Writing an Effective Assessment Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Head teacher Performance Management
Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
A brief overview What is program evaluation? How is an evaluation conducted? When should it be used? When can it be used? Used with Permission of: John.
Nontraditional Employment & Training Program Center for Women in Government & Civil Society University at Albany State University of New York ACTION PLAN.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
NEAIR November 2005 The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair’s Perspective Dr. Barbara R. Sadowski Chief Planning Officer Marywood.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
Evaluation and Human Resources Focus: discuss how evaluation of schools is conducted and where the emphasis should be placed in these evaluations. Thesis:
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Departmental Learning Assessment Developing Strategies to Assess Value NMLA Annual Conference, April 19, 2013.
The LEA Planning Cycle Application
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Administrative and Educational Support Outcomes: Reporting Results, Taking Action, and Improving Services Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
DEFINING AND REFINING LEARNING OUTCOMES UK Office of Assessment.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment to Administrative Services Mohawk Valley Community College February 7, 2006.
Student Learning Outcomes Documentation
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
Functional Area Assessment
The assessment process For Administrative units
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Dr. Ron Atwell Ms. Kathleen Connelly
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Assessment components
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Writing an Effective Assessment Plan Administrative and Academic Support Units February 2015

What is Assessment? Plan: Define your mission, identify outcomes, and develop measures and performance targets Do: Conduct your work in accordance with division and unit strategic plans. Check: Measure your progress against performance targets and analyze results. Act: Use what you've learned. Revise or reinforce your plans, make improvements, change your measures or targets as needed.

Step 1: Define your mission Three or four lines of text that clearly and concisely communicate WHAT you do, WHY you do it, and HOW you do it “The mission of (name) is to (purpose) by providing (functions) to (stakeholders). These (services, etc.) contribute to the university’s mission by….”

Step 1: Define your mission (cont.) Is it brief? Distinctive? Does it clearly state the purpose? Does it indicate the primary function? Does it say who the stakeholders are? Does it clearly support the university’s mission?

Step 2: Identify outcomes Operational outcomes End result for (on impact on) a customer/stakeholder or the institution that is a consequence of your work. Directly related to the mission and key responsibilities; stable from year to year Describes ends, not the means; “big-picture” Beneficiary + action verb + benefit=outcome “Eligible employees will have the information they need to make appropriate decisions regarding employee benefits packages.”

Step 2: Identify outcomes Strategic outcomes Reflect future expected results based on a planned activity Written in future tense, closely tied to strategic goals, consistent with operational outcomes “Over the next year, the Registrar’s office will improve student access to services by expanding hours of operation.”

Step 2: Identify Outcomes Learning outcomes Relate to student learning Describe the key knowledge, skills, or abilities that students attain as a result of a learning experience. “Upon successful completion of ---, students will <action verb>.” Must be observable, measurable. “Students will identify correct academic requirements for their major.”

Which should I use? It depends. Can use a combination of the three. Check: Are they aligned with the mission statement? Are they important to the university/division and reflect key results? Is it possible to collect accurate and reliable data? Can they be used to identify areas to improve?

Step 3: Measure outcomes First: Develop measures Must relate to the outcome directly and clearly Must be objective and avoid structural bias The process is documented, systematic, and impartial. What are you already doing? Direct v. indirect Direct measures examine actual results. Indirect measures examine perceptions related to that outcome. Must use multiple measures to examine each outcome, one of which should be direct.

Step 3: Measure outcomes Institutional Data Sources MAYS (Students) MAYS (Faculty and Staff) CIRP Freshman Survey NSSE Graduating Student Survey Alumni Survey Factbook Great Places to Work

Step 3: Measure outcomes Second: Set targets How do you define success? What is the minimum result that will represent achievement of the outcome? Should be challenging but realistic

Step 4: Collect data Look at what you already collect. Plan: What kind of data is needed? What needs to be done? Who is responsible? When and how will it be collected?

Step 5: Analyze results What do these results mean for your unit? Why did you/did you not reach your target? What does this tell you about strengths/weaknesses? Which strategies were successful? What will you do differently going forward? Each issue that is identified needs to have an action plan to improve performance. If 100% target was achieved, how will you raise the bar? What resources will be needed, who is responsible, when will actions take place?

Planning Data Collection Reporting September October November December January-May June-July Division: Using the university’s strategic plan, develops and presents to units goals for current year onwards. Unit: Develops or revises assessment plan for current year, sends plan to Division. Division: Compiles and reviews unit plans and send division-wide plan to PIE. Formulates appropriate budget requests, based on strategic plan and assessment results from previous year. University: PIE reviews plans and sends feedback to divisions. University: UAC reviews previous year’s assessment reports and sends feedback to Division. Division: Communicates feedback to units. University: UBC reconciles budget requests with projected budget Unit: Responds to feedback as required. Unit: Implements current year assessment plans, collects data, and analyzes results. Units may also collect data at other points during the academic year, as appropriate. University: PIE forwards results of institutional surveys to units Unit: Prepares assessment report and forwards results to Division. Division: Compiles units' assessment reports and analyzes results; sends report to UAC (July 31).

Previous Academic Year Progress on Implementing Improvement Unit Assessment Report 2014-2015 Previous Academic Year Current Academic Year Outcomes Planned Improvement Progress on Implementing Improvement Outcome 1: Relates to divisional goals: Method 1: (Each outcome should be assessed using at least two measures, and at least one of these measures should be a direct measure.) Target: Results: (Detailed discussion of results, charts, tables, etc. can be included in the “analysis” section below.) Method 2: Results: Analysis of Results and Implications: (List all data sources used, discuss the results for each method used, describe what analysis of the results indicates, and provide and other relevant information.) Planned Improvements: (List specific actions intended to improve the unit’s effectiveness. Each result should have an associated improvement. If 100% of the target has been met, what will the unit do to reach the next level?)