Home Care Monitoring Guy Pettengell, Head of Operational Contracts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Life Choices Procurement Process Paul Large, Category Manager – Social Care Adults.
Advertisements

Fire Risk Assessments – Are You Competent?. Fire safety legislation requires that, for most premises except private dwellings, a fire risk assessment.
Managing Risk: A Framework and Reporting Cycle 2014.
January 2009 Equality of Opportunity Elaine Clinton HMI.
Head teacher Performance Management
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
Social Care Procurement – Contracts Monitoring Contracts Monitoring Framework Development Training and Support Session December 2007.
Contracts & Purchasing Unit Developing monitoring arrangements Lynn Mounfield: Head of Contracts & Purchasing Unit Malcolm Price: Quality Monitoring Team.
Children’s Social Care Workload Management System (WMS) A Two-fold approach DSLT 16 th November 2010 Updated with new SWRB standards.
1 Question 5 : Are they well led? Supporting staff Temporary Staffing MAST Staff Appraisals.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
ACFID CODE OF CONDUCT Changes to the Code Effective Jan 2015.
Safeguarding Update for Schools Summer Term 2015
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Responsibilities of Care Workers
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Safeguarding in schools
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Overview of MASH MASH training. What is a MASH?  Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub  A MASH is a centre which brings together agencies (and their information)
FMSiS and benchmarking a seminar at the bursars conference 05 July 2010 Presented by Simon Maddocks Dave Phillips David Dilling.
Standards in Counselling and Counselling Services Colin McCormack Primary Care Mental Health Development Manager SDF - 20th October 2005.
CEHR Stakeholder Reference Group Education commissioning.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
THE STATUS OF SECONDMENT  Poland is a country whose workers are mainly sent to other countries of the European Union or European.
1 Workshop sessions: day two ● CD infrastructure ● CD advisors ● Quality and contract management ● Referral pathways and standardised service ● Discussion.
The Policy Company Limited © Control of Infection.
How the Third Sector and Public Sector can do Business Susan Street, Adult Care Services, HCC Frances Coupe, Children, Schools & Families,
Planning your Summer Food Service Program Staffing Oregon Department of Education Summer Food Service Program.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
Coding Compliance Plan July 12, Benefits of a compliance program  To demonstrate our commitment to honest and responsible conduct, decrease the.
Health and Safety Policy
Safeguarding Tutorial The Manchester College 1. Aim of session: To raise awareness of Safeguarding Objectives: By the end of the session you will be able.
CONFIDENTIAL© Xchanging 2011, No part of this document may be circulated, quoted or reproduced without prior approval of Xchanging.STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL©
Mentor Update, (2008) – Extended Version. Content includes: B71 / B73 SPL Supporting Practice Learning Module, Continuity of Practice Assessment Record,
New Professional Mentor Training MMU PM training
Hertfordshire Anti Bullying Accreditation Programme Hertfordshire Development Centre 17 March 2009 Liz Biggs – Team Leader – Health and Wellbeing Karen.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
The Role of Teaching Assistants. Session outline The Workshop includes four elements: (1)Roles and Responsibilities of Staff (2)Establishing a Professional.
Welcome Return to work: part of good occupational health and safety HCHSA Toronto, Ontario February 21, 2005.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Program Implementation MM.DD.YY. To comply with the OHSA and regulations To demonstrate management's commitment to health and safety To show employees.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
The principles of equal treatment in Estonia. The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia: Everyone is equal before the law. No one shall be discriminated.
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
Shaping Solihull – Everything We Do, Everyone’s Business Meeting Core Objectives for Information, Advice, Advocacy and Support Services in Solihull Partners'
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
IT depends on several codes of ethics 1. PUBLIC - IT engineers shall act consistently with the public interest. 2. CLIENT AND EMPLOYER - IT engineers shall.
Safety Management Standards. Introduction Health and Safety Procedures (which identify the risks, hazards and ways of mitigating these) are weak in that.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
A Quality Assurance Scheme for the MICE Sector. Quality Assurance in the MICE Sector Some other MTA schemes.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
Quality Assurance Lincolnshire County Council Provider Forum Handout 2010.
Lone Working – Good Practice Marie Foster Early Years Safeguarding Officer.
Joint Contracting and Accreditation Process Nottingham City Council and NHS Nottingham City CCG.
Quality Issues in Health and Social Care Maria O’Connell – Acting Team Manager, Social Care Direct & Jane Wilson – Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Adults,
SUPPORTING PEOPLE COMPLAINTS POLICY SP Provider forums 10 th, 13 th & 14 th September 2012.
Updates from The Early Years Area SENCO team October 2014.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Successes criteria : All will be able to: You need to have a definition of legislation, policies and procedures then sate which ones do you have to follow.
An exposure to COMPLIANCE AUDIT By- Vishal Chawre DAG(A/c & VLC) O/o AG(A&E), Nagpur.
SEN, disability and the EYFS
PowerPoint presentation
PowerPoint to accompany:
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
Presentation transcript:

Home Care Monitoring Guy Pettengell, Head of Operational Contracts

Hertfordshire context Hertfordshire provides Home Care services to over 8,500 service usersHertfordshire provides Home Care services to over 8,500 service users Through around 90,000 visits every weekThrough around 90,000 visits every week Around 3,000,000 hours of care per yearAround 3,000,000 hours of care per year All services provided through external provisionAll services provided through external provision

The aims of monitoring To ensure that contracted services continue to meet the HCC contract standards To ensure that HCC is able to offer our Service Users a range of high quality, consistent and secure home care services

How we use monitoring data. Evaluate and approve new providers Ongoing Contract Management –Monitor provider quality –Support remedial action where necessary

The process. Approval Inspection Quality Monitoring and Benchmarking Electronic Monitoring

Approval Process. Providers must be registered with CSCI Providers must prove they meet HCC Contract Standards HCC’s policy is to only contract with approved providers

Contract Standards. Standard 1The agency operates on a sound financial footing. Standard 2The agency maintains proper insurance arrangements. Standard 3The agency operates an effective Quality assurance system. Standard 4The agency ensures that management systems and staff workloads enable safe and effective service delivery to service users. Standard 5Staff are competent and receive training necessary to meet the needs of service users. Standard 6The agency complies with Health and Safety Legislation Standard 7The agency provides a professional service, respecting the rights of service users; and does not discriminate in the provision of services or its employment practices because of race, religion, gender, disability, age or sexual orientation. Standard 8The agency has effective arrangements for service users to make representation about the nature and Quality of the service received. Standard 9Service users are protected from abuse and exploitation.

Additional Standards for live in care providers. 24 Hour Live In Care Standard 10The agency has effective arrangements for the replacement of a careworker in case of emergency. Standard 11The agency must ensure formal monitoring of the Quality of service and standard of care provided is conducted on-site with the service user on a monthly basis. Standard 12The agency must conduct monthly on-site supervisions with care workers. Standard 13The agency produces written guidance for careworkers regarding standards of personal behaviour expected whilst providing a live in service.

Approval – How? Provider makes an application: –Includes 2 year Accounts –Includes appropriate insurance documentation –Includes 2 professional references

Contracts Officer carries out an initial evaluation of policies / procedures against contract standards Financial viability and insurance checked Employment status checked Indicative price

Any requirements are notified with specified timescales Once requirements met the contracts unit carries out an initial inspection If the provider passes this inspection and meets all of HCC’s contract standards they become eligible to contract, and will be added to the Approved List

How we monitor and strive to improve standards 1.A minimum of one annual Inspection against contract standards (inc. QMO feedback). 2.Through EF1 data. 3.Through RR1 data. 4.Through QQ1 / 2 feedback. 5.Through Electronic Monitoring. 6.Quality Matrix (Benchmarking). 7.Six monthly reviews with Block providers.

1.Inspection Annual Contract compliance inspection (full day) Published Inspection Report including QMO feedback Any Requirements Identified, action plan agreed Report scored (based on three levels of risk current / imminent / possible) and entered in Quality Matrix

EF1 (Electronic Form 1) EF1 completed monthly by SST and sent to Contracts Unit listing all concerns / complaints / compliments Concerns weighted by 14 categories / and by volume Info collated into Countywide spreadsheet to identify any trends Major concerns / issues / trends taken up directly Quarterly evaluation entered into Quality Matrix

3.RR1 (Referrals/Refusals Form 1) RR1 returned to Contracts by SST on a monthly basis Used to monitor take up of work inc. increases / decreases Results added into Quality Matrix

4. QQ1 / 2 Quality Questionnaires 1 and 2 Quality Questionnaires (QQ1) sent to SST’s for completion Quality Questionnaires (QQ2) completed by contracting team inc. electronic monitoring performance Data entered into Quality Matrix

5. Electronic Monitoring. A number of K.P.I’s are used in respect to monitoring provider performance, inc: –Arrival time within 15 minutes –Continuity of Care –Average length of calls –Invoice Split

6. Quality Matrix. All data entered quarterly into Quality Matrix The scores achieved for each of the elements are then entered to produce the final ‘Total Quality’ Score. However each individual element has a minimum ‘benchmark figure’ to exceed. –Inspection Report (60%) –Feedback from QMO’s (70%) –Quality Questionnaires (60%) –EF1 (60%) –RR1 (90%) –Electronic Monitoring criteria (75%)

7. Six monthly reviews All relevant data obtained through monitoring is discussed with provider (inc. QMO feedback) Actions to improve service (inc. timescales) agreed Ongoing monitoring of action plan at formal reviews (either 1, 2 or 3 monthly) Links with CSCI – e.g work ceased with Level 1 services

The future The Monitoring processes used by the Contracts Unit have achieved recognition as an example of Best Practice by the Audit Commission for the Joint Review Toolkit: Hertfordshire is recognised nationally as the leader in the implementation and use of Electronic Monitoring. (DOH Case Study), and in market management (CSIP e-book). However with nearly 90,000 visits each and every week things do go wrong. Because of this the Contracts Unit continues to work with colleagues to strive for continuous improvement and better quality services.