1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Wave Energy Resource Assessment and GIS Database for the U.S. Paul T. Jacobson.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review M3 Wave Energy Systems (TRL System) PI: Mike Morrow M3 Wave Energy Systems.

Advertisements

New England’s Regional Renewable Resource Development Efforts New England States Committee on Electricity November 3, 2011.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Validation of W4e Hydropower Turbine Generator PI Henry W Russell Walker Wellington,

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Marine Energy Technology Advancement Partnership (METAP) Hoyt Battey DOE Water.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review OTEC Cold Water Pipe-Platform Sub-System Dynamic Interaction Validation Lockheed.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Effects of Climate Change on Federal Hydropower Michael J. Sale M.J. Sale & Associates.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Advanced Anchoring Technology Dallas Meggitt Sound & Sea Technology, Inc.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Active Acoustic Deterrence of Migratory Whales Steve Kopf, Program Manager Pacific.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Water Use Optimization: Hydrologic Forecasting Presenter: Mark Wigmosta Organization:

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review [Annex IV] Hoyt Battey Andrea Copping DOE Water Power Program

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 2011 Tidal Energy System for On-shore Power Generation Dr. Allan Bruce Sunlight.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Benchmark Modeling of the Near- field and Far-field Wave Effects of Wave Energy.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Tools & Methods to Measure/Predict Environmental Impacts: Effects on the Physical.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Siting Study Framework and Survey Methodology for Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy.

Where IOOS Meets the Land and Atmosphere: Assessing/Mitigating Risks of Current & Prospective Coastal Inundation/Erosion Alaskan Coastal Climatology Workshop.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower Innovative System Testing (1.2) Department of Energy,

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Modular Wave Energy Transfer (WET) Jane Vvedensky Shift Power Solutions

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review ADVANCED INTEGRATION OF POWER TAKE-OFF IN VORTEX INDUCED VIBRATIONS AQUATIC CLEAN.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Direct Drive Wave Energy Buoy Ken Rhinefrank [Columbia Power Technologies, Inc.]

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Near Space Systems Inc. Small Hydropower Research and Development Technology.

1 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Development of a wave-actuated electric power take-off device 2011 Water Power Peer Review Meeting Development.

Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 51-Mile Hydroelectric Power Project PI: Jim Gordon Earth By Design, Inc.

An Instrumented Coastal Process Modeling Test Bed US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Jeff Hanson U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review The Development of Open, Water-Lubricated Polycrystalline Diamond Thrust Bearings.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review A First Assessment of U.S. In-Stream Hydrokinetic Energy Resources Since the.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sensor Fish Redesign Collaboration Z. (Daniel) Deng Thomas J. Carlson Pacific.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project Dr. Philip R. Hart Ocean Power.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center Belinda A. Batten Oregon State.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Acoustic Monitoring of Beluga Whale Interactions with Cook Inlet Tidal Energy.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review WET-NZ Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Advancement Project Justin Klure, Program.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Acoustic Effects of Hydrokinetic Tidal Turbines Dr. Brian Polagye University.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review A-WEC Franc Mouwen Wavebob LLC November 2011.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review OCGen™ Module Mooring Project Jarlath McEntee Ocean Renewable Power Company

Economic Cooperation Organization Training Course on “Drought and Desertification” Alanya Facilities, Antalya, TURKEY presented by Ertan TURGU from Turkish.

Planning Tool for Policy-Makers: GIS-based wind resource mapping in Central & West Asia (TA 7274) Peter J. Hayes, Senior Climate Change Specialist, ADB.

Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.

1 NTHMP FY08 Funding Jenifer Rhoades Date: June 17, 2008.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review SubTask CH TD Day-ahead Scheduling and Real-time Operations Tool Conventional.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Ocean Thermal Energy Extraction Visualization Matthew Ascari Lockheed Martin.

1 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Assessing Historic Properties and Cultural Resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands Dave Ball, MA, RPA Pacific Region.

Plan Development Workshop NOAA Coastal Services Center Charleston, SC November 2-5, 2009 Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review PB500, 500kW Utility-Scale PowerBuoy Project Dr. Philip R. Hart Ocean Power Technologies.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower System and Component Development (1.1) Department.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Integrated Basin Scale Hydropower Opportunity Assessment Initiative Simon Geerlofs.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Cycloidal Wave Energy Converter TRL Advancement to Level 4 Dr. Stefan G. Siegel,

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review THOR’ s Power Method for Hydrokinetic Devices Turner Hunt THOR Energy Group LLC.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Environmentally Benign and Permanent Modifications to Prevent Biofouling on Marine.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Ocean Currents along the United.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Poncelet Kinetics RHK100 Prototype Steven Selvaggio Whitestone Power and Communications.

1 Offshore Wind Resources in the Southeast Bill Bulpitt, Susan Stewart, & Mary Hunt Georgia Tech Strategic Energy Initiative The Southeast & Mid-Atlantic.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review An Assessment of Lifecycle Cost in the U.S. over Time Mirko Previsic RE Vision.

U.S. HYDRO 2007 TIDES WORKSHOP May 17, 2006 UNCERTAINTY WORKSHOP SKGILL SLIDES.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Abrasion Testing of Critical Components of Hydrokinetic Devices Monty Worthington.

Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.

1 NTHMP FY08 Funding Jenifer Rhoades Date: June 17, 2008.

Contributing to the Prediction Coastal Flooding:

NOAA Climate Goal/Climate Program Arctic Workshop Meeting February 2-3, 2005 John Jensen National Climatic Data Center.

National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reference Model Development Richard Jepsen Sandia National Labs

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Modeling the Physical and Biochemical Influence of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion.

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Fish: Desktop.

PNW Wave Energy Note: much of this slide show is composed of slides utilized from the Wallace Energy Systems and Renewables website (Oregon State University)

Online | classroom| Corporate Training | certifications | placements| support CONTACT US: MAGNIFIC TRAINING INDIA USA :

Water Power Peer Review

MERMAID Innovative multi-purpose offshore platforms: planning, Design and operation MERMAID.

AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation

Presentation transcript:

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Wave Energy Resource Assessment and GIS Database for the U.S. Paul T. Jacobson Electric Power Research Institute (410) November 3, 2011

2 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration A comprehensive understanding of U.S. wave resources is of critical importance to accelerate development and commercialization of emerging wave energy technologies. This project estimates the total available and technically recoverable U.S. wave energy resources. Other project deliverables include a geospatial database, verified and validated by a third party, which displays annual and monthly average wave power densities and other sea state parameters for specific geographic coordinates, as well as an accessible data base of hindcast parameters archived at 3-hour intervals over a 51-month hindcast period.

3 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration Expected users of this product include policymakers, project developers, wave energy device developers, investors, universities, non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, the Department of Energy, and the military. Policymakers will be able to use the deliverables from this project to characterize the total available and recoverable wave energy resources for the nation and by region and by state. Such information can be used to inform Department of Energy decisions regarding allocation of R&D funding and identify technical and non-technical barriers associated with the geographic distribution of the resource.

4 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Rigorous estimation of available and recoverable wave energy resources required extensive analysis and synthesis of wave hindcasts and measurements that were originally designed to meet other objectives. 51-month Wavewatch III hindcast database developed especially for this study by NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Prediction to calculate available wave power density (kilowatts per meter of wave crest width crossing a unit diameter circle) at over 76,000 grid points in U.S. coastal waters.

5 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Mapped out to a distance of 50 nautical miles from shore (corresponding to the limits of NREL’s map of offshore wind power density). Independent validation of hindcast results against wave measurements was performed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory “typicalness” study to determine how well the 51-month period of the Wavewatch III hindcast represented the longer-term wave climate.

6 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Estimated the total naturally available and technically recoverable wave energy resources by aggregating unit circle wave power density estimates along inner and outer shelf depth contours. To estimate the recoverable resource, assumed: –array capacity packing of 10 MW, 15 MW, and 20 MW per kilometer –100-fold device operating range between threshold and maximum operating conditions in terms of wave power density recoverable by devices in such arrays.

7 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Plan, Schedule, & Budget Schedule Initiation date: 9/15/2008 Planned completion date: 11/15/2011 –Reasons for project delay include special Wavewatch III hindcast prepared for this project and additional analysis to address concerns raised by NRC review panel FY 2010 and FY 2011 milestones include: 2 nd expert and user workshop, May, 2010; validated available wave energy assessment, June, 2010; GIS data base, October, 2011; response to NRC panel comments, September, 2011; technical (recoverable) assessment, September, Budget: No budget modifications 100% of budget expended Budget History FY2009FY2010FY2011 DOECost-shareDOECost-shareDOECost-share $179,267$0$214,834$0$85,273$0

8 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Accomplishments and Results The total available wave energy resource along the U.S. continental shelf edge, based on accumulating unit circle wave power densities, is estimated as 2,640 TWh/yr, broken down as follows (TWh/yr): West Coast, 590; East Coast, 240; Gulf of Mexico, 80; Alaska, 1570; Hawaii, 130; and Puerto Rico, 30. The total recoverable wave energy resource, as constrained by a capacity packing density of 15 megawatts per kilometer of coastline, yields a total recoverable resource along the U.S. shelf edge of 1,170 TWh/yr, broken down as follows (TWh/yr): West Coast, 250; East Coast, 160; Gulf of Mexico, 60; Alaska, 620; Hawaii, 80; and Puerto Rico, 20.

9 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date Some reviewers expressed concerns that the aggregation of unit circle wave power densities overestimates the total available resource by “double-counting” wave energy that is traveling parallel to the depth contours. To address these reviewer concerns, we quantified the difference between our unit circle approach and their more rigorous approach, which would consider only the flux normally directed across a linear feature such as a depth contour or jurisdictional boundary, by comparing the results of both approaches at 17 National Data Buoy Center stations for which full directional hindcast spectra had been archived.

10 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Next Steps Dissemination of project results Future research should apply the methodologies developed by this project to a longer hindcast period, which is being developed by NOAA. Wave energy mapping should be extended into shallower water in selected regions using appropriate models and data. Near field effects of wave devices and arrays on wave propagation should be further investigated.