1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
Advertisements

WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research Integrate the existing Drinking Water and Water Quality research programs into one holistic program that.
David Purkey, SEI Rob Lempert, RAND
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 We Are Here => Work Plan Recap 1 st Plenary Meeting Sacramento October 22-23, 2007.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study December 10, 2010.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
1 Overview CA Department of Water Resources CCTAG Meeting March 30, 2012.
1 An Investment Framework For Clean Energy and Development November 15, 2006 Katherine Sierra Vice President Sustainable Development The World Bank.
A: Overview of project analysis and workshop contributions July 3, :00 pm to 3:30 pm David Purkey, SEI Robert Lempert, RAND 1.
Introduction to the Session 6 - Theme 4 – on “Water Resources Management and Governance”
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
IWRM as a Tool for Adaptation to Climate Change
Overview of the Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Urban Water Institute 19 th Annual Water Policy Conference August 22-24, 2012 San Diego.
1 Improving Analytical Capabilities of the California Water Plan Rich Juricich, California Dept. of Water Resources.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Water Resources Management within the context of Climate Change: The Case of a Small Island Developing State (SIDS) Geoffrey Marshall Hydrogeologist Water.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Where We’ve Been Where We Are Going South Lahontan Regional Workshop Palmdale July 10, 2007.
Activities, Results and Preliminary Report ACWI Meeting September 14, 2005 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable (SWRR)
Building a Legacy: Integrated Water Resource Management in Damascus, Oregon Oregon Water Conference May 25, 2011 WBG PDX GS
Rethinking Water Policy Opportunities in California: Quantifying Water-Use Efficiency, Groundwater Management, and Water Re-Use Options Bulletin
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
SESSION 2 Identifying Synergies Among MEAs Using IEA Tools.
Adapting Water Policy to Meet Future Need North Bay Watershed Association April 4, 2008 Lester Snow Director.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Advisory Committee June 4, 2007.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Joint Agency Workshop on California Drought Response Robert Kostecki, LBNL California Energy Commission, Sacramento, August 28, 2015.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
Better water resources management -- Greater resilience today, more effective adaptation tomorrow GWP Perspective on water and climate change adaptation.
1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan. 2 Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 scenario narratives ● Analysis performed for Update 2005 ● Scenarios.
Drought Mitigation and Response Advisory Council Elements of a Drought Response Plan May 29, 2008.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Amir Muhammed, Director Asianics Agro. Dev. International, Islamabad, Pakistan Countries Involved: Pakistan, India, Nepal,
1 Using Scenarios in the California Water Plan. 2 Scenario Overview ● Background ● Update 2005 narratives ● Feedback we received ● Creating themes.
1 Scenarios and More California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting April 14 th, 2005.
California Water Plan Update 2005 Draft Slides for Public Hearings in June April 14, 2005.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
Georgia Climate Change Summit antruth Al Gore: an inconvenient truth IPCC: 4th Assessment Report 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.
1 Arne Simonsen Chair Delta Protection Commission October 23, 2008 Governor’s Delta Vision Process E.O. S
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
Water Management and Climate Change in the US- Mexico Border Region Robert Lempert Senior Scientist RAND September 27, 2008.
Municipal Water District of Orange County OC Water Reliability Study INTERIM REPORT Review Interim Phase 1 Results December 8, 2015 Orange County Business.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
1 Public Workshop Chino July 13, 2005 Public Review Draft California Water Plan Update 2005.
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Engineering Perspectives – Towards Structural Change Jackie Kepke, P.E. Workshop on Climate, Society, and Technology June 7, 2011.
Climate Literacy 201 Department of Water Resources May 22, 2013.
Regional Planning Policies and Climate Change – Seminar 1 David Payne South East England Regional Assembly.
Integrated Development and Climate Policies: How to realize benefits at national and international level? 20 – 22 September 2006, Paris, France Development.
Alan Matheson State Planning Coordinator November 19, 2013 Preparing for an Uncertain Future: Developing a Utah Water Strategy Alan Matheson Executive.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
1 California’s Water Supply: The “Big Fix”, Interim Solutions, and How We Get There CFEE Roundtable Conference October 5-7, 2008 Is There Enough Water?
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Integrating data, modeling and tools into Basin Planning
Challenges in a Changing World
5-b) 2012 Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources
5-b) 2012 Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Water Scarcity and Drought EEA Assessment
UN environment Resilient Tanzania Summit Speaker UN environment
Challenges in a Changing World
Jacques Delsalle, DG Environment, Unit D.1
Water and Adaptation Modelling
CBEWP Chino Basin Conjunctive Use Environmental
Presentation transcript:

1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)

2 Presentation Overview ● Evaluation Framework from Update 2005 ● Ideas to inform Update 2009 ● Capabilities of Update 2009 analytical tools ● Activities for today

3 Evaluation Framework from Update 2005 Questions for the Water Plan What do we want to know? (Objectives) Evaluation Criteria What we are measuring? (Indicators) Metric What is the quantity measured? Measure How are we measuring of progress?

4 Evaluation Framework from Update 2005 Questions for the Water Plan “What will future water needs be?” Evaluation Criteria Water demand by sector (urban, agricultural, and environmental) and hydrologic region Metric Amount of water demand (acre-feet) Measure Change in demand from 2000 to 2030

5 Questions for the Water Plan Evaluation Criteria Metric Measure Results

6 Questions for Water Plan Analysis From Update 2005 ● How does water scarcity affect the economy and all beneficial uses? ● How does water quality affect water management and vice versa? ● How does land use affect water management?

7 More Questions From Update 2005 ● How should local, regional, and state agencies manage water during multiple year droughts? ● How will climate change affect water management? ● What are some of the costs, benefits, and tradeoffs between different water management strategies?

8 Categories of Evaluation Criteria (or Indicators) from Update 2005 ● Agriculture ● Catastrophic vulnerability ● Economic costs ● Energy ● Environmental justice ● Flood management ● Operation Flexibility ● Public trust ● Public acceptance ● Recreation ● Regional self- sufficiency ● Third party impacts ● Tribal resources ● Urban ● Water demand ● Water supply

9 Ideas to Inform Update 2009 ● What makes good criteria (indicators) ● Other indicator efforts

10 Selecting Good Evaluation Criteria (Indicators) ● The indicator must be measurable; ● The indicator should measure something believed to be important in its own right; ● A few indicators that can measure multiple metrics is desirable Adapted from Bob Wilkinson, UCSB and Sustainable Water Resource Roundtable

11 Selecting Good Evaluation Criteria (Indicators) ● The indicator should be measurable in a timely manner to be useful to the discussion; ● The indicator should be based on information that can be used to compare different geographical areas; ● International comparability is desirable. Adapted from Bob Wilkinson, UCSB and Sustainable Water Resource Roundtable

12 Related effort: CALFED Performance Measures Report ● Supply reliability ● Water quality ● Levee integrity ● Ecosystem restoration

13 Supply Reliability ● Performance Measure 1: The annual number of incidences when water quality standards, flow requirements, or other agreements related to SWP operations throughout the Delta are not met. ● Target 1: Zero incidences of not meeting water quality and flow requirements, or other agreements throughout the Delta related to SWP operations.

14 Related effort: Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable ● Water availability ● Water quality ● Human uses and health ● Environmental uses and health ● Infrastructure and Institutions

15 Water Consumption and Availability

16 Related effort: Blue Ribbon Task Force ● Supply reliability ● Seismic and flood durability ● Ecosystem health and resilience ● Water quality ● Schedule, cost, and funding

17 Delta Water Use

18 Related Effort: RAND Study of Inland Empire Utilities Agency (1) Question to Answer “How reliable are IEUA’s supplies under plausible scenarios of climate change? Evaluation Criteria Balance of water demand and water supply over time Metric (1) Annual surplus or deficit (af) (2) % of years in which demand is met Measure Change in (1) average surplus and (2) average reliability

19 Related Effort: RAND Study of Inland Empire Utilities Agency (2) Question to Answer “Would investments in increased efficiency reduce costs?” Evaluation Criteria Costs of delivering supply to meet demand before and after additional efficiency Metric Net present value of costs over time Measure Difference in costs with and without additional efficiency

20 Other metrics evaluated in IEUA study ● Water needs  Demand by sector and year ● Water resources  Available water supply by type ● Supply adequacy  Met water demands  Overall supply surplus or deficit ● Supply reliability  % of years in which shortage occurs ● Groundwater condition  Percolation  Extractions  Total storage ● Management costs  Average cost of providing supplies  Average cost of saving water through efficiency

21 Capabilities of Update 2009 analytical tools

22 A Scenario Analysis Has Four Key Elements Exogenous Factors (X)Management Levers (L) Uncertain factors outside of the control of water managers — Basis for “Scenarios” Water management options — “Response Packages” Relationships (R)Performance Measures (M) Mapping between combinations of exogenous factors (X) and levers (L) to outcomes (M) — a “Model” Water outcomes of interest

23 Hydrologic Region Analysis Using WEAP ● Demand by sector  Indoor  Outdoor (influenced by weather/climate) ● Current supplies  Annual yields by supply type  Changes due to hydrologic variability and climate change ● Projected supplies  Under current management  Under various response packages ● Supply and demand balance

24 Planning Area WEAP Analysis for Sacramento and San Joaquin River Regions ● Hydrology  Major river flows (monthly)  Snow accumulation and patterns of melt  Groundwater percolation ● Water demand  Urban and agricultural by Planning Area ● Available and delivered supply  By supply type an PA ● Supply buffer ● Supply reliability  Urban and agricultural ● Critical environmental flows ● Frequency/magnitude of dam spills ● Performance of response packages  Yield and cost

25 Activities for Today

26 Activities For Today ● Review 9 questions most relevant to Future Scenarios and Management Responses ● Help identify important policy questions for these 9 ● Review Update 2005 criteria and the sample indicators ● What criteria (indicators) does your organization use? ● What criteria must be quantified in Update 2009? Questions for the Water Plan Evaluation Criteria Metric Measure

27 Fill Out Evaluation Framework worksheet

28 Reference Information ● Rich Juricich   (916) ● David Groves, RAND Corp 