Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Case Study Case Study Watkins Creek Franklin, TN.
Advertisements

BAT Work Group. BAT Work Group Goals Develop a procedure for identifying technologies eligible for funding Propose policies and regulation necessary to.
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.8 Site selection for hazardous waste treatment facilities.
An Accurate Assessment of the Situation Determining a Communitys Wastewater Needs Nick Haig- University of Minnesota Onsite Sewage Treatment Program
Fayette County Wastewater Management Plan October 6, 2005.
CREW CAMP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW L. David Glatt, P.E. North Dakota Department of Health Environmental Health Section.
Finally! – A Process that Looks at Environmental Risk Early J. S. Irving Environmental Compliance Idaho National Laboratory.
Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Water Quality Management (208) Program Vonie Gilreath, Regional Planner, BCDCOG Coastal Community Workshop February 7, 2006.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Stanlick Sewer Treatment Plant Upgrade Implementation Date: September 1, 2008.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 1: Introduction and Wastewater Recap.
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
Presented to the Connecticut Association of Water Pollution Control Authorities | April 26, 2013 Community Systems 101 Presented by Thom Knowlton, P.E.
“Non-point Source Septic Mitigation Tool Box”. Why we should care about rural sewers? Nicholas M. Ellis Michael Novac Bryan Pohl.
Old Saybrook (Draft) Wastewater Management District Facilities Plan Public Information Session Presented by the Old Saybrook Water Pollution Authority.
Mobile Washing Policy Florida Statutes Section contain the basic requirement for DEP regulation. Must be a stationary pollution source, such as.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
1. The installations of grinder pumps and lines from residences on private property to M.D. collection lines is the final link in finishing a project.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Promoting Smart Growth with Wastewater Management Optimizing Conservation and Growth with Wastewater Management Strategies.
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Feasibility Study of Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment and Wildlife Habitat Luna County, NM Public Meeting November 10, :00 am Presented.
SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND WELLS IN SOLANO COUNTY Solano County Environmental Health Division 601 Texas Street, Fairfield CA (707)
TECHNICAL SECTION 2000 TRAINING LIQUID WASTE LAND USE SOLID WASTE BIOSOLIDS HOUSING VECTOR WATER INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC.
Sewers vs. Sewer Avoidance: The Old Lyme Story Bonnie Reemsnyder, First Selectwoman Town of Old Lyme Dave Prickett, PE, Vice President Woodard & Curran.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Decentralized Sewage System (DSS) Management Robert W. Scully, PE Department of Public Health.
1 Innovative Use of Administrative Order Authority Management, Operation and Maintenance (MOM) Program.
WEKIVA BASIN ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM STUDY Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs Division of Environmental Health Florida Department of.
Presented by Dwain Butler District Director of Environmental Health Southeast Health District Waycross, Georgia.
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
We are a coastal community. We have beaches and marinas. We have salt marshes and tidal inlets. We have parks with fantastic water views. “ Where the.
THE COST AND LEVEL OF SERVIC E PRESENTED BY: COURTNEY REICH, AICP ECOLOGICAL PLANNING GROUP Stormwater Management Programs for Local Governments.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLANNING Public Information Session August 29, 2013 Town of Clinton, CT Water Pollution Control Commission.
HARTFORD | STAMFORD | WASHINGTON, DC | GREENWICH | LAKEVILLE Connecticut Association of Water Pollution Control Authorities, Inc.
Money Talks: Stretching Precious Dollars Drinking Water State Revolving Fund December 11, 2013.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2006 Water Services National Training Group 10 th Annual Conference 7 th September 2006.
Assessment of on-site sewage disposal systems after severe flooding Steven R. Tidwell, E.I. U.S. Public Health Service APHT3 – Disaster Engineer Presentation.
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction.
Massachusetts Public Health Inspector Training Wastewater Certificate Program (MA PHIT WW) Session 2: Permits and Licenses.
Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Section 319 Funding  EPA provides funds to the state and state administers.  All projects have a 25% match requirement.  Centennial grant funds are.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEALTH Onsite Wastewater Treatment Jim Gaughan, P.E., Environmental Engineer Bureau of Environmental Health Services.
Fayette County Wastewater Management Plan February 14, 2006.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
Missoula County Commissioners and City Council formed the Missoula Valley Water Quality District (MVWQD) Missoula County Commissioners.
Indian & Northern Affairs Canada March 10, 2010 On-Site Water and Wastewater Systems - First Nations Water Symposium Matthew Hough, P.Eng. Infrastructure.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Village of Naples and Hazlitt 1852 Vineyards Sewer Feasibility Study.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
 What is EWP & How Does the Program Work? Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Your Septic System Designing and its Maintenance.
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
Water Booster Station Improvement Study
Ontario’s Drainage Legislation
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Finance Options: Funding Water Infrastructure Projects George Bryan South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control State Revolving Fund.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
An example of Finland's approach to wastewater treatment for households in rural areas Kimmo Tiilikainen Minister of the Environment Finland
Sludge Removal Requirements
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
BAT Work Group.
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Onsite Wastewater Treatment: Finding the Funding May 11, 2012 Dennis J. Greci, P.E. Supervising Sanitary Engineer Connecticut Association of Water Pollution Control Authorities

The Basic Issue In parts of Connecticut, existing septic systems may not be able to treat wastewater effectively, because of – Poor soils – Small lots – Inadequate designs – Improper installation

Why is it a problem?? Each of the preceding deficiencies diminishes the ability of the septic system to perform its function; that is, to renovate wastewater to a quality that can be safely discharged back into the environment When a number of properties with similar deficiencies exists in a neighborhood, “…a community pollution problem exists, or… can reasonably be anticipated in the future…” (CGS 22a-428)

Why can’t we just fix the problems? If the problem is with the installation (small septic tank, inadequate leaching area) then an onsite repair may be possible. If the problem is with the site (inadequate land, unsuitable soils, high groundwater) a different approach is necessary.

Getting to the Funding: Accessing the Clean Water Fund In order to obtain funding under the Clean Water Fund, the project must be the most cost-effective solution. Onsite upgrades have been funded in the past (and in the present) where it’s been determined that such an approach is – technically feasible, – environmentally appropriate, and – economically affordable.

But how do we get there ? The Engineering Report An environmental consultant must prepare an engineering report (also called a Facilities Plan) that accomplishes the following: – Evaluates the severity and extent of the existing or potential pollution problems – Evaluates alternatives to determine their suitability and cost-effectiveness – Recommends an alternative or combination of alternatives – Recommends a schedule for implementing solution

Funding the Solution The municipality needs to approve the engineering report: WPCA Local Health Dept Planning & Zoning Finance Get approvals from DEEP and DPH And finally, get authorization from the citizens Referndum RTM

What’s eligible? The Clean Water Fund will provide a grant of 55% for facilities planning (balance is local share) The Clean Water Fund pays for capital costs through a grant and loan program System design, including site investigation Construction Inspection The Clean Water Fund provides funding solely to municipalities. Construction must be some form of municipal project, and is governed by the regulations. The Clean Water Fund will NOT pay for operations and maintenance, or normal costs of local government.

Advanced Treatment At the present time, only DEEP has the authority to approve the installation of advanced treatment technologies. Delegation of permitting authority to municipalities is still in development. Operation and maintenance of AT systems will still require a certified operator. At some point in the future, regulation of small AT system may fall under DPH.