A New Generation of Multi Service Access Networks: Results of MUSE Phase I AccessNets 2006 Athens,

Accessnets 2006 — 2 Outline  Introduction to MUSE  Access Architectures and Platforms  First Mile Solutions  Residential Gateways  Lab Trials  Summary and Outlook

Accessnets 2006 — 3 MUSE Overall Objective Multi service access network that provides  secure connectivity between end-user terminals and edge  in a multi-provider environment  at a low cost for every European citizen. Multi service access network that provides  secure connectivity between end-user terminals and edge  in a multi-provider environment  at a low cost for every European citizen. Customer Premises Network Service Provider Internet Service Provider Application Service Provider Network Access Provider Access Node Residential Gateway Edge Node Aggregation network First Mile

Accessnets 2006 — 4 Partners System vendors SME Aarhus BB society Operators Research Inst. & Universities IBBT Inria TU Eindhoven Budapest University (BUTE) ICCS/NTUA HHI Lund Institute of Technology (LTH) ACREO Univ. Carlos III de Madrid University of Essex Component vendors Phase I: Phase II: partners -100 PY/year (*) (**) (*) Only in phase I (**) Only in phase II

Accessnets 2006 — 5 Outline  Introduction to MUSE  Access Architectures and Platforms  First Mile Solutions  Residential Gateways  Lab Trials  Summary and Outlook

Accessnets 2006 — 6 Issues when using Ethernet in Access  Ethernet LAN (trusted environment)  Ethernet in Access (public network)  Bridge learning - Broadcast of some initialisation messages (ARP, DHCP, PPPoE) DOS attacks Confidential info to other users or competing providers  Secure and scalable connectivity models Model 1 (L2 forwarding) Model 2 (L3 forwarding)  No authentication  AAA  Configurable Conflicts, spoofing  Anti-spoofing mechanism  No QoS  QoS framework

Accessnets 2006 — 7 Model 1: L2 Ethernet forwarding CPN NSP/ISP ASP NAP EN Ethernet aggregation network AN CPE EN CPE Cross connect VLAN (stacking) or Bridging Ethernet bridged BRAS or Edge Router routed (IPv4/IPv6) IP termination

Accessnets 2006 — 8 Model 2: L3 IP forwarding CPN NSP/ISP ASP NAP EN Ethernet aggregation network AN CPE EN CPE BRAS or Edge Router routed (IPv4/IPv6) IP termination bridged IP aware bridging (IPv4/IPv6 )

Accessnets 2006 — 9 Multi Service Access QoS control  QoS is key in multi-service access  End-to-End QoS solutions (e.g. IntServ) commercially failed because of complexity  Priority based QoS (e.g. Diffserv) works in Core Networks with sufficient capacity, not suited for Access & Aggregation => Resource admission control in Access & Aggregation needed Edge Node Access Node

Accessnets 2006 — 10 QoS control Edge Node Access Node  Pre-provisioned pipes NRC  Network Resource Controller (NRC) View of flows and BW already allocated Configures policers at borders Admission control after request

Accessnets 2006 — 11 Outline  Introduction to MUSE  Access Architectures and Platforms  First Mile Solutions  Residential Gateways  Lab Trials  Summary and Outlook

Accessnets 2006 — 12 First Mile  High BW at lower cost Low cost CWDM Radio over Fibre (SM, MM) VDSL over Fibre XL PON DSL Dynamic Spectral Mgt. UWB over DSL

Accessnets 2006 — 13 xDSL Loop Qualification and Monitoring Line testing integrated in DSL System Assessment of loop quality and noise environment Integration in network management for provisioning work-flow Subproject C: EAB, TI, TNO, TS, LTH

Accessnets 2006 — 14 Outline  Introduction to MUSE  Access Architectures and Platforms  First Mile Solutions  Residential Gateways  Lab Trials  Summary and Outlook

Accessnets 2006 — 15 Residential Gateway NT1 NT2 CPN ST U T1T2SR Subscriber Line TAST’ IP ETH PHY MediaSIPTR69 Internet serv Triple play services PHY SIP DHCP QoS Management IP ETH TR69 Data Control Management NT12

Accessnets 2006 — 16 Outline  Introduction to MUSE  Access Architectures and Platforms  First Mile Solutions  Residential Gateways  Lab Trials  Summary and Outlook

Accessnets 2006 — 17 Lab Trials  Model 1: Ethernet Forwarding  Model 2: IP Forwarding Subproject C: Ericsson, TNO, ACREO, IFX, Robotiker, TI, TS, LTH, BUTE Subproject B: Alcatel, Thomson, DT, TID, STM, BT, IBBT, INRIA, NTUA

Accessnets 2006 — 18 Optical Access Integrated Lab trial Subproject D: HHI, TU Eindhoven, Univ. of Essex Lucent Technologies, PTI, FT, UC3M

Accessnets 2006 — 19 Summary  Building Multi Service Access with Ethernet L2 or L3 forwarding model QoS guarantees by network resource control  Increased Bandwidth on First Mile  Residential Gateway Suited for Triple Play  Demonstrated in Lab Trials  Outlook phase II MM service intelligence in access Fixed Mobile convergences Mobile BB Access MUSE Multimedia

Accessnets 2006 — 20 Muse confidential Thank you for your attention