Psychometric Considerations of the MMPI-2 William P. Wattles, Ph.D. Francis Marion University

MMPI/MMPI-2 second most widely used test by clincical psychologists (86%) Translated into more than 50 languages

Original MMPI Published 1943 Paper and pencil improvement on clinical interview and individual psychological testing

Prior to MMPI: Logical Keying Test items generated rationally based on: –Face validity –Subjective judgment Logically keyed items problematic: –Subject to faking –Not always correct

Face Validity Does the test appear to measure what it is purported to Measure?

Face Validity 0 I do not feel sad. 1 I feel sad. 2 I am sad all the time and can't snap out of it. 3 I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it.

70. I am easily downed in an argument 89 My hardest values are with myself 267 I have periods in which I feel unusually cheerful without any special reason. 219 I have been disappointed in love

Empirical Keying Original items came from many sources. Pool of 1,000 items reduced to 566 Rewritten to be less formal and allow for some reversal of responses.

Control Group 724 Visitors to the hospital in Minnesota. Representative of Minnesota in the 1930s –16-65 –Average age mind 30’s –Rural –8 th grade education –White

Empirical Keying Using groups of diagnosed patients Contrast and Cross-validation

MMPI vs MMPI 2 Improved norms Score has meaning only when compared to a representative sample. Original sample Caucasian, 35, married, small town, good job. New sample large and more representative. Higher education level than population

MMPI-2 normative group 2600 Participants Paid $15 ($40 for couples) Tested in 7 locations –Minnesota, Ohio, North Carolina, Washington, Pennsylvania, Virginia, California Selected from phone directories

MMPI-2 composition 2600 Participants (started with 2900) –1138 men –1462 women Age (M=41, SD=15) 61% married Education 3-20 years (M=14, SD=2)

MMPI-2 Restandardization Caucasian 81% African-American 12% Hispanic 3% Native-American 3% Asian-American 1%

Requirements Eight Grade reading level required Satisfactory cooperation and commitment to task Internal checks for the above

T Score transformations Transforming a score makes it easier to interpret. 13 validity and clinical scales converted to T scores T score is a standard score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Thus, a 70 is like a Z score of 2

Standard Scores or Z scores Z score: how many standard deviations a score lies above or below the mean.

46 68% 99.7% 95%

Percent of scores falling below

% 84% 97.5%

33 Z-score

33 MMPI-2 T score

MMPI Uniform T score Original linear T- scores were problematic because the underlying data is somewhat skewed. Thus a T score on one scale represented a different percentile than one on another scale

MMPI Uniform T-scores Involve averaging of the T-scores across the scales.

Frequency high points in contemporary settings

T-score cutoff Formerly T-scores of 70 were considered clinically significant. Now the MMPI-2 recommends 65. That puts the score above 93% of those who answer –65-50/10 = 1.5 –1.5 =.9332 area under standard normal curve to the left of Z = 1.5

Intercorrelations There is considerable overlap between some scales. 13 of 39 items in scale 6 also appear in scale 8

Homogeneity of items The empirical keying approach did not favor item homogeneity thus internal consistency is not high.

Temporal Stability Ability, interest and aptitude tests should be high in temporal stability Personality and psychopathology measures less clear.

Test-retest reliability one week

Test-retest reliability Summary. Test is fairly stable and changes when current appear consistent. Significant changes generally correctly reflect behavior change.

Internal consistency Moderate, not a strength for the MMPI-2 due to empirical keying approach.

Factor Analysis Two strong factors identified –General maladjustment and psychotic thought –Neurotic characteristics

Response sets and styles Charges that MMPI and MMPI-2 were confounded by response style. Block modified MMPI to have equal number of true and false items Test seems to be valid in a variety of settings.

MMPI vs MMPI-2 Validity similar Raw Scores higher on MMPI-2 –May be explained by instructions T-scores compensate for higher raw scores

Items changed MMPI-2

Basic Qualifications for users Graduate-level course in psychological testing. –Standard scores –Transformations –Understand limits of accuracy –Standard error of measurement

Basic Qualifications for users Graduate-level course in psychopathology –Personality structure –Dynamics –Deviance psychodiagnostic concepts –Diagnostic systems –Broad understanding of human personality

Lexile Reading Levels in SIRS What Are Lexile Reading Levels Lexile scores match reader ability and text difficulty, allowing individualized monitoring of student progress. Due to the accountability requirements of NCLB, many states are turning to standardized systems for reading which help to track student progress. How does it Work? Lexile measures are based on two well- established predictors of how difficult a text is to comprehend: semantic difficulty (word frequency) and syntactic complexity (sentence length). AgeSchoo l Year Typical Lexile Level Lexile Score Table from

Reading Level

Lexile examples 39 I am an important person 294 I have not lived the right kind of life 603 I do not read every editorial in the newspaper everyday 860 Most anytime I would rather sit and daydream than do anything else I am troubled by discomfort in the pit of my stomach every few days or oftener.

Testing conditions Quiet room one setting preferred Okay to take over several intervals Person must have privacy and no help Simple definitions of words permitted along with rephrasing of colloquialisms Usually sufficient to say: “Just indicate the way you see it.”

Examiner to act in a serious and professional manner Don’t linger too long in one area

The End