifer, Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, v. 29, no. 4. P. 46-55. Chapelle, F. H., Lacombe, P. J., and Bradley, P. M., 2012, Estimated trichloroethene transformation rates due to naturally occurring biodegradation in a fractured rock aquifer, Remediation, doi: 10.1002/rem.21307. Chartrand, M. M. G., Morrill P. L., Lacrampe-Couloume, G., and Sherwood-Lollar, B., 2005, Stable isotope evidence of biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes at a fractured bedrock site, Environmental Science and Technology, v. 39, p. 4848-4856. Lacombe, P. J., 2011, Mass of chlorinated volatile organic compounds removed by pump-and-treat, naval Air Warfare Center, West Trenton, NJ, 1996-2010, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5003, 48 p. Wilson, J. T., 2010, Monitored natural attenuation of chlorinated solvent plumes, in Stroo, H. F., and Ward, C. H., eds., In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents, Springer, New York, p. 325-355. Wilson, J. T., Kampbell, D. H., Ferrey, M., Estuesta, P., 2001, Evaluation of the protocol for natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents: Case study at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, EPA/600/R-01/025, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Yager, R. M., 2000, Simulated transport and biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes in a fractured dolomite aquifer near Niagara Falls, New York, U. S. Geological survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4275, 55 p. Yager, R. M., Bilotta, S. E., Mann, C. L., and Madsen, E. L., 1997, Metabolic adaptation and in situ attenuation of chlorinated ethenes by naturally occurring microogranisms in a fractured dolomite aquifer near Niagara Falls, New York, Environmental Science and Technology, v. 31, p. 3138-3147.   Natural Attenuation in Fractured Rock