X-ray Capability for Energy Response. Ludlum already has many capabilities in-house:  PMT’s and plastic scintillators  Circuit boards (4-layer SMT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of Safeguards in ORNL Facilities Mateusz Monterial Mike Sharp Allison Toth Jeremy Townsend Stephen Holland Steve Cleveland.
Advertisements

Tenth lecture Last lecture.
32 P Module Objectives  To understand the physical nature of 32 P.  To understand the 32 P is both and internal and external radiation hazard.  To understand.
Geiger-Muller detector and Ionization chamber
Radiation Safety & Compliance External Beam –Electrons (linacs) –Photons (linacs, Gamma Knife) –Protons (Summer 2013) Brachytherapy –Sealed Sources –Radiopharmaceuticals.
Familiarization and Operation
Industrial Radiography
Radiation at accelerator laboratories Prompt radiation from the particle beam Beam induced radiation –Neutrons –Gammas –Synchrotron radiation Radiation.
Response Checks of Portable Radiation Detection Instruments
Evaluation of various diagnostic x-ray measuring devices MDCH Radiation Safety Section Don Parry, CHP.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Basic Concepts of Emergency Preparedness Personal Protective Equipment, Devices and Procedures.
Radiation Safety Rules of Thumb. TR-2 Alpha Particle An alpha energy of at least 7.5 MeV is required to penetrate the protective layer of the skin (0.07mm).
Module 1 Introduction to Radiation
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Review of May 29 Excursion Bob Casey.
External Radiation Exposure Control
Radiological Hazards Instructional Goal To help you understand the potential health hazards of radioactive sources that could be associated with a hazardous.
Quality Control Rad T 110.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
IPD Technical Conference February 19 th 2008 Cable Disk Inspection.
INTRUSION ALARM TECHNOLOGY
MADD Radiological Emergencies
UNIT 6 Introduction to Radiation Protection
HABIS X-RAY PRODUCTION AND EXPOSURE FACTORS X-RAY PRODUCTION AND EXPOSURE FACTORS PREPARED BY PREPARED BY Dr fahad albadr radiology chairman radiology.
Geneva, Switzerland5-7 April, 2004 Monitoring of radioactively contaminated scrap metal in Latvia A.Dreimanis (Radiation Safety Centre, Latvia)
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION Dorothea Pfeiffer Dennis Haasler GIF++ User Meeting
HPT Rev. 3 Page 1 of 33 TP-1 TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program Response Checks of Portable Radiation Detection.
OSU-CHS ALARA Statement The OSU-CHS radiation safety program will be conducted in such a manner so that exposure to faculty, staff, students, the public,
PET/CT Workshop Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite.
APHY398C 6/4/ Dosimetry   Quantifying the incidence of various biological changes as a function of the radiation dose.   Exposure Ratio of total.
Radiation Quality Chapter 4. X-ray Intensity Intensity: the amount of energy present per unit time per unit area perpendicular to the beam direction at.
Radiation Safety and You Brian Kessler Zettl Group Safety Talk September 7, 2006.
What is Radiation? Our sun is a large source of radiation. Radiation is energy that travels through space.
NLCTA Safety Audit Radiation Safety Review W. R. Nelson 9 November 2001.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Exposure, gamma ray constant, time, distance, shielding, shield placement, dose rate, sky shine, stay time, inverse square,
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
APS April Meeting Detector Construction of the Forward Proton Detector at D0 Michael Strang University of Texas at Arlington Diffractive Events FPD.
Radiation Protection and Safety 12/18/ Radiation Protection   Objectives and standards Benefits and risks   Occupational (onsite) vs. Non-occupational.
Shielding Measurements For A Proton Therapy Facility S. Avery, K. P. Risolo, M. Bartels, C. Ainsley, J McDonough, R. L. Maughan University of Pennsylvania.
Determining Radiation Intensity
LA ACES Neutron Detector (NeD)
PHYSICS 225, 2 ND YEAR LAB NUCLEAR RADIATION DETECTORS G.F. West Thurs, Jan. 19.
HP SURVEY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION AND SELECTION PRINCIPLES OF RADIATION DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION CHAPTER 5 – REVIEW AND SUMMARY January 13 – 15, 2016.
HPT001.xxx Rev. x Page 1 of xx TP-1 TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program HPT001.xxx Rev. x Page 1 of xx TP-1 TVAN Technical.
Horst Breuker Review Oct ELENA Safety and Radio Protection ELENA TDR : Chapter 6; Safety Files in preparation; Descriptive, Demonstrative (Risk.
Gamma Shielding Calculations
NUMI Primary Beam Review August 14, 2001 NUMI PRIMARY BEAM INSTRUMENTATION Multiwires, Loss Monitors, Toroids Gianni Tassotto.
Working Procedure with Ionizing Radiation 1. Introduction Introduction Classification of Areas Classification of Areas Safe Handling/Use of Safe Handling/Use.
Welcome To RadTown USA Click to Explore RadTown USAClick to Explore RadTown USAClick to Explore RadTown USAClick to Explore RadTown USA.
MI Shielding Machine Protection Credit D. Capista March 7,2010.
Prompt dose upstream the 12-ft concrete shielding blocks Igor Rakhno May 4, 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 12.1 : Shielding and X-ray room design Practical.
Report Technical Director Storage-Ring-Installation Completed
Radiation Protection RTMR 284 CHAPTER 20 PART II.
Radiation Safety.
Topic 6 : Atomic and Nuclear Physics.
St. George Infrastructure
Industrial Radiography
Thermo RadEye GX, SX, and PX with Various Detectors
X-RAY PRODUCTION AND EXPOSURE FACTORS
ISUAL Product Assurance
Radiation Safety Training Research & Analytical Machines Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
Lecture 4(Unit II): Gas-Filled Detector Quality Control
Lecture 3 (Unit II): Gas-Filled Detector Operation and Use
Presented at VCUHS by Jennifer Love and Mark Crosthwaite
Profiling ( 070ZZ446) INCLUDES:
A fixture designed to provide high precision, high throughput routine spatial characterization of the Xoft Axxent™ X-ray source Linda Kelley, Steve Axelrod,
Occupational Radiation Dose Management
Occupational Radiation Dose Management
Phenotyping Facility X-ray Awareness Training
Presentation transcript:

X-ray Capability for Energy Response

Ludlum already has many capabilities in-house:  PMT’s and plastic scintillators  Circuit boards (4-layer SMT)  Transformers  Cables and Harnesses  Welding (Alum and Steel)-Robot added 2011  Stamping, Milling, Turning  Die and Mold making  Plastic Injection Molding  Lead Casting  Wire EDM machining  Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Neutron source calibrations

But not much energy response capability. Customers sometimes ask difficult questions about energy response…and not enough monoenergetic radiation sources with long half-lives exist to test well. To test both GM and scintillation detectors, we would need both uR/hr and mR/hr level sources. Sometimes, it’s just not good enough to use supplier or scientific data.

As more sales go international…more people are starting to realize that there are energy differences between exposure units and dose equivalent units. “Energy-flat” in terms of exposure isn’t the same as “energy-flat” in terms of dose equivalent. And more people are asking “Why shouldn’t the US join the rest of the world in using the Sievert?”

Once the decision to purchase an x-ray machine was made we needed: 1.A location 2.An appropriate x-ray machine 3.Radiation license and safety 4.Setup and Calibration

An unused 2 nd floor site was chosen…with six inch concrete floor and plenty of space- approximately 40 feet wide by 100 feet long.

When looking at x-ray systems used by other calibration facilities we found: NIST: Pantak HF320 system LANL: Pantak HF320 system ORNL: Pantak HF320 system PNNL: Pantak HF320 system Ludlum decided to get the same system.

A used (1999) Pantak HF320 system was purchased, which would give crucial energy response data in the keV region. An x-ray technician installed and calibrated the system onsite, and provide operational training.

Ludlum RSO performed the license modification: radiation source and x-ray devices handled separately. “X-ray in Use” signs and lights installed. Door Interlocks installed downstairs-opening door causes control panel to shut beam off. Radiological survey done inside on the 1 st and 2 nd floors and also outside with beam at full working power and kVp. Procedures written for use, log and safety equipment established.

NIST H-series filters-made with 99%+ pure materials

Two filter wheels were made, each holding 8 filters. The second wheel hold HVL, used to verify the correct output spectral energy.

X-ray Calibration A NIST-traceable PTW ion chamber was used to establish exposure and dose rates at approximately 16 feet. A CdTe isotope identifier (ICS-4000) was used to qualitatively see the spectra.

Clearly, we had some serious scattering issues…some additional steel shielding was added

X-Ray Calibration (continued) With the steel shield in place, measurements (again with the NIST-traceable ion chamber) were taken at each of the 8 energies. The HVL filter wheel was added, and the measurements repeated- measurements were within 2% of half-value. Exposure and Dose Equivalent values were then taken at both the 16 and 72 ft distances to give approximately 15 mR/hr and 1 mR/hr exposure distances for GM and scintillation detectors.

RESULTS: A version of the 9DP (the Ludlum pressurized ion chamber) has been developed to be energy flat to H*(10) within 20 % from 40 keV to 1.3 MeV, and this result has been verified by an independent lab. More results to follow….