Scaling the Internet Core William B. Norton Co-founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. William B. Norton Co-founder.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Internet infrastructure and access Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003.
Advertisements

Selecting an IXP Where to peer?. THE TOP 10 IXP SELECTION CRITERIA How do network operators choose an Internet Exchange Point? 2.
Evolution 0.9: The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem Gigabit Peering Forum VII Herndon, VA September 9, 2003 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief.
ONE PLANET ONE NETWORK A MILLION POSSIBILITIES Barry Joseph Director, Offer and Product Management.
1 A Gathering of State Networks: Strategies for the Next Decade Scott Gerstenberger - Mike Mosher - Merit Network, Inc.
Optical communications & networking - an Overview
The Folly of Peering Ratios? William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. From Debate…
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Workshop: A Practical Guide to Interconnect, Transit & Peering.
1 Computer Networks & The Internet Lecture 3 Imran Ahmed University of Management & Technology.
RIPE39 EIX WG Update Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer.
GigaBit Deployment Case Study Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer.
James 1:5 If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to him.
RIT Campus Data Network. General Network Statistics Over 23,000 wired outlets Over 14,500 active switched ethernet ports > 250 network closets > 1,000.
Build vs. Buy: Internet Datacenter Operations Research INTAP March 6, 2001 Tokyo.
Lappeenranta University of Technology Valery Naumov Telecommunications Laboratory Tel: “Why Do We Need WDM Networks?”
1Presentation_ID © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. IP Over Optical: Building Terabit Networks Today Larry McAdams
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
The Next Wave of Massive Disruptions to the Peering Ecosystem Asia Pacific Peering Forum Sydney, Nov. 8, 2006 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical.
Company Confidential Breakthrough Solutions for Friction-Free Networking Introducing.
The Optical Communications Market
1 Introduction to Optical Networks. 2 Telecommunications Network Architecture.
Toolbox Helping You Define Value and Close Business The Business Value of Ethernet Services.
April, 2001Korea Telecom1 IP Pricing and Interconnection in Korea by Inho Chung Korea Telecom (The views in this slide do not necessarily represent the.
Company and Product Overview Company Overview Mission Provide core routing technologies and solutions for next generation carrier networks Founded 1996.
The Next Wave of Massive Disruptions to the Peering Ecosystem Tokyo Peering Forum II June 22, 2006 William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 The Internet and Its Uses Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or.
© XchangePoint 2001 Economic Differences Between Transit and Peering Exchanges Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer NANOG 25 10th June 2002.
A Scottish Internet Exchange: Benefits, Viability, Options Keith Mitchell Executive Chairman London Internet Exchange Ltd Director, NOMINET Chair, RIPE.
Introduction 1-1 Chapter 1: roadmap 1.1 What is the Internet? 1.2 Network edge  end systems, access networks, links 1.3 Network core  circuit switching,
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 The Internet and Its Uses Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Slides originally from Professor Williamson at U Calgary1-1 Introduction Part II  Network Core  Delay & Loss in Packet-switched Networks  Structure.
NORDUnet NORDUnet The Fibre Generation Lars Fischer CTO NORDUnet.
The Internet: Present Broadband Packet Switching: A Personal Perspective Meehwa Kim.
Interconnection Strategies for ISPs William B. Norton Co-Founder, Director of Business Development NANOG 16 - Eugene, Oregon24-May-99 © Equinix, Inc
Internet Video: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
Policy Committee Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 Budget Considerations: Dark Fiber November 13, 2002.
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem William B. Norton Co-Founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.
Introduction Switches and Access. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach Featuring the Internet, 5 rd edition. Jim.
IT Networking Challenges for Westchester/CT-area Businesses Presented by: David Giannetta Territory Manager Westchester County Fibertech Networks.
Internet Exchange Points Keith Mitchell CTO, XchangePoint ICANN GAC Regional Forum Cape Town 29 th Nov 2004.
© XchangePoint 2001 Growing Your IP Business by Addressing Your Customers’ Broadband Content Needs Keith Mitchell Chief Technical Officer Global IP Carriers.
1. 2 NANOG Welcome Betty Burke NANOG Executive Director.
25/07/2003BGP Table Manners 1 Interdomain Routing Politics for the Masses Dave Aaldering.
® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved 1 ® Adtran, Inc All rights reserved ADTRAN & Smart Grid January 21, 2010 Kevin Morgan Director, Product Marketing.
Impact of Photonic Integration on Optical Services Serge Melle VP Technical Marketing, Infinera.
Advanced Networks: The Past and the Future – The Internet2 Perspective APAN 7 July 2004, Cairns, Australia Douglas Van Houweling, President & CEO Internet2.
The Internet 1.Clients, Servers, Routers, Networks 2.Broadband, Wireless & Dial up 3.Connecting backbone 4.The roles of points of presence & network access.
The Great (Public vs. Private) Peering Debate Peering at 10G William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. RIPE 50 – Stockholm EIX-WG.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 The Internet and Its Uses Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or.
Why SingTel Won’t Peer William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. Asia Pacific Peering Forum Singapore, Oct. 5, 2006 Slide Set.
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7) William B. Norton Co-Founder & Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. (V0.7), XChangePoint Europe October 28,
Peering BOF III William B. Norton Co-Founder, Chief Technical Liaison Equinix Inc. NANOG 19 Washington, DC.
Whats hot in networking? S. Keshav. Internet architecture Access Enterprise/campus/local ISP Wide area/backbone ISP.
1 Merit Network: Connecting People and Organizations Since 1966 Business Continuity A Networking Perspective Bob Stovall Merit Annual Meeting June 22 &
RESILIENT PACKET RING NETWORK(RPR).  The nature of the public network has changed. Demand for Internet Protocol(IP)data is growing at a compound annual.
© 2001 Caspian Networks, Inc. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Internet Intelligence and Traffic Growth Lawrence G. Roberts Chairman & CTO Caspian.
Remote Peering William B. Norton Executive Director, DrPeering International Chief Strategy Officer, International Internet Exchange (IIX)
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
A Business Case for Peering
Peering Information: Some Data Points
Ken Gunnells, Ph.D. - Networking Paul Crigler - Programming
The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem
Chapter 11 Inventing the Internet
Peering Information: Some Data Points
The Internet and Its Applications
A Business Case for Peering in 2004 (v0.7)
Resource Negotiation, Pricing and QoS
Intro to Data & Internet
Presentation transcript:

Scaling the Internet Core William B. Norton Co-founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc. William B. Norton Co-founder and Chief Technical Liaison Equinix, Inc.

Perspective Practical: Application of technology Neutral Internet Exchanges Environment for Exploitation of Optical Efficiencies ISP Peering and Transit Massive Scaling of Content Environment for launching Next Generation Services Practical: Application of technology Neutral Internet Exchanges Environment for Exploitation of Optical Efficiencies ISP Peering and Transit Massive Scaling of Content Environment for launching Next Generation Services

Service Provider Scalability Position: The current service provider interconnection model does not scale well Service providers need solutions that provide: Control over bandwidth provisioning Choice of providers Efficient scaling Position: The current service provider interconnection model does not scale well Service providers need solutions that provide: Control over bandwidth provisioning Choice of providers Efficient scaling

NSFNET to Post-NSFNET Era Internet No Internet presentation complete without… BARRNet NWNet Sesqui NEARNet NyserNet Merit NCAR OarNet Regional NSFNET SDSC AT&T MCI Sprint UUNet ANS NWNet NyserNet Merit OarNet Regional NSFNET ( ) Regional Tech Meetings Performance & Operations Reporting & Coordination Routing & Network Planning Privatization (1994-Now) North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) Meetings NSFNET ( ) Regional Tech Meetings Performance & Operations Reporting & Coordination Routing & Network Planning Privatization (1994-Now) North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) Meetings

Internet Statistics 87.5% of all Internet statistics are made up Made Up Real Source: I made it up

Evolution of Interconnection Strategies Carrier Internet Exchanges Technologies: ATM, distributed (and colo) Network Access Points (NAPs) Technologies: FDDI (with colo) Congestion issues Direct (point-to-point) interconnections Technologies: N x OC-3, N x OC-12 Carrier Internet Exchanges Technologies: ATM, distributed (and colo) Network Access Points (NAPs) Technologies: FDDI (with colo) Congestion issues Direct (point-to-point) interconnections Technologies: N x OC-3, N x OC-12 OC-3=155Mbps, OC-12=622Mbps OC-48=2.5Gbps, OC-192=10Gbps OC-768=40Gbps OC-3=155Mbps, OC-12=622Mbps OC-48=2.5Gbps, OC-192=10Gbps OC-768=40Gbps

Direct Circuit ISP Interconnection Strategy Point-to-Point Circuits Regional interconnects Now: N x OC-12 Insufficient carrier bandwidth Carriers can’t provision fast enough No traffic aggregation efficiency Doesn’t scale well Point-to-Point Circuits Regional interconnects Now: N x OC-12 Insufficient carrier bandwidth Carriers can’t provision fast enough No traffic aggregation efficiency Doesn’t scale well UUUU GGGGAAAACCCCSSSS

Current Problems at the “Core” Time to provision services (9-18 months) Carrier ISPs Content (ASP, E*Com, hosting, etc.) Scaling at the Core Interconnection bandwidth (OC-12->OC-48->OC- 192) Transport (try and order an OC-12!) ISP Peering (exponential growth in users/traffic) ISP Transit (demand exceeds supply, choice) Content Peering (unicast streaming, content generation) Edge (DSL – AOL+) Time to provision services (9-18 months) Carrier ISPs Content (ASP, E*Com, hosting, etc.) Scaling at the Core Interconnection bandwidth (OC-12->OC-48->OC- 192) Transport (try and order an OC-12!) ISP Peering (exponential growth in users/traffic) ISP Transit (demand exceeds supply, choice) Content Peering (unicast streaming, content generation) Edge (DSL – AOL+)

Tools for Service Provider Scalability Application of Technology Dark Fiber Providers Control over provisioning of capacity WDM/DWDM Huge capacity into exchange Enabled Bandwidth Aggregation Efficiency Half filled pipes Collocated Content Providers Environment to exploit optical efficiencies Application of Technology Dark Fiber Providers Control over provisioning of capacity WDM/DWDM Huge capacity into exchange Enabled Bandwidth Aggregation Efficiency Half filled pipes Collocated Content Providers Environment to exploit optical efficiencies WDM=Wave Division Multiplexing, DWDM=Dense Wave Division Multiplexing S UUUU GGGG AAAA CCCC SSS Neutral Internet Business Exchange CP

Scaling of Interconnection Methods Traffic (Content, Peering, Transit) Exchange at OC-3 Cost Comparison of Interconnection Strategies $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400, # of participants Monthly Cost of Interconnection Direct Circuit Interconnection: Linear Exchange : Stepped Efficient Fiber Exchange:Linear Efficient

Future of the Internet Exchange Environment MarketPlace: Stratification of component operations, fast creation & provisioning of next generation packaged operations services MarketPlace: Stratification of component operations, fast creation & provisioning of next generation packaged operations services DSL Access Providers Dial-in Modem Operators Svcs USENET Svcs WebHost Svcs Search Engines Cache/Content Distribution Carrier Internet Service Provider Carriers Carrier Internet Service Provider Carrier Internet Service Provider Service Providers Internet Service Provider Wireless Access Svc Virtual ISP Sparing

Scaling Benefits of Neutral Co-location of Content and ISP Backbones Control Time to provision interconnect : 24 hours Scalability Bandwidth scalability into the exchange Bandwidth scalability within the exchange Choice Ease of multi-homing Open marketplace to buy/sell evolving services Stratification of the Internet service space Robust Interconnection Environment Control Time to provision interconnect : 24 hours Scalability Bandwidth scalability into the exchange Bandwidth scalability within the exchange Choice Ease of multi-homing Open marketplace to buy/sell evolving services Stratification of the Internet service space Robust Interconnection Environment

Summary Application of existing technology can scale the core Service provider tools include: Dark fiber service providers; WDM into Robust neutral exchange environment Fiber cross-connects within exchange Co-located content and multiple ISPs Leads to: Control, choice, scalability at the core Application of existing technology can scale the core Service provider tools include: Dark fiber service providers; WDM into Robust neutral exchange environment Fiber cross-connects within exchange Co-located content and multiple ISPs Leads to: Control, choice, scalability at the core