This is a set of working notes – hopefully useful to illustrate the tests that have been made, but not intended as a real “presentation”. MPOD special.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Note 2 Transmission Lines (Time Domain)
Advertisements

CHAPTER 3: SPECIAL PURPOSE OP-AMP CIRCUITS
Engineering Design How to build stuff that works, and make it work better Dr. Tom Clarke, Second Year Electronics Laboratory Coordinator.
Power e Lab PowerELab Limitedwww.powerelab.com 1 An Active EMI reduction IC WT6001 POWERELAB LIMITED A Power Converter Technology Provider.

G. Visser, IU, 4/10/2014 Single-photon signals from PMT through front board and pogo pins to 30 Ω load on carrier (mockup) board 4 independent events,
Introduction to electronics lab ENGRI 1810 Using: Solderless prototype board (white board) Digital multimeter (DMM) Power Supply Signal Generator Oscilloscope.
Voltage-Series Feedback
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #6 Page 1 EELE 461/561 – Digital System Design Module #6 – Differential Signaling Topics 1.Differential and.
Lab #4: RC and RL Circuits
Lab #4: RC and RL Circuits remember what capacitors and inductors are remember why circuits containing them can have currents that change with time.
LV power cables for iTOP
9/20/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 91 Lecture #9 Example problems with capacitors Next we will start exploring semiconductor materials (chapter 2). Reading:
8/11/2006 FPIX TB meeting L. Perera 1 Pixel Power Supply Response Measurement Lalith Perera - Univ. of Iowa Carlos Florez, Simon Kwan, Charles Newsom,
Chapter 8 Inverters AC Power • Inverters • Power Conditioning Units • Inverter Features and Specifications.
Linear Regulator Fundamentals 2.1 Types of Linear Regulators.
ITOP LV power supply and cable scheme G. Visser Indiana University 3/17/2015.
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) LED Dimmer Circuit
Lecture 3: Bridge Circuits
ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.
Microwave Amplifier Design Blog by Ben (Uram) Han and Nemuel Magno Group 14 ENEL 434 – Electronics 2 Assignment
Introduction to Transistors
Static Pressure Control Loop The purpose of the static pressure control loop is to maintain an optimal static pressure in the ductwork. The control loop.
A* candidate for the power supply Wiener MPOD-LV crate w/ remote control only (except for local on/off switch) Type “EC LV” Front or rear connections (reverse.
1 Computer Power Supply Amateur Radio Conversion For Cheap +12 vdc Power March 17, 2003.
Low Voltage Power Requirement of TOF FEEs. Maximum tray. Low Noise:  Periodic and Random Distortion (PARD) < few mV RMS Floating.
Lecture 2 Most basic facts from Electricity needed for understanding telecommunications Local transmission lines in the telephone system Decibels Signals.
Electronic Troubleshooting
Module 7 – Power Systems: Tethers
ابزاردقیق ارائه دهم. The device has 2 input ports, named inverting ( - ) input and non-inverting (+) input. The output is simply an amplified signal of.
ECE 2300 Circuit Analysis Dr. Dave Shattuck Associate Professor, ECE Dept. Lecture Set #12 Natural Response W326-D3.
Microwave Amplifier Design Blog by Ben (Uram) Han and Nemuel Magno Group 14 ENEL 434 – Electronics 2 Assignment
CHAPTER 18 Power Supplies. Objectives Describe and Analyze: Power Supply Systems Regulation Buck & Boost Regulators Flyback Regulators Off-Line Power.
Single Time Constant Measurement Dr. Len Trombetta 1 ECE 2100.
Update on MPPC frontend electronics development at IU
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
CVD PCB, first steps. 15 mm 25 mm Chip area. No ground plane underneath the chip. Bulk isolated => only one ground line Power lines Connector: 11,1mm*2,1mm:
Modelling of TPM noise problems Greg, following discussions and measurements with David and Senerath.
Status of TRD Chamber and Readout Electronics Integration Ken Oyama and Christian Lippmann for the TRD Collaboration Sep. 26, 2005 TRD status meeting in.
Chapter 25 Electric Circuits.
Performance Improvement of APS Booster Ring Dipole Magnet Power Supplies Ju Wang The 3 rd Workshop on Power Converters for Particle.
Differential Amplifiers.  What is a Differential Amplifier ? Some Definitions and Symbols  Differential-mode input voltage, v ID, is the voltage difference.
10/11/2015 Operational Amplifier Characterization Chapter 3.
Measuring Phase Difference Dr. Len Trombetta 1 ECE 2100.
D0 Workshop Bagby, Foglesong John Foglesong Run 2B SMT Low Voltage Power The present location of the SMT DC power supply units creates a problem.
LDO or Switcher? …That is the Question Choosing between an LDO or DC/DC Converter Frank De Stasi Texas Instruments.
Per the instructions raised the ‘PWM Offset’ parameter from original 1.0V setting. I found that 5.0V worked, and so set 6.0V to have some margin over that.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Lab #3 and Lab 4: RC and RL Circuits Remember what capacitors and inductors are Remember why circuits containing them can have currents that change with.
Two-stage amplifier status test buffer – to be replaced with IRSX i signal recent / final (hopefully) design uses load resistor and voltage gain stage.
UF –PNPI HV system status August 2008 Sergey Volkov Nikolai Bondar PNPI.
Doug, here are some slides. FGT Electrical Integration ethernet trig/clk DDL fiber Wiener MPOD controller ISEG 8 ch HV -4 2 mA ARC module (APV Readout.
1 10 th October 2007Luciano Musa Considerations on readout plane IC Area (die size) 1-2 mm 2 /channel Shaping amplifier 0.2 mm 2 ADC0.6 mm 2 (estimate)
Large Signal Amplifier Design Ryan Child 1. Background Large Signal Amplifiers belong to a class of amplifiers that are used for applications where high.
Lecture 3: Bridge Circuits
Summary of FPIX tests Tom Zimmerman Fermilab May 16, 2007.
BASIC INSTRUMENTS - oscilloscopes
1 (Gerard Visser – STAR Integration Meeting 5/16/2008) STAR Forward GEM Tracker Readout/DAQ Integration G. Visser Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
TECHNICAL PAPER ON SIMULTANEOUS AC-DC POWER TRANSMISSION
Mauro Citterio Milano, PP2/Services - an update - Mauro Citterio INFN Milano Type II cables  Layout in progress  Duplication of VVDC wires.
Design and Development of Transient Network Analyzer By M.Satish kumar 04131A0241 P.Sasi kumar 04131A0240 T.Sirisha 04131A0244 V.S.Pramod 04131A0247 Under.
EE140 Final Project Members: Jason Su Roberto Bandeira Wenpeng Wang.
DC bias circuit effects in CV measurements A.Chilingarov, D.Campbell Lancaster University, UK 9 th RD50 Workshop CERN,
Lab 3 Slide 1 PYKC 19 May 2016 EA1.3 - Electronics Laboratory Experiment 3 Operational Amplifiers Peter Cheung Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering.
APFC-03 Reactive Power Compensation Method & Settings
TROUBLES WITH SPURIOUS “CURRENT LIMIT” IN REMOTE SENSE OPERATION
ALICE Muon Tracking Upgrade EDR Answers
Wireless Laptop Charger
The Command interface in the 4000 series
Presentation transcript:

This is a set of working notes – hopefully useful to illustrate the tests that have been made, but not intended as a real “presentation”. MPOD special parallel unit, ch 0/1/2 used here At first, according to “original” cable plan, test setup used 120 feet 12AWG cable (Belden #5000FE) 3x 150uF (T495D157K010ATE100) at load (at first – changed later, see below) Load is Agilent 6060B Sense connected with 107 feet Belden #9503 (3x 24AWG twisted pair w/ overall foil shield, one pair used here) Direct connect to sense terminals at PS (try other setups maybe too?) Setpoint 2.70V (I’m not sure of 6060B performance much lower than this, and this is I hope close enough to our lowest setpoint in system, 2.16V) “PWM offset” control set to 12.5V except as noted With all that, following pages show (at remote load / sense connection) the transient response with various 3A load steps (10 Hz square wave), from 6060B. iTOP LV DC Power Supply Tests at Indiana University

2A to 5A PWM offset: 12.5V

5A to 2A PWM offset: 12.5V

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5V

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5V

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5V (ref1), 8.0V (ch1)

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5V (ref1), 8.0V (ch1)

At this point, switched to 106 ft Belden # 5T00UP (10AWG, unshielded). This better approximates the revised and hopefully final cable design: 4C 10AWG 2C 16AWG (perhaps to 14AWG) 3pair 24AWG overall foil shield maximum length is expected to be 106ft (32.2m) according to measurements made at Belle-II 1/2015 For the test, sense line connected as before. Lack of shielding on test power lines is not likely to make a significant difference.

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5V

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5V

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5Vno cap at load

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vno cap at load

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5Vgeneric 1mF 63V aluminum axial

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vgeneric 1mF 63V aluminum axial

The large aluminum capacitor stabilizes it, but I think cannot really be used due to lifetime/reliability concerns. We have to use tantalum, or probably better now the niobium oxide capacitors which have a benign open-circuit failure mode. Next pages explore this. Some damping resistor seems to be necessary, but that’s fine.

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 5x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 6x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 7x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 8x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 9x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 10x NOJD107M010RWB

8A to 11A PWM offset: 12.5Vch1: 10x NOJD107M010RWB

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 3x NOJD107M010RWB || ((7x NOJD107M010RWB) + 60mΩ)

11A to 8A PWM offset: 12.5Vref1: generic 1mF 63V aluminum axial ch1: 3x NOJD107M010RWB || ((7x NOJD107M010RWB) + 60mΩ)

Now basically let’s assume that this load capacitance is what we’ll use. I looked into aluminum caps a bit, but reliability looks to be worse even for the long-life grades. And, although only one part instead of 8-10 are needed, it isn’t actually smaller. The niobium oxide caps look like the best option for us. So (for now) we use 3x NOJD107M010RWB || ((7x NOJD107M010RWB) + 60mΩ)

5A to 2A (ref1) & 4A to 1A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V Results seem consistent w/ ~2.5mF total output capacitance (ours + MPOD internal)

1A to 4A (ref1), 2A to 5A (ref2), 3A to 6A (ref3), 4A to 7A (ref4), 5A to 8A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V

6A to 9A (ref1), 7A to 10A (ref2), 8A to 11A (ref3), 9A to 12A (ref4), 10A to 13A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V

10A to 13A (ref1), 11A to 14A (ref2), 11.5A to 14.5A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V

PWM_offset=12.5V, no “PWM from Umod” (ref1), PWM_offset=12.5V, yes “PWM from Umod” (ch1) 11A to 14A

PWM_offset=12.5V, no “PWM from Umod” (ref1), PWM_offset=6V, no “PWM from Umod” (ch1) 11A to 14A

PWM_offset=12.5V, no “PWM from Umod” (ref1), PWM_offset=6V, yes “PWM from Umod” (ch1) 11A to 14A

PWM_offset=12.5V, no “PWM from Umod” (ref1), PWM_offset=15V, no “PWM from Umod” (ch1) 11A to 14A

PWM_offset=12.5V, no “PWM from Umod” (ref1), PWM_offset=15V, yes “PWM from Umod” (ch1) 11A to 14A

PWM_offset= 15V (ref1), 13V (ref2), 11V (ref3), 9V (ref4), 7V (ch1) 11A to 14Aall cases no “PWM from Umod”

PWM_offset= 7V (ref1) as before, 6V (ref2), 5V (ref3), 4V (ch1) 11A to 14Aall cases no “PWM from Umod”

MUSEcontrol screenshots, in steady-state operation (maybe not fully warmed up, but close) with 14.5A load (nominal from 6060B front panel entry / readout)

I plan to check still the waveforms at PS terminals under the various 3A transient steps quick comparison of performance at 5V regulated instead of 2.7V – any difference in stability efficiency check (although it isn’t very meaningful with so little overall load on the crate, we can probably still get some useful info from it, by looking at AC input delta with load 0A, 14.5A) cable temperature measurement (qualitative impression is, it is much cooler than the 12AWG cable…) And then I have to return the MPOD mainframe to Wiener. Next testing will be by them, with PL512. If that looks good, we should buy one for our prototype.

load (ref1), PS terminal (ref2), independently acquired! PWM offset: 12.5V1A to 4A

1A to 4A (ref1), 2A to 5A (ref2), 3A to 6A (ref3), 4A to 7A (ref4), 5A to 8A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div

PWM offset: 12.5V PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div 6A to 9A (ref1), 7A to 10A (ref2), 8A to 11A (ref3), 9A to 12A (ref4), 10A to 13A (ch1)

PWM offset: 12.5V PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div 10A to 13A (ref1), 11A to 14A (ref2), 11.5A to 14.5A (ch1)

PWM offset: 12.5V 11A to 14A PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div Vset=2.7V (ref1), Vset=3.7V (ref2), Vset=4.7V (ch1)

PWM offset: 12.5V 6.4A to 9.4A PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div Vset=13.85V (ref1), Vset=13.35V (ch1) ref1 scale is offset +500mV This was a check that we can run right up to the voltage limit of the supply and still hold regulation. Success. Unfortunately, scope offset range limitations get in the way here. But that isn’t important.

PWM offset: 12.5V 6.4A to 9.4A PS terminal voltage scope offset adjusted to overlay traces, same V/div Vset=13.85V (ref1), Vset=15.00V (ch1) ref1 on same scale (no offset) In fact, we can go beyond the nameplate 16V limit. MUSEcontrol allows max terminal voltage to be set to 17.6V, did that, we can run right up to it and it works well as seen here.

3A to 4A (ref1), 3A to 5A (ref2), 3A to 6A (ref3), 3A to 7A (ref4), 3A to 8A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V

3A to 3.2A (ref1), 3A to 3.4A (ref2), 3A to 3.6A (ref3), 3A to 3.8A (ref4), 3A to 4A (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V

Now a look at if we can do any better using “fast” remote sense setting (i.e. “medium” box unchecked in MUSEcontrol) together with some external network to stabilize. First revisited the load capacitance, I find can get just as good, maybe slightly better, performance from 60mΩ+(10x NOJD107M010RWB). So that’s what’s there now. Also, find that sense input to MPOD is pretty high impedance, and we can connect sense lines with up to few hundred Ohms and have no change in performance. (Tested at MPOD, not at load side, need to re- check.) “Fast” regulation stabilized with 450 Ω to load sense cable, 400 nF to PS out terminal, on each PS sense terminal (i.e. one of these networks on positive and one on negative). This was done with substitution boxes and values optimized by a bit of experimentation. But performance that way is not as good as “medium” regulation mode with no network (or with only 50 Ω resistors and no caps), see next slide. That’s fine, “medium” regulation mode looks good for us. This was just a test to see what happens; note that we use a similar network to make long distance remote sense work on Excelsys unit under test.

“medium” (ref1), “fast” w/ 450 Ω, 400nF (ch1) PWM offset: 12.5V 3A to 6A

I confirmed, the 50 Ω or even up to a few hundred Ohm resistors can be used to connect the sense lines at the load. I think we will probably do this rather than use polyfuses. Resistors should be more reliable and convenient. Final circuit (showing only one of the three PS circuits that feed each FEE (“boardstack”) is below: Note that (owing to space constraints) the final 1.2m of the circuit is run on lighter gauge wire and remote sense is placed at the junction point not at the FEE.

Question: We may be able to use 8V modules (and so 2 ch parallel for 20A capability, rather than 3 ch parallel for 15A). On the 16V unit, max terminal voltage is 17.6V according to MUSEcontrol. It doesn’t seem to be specified on the datasheet. From my testing, this really works… Is the exact value universal, or it depends on specific module’s calibration? What is guaranteed minimum value of this, if it varies. And most importantly, what is corresponding value for the 8V 10A MPOD module????