Water Rights 101 Jon Culp Washington State Conservation Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Law and Institutions – rights and binding agreements U.S. water rights traditionally based on common law: Riparian doctrine in East – land owners.
Advertisements

Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
The Surveyors Role in Utah Water Rights Utah Council of Land Surveyors February 19-21, 2014.
WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004.
Department of the Environment Water Use and Appropriation of Maryland’s Waters.
Presentation Texas Water: What You Should Know November 6, 2010.
Larry MacDonnell Prospective Panel September 12, 2014.
Pueblo Water Rights Under Mexican Law (prior to 1848), prevailing law was pueblo right—pueblo rights are paramount to the beneficial use of all needed,
Small Acreage Workshop March 8, 2008 Sheridan, Wyoming Kara Brighton Hageman & Brighton, P.C.
Recommendations for a Statewide Water Plan By: Ewan Hadgraft Alabama Rivers Alliance Birmingham-Southern College.
December 9, WHY?  1 st Call: September 2003  2 nd Call: January 13, 2011  Hearing: May 1, MONTHS.
Kansas Transition from Ground Water Development to Enhanced Ground Water Management Define the Resource Beneficial Use Protect and Control Thomas L. Huntzinger,
Water in Washington Keith Phillips May The numbers ~ population growth l 1.5 M -- surface code adopted (1917) l 3.5 M -- last time code updated.
UC Davis Viticulture & Enology Water Rights in California Impacts of New Regulations 1 February 13, 2015 Paula J. Whealen, Principal.
This presentation only reflects the views of the author and does not reflect the views of Downey Brand LLP or any of its clients. Presentation on California.
Water Rights: In the Odessa Groundwater Management Area By Peter G. Scott Preston|Gates|Ellis LLP.
The Compact  Legally enforceable contract among the Great Lakes States  Provided for in the U.S. Constitution  Ratification by State legislatures 
Conjunctive Management in Idaho A State Perspective Rexburg, Idaho December 9, 2014Mat Weaver, IDWR.
Do I need a water right? Do I have a water right? Is it valid? King County Agricultural Water Rights Workshop November 2, 2010.
New Mexico Water Law & Acequias Hosted by: New Mexico Acequia Association April 19, 2012 The Lodge at Santa Fe.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SURFACE WATER RIGHTS UNIT.
Commercial Webinar Series 1 hour presentation Questions will be answered at the end. For technical questions, call
Environmental law is what we do. TM 1191 Second Avenue Suite 2200 Seattle, WA Water Rights in Washington: Historic Roots/Current.
Utah Division of Water Rights June 21, 2004 Current Water Right Issues Rural Water Users Association Boyd Clayton
Taking Care of Your Water Rights: Permits, Extensions & Certificates Oregon Association of Water Utilities August 2013 Lisa Jaramillo Water Right Services.
Utah State Engineer Where Do We Go From Here? (and how are we going to get there?) Kent L. Jones, P.E.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Legal Due Diligence Columbia Basin Water Transactions Program Quarterly QLE Meeting April 2004.
Utah Water Users Workshop March 6, 2007 Current Water Rights Issues Jerry Olds State Engineer / Director DWRi.
Water Rights and Water Allocation Land Camp 2015 April 13-15, 2015 Menucha Retreat and Conference Center, Columbia Gorge, OR Duncan Greene with Kelley.
Appropriation Policy Escalante River Drainage Kurt Vest Regional Engineer Division of Water Rights.
Water: 101 Adjudication. Permit vs. Adjudication Permit Issued Authorizes Holder to Make Use of the Water as Limited by the Permit Beneficial Use Adjudication.
Public Water Supplier Considerations Rural Water Association of Utah April 25, 2013 April 25, 2013 Utah Division of Water Rights Kirk Forbush, P.E. Regional.
Surveying principles 1 Public Water Suppliers S. Ross Hansen P.E., L.S. Region Engineer 4/10/2014 Rural Water Certification Class.
Water Markets and Good Watershed Governance: An Inherent Conflict? John Janmaat Economics UBC Okanagan.
Overview Utah Water Law Application Process Kirk Forbush PE Regional Engineer April 25, 2013.
CALIFORNIA LAW OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER
Declaring Beneficial Use in Water Use Groups R
What You Need to Know about Groundwater Conservation Districts In Texas Tyler December 3,2002 Guy Fipps Professor and Extension Irrigation Engineer Dept.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 21 Policy History: Rivers as a Legal Battleground Public Policy in the American Federal System – An Overview Prepared by.
Nebraska Water Law Conference Wyoming Ground Water Laws.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
WATER MARKETS IN WASHINGTON Presented by: Eugene N.J. St.Godard, P.G., C.HG. Principal Hydrogeologist/Owner Water & Natural Resource Group P.O. Box 28755,
1 Conveying Water Rights Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) April 2013.
State Water Issues – State Engineer Utah Water Users Workshop March 13, 2012 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
Water Right Issues of the State Engineer Utah Water Users Workshop March 17, 2015 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
Is My Water Right Valid? Or Seven Steps to Water Right Certainty John Stuhlmiller Director of Government Relations Washington Farm Bureau
UTAH WATER USERS WORKSHOP March 15, 2011 HOW FAR CAN I STRETCH MY CFS? Kent L. Jones P.E. Utah State Engineer Utah Division of Water Rights.
1 Conveying Water Rights Division of Water Rights By Randy Tarantino Title Program Specialist Telephone: (801) March 2012.
Whiskey’s for drinking; water’s for fighting. Mark Twain.
Water Right Transfers OAR Chapter 690 Divisions 380, 382, 385, 77 CWRE Workshops – October, 2012 Susan Douthit District Analyst.
Louie Brown Kahn, soares & conway, llp
Municipal Water Rights…… Water Law & Policy Seminars March 12, 2012 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
Utah Division of Water Rights June 21, Boyd Clayton April 25, 2015 Public Water Suppliers.
Council of Economic Advisors Water Rights Overview Utah Division of Water Rights Jerry Olds.
Utah Division of Water Rights June 21, 2004 From Application to Certification Clark Adams--April 2016 The Application Process.
The History and Origin of Water Rights Law Norman K. Johnson Tooele County Water Users Workshop September 7, 2011 Tooele County Health Building Tooele,
permitting.
Implementation Under HB 25 – Quantity Impairment Water Law and Policy Seminars Kent L. Jones, P.E. March 14, 2016 State Engineer.
Urban Water Institute- August 2015
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
“Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over.”
Utah Division of Water Rights
AWRA Washington State Conference October 3, 2017
One Leadership Square , 15th Floor
Interpreting Water Rights
Washington State Water Rights & Water Supply Law
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Lisa Jaramillo Transfer and Conservation Section Manager Kelly Starnes
WRIA 49 Planning Unit Buildout Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Water Rights 101 Jon Culp Washington State Conservation Commission

Summary Why should land owner care? Introduction to Basic Water Law Issuing New Water Rights Water Rights Transfers/Changes Trust Water Program Columbia River Program

Why Should Land Owner Care Land owner is a water right holder. Land owner buys land with appurtenant water rights. Ecology funding programs (e.g. water acquisition, IEGP) improve stream conditions.

What is a Water Right? A water right is a legal authorization to use a reasonable amount of public water for specific beneficial purposes. A water right is a use-based vested, property right Introduction to Basic Water Law

Why Are Water Rights Required? Water rights are required by law to ensure proper allocation and management of Washington’s water resources. Our state’s waters are a public resource and their use should return the maximum benefit to the public. Water rights establish priority dates which can be used to protect senior water right holders, and instream flows.

Pre-State (1889) / Territorial (1853) Water is a natural resource held in common for the public good. Water is not “owned.” Individuals can have the right to use it. History

Riparian (bankside) rights emerged by virtue of property ownership bordering a lake, stream or water body (English common law). y Each riparian has an equal right to water. y Reasonable use must be made of the water. y Riparians are entitled to protection against appropriations occurring after their priority date [date of claim] regardless of who first used the water.

1891 (Prior Appropriation Doctrine) “The right to the use of water in any [water body] may be acquired by appropriation, and as between appropriations, the first in time is the first in right.” Water users were required to post a “notice” of intent to use water on a tree near the diversion and record the notice at the county courthouse Laws of Washington

During early Settlement, there was Chaos “At present the appropriators on our streams, in many instances, have filed on all and more water than the stream would supply; and under the constitution and statutes claim the right to beneficially use it all. In opposition to this the bank owners claim the right to have all said waters flow past their lands; and have a right to restrain the diversion of said waters to any lands beyond those owned by the bank proprietors.” Report of the Washington Water Code Commission, (1914)

During early Settlement, there was Chaos “The appropriator’s rights to use the water of this state are open to attack.... [T]here is no law limiting the amount of water that may be filed on from any stream. On some streams the appropriations now on file call for many times the amount of water in the stream and available for use, and yet, there is no law prohibiting further appropriations, and no officer whose duty it is to eliminate excess appropriations and protect water users against future encroachments upon their rights.” Report of the Washington Water Code Commission, (1914)

1917 “All waters within the state belong to the public, subject to existing rights.” Subsequently, water law was based on the Prior Appropriation Doctrine: “First in time, first in right.” Permit system for using surface water. Procedures for adjudicating all “vested” water rights prior to the act. The Legislature mandated that the state administer the water resources. RCW 90.03

What is a Permit? A permit to appropriate water is an inchoate (undeveloped or unperfected) right, which is “an incomplete appropriative right in good standing” which “remains in good standing so long as the requirements of law are being fulfilled.” Reasonable progress & due diligence. Construction Perfection

What is a Certificate? A certificate to appropriate water is awarded when the water right holder beneficially uses the amount of water permitted, at the location identified, and for the intended purpose.

1945 Ground Water Code Extended the 1917 surface water code to ground water. Created a permit system for all uses of ground water Declaration period for vested uses Exempted withdrawals for domestic & industrial purposes (5000 gpd), irrigation of ½ acre of lawn & stockwatering,. RCW 90.44

1967 Water Right Claim Registration Act Established a water rights claim registry Covered water use not previously required to be documented (RCW 90.14) Between 1969 and 1974, approximately 170,000 claims were filed. Claims also filed in 1985 and

What is a Water Right Claim? A “claim” asserts that water was used prior to establishment of the water code.

If I file a Claim, do I have a Water Right? Not Necessarily. Some people have mistaken claims to be water rights. A water right is an authorization to use water, and a water right claim is only a statement that you believe you have a vested right.

How do I know if my Claim is “Vested”? The final determination that a claim represents a vested right can only be made through an adjudication, a legal process conducted through a superior court which determines the priority and extent of existing water rights in a given area. Ecology and Conservancy Boards can “tentatively” determine the extent and validity of claims through a change application.

By the numbers... Water Rights in the State

1970 to Present Statutes passed in the last 40 years added complication to the water code. Water Resources Act (1971) RCW Family Farm Act (1977) RCW Water Storage (1987) RCW Trust Water Rights (1989) RCW Water Re-use (1992) RCW Watershed Planning (1997) RCW Conservancy Boards (2001) RCW Municipal Suppliers (2003) RCW

What Criteria Are Used When Making New Water Right Decisions? Water right permits are issued only if the following statutory requirements are met: The water use will be beneficial; There will be no impairment of existing water rights There is water available for appropriation The issuance of the requested water right will not be detrimental to the public’s interest.

Are there Other Considerations? Yes… Existing watershed plans. Stream closures, instream flows. SEPA. Reasonable use. Hydraulic continuity. Consumptive use. Seawater intrusion. Site-specific considerations.

What Criteria Are Used When Changing Water Rights? Two-Step Process Step 1: Is there a water right to transfer (tentative determination of extent and validity, or HOW BIG IS IT)? Step 2: Is the proposed transfer allowable?

Is There A Water Right To Transfer? Is there a certificate, permit or claim? How big was it originally? Has it been abandoned? Has it been relinquished?

Beneficial Use Beneficial use is the basis, the measure, and the limit of a water right (Ickes v. Fox, 1937) A beneficial use is perfected through the actual use of water (Twisp, 1997). No right exists beyond the extent that a beneficial use has actually and legally been made (Theodoratus, 1998; Grimes, 1993).

Abandonment Long-standing non-use Intent to abandon. Intent can be physical, planned or both.

Relinquishment Chapter RCW If all or a portion of the right is not used at least once every 5 years, it relinquishes to the state. Relinquishment occurs by operation of law. 19 “good” reasons that it is o.k. to not use your water for longer than 5 years...

Relinquishment (RCW ) Drought Active military service during military crisis Non-voluntary service in the U.S. armed services Operation of a legal proceeding Federal or agency leases of land or water rights Federal laws imposing land or water use restrictions through a program for acreage limitations or production quotas “Wet” water years Power buy-back Yakima River basin water enhancement project conservation Reliance on transitory return flow continued...

Relinquishment (RCW ) Crop rotation Power development Standby/reserve supply to be used during drought Determined future development Municipal Water Supply If such waters are not subject to appropriation under RCW (federal reserves) Beneficial uses under leases approved by Ecology Rights satisfied by agricultural industrial process water Trust water rights Rights in the change process

Water Right Transfers: How? File an application for change Notify the public SEPA Investigate the change Approve or deny the change

How Does Ecology Investigate a Water Right? Site Investigation Ownership Meter / Power Data Photography ( ) Crop Records, Washington Irrigation Guide

Step 2: Can the Water Right Be Changed? Impairment Public Interest Enlargement Season of Use Considerations Same Body of Groundwater Surface to Ground Transfers Consumptive Use Issues Family Farm Act Restrictions Municipal Issues

Questions / Comments? More information! or